Re: Help testing release candidate / mc-4.8.23-rc1

2019-06-17 Thread Henning

On 17/06/2019 16:42, Henning wrote:


Build and run ok on CYGWIN_NT-6.3 3.1.0s(0.338/5/3) 2019-06-05 i686.


Just build (and run) ok from master. Warnings about shadowed 
declarations are gone, but 'mc --version' gives 'unknown'.


Henning


___
mc-devel mailing list
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel


Re: Help testing release candidate / mc-4.8.23-rc1

2019-06-17 Thread Henning

On 16/06/2019 20:56, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:


TLDR; I would appreciate if you could please test the following tarball
on your systems and report any blocker regressions as compared to the
previous 4.8.22 release:


Build and run ok on CYGWIN_NT-6.3 3.1.0s(0.338/5/3) 2019-06-05 i686.

Warnings (some may be cygwin related):

*** Warning: Trying to link with static lib archive /usr/lib/libiconv.dll.a.
*** I have the capability to make that library automatically link in when
*** you link to this library.  But I can only do this if you have a
*** shared version of the library, which you do not appear to have
*** because the file extensions .a of this argument makes me believe
*** that it is just a static archive that I should not use here.

more like the following:
warning: "__linux__" is not defined, evaluates to 0 [-Wundef]
 #if __linux__ && (__GLIBC__ || __UCLIBC__)

mountlist.c: In function 'me_remote':
mountlist.c:245:9: warning: switch missing default case [-Wswitch-default]
 switch (GetDriveType (drive))
 ^~

sfs.c: In function 'sfs_open':
sfs.c:281:10: warning: declaration of 'sfs_info' shadows a global 
declaration [-Wshadow]

 int *sfs_info;
  ^~~~
sfs.c:118:3: note: shadowed declaration is here
 } sfs_info[MAXFS];
   ^~~~
-
./.libs/lt-mc.c: In function 'lt_debugprintf':
./.libs/lt-mc.c:574:7: warning: function 'lt_debugprintf' might be a 
candidate for 'gnu_printf' format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]

   (void) vfprintf (stderr, fmt, args);
   ^
./.libs/lt-mc.c: In function 'lt_error_core':
./.libs/lt-mc.c:585:3: warning: function 'lt_error_core' might be a 
candidate for 'gnu_printf' format attribute [-Wsuggest-attribute=format]

   vfprintf (stderr, message, ap);
   ^~~~
-

And finally, I'm not knowledgeable enough to know about blocker
regressions. If I can do something to provoke things, please tell
me.

Otherwise I'm looking forward to the final release. (I'm a long-time
[1998] and hardcore user of mc [linux]. So I'd like to thank all of you 
a lot

for your work.)

Henning
___
mc-devel mailing list
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel