Re: [MBZ] 71 220 Poor car
I always try to be funny, except when I am being indignant. On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Curly McLain via Mercedes < mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote: > I didn't try to list all the /8 types AND 280, 220D, 240D in the USA > Other models in the RTW. > > AND a 250/8. >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Curly McLain [mailto:126die...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 9:48 AM >> To: Mercedes Discussion List >> Subject: Re: [MBZ] 71 220 Poor car >> >> There were 220 and 230 in the /8 body (114/115) I think this is a 114. >> the 300Ds are 115 I think the 220s were dropped in the US by '72. >> >> It could also be a RTW car, that was later brought into the USA. >> >> Not all 220s were in 111 bodies. There were Pontons, unimogs, >> Heckflosse, and /8, 123 and probably more in various parts of the world. >> The carbureted 220 and 230 were popular engines for a long time. >> M180 6 cyl and I think there were also 4 cyl 220 engines. I am not sure >> if that was M121 or a later engine. >> >> 111 had 220b and 220Sb, 220SEb as well as 230S, SE in the USA >> 110 had 190, 190Dc, 200, 200D, and 230 in the USA >> 108 had 250S, 280S 250SE, 280S, 280SE and engine variants in the USA >> models >> >> Except that I don't think it's a 220. A 220 wouldn't have double front >>> bumpers and a wood dash. >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>>On Feb 3, 2015, at 2:09 PM, Donald Snook via Mercedes >>>> wrote: >>>> >>> > >>> > http://wichita.craigslist.org/cto/4875525251.html >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> ___ >> http://www.okiebenz.com >> >> To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ >> >> To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: >> http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com >> >> All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those >> individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner >> has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor. >> > > > ___ > http://www.okiebenz.com > > To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ > > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: > http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com > > All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those > individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner > has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor. > ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
Re: [MBZ] 71 220 Poor car
I didn't try to list all the /8 types AND 280, 220D, 240D in the USA Other models in the RTW. AND a 250/8. -Original Message- From: Curly McLain [mailto:126die...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 9:48 AM To: Mercedes Discussion List Subject: Re: [MBZ] 71 220 Poor car There were 220 and 230 in the /8 body (114/115) I think this is a 114. the 300Ds are 115 I think the 220s were dropped in the US by '72. It could also be a RTW car, that was later brought into the USA. Not all 220s were in 111 bodies. There were Pontons, unimogs, Heckflosse, and /8, 123 and probably more in various parts of the world. The carbureted 220 and 230 were popular engines for a long time. M180 6 cyl and I think there were also 4 cyl 220 engines. I am not sure if that was M121 or a later engine. 111 had 220b and 220Sb, 220SEb as well as 230S, SE in the USA 110 had 190, 190Dc, 200, 200D, and 230 in the USA 108 had 250S, 280S 250SE, 280S, 280SE and engine variants in the USA models Except that I don't think it's a 220. A 220 wouldn't have double front bumpers and a wood dash. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 3, 2015, at 2:09 PM, Donald Snook via Mercedes wrote: > > http://wichita.craigslist.org/cto/4875525251.html > ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor. ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
Re: [MBZ] 71 220 Poor car
Andrew wrote: "The only colletible 4 door car from the vintage era is the W123 wagon." I know you have some 123 wagons, so I hope you are being funny! I would really like to have a bunch of the old MB's. Obviously any of the 190SL, 300SL, or the 280SL (with Pagoda roof), the 280 SE Cabriolet, and many others. A 300SEL 6.3 and any 600 (W100) would be a spectacular addition to any MB collection! In the future I think the 450SEL 6.9 will start to increase in value quickly, and I think 20 years from now we will be seeing the 124 500E (the ones made in cooperation with Porsche) go for big dollars! Don -Original Message- From: Andrew Strasfogel [mailto:astrasfo...