Re: [Midnight Commander] #34: [FtReq] DAR archive support (was: savannah: Feature request, please add support for dar archives)
#34: [FtReq] DAR archive support --+- Reporter: slavazanko | Owner: Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: minor| Milestone: Component: vfs | Version: Resolution: |Keywords: Blocking: | Blockedby: --+- Changes (by metux): * priority: trivial = minor * type: task = enhancement -- Ticket URL: www.midnight-commander.org/ticket/34#comment:2 Midnight Commander www.midnight-commander.org Midnight Development Center ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: archives
Pavel Tsekov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I've just fetched the compressed ports tree from: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/ports-current/ports.tar.gz I've extracted the archive contents into a temporary directory and cd-ed into it with MC. In the other panel I've pressed Enter on the archive. The output in both panels is the same. I am using MC from CVS. I suggest you to try a MC snapshot and if that doesn't help report the exact commands that you've used to create the archive which fools MC. I tried MC snapshot. It works! It shows correct archive layout. Thank you. I'm sorry for wasting your time and bandwidth. ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: archives
Hello, On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I tried MC snapshot. It works! It shows correct archive layout. Thank you. I'm sorry for wasting your time and bandwidth. Certain changes were made to the tar handling code with regards to the POSIX tar format. I guess your .tar file was created with the pax utility or with tar which output posix format .tar files and thus it didn't display properly. ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: archives
Hello, On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pavel Tsekov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MC shows list of files in large (a few tens of MB) gzipped/bzip2'ed tar archives with multi-level directory structure incorrectly. When archive contains only one root folder, MC shows directories from other levels, as it were to be root folders. It doesn't affect other archive operations. File list in real root folder is shown correctly. File list of non-root folders, been accessed from root list, is shown incorrectly too (only part of its contents). Please, put some of those files that you speak of on some place where I can download them and see what's wrong. What version of MC are you using ? Ok then. I guess you can at least supply the names of those ports and links to them. So I can fetch them off the FreeBSD site - is that ok ? ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: archives
Hello, On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Pavel Tsekov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok then. I guess you can at least supply the names of those ports and links to them. So I can fetch them off the FreeBSD site - is that ok ? I doubt whether an effect is reproducible with small number of directories and files. For example, partial FreeBSD doc tree archive (which is about 3.5 MB) is handled by MC fully correctly. I can list the real directory structure and the one which MC shows. Contents of /usr/ports/: [...] When entering archive with ports tree (excluding distfiles and packages) I see in the panel: /editors /gnome-splashscreen-manager /lang /net-p2p /openoffice.org-1.1-devel /ports /sysutils /usr /x11-themes Under all directories, except 'usr' some partial content is shown. Under 'usr' everything is correct: 'ports', then listing above. If you really want, you can receive FreeBSD ports or src trees via cvs or cvsup. Instructions exist at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/anoncvs.html http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html I asked about 'tar tvf' using for contents showing. Why not to use it instead of full archive decompressing? Ok, now. What I want to know is the exact steps to build an archive like the one that you have so I can see what's wrong. Even if I fetch the ports tree using the instructions above, I'll need to know what commands did you use to create the tar file. Having the same file as yours would help me to debug the problem. If you really care to know why tar tvf is not used you can have a look at the source tree. If you want me to try the bug you have to help me a bit... Btw have you tried using a snapshot MC to see if it behaves better ? You can get a snapshot source from: http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/utils/file/managers/mc/snapshots/ P.S. Do not reply to my personal address but rather use the mailing list address instead. Thanks! ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: archives
