[MCN-L] Gladwell New Yorker Article "Priced to Sell"

2009-11-01 Thread Jeff Doyle
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Amalyah Keshet [akeshet at imj.org.il]
 wrote:
>
> "Free is just another price, and prices are set by individual actors, in 
> accordance with the aggregated particulars of marketplace power. "Information 
> wants to be free," Anderson tells us, "in the same way that life wants to 
> spread and water wants to run downhill." But information can't actually want 
> anything, can it? Amazon wants the information in the Dallas paper to be 
> free, because that way Amazon makes more money. Why are the self-interested 
> motives of powerful companies being elevated to a philosophical principle? "
>
> http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/books/2009/07/06/090706crbo_books_gladwell
>
> Posted by Amalyah Keshet, The Israel Museum, Jerusalem
>

Malcolm Gladwell's New Yorker article is certainly worth a read.

His critique of Stewart Brand's famous dictum has a certain merit, but
he is guilty of at least as egregious a categorical error when (in
paragraph 4) he refers to unauthorized copying as "theft". The content
publishing industry has spent a lot of money to propagate the 'theft'
metaphor in attempt to influence public attitudes towards copyright
law, and Gladwell seems to have taken the bait.

William Patry puts it very well in a recent interview
(http://bit.ly/V6hEn) concerning his book "Moral Panics and the
Copyright Wars" when he says:

"My only regret, and this is what much of my book is about, is that in
the case of corporations, what are business issues?are misdescribed?as
moral issues, when in fact they are economic issues. I think we will
reach better economic results if we discuss economic issues honestly."

--
Jeff Doyle
www.openmuseum.org
@jeffdoyle



[MCN-L] Gladwell New Yorker Article "Priced to Sell

2009-11-02 Thread Doron Ben-Avraham
In addition, Gladwell fails to recognize other modes of distribution that do 
not require a centralized system  ala YouTube, and thus do not require the 
recovering of the phenomenal bandwidth costs associated with maintaining a 
walled garden. Torrents for example offer a wider distribution methods that 
passes the cost of distribution (in terms of bandwidth) to the consumer, 
effectively eliminating the economical bottleneck that YouTube presents

YouTube in effect, is not a good example of the potentials of new modes 
distribution, merely a widely known one. It is still centrally controlled and 
administered thus operating in a way that requires a recovery of costs that 
simply cannot be obtained directly from the content it serves


Doron Ben Avraham - IT Manager
New Museum Of Contemporary Art
newmuseum.org




> "Free is just another price, and prices are set by individual actors, in 
> accordance with the aggregated particulars of marketplace power. "Information 
> wants to be free," Anderson tells us, "in the same way that life wants to 
> spread and water wants to run downhill." But information can't actually want 
> anything, can it? Amazon wants the information in the Dallas paper to be 
> free, because that way Amazon makes more money. Why are the self-interested 
> motives of powerful companies being elevated to a philosophical principle? "
>
> http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/books/2009/07/06/090706crbo_books_gladwell
>
> Posted by Amalyah Keshet, The Israel Museum, Jerusalem
>

Malcolm Gladwell's New Yorker article is certainly worth a read.

His critique of Stewart Brand's famous dictum has a certain merit, but
he is guilty of at least as egregious a categorical error when (in
paragraph 4) he refers to unauthorized copying as "theft". The content
publishing industry has spent a lot of money to propagate the 'theft'
metaphor in attempt to influence public attitudes towards copyright
law, and Gladwell seems to have taken the bait.

William Patry puts it very well in a recent interview
(http://bit.ly/V6hEn) concerning his book "Moral Panics and the
Copyright Wars" when he says:

"My only regret, and this is what much of my book is about, is that in
the case of corporations, what are business issues?are misdescribed?as
moral issues, when in fact they are economic issues. I think we will
reach better economic results if we discuss economic issues honestly."

--
Jeff Doyle
www.openmuseum.org
@jeffdoyle


--

___
mcn-l mailing list
mcn-l at mcn.edu
http://toronto.mediatrope.com/mailman/listinfo/mcn-l


End of mcn-l Digest, Vol 50, Issue 1