Re: Fixing resolve_symlink() in ftpfs.c
Hi! Is anyone working on teh $SUBJ ? I guess no :( (that few-pages long code between #ifdef FIXME_LATER since ages) I've started it today, but after many hours of grepping and patching i feel lost. Could someone please explain the transition from bucket+dcache (4.1.35) to me+super+dir (4.6.0) structures? I did the translation, long time ago. Is the directory cache (at least for the current directory, just filled in dir_load()) accessible (searchable/readable) from ftpfs.c at all? Nothing prevents you from calling vfs_s_inode_from_path() and walking lists yourself... Pavel -- When do you have a heart between your knees? [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?] ___ Mc-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Fixing resolve_symlink() in ftpfs.c
Hi, Is anyone working on teh $SUBJ ? I guess no :( (that few-pages long code between #ifdef FIXME_LATER since ages) I've started it today, but after many hours of grepping and patching i feel lost. Could someone please explain the transition from bucket+dcache (4.1.35) to me+super+dir (4.6.0) structures? Is the directory cache (at least for the current directory, just filled in dir_load()) accessible (searchable/readable) from ftpfs.c at all? A'rpi / Astral ESP-team -- Developer of MPlayer, the Movie Player for Linux - http://www.MPlayerHQ.hu However, many people beg for its inclusion in Debian. Why? - Gabucino Because having new software in Debian is good. - Josselin Mouette Because having good software in Debian is new. - Gabucino ___ Mc-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