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 10:37 AM To: Curly McLain; Mercedes Discussion List Subject: Re: [MBZ] 71 220 Poor car I fail to see the charm in the early 70s 220 or 250 sedans. The MB Tex and ghastly black dashes stink over time, probably due to a stale cigarette smoke. The body style is boxy and inelegant. They drive OK and are easy to work on, but so what? Their appreciation as a "classic" is, IMHO, unpromising, and there is no reason for Mercedees to make the parts available forever since they are so uncollectible. The only colletible 4 door car from the vintage era is the W123 wagon. Tell all your friends. Andrew 1983 300TD white/blue 340 k miles 1985 300TD blue/blue 295 K miles On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Curly McLain via Mercedes < mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote: > There were 220 and 230 in the /8 body (114/115) I think this is a 114. > the 300Ds are 115 > I think the 220s were dropped in the US by '72. > > It could also be a RTW car, that was later brought into the USA. > > Not all 220s were in 111 bodies. There were Pontons, unimogs, > Heckflosse, and /8, 123 and probably more in various parts of the > world. The carbureted 220 and 230 were popular engines for a long time. > M180 6 cyl and I think there were also 4 cyl 220 engines. I am not > sure if that was M121 or a later engine. > > 111 had 220b and 220Sb, 220SEb as well as 230S, SE in the USA > 110 had 190, 190Dc, 200, 200D, and 230 in the USA > 108 had 250S, 280S 250SE, 280S, 280SE and engine variants in the USA > models > > Except that I don't think it's a 220. A 220 wouldn't have double > front >> bumpers and a wood dash. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Feb 3, 2015, at 2:09 PM, Donald Snook via Mercedes < >>> mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote: >>> >> > >> > http://wichita.craigslist.org/cto/4875525251.html >> > >> > > ___ > http://www.okiebenz.com > > To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ > > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: > http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com > > All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those > individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list > owner has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor. > ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
Re: [MBZ] 71 220 Poor car
AND a 250/8. -Original Message- From: Curly McLain [mailto:126die...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2015 9:48 AM To: Mercedes Discussion List Subject: Re: [MBZ] 71 220 Poor car There were 220 and 230 in the /8 body (114/115) I think this is a 114. the 300Ds are 115 I think the 220s were dropped in the US by '72. It could also be a RTW car, that was later brought into the USA. Not all 220s were in 111 bodies. There were Pontons, unimogs, Heckflosse, and /8, 123 and probably more in various parts of the world. The carbureted 220 and 230 were popular engines for a long time. M180 6 cyl and I think there were also 4 cyl 220 engines. I am not sure if that was M121 or a later engine. 111 had 220b and 220Sb, 220SEb as well as 230S, SE in the USA 110 had 190, 190Dc, 200, 200D, and 230 in the USA 108 had 250S, 280S 250SE, 280S, 280SE and engine variants in the USA models >Except that I don't think it's a 220. A 220 wouldn't have double front >bumpers and a wood dash. > >Sent from my iPhone > >> On Feb 3, 2015, at 2:09 PM, Donald Snook via Mercedes >> wrote: > > > > http://wichita.craigslist.org/cto/4875525251.html > > ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
Re: [MBZ] 71 220 Poor car
I fail to see the charm in the early 70s 220 or 250 sedans. The MB Tex and ghastly black dashes stink over time, probably due to a stale cigarette smoke. The body style is boxy and inelegant. They drive OK and are easy to work on, but so what? Their appreciation as a "classic" is, IMHO, unpromising, and there is no reason for Mercedees to make the parts available forever since they are so uncollectible. The only colletible 4 door car from the vintage era is the W123 wagon. Tell all your friends. Andrew 1983 300TD white/blue 340 k miles 1985 300TD blue/blue 295 K miles On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Curly McLain via Mercedes < mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote: > There were 220 and 230 in the /8 body (114/115) I think this is a 114. > the 300Ds are 115 > I think the 220s were dropped in the US by '72. > > It could also be a RTW car, that was later brought into the USA. > > Not all 220s were in 111 bodies. There were Pontons, unimogs, Heckflosse, > and /8, 123 and probably more in various parts of the world. The > carbureted 220 and 230 were popular engines for a long time. > M180 6 cyl and I think there were also 4 cyl 220 engines. I am not sure > if that was M121 or a later engine. > > 111 had 220b and 220Sb, 220SEb as well as 230S, SE in the USA > 110 had 190, 190Dc, 200, 200D, and 230 in the USA > 108 had 250S, 280S 250SE, 280S, 280SE and engine variants in the USA models > > Except that I don't think it's a 220. A 220 wouldn't have double front >> bumpers and a wood dash. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Feb 3, 2015, at 2:09 PM, Donald Snook via Mercedes < >>> mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote: >>> >> > >> > http://wichita.craigslist.org/cto/4875525251.html >> > >> > > ___ > http://www.okiebenz.com > > To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ > > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: > http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com > > All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those > individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner > has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor. > ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
