Re: Help testing release candidate / mc-4.8.24-rc1
Hello Andrew, On Tue, 07 Jan 2020 17:45:28 +0300 Andrew Borodin wrote: > On Tue, 7 Jan 2020 14:15:21 +0100 wwp wrote: > > I think I have one more tiny issue to report.. I went back to 4.8.23, > > and at least two settings from the layout prefs were lost: command > > prompt and panel split. Maybe you changed the storage format for some > > config items? > > Yes. This is a result of [1]. > > Previously some options that are actually boolean were stored > as intreger 0/1. Now its are stored as yes/no. > > [1] https://midnight-commander.org/ticket/4039 Thanks, this all makes sense now! Regards, -- wwp https://useplaintext.email/ pgp5lWsce_9ki.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ mc-devel mailing list https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: Help testing release candidate / mc-4.8.24-rc1
On Tue, 07 Jan 2020 17:45:28 +0300 Andrew Borodin wrote: > On Tue, 7 Jan 2020 14:15:21 +0100 wwp wrote: > > I think I have one more tiny issue to report.. I went back to 4.8.23, > > and at least two settings from the layout prefs were lost: command > > prompt and panel split. Maybe you changed the storage format for some > > config items? > > Yes. This is a result of [1]. > > Previously some options that are actually boolean were stored > as intreger 0/1. Now its are stored as yes/no. Sorry. Not yes/no, but true/false. > > [1] https://midnight-commander.org/ticket/4039 -- А. ___ mc-devel mailing list https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: Help testing release candidate / mc-4.8.24-rc1
On Tue, 7 Jan 2020 14:15:21 +0100 wwp wrote: > I think I have one more tiny issue to report.. I went back to 4.8.23, > and at least two settings from the layout prefs were lost: command > prompt and panel split. Maybe you changed the storage format for some > config items? Yes. This is a result of [1]. Previously some options that are actually boolean were stored as intreger 0/1. Now its are stored as yes/no. [1] https://midnight-commander.org/ticket/4039 -- А. ___ mc-devel mailing list https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: Help testing release candidate / mc-4.8.24-rc1
Hello Yury, On Wed, 01 Jan 2020 21:02:50 +0100 "Yury V. Zaytsev" wrote: > Hi there, > > TLDR; I would appreciate if you could please test the following tarball > on your systems and report any blocker regressions as compared to the > previous 4.8.23 release: > > https://www.midnight-commander.org/nopaste/tarball/mc-4.8.23-149-g06bf088bc.tar.xz > > $ sha256sum mc-4.8.23-149-g06bf088bc.tar.xz > bafd8a0556504c2806b77cd7506ac087d4ad050fbb4d711fbd7898fe493493fd > mc-4.8.23-149-g06bf088bc.tar.x > > I've built this tarball out of the latest master with translations from > Transifex pulled in on a fresh Fedora 31 VM, which I'm also going to use > to build the final release in about a week from now if nothing serious I think I have one more tiny issue to report.. I went back to 4.8.23, and at least two settings from the layout prefs were lost: command prompt and panel split. Maybe you changed the storage format for some config items? Regards, -- wwp https://useplaintext.email/ pgpnVHJW5XLux.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ mc-devel mailing list https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: Help testing release candidate / mc-4.8.24-rc1
Hello Andrew, On Mon, 06 Jan 2020 16:18:32 +0300 Andrew Borodin wrote: > On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 12:45:57 +0100 wwp wrote: > > > > I noticed one regression: if I start mc, then start mcedit from > > subshell, I'll get: > > === > > GNU Midnight Commander is already running on this terminal. > > Subshell support will be disabled. > > === > > > > Back to 4.8.23 and the issue is gone, as expected. > > Notice if you run standalone mceditor, you haven't a subshell in it [1]. > > A new behavior (I can't say this is a bug) is a some kind of payment > for having a full-functional subshell in standalone > mceditor/mcviewer/mcdiffviewer. > Now if you run mcedit from mc it is the same as you run mc from mc > with all features. > > [1] https://midnight-commander.org/ticket/3380 Maybe not a bug, but the error message is quite useless and pretty nagging, IMO, in addition of behaving differently than formerly. Regards, -- wwp https://useplaintext.email/ pgpBsc3bEZiLq.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ mc-devel mailing list https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: Help testing release candidate / mc-4.8.24-rc1
On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 12:45:57 +0100 wwp wrote: > > I noticed one regression: if I start mc, then start mcedit from > subshell, I'll get: > === > GNU Midnight Commander is already running on this terminal. > Subshell support will be disabled. > === > > Back to 4.8.23 and the issue is gone, as expected. Notice if you run standalone mceditor, you haven't a subshell in it [1]. A new behavior (I can't say this is a bug) is a some kind of payment for having a full-functional subshell in standalone mceditor/mcviewer/mcdiffviewer. Now if you run mcedit from mc it is the same as you run mc from mc with all features. [1] https://midnight-commander.org/ticket/3380 -- Andrew ___ mc-devel mailing list https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: Help testing release candidate / mc-4.8.24-rc1
Hello Yury, On Wed, 01 Jan 2020 21:02:50 +0100 "Yury V. Zaytsev" wrote: > Hi there, > > TLDR; I would appreciate if you could please test the following tarball > on your systems and report any blocker regressions as compared to the > previous 4.8.23 release: > > https://www.midnight-commander.org/nopaste/tarball/mc-4.8.23-149-g06bf088bc.tar.xz > > $ sha256sum mc-4.8.23-149-g06bf088bc.tar.xz > bafd8a0556504c2806b77cd7506ac087d4ad050fbb4d711fbd7898fe493493fd > mc-4.8.23-149-g06bf088bc.tar.x > > I've built this tarball out of the latest master with translations from > Transifex pulled in on a fresh Fedora 31 VM, which I'm also going to use > to build the final release in about a week from now if nothing serious > comes up. I noticed one regression: if I start mc, then start mcedit from subshell, I'll get: === GNU Midnight Commander is already running on this terminal. Subshell support will be disabled. === Back to 4.8.23 and the issue is gone, as expected. GNU Midnight Commander 4.8.23-149-g06bf088bc Built with GLib 2.56.1 Using the S-Lang library with terminfo database With builtin Editor and Aspell support With subshell support as default With support for background operations With mouse support on xterm and Linux console With support for X11 events With internationalization support With multiple codepages support Virtual File Systems: cpiofs, tarfs, sfs, extfs, ftpfs, sftpfs, fish, smbfs Data types: char: 8; int: 32; long: 64; void *: 64; size_t: 64; off_t: 64; Regards, -- wwp https://useplaintext.email/ pgpsYvUgow6br.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ mc-devel mailing list https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Help testing release candidate / mc-4.8.24-rc1
Hi there, TLDR; I would appreciate if you could please test the following tarball on your systems and report any blocker regressions as compared to the previous 4.8.23 release: https://www.midnight-commander.org/nopaste/tarball/mc-4.8.23-149-g06bf088bc.tar.xz $ sha256sum mc-4.8.23-149-g06bf088bc.tar.xz bafd8a0556504c2806b77cd7506ac087d4ad050fbb4d711fbd7898fe493493fd mc-4.8.23-149-g06bf088bc.tar.x I've built this tarball out of the latest master with translations from Transifex pulled in on a fresh Fedora 31 VM, which I'm also going to use to build the final release in about a week from now if nothing serious comes up. Many thanks! -- Sincerely yours, Yury V. Zaytsev signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ mc-devel mailing list https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
