Re: [MBZ] Linux is where it's at

2012-06-09 Thread John Reames
And the NSA has contributed a security framework for it in the past.

Two points:
  There is no real security in obscurity.
  Unix learned lessons years ago about buffer overflows and unchecked 
parameters in operations involving escalation of privileges.

On the second point, many shops moved from UNIX to windows NT because of MS 
marketing pointing out that NT did NOT have those bugs (which plagued UNIXes 
back then) and because it was easier to administer.

The question is whether that is still the case.

--
John W Reames
jream...@verizon.net
Home: +14106646986
Mobile: +14437915905

On Jun 8, 2012, at 23:10, Rick Knoble rickkno...@hotmail.com wrote:

 On Jun 8, 2012, at 10:00 PM, Gerry Archer arche...@embarqmail.com wrote:
 
 After a malware attack on the Air Force's Windows-based drone-control system 
 last year, there has been a wholesale move to Linux for security reasons.
 
 
 Which sucks because now the Chinese, Russians, and anyone else that writes 
 virii will be coding for Linux now. 
 Great. 
 
 Rick
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
 
 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Linux is where it's at

2012-06-09 Thread Allan Streib
Nearly any operating sytem that comes under a focused attack by a
nation-state or especially the NSA is unlikely to withstand it.

John Reames jwrea...@comcast.net writes:

 And the NSA has contributed a security framework for it in the past.

 Two points:
   There is no real security in obscurity.
   Unix learned lessons years ago about buffer overflows and unchecked 
 parameters in operations involving escalation of privileges.

 On the second point, many shops moved from UNIX to windows NT because of MS 
 marketing pointing out that NT did NOT have those bugs (which plagued UNIXes 
 back then) and because it was easier to administer.

 The question is whether that is still the case.

 --
 John W Reames
 jream...@verizon.net
 Home: +14106646986
 Mobile: +14437915905

 On Jun 8, 2012, at 23:10, Rick Knoble rickkno...@hotmail.com wrote:

 On Jun 8, 2012, at 10:00 PM, Gerry Archer arche...@embarqmail.com wrote:
 
 After a malware attack on the Air Force's Windows-based drone-control 
 system last year, there has been a wholesale move to Linux for security 
 reasons.
 
 
 Which sucks because now the Chinese, Russians, and anyone else that writes 
 virii will be coding for Linux now. 
 Great. 
 
 Rick
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
 
 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


-- 
1983 300D
1979 300SD

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Linux is where it's at

2012-06-09 Thread Dave Walton
If you fire up Metasploit you will find many known exploits for NT.

-Dave Walton

On Jun 9, 2012, at 9:38 AM, John Reames jwrea...@comcast.net wrote:

 And the NSA has contributed a security framework for it in the past.
 
 Two points:
  There is no real security in obscurity.
  Unix learned lessons years ago about buffer overflows and unchecked 
 parameters in operations involving escalation of privileges.
 
 On the second point, many shops moved from UNIX to windows NT because of MS 
 marketing pointing out that NT did NOT have those bugs (which plagued UNIXes 
 back then) and because it was easier to administer.
 
 The question is whether that is still the case.
 
 --
 John W Reames
 jream...@verizon.net
 Home: +14106646986
 Mobile: +14437915905
 
 On Jun 8, 2012, at 23:10, Rick Knoble rickkno...@hotmail.com wrote:
 
 On Jun 8, 2012, at 10:00 PM, Gerry Archer arche...@embarqmail.com wrote:
 
 After a malware attack on the Air Force's Windows-based drone-control 
 system last year, there has been a wholesale move to Linux for security 
 reasons.
 
 
 Which sucks because now the Chinese, Russians, and anyone else that writes 
 virii will be coding for Linux now. 
 Great. 
 
 Rick
 Sent from my iPhone
 
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
 
 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com
 
 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/
 
 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Linux is where it's at

2012-06-09 Thread Peter Frederick
They all use the same guts these days ; that is, a Unix compliant  
kernel, often based on the Mach Ten BSD kernel, at least a few years  
back when I paid attention.  Apple does too, it's not a secret.


