Re: syntax switching
Hello, Oswald! OB apropos syntax highlighting ... i just used the asm syntax and noticed OB that section names are colored light blue ... well ... this color OB really should not be used for anything but whitespace - i had a tough OB time reading it. it certainly depends on the monitor settings, but mine OB are not that extraordinary. heh, that was my syntax file for asm. I did it because mc does not had that syntax before at all. So I think colours can be changed, but they are suitable for me (and my monitor color temperature setup). I'm really using this asm syntax very often :) But as for me C/C++ comments are have really ugly color :) With best regards, Mike V. Gorchak. E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: New Maintainer for MC Project
Fudoki Wilkinson ! Hey, buddy, calmdown and move your ass away from this list, don't botherMC developers. With all your postings here Ican see that your behavior like a hysteric woman, which do not want to hear that ppl talking to her. Iloathe toppl which can't understand that others says to him. You got an answer - NO, so shut up and silently run away, if you still have remains of your self-respect of course ... ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: New syntax highlight files, please add it to the distro
Hello, Oswald! OB oh, sure it works. with my variable ah in gas being highlighted, etc. OB just as useful as new and class, etc. all over my c sources. That's bad style :) Write hundred times Do not name variables as registers names. The same as in linux 2.4.x kernels was numerous variables 'new', 'list', etc which has been highlighted, but ... these headers failed to be compiled when was included in the c++ application, because of reserved names. So it's another side of bad style. With best regards, Mike V. Gorchak. E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