Hello, I've just fetched the compressed ports tree from: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/ports-current/ports.tar.gz I've extracted the archive contents into a temporary directory and cd-ed into it with MC. In the other panel I've pressed Enter on the archive. The output in both panels is the same. I am using MC from CVS. I suggest you to try a MC snapshot and if that doesn't help report the exact commands that you've used to create the archive which fools MC. ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
archives
MC shows list of files in large (a few tens of MB) gzipped/bzip2'ed tar archives with multi-level directory structure incorrectly. When archive contains only one root folder, MC shows directories from other levels, as it were to be root folders. It doesn't affect other archive operations. File list in real root folder is shown correctly. File list of non-root folders, been accessed from root list, is shown incorrectly too (only part of its contents). Besides that, in fact, when entering to archives, MC just decompress it into temporary file. Therefore, if uncompressed size of files is more than /tmp space, operation is ended with an error. 'tar tvf' is much faster. Is it possible to use it when entering to archives instead of decompressing? ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: archives
Hello, On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MC shows list of files in large (a few tens of MB) gzipped/bzip2'ed tar archives with multi-level directory structure incorrectly. When archive contains only one root folder, MC shows directories from other levels, as it were to be root folders. It doesn't affect other archive operations. File list in real root folder is shown correctly. File list of non-root folders, been accessed from root list, is shown incorrectly too (only part of its contents). Please, put some of those files that you speak of on some place where I can download them and see what's wrong. What version of MC are you using ? ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
[bug #15057] Feature request, please add support for dar archives
Update of bug #15057 (project mc): Category:None = VFS ___ Reply to this item at: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitemitem_id=15057 ___ Nachricht geschickt von/durch Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/ ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
[bug #15057] Feature request, please add support for dar archives
URL: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitemitem_id=15057 Summary: Feature request, please add support for dar archives Project: GNU Midnight Commander Submitted by: puntarenas Submitted on: Fr 25.11.2005 um 05:39 Category: None Severity: 3 - Normal Status: None Privacy: Public Assigned to: None Open/Closed: Open Release: 4.6.1 Platform Version: GNU/Linux ___ Details: Disk ARchive from http://dar.linux.free.fr/ is a shell command that backs up directory trees and files. I don`t know if it is possible to add support for *.dar files, so one could browse them like it is already working for *.tar archives. Kind regards Martin Seifert ___ Reply to this item at: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitemitem_id=15057 ___ Nachricht geschickt von/durch Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/ ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: [Bug#324755: mc: tar archives greater than 2GB not supported] (fwd)
Hello,
Forwarding the message to mc-devel at gnome dot org where it belongs.
Please, keep the discussion public.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 14:54:55 +0200
From: Michael Mueller
To: Pavel Tsekov
Subject: Re: [Bug#324755: mc: tar archives greater than 2GB not supported]
Hi Pavel,
you wrote to Stefano Melchior:
This seems to be a much needed patch indeed. I haven't applied it nor
tested it - just took a look at it. I noticed something that might need
to be fixed in the 3rd hunk of tar.c patch:
@@ -642,8 +642,9 @@
int fd = FH_SUPER-u.arch.fd;
struct vfs_class *me = FH_SUPER-me;
-if (mc_lseek (fd, begin + FH-pos, SEEK_SET) !=
-begin + FH-pos) ERRNOR (EIO, -1);
+
+off_t o = mc_lseek(fd, begin + FH-pos, SEEK_SET);
+if ( o != begin + FH-pos) ERRNOR (EIO, -1);
count = MIN(count, FH-ino-st.st_size - FH-pos);
The type of FH-pos is not off_t but long. See struct vfs_s_fh in
vfs/xdirentry.h .
Yes, I did notice this before. This should make it impossible to read
files bigger than 2GB from inside the archive. I simply stopped there
because now it is working for me, which is sufficient for a local patch ;)
However, from the findings in the code it seems to be sufficient to
change the definition of 'ofs' in the structs definition.
Btw, the chunk you quoted is not really needed, just used the temporary
variable ('o') for debugging purpose. The result of mc_lseek is off_t
with this patch and (begin + FH-pos) should give an integer the size of
off_t too. So comparing them directly - as was before - should give the
same code in result.
