[MediaWiki-commits] [Gerrit] Change license to GPL-3.0+ - change (mediawiki...Wikispeech)

[jenkins-bot (Code Review)]

jenkins-bot has submitted this change and it was merged.

Change subject: Change license to GPL-3.0+
..


Change license to GPL-3.0+

Changed the license to GPL-3.0+, since this was specified in the project
application. Also added .gitignore.

Bug: T136541
Change-Id: I857bab87c6c8dd76745ae767e33632d6c162cea1
---
A .gitignore
A COPYING.txt
A CREDITS.txt
M Hooks.php
M extension.json
5 files changed, 697 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Approvals:
  Lokal Profil: Looks good to me, approved
  jenkins-bot: Verified



diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
new file mode 100644
index 000..b25c15b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+*~
diff --git a/COPYING.txt b/COPYING.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000..4936591
--- /dev/null
+++ b/COPYING.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,683 @@
+The license text below "" applies to all files within this distribution,
+other than those that are in a directory which contains files named "LICENSE",
+"LICENSE.txt", "COPYING" or "COPYING.txt", or a subdirectory thereof. For those
+files, the license text contained in said file overrides any license
+information contained in directories of smaller depth. Alternative licenses are
+typically used for software that is provided by external parties, and merely
+packaged with this software for convenience.
+
+
+GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
+   Version 3, 29 June 2007
+
+ Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. 
+ Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies
+ of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.
+
+Preamble
+
+  The GNU General Public License is a free, copyleft license for
+software and other kinds of works.
+
+  The licenses for most software and other practical works are designed
+to take away your freedom to share and change the works.  By contrast,
+the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to
+share and change all versions of a program--to make sure it remains free
+software for all its users.  We, the Free Software Foundation, use the
+GNU General Public License for most of our software; it applies also to
+any other work released this way by its authors.  You can apply it to
+your programs, too.
+
+  When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not
+price.  Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you
+have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for
+them if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you
+want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new
+free programs, and that you know you can do these things.
+
+  To protect your rights, we need to prevent others from denying you
+these rights or asking you to surrender the rights.  Therefore, you have
+certain responsibilities if you distribute copies of the software, or if
+you modify it: responsibilities to respect the freedom of others.
+
+  For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether
+gratis or for a fee, you must pass on to the recipients the same
+freedoms that you received.  You must make sure that they, too, receive
+or can get the source code.  And you must show them these terms so they
+know their rights.
+
+  Developers that use the GNU GPL protect your rights with two steps:
+(1) assert copyright on the software, and (2) offer you this License
+giving you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify it.
+
+  For the developers' and authors' protection, the GPL clearly explains
+that there is no warranty for this free software.  For both users' and
+authors' sake, the GPL requires that modified versions be marked as
+changed, so that their problems will not be attributed erroneously to
+authors of previous versions.
+
+  Some devices are designed to deny users access to install or run
+modified versions of the software inside them, although the manufacturer
+can do so.  This is fundamentally incompatible with the aim of
+protecting users' freedom to change the software.  The systematic
+pattern of such abuse occurs in the area of products for individuals to
+use, which is precisely where it is most unacceptable.  Therefore, we
+have designed this version of the GPL to prohibit the practice for those
+products.  If such problems arise substantially in other domains, we
+stand ready to extend this provision to those domains in future versions
+of the GPL, as needed to protect the freedom of users.
+
+  Finally, every program is threatened constantly by software patents.
+States should not allow patents to restrict development and use of
+software on general-purpose computers, but in those that do, we wish to
+avoid the special danger that patents applied to a free program could
+make it effectively proprietary.  To prevent this, the GPL assures that
+patents cannot be used to render the program non-free.
+
+  The precise terms 

[MediaWiki-commits] [Gerrit] Change license to GPL 3.0 - change (mediawiki...Wikispeech)

[Sebastian Berlin (WMSE) (Code Review)]

Sebastian Berlin (WMSE) has uploaded a new change for review.

  https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/292092

Change subject: Change license to GPL 3.0
..

Change license to GPL 3.0

Changed the license to GPL 3.0, since this was specified in the project
application. Also added .gitignore.

Bug: T136541
Change-Id: I857bab87c6c8dd76745ae767e33632d6c162cea1
---
A .gitignore
A COPYING.txt
A CREDITS.txt
M Hooks.php
M extension.json
5 files changed, 716 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)


  git pull ssh://gerrit.wikimedia.org:29418/mediawiki/extensions/Wikispeech 
refs/changes/92/292092/1

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
new file mode 100644
index 000..b25c15b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+*~
diff --git a/COPYING.txt b/COPYING.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000..4936591
--- /dev/null
+++ b/COPYING.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,683 @@
+The license text below "" applies to all files within this distribution,
+other than those that are in a directory which contains files named "LICENSE",
+"LICENSE.txt", "COPYING" or "COPYING.txt", or a subdirectory thereof. For those
+files, the license text contained in said file overrides any license
+information contained in directories of smaller depth. Alternative licenses are
+typically used for software that is provided by external parties, and merely
+packaged with this software for convenience.
+
+
+GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
+   Version 3, 29 June 2007
+
+ Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. 
+ Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies
+ of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.
+
+Preamble
+
+  The GNU General Public License is a free, copyleft license for
+software and other kinds of works.
+
+  The licenses for most software and other practical works are designed
+to take away your freedom to share and change the works.  By contrast,
+the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to
+share and change all versions of a program--to make sure it remains free
+software for all its users.  We, the Free Software Foundation, use the
+GNU General Public License for most of our software; it applies also to
+any other work released this way by its authors.  You can apply it to
+your programs, too.
+
+  When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not
+price.  Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you
+have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for
+them if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you
+want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new
+free programs, and that you know you can do these things.
+
+  To protect your rights, we need to prevent others from denying you
+these rights or asking you to surrender the rights.  Therefore, you have
+certain responsibilities if you distribute copies of the software, or if
+you modify it: responsibilities to respect the freedom of others.
+
+  For example, if you distribute copies of such a program, whether
+gratis or for a fee, you must pass on to the recipients the same
+freedoms that you received.  You must make sure that they, too, receive
+or can get the source code.  And you must show them these terms so they
+know their rights.
+
+  Developers that use the GNU GPL protect your rights with two steps:
+(1) assert copyright on the software, and (2) offer you this License
+giving you legal permission to copy, distribute and/or modify it.
+
+  For the developers' and authors' protection, the GPL clearly explains
+that there is no warranty for this free software.  For both users' and
+authors' sake, the GPL requires that modified versions be marked as
+changed, so that their problems will not be attributed erroneously to
+authors of previous versions.
+
+  Some devices are designed to deny users access to install or run
+modified versions of the software inside them, although the manufacturer
+can do so.  This is fundamentally incompatible with the aim of
+protecting users' freedom to change the software.  The systematic
+pattern of such abuse occurs in the area of products for individuals to
+use, which is precisely where it is most unacceptable.  Therefore, we
+have designed this version of the GPL to prohibit the practice for those
+products.  If such problems arise substantially in other domains, we
+stand ready to extend this provision to those domains in future versions
+of the GPL, as needed to protect the freedom of users.
+
+  Finally, every program is threatened constantly by software patents.
+States should not allow patents to restrict development and use of
+software on general-purpose computers, but in those that do, we wish to
+avoid the special danger that patents applied to a free program could
+make it effectively proprietary.  To prevent this, the GPL assures that
+patents cannot