Re: [MBZ] OT: Any Xorg gurus on the list?

2012-10-27 Thread Tim C
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Allan Streib str...@cs.indiana.edu wrote:
 It is actally OpenBSD 5.2-CURRENT.  Not using any GUI for the
 configuration... in the past X as mostly just worked for me

I've not had an issue like that, but I had to tweak my Nvidia cards to
no end to make them work.  If you ctrlaltplus can you cycle
through your resolution and see if one of them is working better?
That might give a clue.

Does OpenBSD come with Xconfigurator?

Best,
Tim

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


[MBZ] OT: Any Xorg gurus on the list?

2012-10-26 Thread Allan Streib
I spent a good chunk of hours at work earlier today trying to get a
two-monitor setup working.  It actually does work, except the resolution
is wrong.

These are a pair of 30 Dell monitors, 2560x1600.  Specs say 101 PPI.
Everything as far as the desktop works, I can drag windows from one to
display to the other, etc. but the horizontal resolution seems out of
whack.  Everything looks very pixelated, and as I move windows
horizontally pixels drop out and reappear.

I have a basic /etc/X11/xorg.conf that sets up a Screen with a Virtual
size of 5120x1600.  The card is an ATI Radeon HD 4670 with two DVI
connectors, and uses the radeon driver.  (I am using dual-link DVI
cables on each monitor).

xrandr -q reports:

  Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 5120 x 1600, maximum 5120 x 1600
  DVI-0 connected 2560x1600+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 
641mm x 401mm
  DVI-1 connected 2560x1600+2560+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 
641mm x 400mm

xdpyinfo reports:

  dimensions:5120x1600 pixels (1354x423 millimeters)
  resolution:96x96 dots per inch
 
...so that all looks OK, I think.  The size reported by xdpyinfo is a
bit off, should actually be 1282mm x 400mm if you look at the sizes
reported by the individual monitors, above.  The difference appears to
be either caused by or resulting in the 96x96 DPI resolution, when the
monitor is actually 101 DPI.

But in the xorg.0.log I see

  [  5698.647] (II) RADEON(0): Output DVI-0 connected
  [  5698.647] (II) RADEON(0): Output DVI-1 connected
  [  5698.647] (II) RADEON(0): Using user preference for initial modes
  [  5698.647] (II) RADEON(0): Output DVI-0 using initial mode 2560x1600
  [  5698.647] (II) RADEON(0): Output DVI-1 using initial mode 2560x1600
  [  5698.647] (II) RADEON(0): Using default gamma of (1.0, 1.0, 1.0) unless 
otherwise stated.
  [  5698.647] (**) RADEON(0): Display dimensions: (640, 400) mm
  [  5698.647] (**) RADEON(0): DPI set to (203, 101)

That last line... has the horizontal DPI at twice what it should be.  I
am guessing that is causing my problem.  But I really am not sure.
Anyone know enough to say if I'm on the right track, at least?  If so
how do I fix it?

Allan
-- 
Allan Streib

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] OT: Any Xorg gurus on the list?

2012-10-26 Thread Craig
On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 21:57:00 -0400 Allan Streib str...@cs.indiana.edu
wrote:

 I spent a good chunk of hours at work earlier today trying to get a
 two-monitor setup working.  It actually does work, except the resolution
 is wrong.

What distribution are you using? Does it have a GUI to do the work for
you?

Should we take this to the Linux list?


Craig

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com


Re: [MBZ] OT: Any Xorg gurus on the list?

2012-10-26 Thread Allan Streib
It is actally OpenBSD 5.2-CURRENT.  Not using any GUI for the
configuration... in the past X as mostly just worked for me

Craig diese...@pisquared.net writes:

 On Fri, 26 Oct 2012 21:57:00 -0400 Allan Streib str...@cs.indiana.edu
 wrote:

 I spent a good chunk of hours at work earlier today trying to get a
 two-monitor setup working.  It actually does work, except the resolution
 is wrong.

 What distribution are you using? Does it have a GUI to do the work for
 you?

 Should we take this to the Linux list?


 Craig

 ___
 http://www.okiebenz.com
 For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
 To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

 To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
 http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com

-- 
Allan Streib

___
http://www.okiebenz.com
For new and used parts go to www.okiebenz.com
To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com