With best regards
Michael M?ller
___
Mc-devel mailing list
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#324755: mc: tar archives greater than 2GB not supported]
Hi, On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 06:36 +0200, Stefano Melchior wrote: +off_t result; +if (result == (off_t)-1) Is this cast of -1 necessary as result already is an off_t? Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#324755: mc: tar archives greater than 2GB not supported]
Hello, On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Stefano Melchior wrote: Hi Pavel, Michael, a Debian GNU/Linux user, reported this bug and suggested the following patch for the same. I soon would like to infor you and the `mc-devel` list about this. Thank you in advance This seems to be a much needed patch indeed. I haven't applied it nor tested it - just took a look at it. I noticed something that might need to be fixed in the 3rd hunk of tar.c patch: @@ -642,8 +642,9 @@ int fd = FH_SUPER-u.arch.fd; struct vfs_class *me = FH_SUPER-me; -if (mc_lseek (fd, begin + FH-pos, SEEK_SET) != -begin + FH-pos) ERRNOR (EIO, -1); + +off_t o = mc_lseek(fd, begin + FH-pos, SEEK_SET); +if ( o != begin + FH-pos) ERRNOR (EIO, -1); count = MIN(count, FH-ino-st.st_size - FH-pos); The type of FH-pos is not off_t but long. See struct vfs_s_fh in vfs/xdirentry.h . ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Bug#324755: mc: tar archives greater than 2GB not supported]
Hi Pavel,
Michael, a Debian GNU/Linux user, reported this bug and suggested the
following patch for the same.
I soon would like to infor you and the `mc-devel` list about this.
Thank you in advance
Cheers
SteX
- Forwarded message from Michael Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 21:50:35 +0200
From: Michael Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Stefano Melchior [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#324755: mc: tar archives greater than 2GB not supported
Reply-To: Michael Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-From: Michael Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-Cc: Stefano Melchior [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 20:03:10 UTC
Resent-Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Debian-PR-Message: report 324755
X-Debian-PR-Package: mc
X-Debian-PR-Keywords:
X-ID: TEOJF2ZOreDY-47VoI3b39kQg+akK-GT4Fbt0Cbg0aubvSIGkeH3rO
X-TOI-MSGID: dc04d4ea-64e3-4bab-bace-072c7e66b82e
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Resent-Sender: Debian BTS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: mc
Version: 4.6.0-4.6.1-pre4-2
Midnight Commander does handle tar archives bigger than the magic 2GB
size incorrectly.
I appended a patch fixing the problem. Since it includes changes in the
VFS of the Midnight Commander, changes made to other virtual filesystems
are included too. Those however are not tested and mostly will not make
them bypassing the limit.
With best regards
Michael M?ller
diff -N -r -u -x config.log mc-4.6.1-pre4.debian/vfs/cpio.c
mc-4.6.1-pre4/vfs/cpio.c
--- mc-4.6.1-pre4.debian/vfs/cpio.c 2005-05-27 16:19:19.0 +0200
+++ mc-4.6.1-pre4/vfs/cpio.c2005-08-23 21:32:39.306219927 +0200
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@
struct vfs_s_inode *inode;
};
-static int cpio_position;
+static off_t cpio_position;
static int cpio_find_head(struct vfs_class *me, struct vfs_s_super *super);
static int cpio_read_bin_head(struct vfs_class *me, struct vfs_s_super *super);
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@
return l;
}
-static int cpio_skip_padding(struct vfs_s_super *super)
+static off_t cpio_skip_padding(struct vfs_s_super *super)
{
switch(super-u.arch.type) {
