Re: Is anyone reviewing patches ?
Pavel Tsekov wrote: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/mc-devel/2005-April/msg5.html Rejected because it is too complicated without proper support for extended character sets. http://mail.gnome.org/archives/mc-devel/2005-April/msg00021.html I like this patch. http://mail.gnome.org/archives/mc-devel/2005-April/msg00035.html There are various other places where canonicalize_pathname() is used. That means that ftp paths could be canonicalized wrongly after being displayed. I would suggest to add a parameter fold_dotdot to canonicalize_pathname() to mark the places where we actually want this. This also eliminates the code duplication for the two for-loops. http://mail.gnome.org/archives/mc-devel/2005-April/msg00043.html I didn't look at it too closely, but I like it. I would rather extend it to the whole Midnight Commander so that you can redefine the keys to whatever you like. Roland ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: Is anyone reviewing patches ?
Hello, On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, Marco Ciampa wrote: On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 10:25:02AM +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote: Hello, Does anyone care ? which patches? http://mail.gnome.org/archives/mc-devel/2005-April/msg5.html http://mail.gnome.org/archives/mc-devel/2005-April/msg00021.html http://mail.gnome.org/archives/mc-devel/2005-April/msg00035.html http://mail.gnome.org/archives/mc-devel/2005-April/msg00043.html Those are the patches from April that didn't get any input so far. There are others that only got input from me. How? Code and functionality. Do you need testers? I don't know what we need but it seems the discussion on this list is stalled (dead) again. This is for sure counter productive and for sure we are taking a wrong way by holding the release of 4.6.1 . ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: Is anyone reviewing patches ?
Please forgive me if I'm off topic but I'm only trying to give a hand. On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 10:47:03AM +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote: Hello, On Thu, 14 Apr 2005, Marco Ciampa wrote: On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 10:25:02AM +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote: Hello, Does anyone care ? which patches? http://mail.gnome.org/archives/mc-devel/2005-April/msg5.html This is a very good thing (althougth I haven't tested it) for new translations. I personally lost days adjusting the menu alignment in the italian translation... http://mail.gnome.org/archives/mc-devel/2005-April/msg00021.html http://mail.gnome.org/archives/mc-devel/2005-April/msg00035.html It seem interesting but I'm not skilled enougth to say anything about it (but I really would like to be able to do it...) Now I'm only a translator :-( Any hint to improve my usefulness for the mc developers list? http://mail.gnome.org/archives/mc-devel/2005-April/msg00043.html Those are the patches from April that didn't get any input so far. There are others that only got input from me. How? Code and functionality. Do you need testers? I don't know what we need but it seems the discussion on this list is stalled (dead) again. This is for sure counter productive and for sure we are taking a wrong way by holding the release of 4.6.1 . I agree. Perhaps we need some external help to increment the number of mc developers. If there is some thing I can do for it, I'm here. Trying is the best way to learn...but sometimes there is the need to start with simple jobs at first... -- Marco Ciampa ++ | Linux User #78271 | ++ ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
