Re: Memcached cluster
Thanks guys, this is quite helpful In the same vein, can we also say that memcache replication is also a client side driven solution? -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups memcached group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to memcached+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Does memached 1.4 series have storage engine interface?
Hi Dormando, Thanks for asking this question. I manually looked at the patches that went in memcached 1.4.17 and looked at the code in memcached 1.6.0beta. The 4 issues that we were interested in (CVE-2013-7239 CVE-2013-7291 CVE-2013-7290 CVE-2013-0179) is already fixed in memcached 1.6.0beta. We were especially worried about https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2013-7239 (memcached: SASL authentication allows wrong credentials to access memcache). I think memcached 1.6.0beta is not affected. Thank you for your help. Rgds, anna On Tuesday, 4 March 2014 11:15:54 UTC+5:30, Dormando wrote: Have you tested to be sure the security fixes even affect 1.6.0? The code was significantly rewritten and I'm unsure if it is even affected. On Mon, 3 Mar 2014, அண்ணாமலை குருசாமி wrote: Hi Dormando, Thanks for your response. Currently MySQL provides a memcached interface using InnoDB as a storage engine. We are using memcached 1.6.0beta and are dependent on the storage engine interface. But memcached 1.4.17 has some security fixes which memcached 1.6.0beta is not having. So we are in trouble. Either we need to get the security fixes for memcached 1.6.0beta or we need to downgrade to 1.4.17. Since memcached 1.4 series does not have storage engine interface, we might not be able to downgrade to memcached 1.4.17. Any idea when memcached 1.6.0 will become GA? Or are there any plans to provide security fixes for memcached 1.6.0beta? Looking forward to your reponse. Rgds, anna On Saturday, 1 March 2014 03:44:40 UTC+5:30, Dormando wrote: The storage engine interface is not available in the 1.4 series. On Fri, 28 Feb 2014, அண்ணாமலை குருசாமி wrote: Hi All, Does memcached 1.4.17 have the storage engine interface? Can anyone confirm this? Is the storage engine interface available only in 1.6 series? Is it not available in 1.4 series? http://code.google.com/p/memcached/wiki/EngineInterface Thank you. Rgds, anna -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups memcached group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to memcached+...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups memcached group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to memcached+...@googlegroups.com javascript:. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups memcached group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to memcached+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Memcached cluster
Also, anyone heard about repcached? Is this a patch users would need to add in order to get data replication feature? Does memcached endorse this? -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups memcached group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to memcached+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
do you blacklist source IPs accessing the site?
My company is having problems connecting to your site from 64.132.38.206. I can access it from all other places I've tried and I manage our internet proxies, so I know we're not explicitly blocking access to the site. -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups memcached group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to memcached+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Memcached cluster
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Ranjit D'Souza bernard@gmail.com wrote: Thanks guys, this is quite helpful In the same vein, can we also say that memcache replication is also a client side driven solution? In the stock system, there is no replication - although I believe others done it with client code. If you have a large enough number of servers, losing one will just add a small percentage of extra load on your backend DB to cover the extra cache misses. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups memcached group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to memcached+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Memcached cluster
FYI, I have written a memcached compatible KVS named yrmcds that implements master-slave replication. As this is slightly off-topic from the list, please ask me directly if you are interested in it: http://cybozu.github.io/yrmcds/ @ymmt2005 On Tuesday, March 4, 2014 6:33:24 PM UTC+9, Ranjit D'Souza wrote: Also, anyone heard about repcached? Is this a patch users would need to add in order to get data replication feature? Does memcached endorse this? -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups memcached group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to memcached+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
Re: Memcached installation on windows
Dear Gourav Gavate, I am really thankful to you for sharing your problem solution , i was having the same issue and get solved by following your solution steps. Thanks Regards, Ashish tyagi On Saturday, October 26, 2013 6:16:33 PM UTC+5:30, Gourav Gavate wrote: Dear , i got exactly same error as shown below. in C:\memcached have memcached.exe 1. right click on this .exe file then gores into properties. 2.then click allow all permission to all users from secutiry tab 3. then click on compatibilty tab and select compatible windows xp. i think this may solve your problem. On Tuesday, August 4, 2009 6:46:24 PM UTC+5:30, mike_255 wrote: hello, i am having trouble installing memcached on windows, when i cd into the directory and inpsut the installation code i get the following message- C:\memcachedmemcached -d install failed to install service or service already installed when i try to start memcached i get the following message C:\memcachedmemcached -d start failed to start service I have no idea why this is happening and would greatly appreciate any support, regards, mike -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups memcached group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to memcached+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
