Re: [MBZ] ***SPAM*** Re: Who is in Charge? Just the Facts please

2018-10-31 Thread Curley McLain via Mercedes

You are right.   Don't wanna cook em.

Randy Bennell via Mercedes wrote:

So who knows what about charging car batteries?
I always thought it was bad to charge at a high rate. Better to slowly 
charge at a low amperage unless one needed to get the motor started 
and the battery did not cooperate.

Now I read on here, that you folks want big chargers with big amperage.
Are you just ruining your batteries or am I  incorrect in my 
assumption that slow and easy is better?


RB



___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] ***SPAM*** Re: Who is in Charge? Just the Facts please

2018-10-31 Thread fmiser via Mercedes
> >  fmiser wrote:
> >
> > But - the alternator is rather high current.  I don't remember
> > what is on an OM61x - 60A maybe?  With a bunch of glow and a
> > lot of cranking the battery voltage could be low enough that
> > alternator could be supplying more than 40 amps just to charge.

> Jim wrote:
> 
> But not for long.  The voltage regulator is in there.  The
> high-current alternators are there to _run_ the heavy loads, not
> for nuclear battery charging.

Yup.  And the "big" batter chargers also limit the voltage so they
too will not charge at those high currents for very long - unless
the battery is bad.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] ***SPAM*** Re: Who is in Charge? Just the Facts please

2018-10-31 Thread Randy Bennell via Mercedes

On 31/10/2018 11:18 AM, Mitch Haley via Mercedes wrote:



On October 31, 2018 at 10:04 AM Jim Cathey via Mercedes  
wrote:
But not for long.  The voltage regulator is in there.  The high-current
alternators
are there to _run_ the heavy loads, not for nuclear battery charging.

Right.
A typical Mercedes is going to be around 13.4V in warm weather, the battery 
takes whatever amps raise it to the car's voltage. A car with a higher target 
voltage will charge faster.
In normal life, all that's required is to replace the energy used to start the 
car.
Mitch

___
Unless you sit around in parking lots, waiting for your wife, while 
listening to the radio with the engine off etc.


RB

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] ***SPAM*** Re: Who is in Charge? Just the Facts please

2018-10-31 Thread Mitch Haley via Mercedes



> On October 31, 2018 at 10:04 AM Jim Cathey via Mercedes 
>  wrote:

> But not for long.  The voltage regulator is in there.  The high-current
> alternators
> are there to _run_ the heavy loads, not for nuclear battery charging.

Right. 
A typical Mercedes is going to be around 13.4V in warm weather, the battery 
takes whatever amps raise it to the car's voltage. A car with a higher target 
voltage will charge faster. 
In normal life, all that's required is to replace the energy used to start the 
car. 
Mitch

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] ***SPAM*** Re: Who is in Charge? Just the Facts please

2018-10-31 Thread Jim Cathey via Mercedes
>
> But - the alternator is rather high current.  I don't remember

what is on an OM61x - 60A maybe?  With a bunch of glow and a lot
> of cranking the battery voltage could be low enough that
> alternator could be supplying more than 40 amps just to charge.
>

But not for long.  The voltage regulator is in there.  The high-current
alternators
are there to _run_ the heavy loads, not for nuclear battery charging.

-- Jim
___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] ***SPAM*** Re: Who is in Charge? Just the Facts please

2018-10-31 Thread fmiser via Mercedes
> Randy wrote:

> So who knows what about charging car batteries?
> I always thought it was bad to charge at a high rate. Better to
> slowly charge at a low amperage unless one needed to get the
> motor started and the battery did not cooperate.
> Now I read on here, that you folks want big chargers with big
> amperage. Are you just ruining your batteries or am I  incorrect
> in my assumption that slow and easy is better?

You are correct. Yes.
Heat is bad.  Rapid charging causes heat.  So slow is better.

Charge rate is usually expressed relative to the amp-hour capacity
of the battery, so the "bigger" the battery the more amps can
still be considered "slow".

But - the alternator is rather high current.  I don't remember
what is on an OM61x - 60A maybe?  With a bunch of glow and a lot
of cranking the battery voltage could be low enough that
alternator could be supplying more than 40 amps just to charge.  

Automotive flooded cell batteries are pretty tough.  About the
only thing good in a typical car is the battery is kept charged.
High current of starting is not good.  High current of the
following charge isn't good.  Heat (in an engine compartment)
isn't good.  Vibration isn't good.  Use an AGM and when the system
was built for a flooded cell and the voltage will be wrong.  Etc.
But we can still expect to get 7 years of use from one.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] ***SPAM*** Re: Who is in Charge? Just the Facts please

2018-10-30 Thread Mitch Haley via Mercedes


> On October 30, 2018 at 3:17 PM Randy Bennell via Mercedes 
>  wrote:
> 
> 
> So who knows what about charging car batteries?
> I always thought it was bad to charge at a high rate.

Two issues with high rate charging, heat and hydrolysis. 
Run it too hot and plates can warp. 
Excess voltage makes the water in your electrolyte go bye-bye. 
Probably the best bet is a 6-10A charger that slowly tapers down to 2-4A at 
full charge and then shuts itself off.

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com



Re: [MBZ] ***SPAM*** Re: Who is in Charge? Just the Facts please

2018-10-30 Thread Craig via Mercedes
On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 14:17:39 -0500 Randy Bennell via Mercedes
 wrote:

> So who knows what about charging car batteries?

I know some, and have lots of references.


> I always thought it was bad to charge at a high rate. Better to slowly 
> charge at a low amperage unless one needed to get the motor started and 
> the battery did not cooperate.

Yes, high current charging will heat the battery and could damage the
plates. But then, high current discharging is required to start an engine.


> Now I read on here, that you folks want big chargers with big amperage.
> Are you just ruining your batteries or am I incorrect in my assumption 
> that slow and easy is better?

Big chargers? How much current do you is the threshold between small
chargers and big chargers?


Craig

___
http://www.okiebenz.com

To search list archives http://www.okiebenz.com/archive/

To Unsubscribe or change delivery options go to:
http://mail.okiebenz.com/mailman/listinfo/mercedes_okiebenz.com