Re: Issue 157 in memcached: Instrumenting memcached with sFlow

2013-09-02 Thread memcached


Comment #9 on issue 157 by adam...@gmail.com: Instrumenting memcached with  
sFlow

http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=157

Testing the water again

If I were to strip out all the unnecessary library code from this patch it  
might only be about 500 lines of code,  mostly in sflow.h and sflow.c with  
just a few macros in memcached.c.  That would make it easier to  
vet/critique/improve -- and perhaps ultimately sign-off on?   If there's an  
even chance then I'll do the work.  Let me know.


Neil





--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.

You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

--

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups memcached group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to memcached+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Re: Issue 157 in memcached: Instrumenting memcached with sFlow

2012-06-29 Thread memcached


Comment #7 on issue 157 by rosso.gi...@gmail.com: Instrumenting memcached  
with sFlow

http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=157

@Neil
Thanks for your answer, we are using last version, 1.4.10 has problems with  
big slabs (we use 'em). So if you could just give as a patch or a full  
source for 1.4.13 I would be very glad.

Thanks.

PS Sorry for the personal post, but I didn't how to contact you directly.



Re: Issue 157 in memcached: Instrumenting memcached with sFlow

2012-06-29 Thread memcached


Comment #8 on issue 157 by neil.mck...@gmail.com: Instrumenting memcached  
with sFlow

http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=157

I pulled in the 1.4.13 changes (with no conflicts), and posted a download  
tarball on this page:


https://github.com/sflow/memcached/downloads

sFlow is enabled by default.  So the steps are just:

tar xvzf memcached-1.4.13-sflow.tar.gz
cd memcached-1.4.13-sflow
./autogen.sh
./configure
make
make install
memcached -u nobody

It will pick up the config that is shared by hsflowd (via  
/etc/hsflowd.auto).

http://host-sflow.sourceforge.net

Please let me know how it goes:  neil.mckee...@gmail.com

Neil




Re: Issue 157 in memcached: Instrumenting memcached with sFlow

2012-06-26 Thread memcached


Comment #5 on issue 157 by rosso.gi...@gmail.com: Instrumenting memcached  
with sFlow

http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=157

Any news here? It would be very interesting to integrate official memcached  
with sflow.

Thank you very much.



Re: Issue 157 in memcached: Instrumenting memcached with sFlow

2012-06-26 Thread memcached


Comment #6 on issue 157 by neil.mck...@gmail.com: Instrumenting memcached  
with sFlow

http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=157

FYI,  there is a talk on this at Velocity tomorrow:
http://velocityconf.com/velocity2012/public/schedule/detail/23487

If you would like to try memcached+sflow,  please just let me know the  
particular version of memcached that you want to run,  and I can make sure  
there is an corresponding build with the sFlow feature.   It's not hard to  
add,  and most users stick with the same version for a while,  so I think  
it's quite sustainable to do it this way for now(?)   Perhaps eventually  
the memcached experts will take it on,  but in the mean time more users can  
only help.


Neil




Re: Issue 157 in memcached: Instrumenting memcached with sFlow

2011-07-12 Thread memcached


Comment #3 on issue 157 by s.schles...@ixolit.com: Instrumenting memcached  
with sFlow

http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=157

Hello Folks,

is this patch going to be added any time soon?

Regards, Stefan.



Re: Issue 157 in memcached: Instrumenting memcached with sFlow

2011-07-12 Thread memcached


Comment #4 on issue 157 by dsalli...@gmail.com: Instrumenting memcached  
with sFlow

http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=157

I really think this can exist as a plugin without having to modify the  
source tree.  I'd rather not drop all of this in directly if it can be  
avoided.