The difference is the rest of the OS -- Apple and Linux (in all the  
various flavors -- it was started as a class project in the late  
80's by Linus Torvalds as a Unix compliant system NOT based on ATT  
code) have been aware of virus and malware vulnerability and hence  
were built from the ground up to be protected from stupid things like  
processor overflows and buffer over/under runs leaving gaping holes  
for the malware to get root access and so forth.


None of the non-Microsoft programs like Firefox, etc. allow root  
access to Javascript or Active-X or whatever that stupid thing  
Microsoft did with their office suite that give programs unlimited  
root user access -- this is just stupid programming and one of the  
main reasons I avoid Microsoft products whenever possible, they are  
VERY badly designed and written, usually in a great rush to be first  
and set the standard, whatever that means.


The very idea that a stack overflow will leave an OS in an  
undetermined state or allow non-kernel processes root user access is  
hilarious, one of the first things any decent class on operating  
systems should teach is error and exception trapping.  Not a  
Microsoft exclusive by far as we have a program running one of our  
analyzers that will crash the OS with a divide by zero error  
occasionally , but for a company that used to shout about their  
excellence and how much money they spent on research to have  
malware exploit a stack overflow or buffer overslow (which shouldn't  
happen anyway with decently written software) is an indication that  
the people in charge don't understand computer programming.   
Obviously, Gates didn't since he didn't finish any of his computer  
science classes.


Things are better with MS now that Gates is gone, I suspect, if only  
because they don't control the market anymore and will have to  
actually compete.


Peter

On Jun 9, 2012, at 8:38 AM, John Reames wrote:


And the NSA has contributed a security framework for it in the past.

Two points:
  There is no real security in obscurity.
  Unix learned lessons years ago about buffer overflows and  
unchecked parameters in operations involving escalation of privileges.


On the second point, many shops moved from UNIX to windows NT  
because of MS marketing pointing out that NT did NOT have those  
bugs (which plagued UNIXes back then) and because it was easier to  
administer.


The question is whether that is still the case.

--
John W Reames
jream...@verizon.net
Home: +14106646986
Mobile: +14437915905

On Jun 8, 2012, at 23:10, Rick Knoble rickkno...@hotmail.com wrote:

On Jun 8, 2012, at 10:00 PM, Gerry Archer  
arche...@embarqmail.com wrote:


After a malware attack on the Air Force's Windows-based drone- 
control system last year, there has been a wholesale move to  
Linux for security reasons.



Which sucks because now the Chinese, Russians, and anyone else  
that writes virii will be coding for Linux now.

Great.

Rick
Sent from my iPhone

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


[MBZ] Linux is where it's at

2012-06-08 Thread Gerry Archer
The US Navy has signed off on a $27,883,883 contract from military 
contractor Raytheon to install Linux ground control software for its fleet 
of vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) drones.


While the US military has been a growing user of Linux, the contract might 
also have something to do with the swabbies learning from the mistakes made 
by the flyboys and girls in the US Air Force. After a malware attack on the 
Air Force's Windows-based drone-control system last year, there has been a 
wholesale move to Linux for security reasons.
If I would need to select between Windows XP and a Linux based system while 
building a military system, I wouldn't doubt a second which one I would 
take, F-Secure's security researcher Mikko Hypponen pointed out at the 
time.


http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/06/08/us_navy_linux_drones/ 



___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] Linux is where it's at

2012-06-08 Thread Rick Knoble
On Jun 8, 2012, at 10:00 PM, Gerry Archer arche...@embarqmail.com wrote:

 After a malware attack on the Air Force's Windows-based drone-control system 
 last year, there has been a wholesale move to Linux for security reasons.


Which sucks because now the Chinese, Russians, and anyone else that writes 
virii will be coding for Linux now. 
Great. 

Rick
Sent from my iPhone

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com