Re: [MBZ] 71 220 Poor car
There were 220 and 230 in the /8 body (114/115) I think this is a 114. the 300Ds are 115 I think the 220s were dropped in the US by '72. It could also be a RTW car, that was later brought into the USA. Not all 220s were in 111 bodies. There were Pontons, unimogs, Heckflosse, and /8, 123 and probably more in various parts of the world. The carbureted 220 and 230 were popular engines for a long time. M180 6 cyl and I think there were also 4 cyl 220 engines. I am not sure if that was M121 or a later engine. 111 had 220b and 220Sb, 220SEb as well as 230S, SE in the USA 110 had 190, 190Dc, 200, 200D, and 230 in the USA 108 had 250S, 280S 250SE, 280S, 280SE and engine variants in the USA models Except that I don't think it's a 220. A 220 wouldn't have double front bumpers and a wood dash. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 3, 2015, at 2:09 PM, Donald Snook via Mercedes wrote: > > http://wichita.craigslist.org/cto/4875525251.html > ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
Re: [MBZ] 71 220 Poor car
Could it be a 250? My 71 250 had wood on the dash, I don't remember whether it had the double bumper. Mine also had the shifter in the center console and it didn't have the indicator on the dash. Don -Original Message- From: dsereta...@yahoo.com [mailto:dsereta...@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 7:13 PM To: Donald Snook; Mercedes Discussion List Subject: Re: [MBZ] 71 220 Poor car Except that I don't think it's a 220. A 220 wouldn't have double front bumpers and a wood dash. Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 3, 2015, at 2:09 PM, Donald Snook via Mercedes > wrote: > > http://wichita.craigslist.org/cto/4875525251.html > > ___ > http://www.okiebenz.com > > To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ > > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: > http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com > > All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those > individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has > no control over the content of the messages of each contributor. ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
Re: [MBZ] 71 220 Poor car
Except that I don't think it's a 220. A 220 wouldn't have double front bumpers and a wood dash. Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 3, 2015, at 2:09 PM, Donald Snook via Mercedes > wrote: > > http://wichita.craigslist.org/cto/4875525251.html > > ___ > http://www.okiebenz.com > > To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ > > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: > http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com > > All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those > individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has > no control over the content of the messages of each contributor. ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
Re: [MBZ] 71 220 Poor car
I never thought about it that way. I have no desire to be abused. But, when you see someone like that, it almost makes me want to bother them just because they are such a-holes about it. Don Snook -Original Message- From: Randy Bennell [mailto:rbenn...@bennell.ca] Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 4:00 PM To: Donald Snook; Mercedes Discussion List Subject: Re: [MBZ] 71 220 Poor car I see ads on the local Kijiji that make me wonder if there is a class of buyer out there that likes to be abused. An example from this morning goes something like >>> "don't email me, don't text me, don't phone me unless you are serious. I am busy enough without you wasting my time" etc. It is like he is saying "I don't know why I bothered to list this because I am such a jerk I won't ever manage to sell it anyway". Or, as I said up top, are there actually people out there that thrive on this crap and will call him to see if they can get abused a bit more RB On 03/02/2015 3:21 PM, Donald Snook via Mercedes wrote: > I am always amazed by that too. There was a really nice S Class on ebay > last week. The car was parked outside and it must have snowed -- a lot. > They didn't bother to clear the snow off the car. They just turned on the > wipers. > > -Original Message- > From: Randy Bennell [mailto:rbenn...@bennell.ca] > Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 1:39 PM > To: Donald Snook; Mercedes Discussion List > Subject: Re: [MBZ] 71 220 Poor car > > On 03/02/2015 1:09 PM, Donald Snook via Mercedes wrote: >> http://wichita.craigslist.org/cto/4875525251.html >> >> ___ >> > I do not understand why, someone who wants to sell a car, does not at least > wash it. > One would think that a lot of the mess one sees on the paint of that car > would wash off. > > RB > > > > ___ > ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