case CPIO_BIN:
diff -N -r -u -x config.log mc-4.6.1-pre4.debian/vfs/direntry.c
mc-4.6.1-pre4/vfs/direntry.c
--- mc-4.6.1-pre4.debian/vfs/direntry.c 2004-11-29 19:44:49.0 +0100
+++ mc-4.6.1-pre4/vfs/direntry.c2005-08-23 21:32:39.307219773 +0200
@@ -836,13 +836,13 @@
return 0;
}
-static int
+static off_t
vfs_s_lseek (void *fh, off_t offset, int whence)
{
off_t size = FH-ino-st.st_size;
if (FH-handle != -1){ /* If we have local file opened, we want to
work with it */
- int retval = lseek (FH-handle, offset, whence);
+ off_t retval = lseek (FH-handle, offset, whence);
if (retval == -1)
FH-ino-super-me-verrno = errno;
return retval;
diff -N -r -u -x config.log mc-4.6.1-pre4.debian/vfs/extfs.c
mc-4.6.1-pre4/vfs/extfs.c
--- mc-4.6.1-pre4.debian/vfs/extfs.c2005-05-27 16:19:19.0 +0200
+++ mc-4.6.1-pre4/vfs/extfs.c 2005-08-23 21:32:39.309219464 +0200
@@ -1125,7 +1125,7 @@
return 0;
}
-static int extfs_lseek (void *data, off_t offset, int whence)
+static off_t extfs_lseek (void *data, off_t offset, int whence)
{
struct pseudofile *file = (struct pseudofile *) data;
diff -N -r -u -x config.log mc-4.6.1-pre4.debian/vfs/local.c
mc-4.6.1-pre4/vfs/local.c
--- mc-4.6.1-pre4.debian/vfs/local.c2004-09-25 01:00:18.0 +0200
+++ mc-4.6.1-pre4/vfs/local.c 2005-08-23 21:32:39.310219310 +0200
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@
return chdir (path);
}
-int
+off_t
local_lseek (void *data, off_t offset, int whence)
{
int fd = * (int *) data;
diff -N -r -u -x config.log mc-4.6.1-pre4.debian/vfs/local.h
mc-4.6.1-pre4/vfs/local.h
--- mc-4.6.1-pre4.debian/vfs/local.h2004-08-17 11:17:43.0 +0200
+++ mc-4.6.1-pre4/vfs/local.h 2005-08-23 21:32:39.318218076 +0200
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
extern int local_read (void *data, char *buffer, int count);
extern int local_fstat (void *data, struct stat *buf);
extern int local_errno (struct vfs_class *me);
-extern int local_lseek (void *data, off_t offset, int whence);
+extern off_t local_lseek (void *data, off_t offset, int whence);
#ifdef HAVE_MMAP
extern caddr_t local_mmap (struct vfs_class *me, caddr_t addr, size_t len,
int prot, int flags, void *data, off_t offset);
diff -N -r -u -x config.log mc-4.6.1-pre4.debian/vfs/mcfs.c
mc-4.6.1-pre4/vfs/mcfs.c
--- mc-4.6.1-pre4.debian/vfs/mcfs.c 2005-05-27 16:19:19.0 +0200
+++ mc-4.6.1-pre4/vfs/mcfs.c2005-08-23 21:32:39.315218539 +0200
@@ -1037,7 +1037,7 @@
return 0;
}
-static int
+static off_t
mcfs_lseek (void *data, off_t
What happened to the mail archives?
Hi, What happened to the mail archives? http://mail.gnome.org/archives/mc/2004-November/date.html only shows 6 messages, although there are hundreds in my mailbox for that month... Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Re: What happened to the mail archives?
Hello Leonard, Wednesday, February 2, 2005, 1:15:50 AM, you wrote: LdO What happened to the mail archives? LdO http://mail.gnome.org/archives/mc/2004-November/date.html only shows 6 LdO messages, although there are hundreds in my mailbox for that month... Bug ? :) -- Best regards, Pavelmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
[BUG] extfs - rpm archives
Hello. I finally installed pre2 and discovered that browsing of rpm archives no longer works. This problem was not present in pre1. A short error message is displayed: Inconsistent extfs archive My rpm version is 4.0.4. This problem happens every time. The problem is somewhere in the /usr/local/share/mc/extfs/rpm file. When I replaced it with the same file from pre1, the problem disappeared. -- Tomas Styblo [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xC97EA4B6 ___ Mc-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
