[MediaWiki-commits] [Gerrit] VisualEditor/VisualEditor[master]: Fix 'new ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion' typos in tests

2016-09-14 Thread jenkins-bot (Code Review)
jenkins-bot has submitted this change and it was merged.

Change subject: Fix 'new ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion' typos in tests
..


Fix 'new ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion' typos in tests

They were harmless because the function returned an object which supplants the
spurious one 'new' creates.

Change-Id: I46a6b8cf072f342c81eeb01e6659f2f0500445d6
---
M tests/dm/ve.dm.Surface.test.js
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Approvals:
  Jforrester: Looks good to me, approved
  jenkins-bot: Verified



diff --git a/tests/dm/ve.dm.Surface.test.js b/tests/dm/ve.dm.Surface.test.js
index c82285e..48cd63f 100644
--- a/tests/dm/ve.dm.Surface.test.js
+++ b/tests/dm/ve.dm.Surface.test.js
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
fragment = surface.getFragment(),
doc = surface.getDocument(),
selection = new ve.dm.LinearSelection( doc, range ),
-   tx = new ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 1, [ 'x' ] );
+   tx = ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 1, [ 'x' ] );
 
assert.strictEqual( surface.breakpoint(), false, 'Returns false if no 
transactions applied' );
 
@@ -106,14 +106,14 @@
assert.strictEqual( surface.doesStagingAllowUndo(), undefined, 
'doesStagingAllowUndo undefined when not staging' );
assert.equalHash( surface.getSelection(), fragment.getSelection(), 
'Surface range matches fragment range' );
 
-   surface.change( new ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 1, [ 'a' ] 
) );
+   surface.change( ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 1, [ 'a' ] ) );
 
surface.pushStaging();
assert.strictEqual( surface.isStaging(), true, 'isStaging true after 
pushStaging' );
assert.deepEqual( surface.getStagingTransactions(), [], 
'getStagingTransactions empty array after pushStaging' );
assert.strictEqual( surface.doesStagingAllowUndo(), false, 
'doesStagingAllowUndo false when staging without undo' );
 
-   tx1 = new ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 2, [ 'b' ] );
+   tx1 = ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 2, [ 'b' ] );
surface.change( tx1 );
 
assert.strictEqual( fragment.getText(), 'abhi', 'document contents 
match after first transaction' );
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@
assert.strictEqual( surface.doesStagingAllowUndo(), true, 
'doesStagingAllowUndo true when staging with undo' );
assert.equalHash( surface.getSelection(), fragment.getSelection(), 
'Surface selection matches fragment range' );
 
-   tx2 = new ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 3, [ 'c' ] );
+   tx2 = ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 3, [ 'c' ] );
surface.change( tx2 );
 
assert.strictEqual( fragment.getText(), 'abchi', 'document contents 
match after second transaction' );
@@ -143,11 +143,11 @@
assert.equalHash( surface.getSelection(), fragment.getSelection(), 
'Surface selection matches fragment range' );
 
surface.pushStaging();
-   tx1 = new ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 2, [ 'b' ] );
+   tx1 = ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 2, [ 'b' ] );
surface.change( tx1 );
 
surface.pushStaging();
-   tx2 = new ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 3, [ 'c' ] );
+   tx2 = ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 3, [ 'c' ] );
surface.change( tx2 );
 
assert.deepEqual( surface.popAllStaging(), [ tx1, tx2 ], 'popAllStaging 
returns full transaction list' );
@@ -155,11 +155,11 @@
assert.equalHash( surface.getSelection(), fragment.getSelection(), 
'Surface selection matches fragment range' );
 
surface.pushStaging();
-   tx1 = new ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 2, [ 'b' ] );
+   tx1 = ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 2, [ 'b' ] );
surface.change( tx1 );
 
surface.pushStaging();
-   tx2 = new ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 3, [ 'c' ] );
+   tx2 = ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 3, [ 'c' ] );
surface.change( tx2 );
 
surface.applyStaging();
@@ -171,11 +171,11 @@
assert.equalHash( surface.getSelection(), fragment.getSelection(), 
'Surface selection matches fragment range' );
 
surface.pushStaging();
-   tx1 = new ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 4, [ 'd' ] );
+   tx1 = ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 4, [ 'd' ] );
surface.change( tx1 );
 
surface.pushStaging();
-   tx2 = new ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 5, [ 'e' ] );
+   tx2 = ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 5, [ 'e' ] );
surface.change( tx2 );
 
surface.applyAllStaging();
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@
surface.pushStaging();
surface.pushStaging();
// Apply transaction at second level, first level is empty and has no 
selctionBefore
-   tx1 = new ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 4, [ 'd' ] );
+   tx1 = 

[MediaWiki-commits] [Gerrit] VisualEditor/VisualEditor[master]: Fix 'new ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion' typos in tests

2016-09-14 Thread Divec (Code Review)
Divec has uploaded a new change for review.

  https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/310544

Change subject: Fix 'new ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion' typos in tests
..