Re: [MBZ] 71 220 Poor car
I see ads on the local Kijiji that make me wonder if there is a class of buyer out there that likes to be abused. An example from this morning goes something like >>> "don't email me, don't text me, don't phone me unless you are serious. I am busy enough without you wasting my time" etc. It is like he is saying "I don't know why I bothered to list this because I am such a jerk I won't ever manage to sell it anyway". Or, as I said up top, are there actually people out there that thrive on this crap and will call him to see if they can get abused a bit more RB On 03/02/2015 3:21 PM, Donald Snook via Mercedes wrote: I am always amazed by that too. There was a really nice S Class on ebay last week. The car was parked outside and it must have snowed -- a lot. They didn't bother to clear the snow off the car. They just turned on the wipers. -Original Message- From: Randy Bennell [mailto:rbenn...@bennell.ca] Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 1:39 PM To: Donald Snook; Mercedes Discussion List Subject: Re: [MBZ] 71 220 Poor car On 03/02/2015 1:09 PM, Donald Snook via Mercedes wrote: http://wichita.craigslist.org/cto/4875525251.html ___ I do not understand why, someone who wants to sell a car, does not at least wash it. One would think that a lot of the mess one sees on the paint of that car would wash off. RB ___ ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
Re: [MBZ] 71 220 Poor car
When I was in college, I worked a few days a week as a lot boy at a used car lot. In the back lot, they had an old 69 or 70 Buick Electra 225. A real land barge. I asked one day if I should wash it. The old man told me he would just as soon get rid of the car, but he said he would sell it for $60. I have no idea how he came up with that number. But, I called a few friends at School and 3 of us put up $20 each and bought the car. It actually started and the tires held air. So, we bought it just to take it out to one of the guys parents farm. We crashed it into trees, tried to tear out the transmission by slamming it into reverse at 40 mph, we just had a demolition derby with it. Finally, we accidentally busted the radiator and our fun was over. We took the D tag off it and left it in the field. It was definitely $20 worth of fun. I think my friend's dad rescued the car, fixed a few things on it and sold it for $400-500. -Original Message- From: clay [mailto:redgh...@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 3:14 PM To: Donald Snook; Mercedes Discussion List Subject: Re: [MBZ] 71 220 Poor car I paid $150 for a something like that and it actually runs clay On Feb 3, 2015, at 11:09 AM, Donald Snook via Mercedes wrote: > http://wichita.craigslist.org/cto/4875525251.html > > ___ > http://www.okiebenz.com > > To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ > > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: > http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com > > All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those > individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has > no control over the content of the messages of each contributor. ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
Re: [MBZ] 71 220 Poor car
I bet if somebody really wanted it, the seller would take $500 cash. If I had the room and the time, I might buy it for $250. But, that car could be a money pit. Its probably worth parting it out. Don Snook -Original Message- From: Dan Penoff [mailto:d...@penoff.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 1:56 PM To: Mercedes Discussion List Subject: Re: [MBZ] 71 220 Poor car If the jack points aren't rusty, it actually looks pretty solid. Could be a decent project car if everything is there. The strange gray band of paint around the bottom is weird, though. Price is pretty optimistic considering it's a trailer car. Dan Sent from my iPad > On Feb 3, 2015, at 2:09 PM, Donald Snook via Mercedes > wrote: > > http://wichita.craigslist.org/cto/4875525251.html > > ___ > http://www.okiebenz.com > > To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ > > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: > http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com > > All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those > individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has > no control over the content of the messages of each contributor. ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
Re: [MBZ] 71 220 Poor car
I am always amazed by that too. There was a really nice S Class on ebay last week. The car was parked outside and it must have snowed -- a lot. They didn't bother to clear the snow off the car. They just turned on the wipers. -Original Message- From: Randy Bennell [mailto:rbenn...@bennell.ca] Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 1:39 PM To: Donald Snook; Mercedes Discussion List Subject: Re: [MBZ] 71 220 Poor car On 03/02/2015 1:09 PM, Donald Snook via Mercedes wrote: > http://wichita.craigslist.org/cto/4875525251.html > > ___ > I do not understand why, someone who wants to sell a car, does not at least wash it. One would think that a lot of the mess one sees on the paint of that car would wash off. RB ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
