Bit late in responding: That wiki page is about the older DDoS. Not about a DoS. They're completely different. This bug is more simply a server crash, not convincing the server to do stupid shit.
I'm not going to write tests for it, but someone else is free to. On Thu, 2 Apr 2020, Victor Rodriguez wrote: > Hi memcached community > > I was very happy to see fixes for remote DoS (segfault) in parsing of the > binary protocol, introduced in 1.6.0. > > https://github.com/memcached/memcached/commit/02c6a2b62ddcb6fa4569a591d3461a156a636305 > > I was wondering if we have a test case for this scenario. I was able to get > instructions on how the DOS attack works here > https://github.com/memcached/memcached/wiki/DDOS > > however, I was wondering if we a coded test case, if not happy to write one > > Regards > > Victor Rodriguez > > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "memcached" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to memcached+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/memcached/b895233f-c39c-4810-b702-3027804c5864%40googlegroups.com. > > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "memcached" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to memcached+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/memcached/alpine.DEB.2.21.2004112011340.23694%40dskull.