Fix 'new ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion' typos in tests

They were harmless because the function returned an object which supplants the
spurious one 'new' creates.

Change-Id: I46a6b8cf072f342c81eeb01e6659f2f0500445d6
---
M tests/dm/ve.dm.Surface.test.js
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)


  git pull ssh://gerrit.wikimedia.org:29418/VisualEditor/VisualEditor 
refs/changes/44/310544/1

diff --git a/tests/dm/ve.dm.Surface.test.js b/tests/dm/ve.dm.Surface.test.js
index c82285e..48cd63f 100644
--- a/tests/dm/ve.dm.Surface.test.js
+++ b/tests/dm/ve.dm.Surface.test.js
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
fragment = surface.getFragment(),
doc = surface.getDocument(),
selection = new ve.dm.LinearSelection( doc, range ),
-   tx = new ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 1, [ 'x' ] );
+   tx = ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 1, [ 'x' ] );
 
assert.strictEqual( surface.breakpoint(), false, 'Returns false if no 
transactions applied' );
 
@@ -106,14 +106,14 @@
assert.strictEqual( surface.doesStagingAllowUndo(), undefined, 
'doesStagingAllowUndo undefined when not staging' );
assert.equalHash( surface.getSelection(), fragment.getSelection(), 
'Surface range matches fragment range' );
 
-   surface.change( new ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 1, [ 'a' ] 
) );
+   surface.change( ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 1, [ 'a' ] ) );
 
surface.pushStaging();
assert.strictEqual( surface.isStaging(), true, 'isStaging true after 
pushStaging' );
assert.deepEqual( surface.getStagingTransactions(), [], 
'getStagingTransactions empty array after pushStaging' );
assert.strictEqual( surface.doesStagingAllowUndo(), false, 
'doesStagingAllowUndo false when staging without undo' );
 
-   tx1 = new ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 2, [ 'b' ] );
+   tx1 = ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 2, [ 'b' ] );
surface.change( tx1 );
 
assert.strictEqual( fragment.getText(), 'abhi', 'document contents 
match after first transaction' );
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@
assert.strictEqual( surface.doesStagingAllowUndo(), true, 
'doesStagingAllowUndo true when staging with undo' );
assert.equalHash( surface.getSelection(), fragment.getSelection(), 
'Surface selection matches fragment range' );
 
-   tx2 = new ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 3, [ 'c' ] );
+   tx2 = ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 3, [ 'c' ] );
surface.change( tx2 );
 
assert.strictEqual( fragment.getText(), 'abchi', 'document contents 
match after second transaction' );
@@ -143,11 +143,11 @@
assert.equalHash( surface.getSelection(), fragment.getSelection(), 
'Surface selection matches fragment range' );
 
surface.pushStaging();
-   tx1 = new ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 2, [ 'b' ] );
+   tx1 = ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 2, [ 'b' ] );
surface.change( tx1 );
 
surface.pushStaging();
-   tx2 = new ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 3, [ 'c' ] );
+   tx2 = ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 3, [ 'c' ] );
surface.change( tx2 );
 
assert.deepEqual( surface.popAllStaging(), [ tx1, tx2 ], 'popAllStaging 
returns full transaction list' );
@@ -155,11 +155,11 @@
assert.equalHash( surface.getSelection(), fragment.getSelection(), 
'Surface selection matches fragment range' );
 
surface.pushStaging();
-   tx1 = new ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 2, [ 'b' ] );
+   tx1 = ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 2, [ 'b' ] );
surface.change( tx1 );
 
surface.pushStaging();
-   tx2 = new ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 3, [ 'c' ] );
+   tx2 = ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 3, [ 'c' ] );
surface.change( tx2 );
 
surface.applyStaging();
@@ -171,11 +171,11 @@
assert.equalHash( surface.getSelection(), fragment.getSelection(), 
'Surface selection matches fragment range' );
 
surface.pushStaging();
-   tx1 = new ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 4, [ 'd' ] );
+   tx1 = ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 4, [ 'd' ] );
surface.change( tx1 );
 
surface.pushStaging();
-   tx2 = new ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 5, [ 'e' ] );
+   tx2 = ve.dm.Transaction.newFromInsertion( doc, 5, [ 'e' ] );
surface.change( tx2 );
 
surface.applyAllStaging();
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@
surface.pushStaging();
surface.pushStaging();
// Apply transaction at second level, first level is empty and has no 
selctionBefore
-   tx1 = new