Re: Sugesstion for code cleanups
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 07:33:17PM +0200, David Sterba wrote: > I don't know if it's convenient to treat all such parts as bugs > and file them into BTS or just put some items to TODO. The best way is just to submit patches to fix them :) -- _.|._ |_ _. : Adam Byrtek /alpha [EMAIL PROTECTED] (_|||_)| |(_| : http://krakow.linux.org.pl/pgp 0xB25952C0 | pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Sugesstion for code cleanups
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, David Sterba wrote: > I don't know if it's convenient to treat all such parts as bugs > and file them into BTS or just put some items to TODO. I think we have more than enough stuff in the TODO list. I don't think we need to look what else can be put there. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin ___ Mc-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Sugesstion for code cleanups
Hi, I just looked around sources and found many FIXMEs. Some of them apparently old or talking about thinks that should be really fixed (but are not). I'd like to ask, if it's worth to map all these parts, analyze or suggest correct solution, and add new potentially suspicious parts. Most of them are code cleanups, some need wider code changes. I don't know if it's convenient to treat all such parts as bugs and file them into BTS or just put some items to TODO. bye David ___ Mc-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