Re: [MBZ] 71 220 Poor car
That will not come back. Bird poop has eaten away at the paint. Tires are rotted. Better to have hosed it off, put worn out tires on the rims, spray armor all clay On Feb 3, 2015, at 11:39 AM, Randy Bennell via Mercedes wrote: > On 03/02/2015 1:09 PM, Donald Snook via Mercedes wrote: >> http://wichita.craigslist.org/cto/4875525251.html >> >> ___ >> > I do not understand why, someone who wants to sell a car, does not at least > wash it. > One would think that a lot of the mess one sees on the paint of that car > would wash off. > > RB > > ___ > http://www.okiebenz.com > > To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ > > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: > http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com > > All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those > individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has > no control over the content of the messages of each contributor. ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
Re: [MBZ] 71 220 Poor car
I paid $150 for a something like that and it actually runs clay On Feb 3, 2015, at 11:09 AM, Donald Snook via Mercedes wrote: > http://wichita.craigslist.org/cto/4875525251.html > > ___ > http://www.okiebenz.com > > To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ > > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: > http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com > > All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those > individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has > no control over the content of the messages of each contributor. ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
Re: [MBZ] 71 220 Poor car
If the jack points aren't rusty, it actually looks pretty solid. Could be a decent project car if everything is there. The strange gray band of paint around the bottom is weird, though. Price is pretty optimistic considering it's a trailer car. Dan Sent from my iPad > On Feb 3, 2015, at 2:09 PM, Donald Snook via Mercedes > wrote: > > http://wichita.craigslist.org/cto/4875525251.html > > ___ > http://www.okiebenz.com > > To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ > > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: > http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com > > All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those > individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has > no control over the content of the messages of each contributor. ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
Re: [MBZ] 71 220 Poor car
On 03/02/2015 1:09 PM, Donald Snook via Mercedes wrote: http://wichita.craigslist.org/cto/4875525251.html ___ I do not understand why, someone who wants to sell a car, does not at least wash it. One would think that a lot of the mess one sees on the paint of that car would wash off. RB ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
Re: [MBZ] 71 220 Poor car
The first MD I considered buying new in April, '71. Did not, though; first actually an '80 240D in Oct '79. Wilton Sent from my iPad > On Feb 3, 2015, at 2:09 PM, Donald Snook via Mercedes > wrote: > > http://wichita.craigslist.org/cto/4875525251.html > > ___ > http://www.okiebenz.com > > To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ > > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: > http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com > > NAll posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those > individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has > no control over the content of the messages of each contributor. ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
Re: [MBZ] 71 220 Poor car
It'll buff right out. On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Donald Snook via Mercedes < mercedes@okiebenz.com> wrote: > http://wichita.craigslist.org/cto/4875525251.html > > ___ > http://www.okiebenz.com > > To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ > > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: > http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com > > All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those > individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner > has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor. > ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
[MBZ] 71 220 Poor car
http://wichita.craigslist.org/cto/4875525251.html ___ http://www.okiebenz.com To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/ To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com All posts are the result of individual contributors and as such, those individuals are responsible for the content of the post. The list owner has no control over the content of the messages of each contributor.
