Re: [MBZ] Anthropomorphism
Oh, right. You may have it right there. Tim 1982 300TD Moby On 1/11/06, Zeitgeist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Isn't that anthropocentrism? > > Is technopocentrism, the thought that your technology kicks ass over all > others?
Re: [MBZ] Anthropomorphism
Isn't that anthropocentrism? Is technopocentrism, the thought that your technology kicks ass over all others? On 1/11/06, TimothyPilgrim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I believe that anthropomorphism is the though the the universe > revolves around, if not actually then figuratively, humanity. As all > in and on the Earth and universe were created -for- us. Casey Olympia, WA Biodiesel: "I drive in a persistent vegetative state" '87 300TD intercooler (211k) '84 300D (207k) Gashuffer: '89 Vanagon Wolfsburg Edition (186K)
Re: [MBZ] Anthropomorphism
I believe that anthropomorphism is the though the the universe revolves around, if not actually then figuratively, humanity. As all in and on the Earth and universe were created -for- us. Tim 1982 300TD Moby On 1/11/06, Dan Weeks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, but I thought that was for assigning attributes from one living > thing to another. We've determined that assigning inanimate > attributes to an animate object is technomorphism, but is there a > distinct term for its converse? I lose sleep over this kind of thing > all the time. > > I think it's all anthropomorphism, but then again, I sleep just fine. :-) > -- > Dan Weeks > Freelance Writing and Photography > 515/279-4825 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ___ > http://www.striplin.net > For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ > For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: > http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net >
Re: [MBZ] Anthropomorphism
There's also anthropocentrism. On 1/11/06, Dan Weeks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes, but I thought that was for assigning attributes from one living > thing to another. We've determined that assigning inanimate > attributes to an animate object is technomorphism, but is there a > distinct term for its converse? I lose sleep over this kind of thing > all the time. > > I think it's all anthropomorphism, but then again, I sleep just fine. :-) > -- > Dan Weeks > Freelance Writing and Photography > 515/279-4825 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ___ > http://www.striplin.net > For new parts see official list sponsor: http://www.buymbparts.com/ > For used parts email [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to: > http://striplin.net/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_striplin.net >
[MBZ] Anthropomorphism
Yes, but I thought that was for assigning attributes from one living thing to another. We've determined that assigning inanimate attributes to an animate object is technomorphism, but is there a distinct term for its converse? I lose sleep over this kind of thing all the time. I think it's all anthropomorphism, but then again, I sleep just fine. :-) -- Dan Weeks Freelance Writing and Photography 515/279-4825 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
