Re: [Midnight Commander] #237: Why some removed and same added?
#237: Why some removed and same added? -+-- Reporter: slavazanko | Owner: styx Type: task| Status: accepted Priority: major | Milestone: 4.7 Component: mc-core | Version: 4.6.2 Resolution: |Keywords: Blocking: | Blockedby: -+-- Changes (by styx): * owner: = styx * status: new = accepted -- Ticket URL: www.midnight-commander.org/ticket/237#comment:9 Midnight Commander www.midnight-commander.org Midnight Development Center ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: [Midnight Commander] #237: Why some removed and same added?
#237: Why some removed and same added? -+-- Reporter: slavazanko | Owner: styx Type: task| Status: testing Priority: major | Milestone: 4.7 Component: mc-core | Version: 4.6.2 Resolution: invalid |Keywords: Blocking: | Blockedby: -+-- Changes (by styx): * status: accepted = testing * resolution: = invalid -- Ticket URL: www.midnight-commander.org/ticket/237#comment:10 Midnight Commander www.midnight-commander.org Midnight Development Center ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: [Midnight Commander] #237: Why some removed and same added?
#237: Why some removed and same added? -+-- Reporter: slavazanko | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: 4.7 Component: mc-core | Version: 4.6.2 Resolution: |Keywords: Blocking: | Blockedby: -+-- Comment(by slavazanko): http://mail.gnome.org/archives/mc-devel/2009-February/msg00015.html I agree with man - we need to more use glib, but my propose: use via mhl (as wrapper). If someone want - they may write glib-replacement code (will use via ./configure --without-glib). As now, we use glib-functions very poor, but glib it's very powerful library. And my IMHO: need to use more functional of glib -- Ticket URL: www.midnight-commander.org/ticket/237#comment:1 Midnight Commander www.midnight-commander.org Midnight Development Center ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: [Midnight Commander] #237: Why some removed and same added?
#237: Why some removed and same added? -+-- Reporter: slavazanko | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: 4.7 Component: mc-core | Version: 4.6.2 Resolution: |Keywords: Blocking: | Blockedby: -+-- Comment(by angel_il): ... and I would be very glad to see optional build with --without-glib -- Ticket URL: www.midnight-commander.org/ticket/237#comment:3 Midnight Commander www.midnight-commander.org Midnight Development Center ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: [Midnight Commander] #237: Why some removed and same added?
#237: Why some removed and same added? -+-- Reporter: slavazanko | Owner: Type: task| Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: 4.7 Component: mc-core | Version: 4.6.2 Resolution: |Keywords: Blocking: | Blockedby: -+-- Changes (by metux): * type: defect = task Comment: #1: glib: Most of the glib stuff we'd used actually does nothing by itself (g_malloc(), g_free(), ...) or things that easily fit into a few inlines. Some can even be harmful (easy to forget a trailing NULL parameter, don't handle NULL ptrs properly, ...). ATM we only use very few glib functions which aren't already provided by mhl (GTree, etc). But they're easy to replace. #2: ncurses vs. slang I've made some polls on several maillists, and the majority seem to prefer ncurses, but I know there're still some open issues for it. Perhaps we should table this decision for a while and look if we can get them solved in nearest future. -- Ticket URL: www.midnight-commander.org/ticket/237#comment:7 Midnight Commander www.midnight-commander.org Midnight Development Center ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
