D9445: sidedata: send the correct revision data for wireproto v2

2020-12-07 Thread joerg.sonnenberger (Joerg Sonnenberger)
joerg.sonnenberger added a comment.


  I don't think they are. The main motivation for pushing this one is to ensure 
that later changes to result in more sidedata doesn't create spurious failures 
with wireproto v2. As discussed on IRC around the sprint, it is dead at this 
point, but I'd still want to avoid introducing extra breakage.

REPOSITORY
  rHG Mercurial

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9445/new/

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9445

To: joerg.sonnenberger, #hg-reviewers, Alphare, pulkit
Cc: marmoute, mercurial-devel, mercurial-patches
___
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel


Re: D9445: sidedata: send the correct revision data for wireproto v2

2020-12-07 Thread Pierre-Yves David
I think this will behave badly if any other processing flag is involved 
(something like `lfs`, which thankfully is not used on changelog 
revision). What happens to the associated flags ? where they preserved 
by wireprotov2 in the first place ?


On 11/28/20 3:05 PM, joerg.sonnenberger (Joerg Sonnenberger) wrote:

joerg.sonnenberger created this revision.
Herald added a reviewer: hg-reviewers.
Herald added a subscriber: mercurial-patches.

REVISION SUMMARY
   When no sidedata is present, rawdata() and revision() are the same. But
   as soon as sidedata is present, the way it is currently stored will
   change the rawdata and that is not desired here, so switch to the
   correct data accessor.

REPOSITORY
   rHG Mercurial

BRANCH
   default

REVISION DETAIL
   https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9445

AFFECTED FILES
   mercurial/wireprotov2server.py

CHANGE DETAILS

diff --git a/mercurial/wireprotov2server.py b/mercurial/wireprotov2server.py
--- a/mercurial/wireprotov2server.py
+++ b/mercurial/wireprotov2server.py
@@ -1046,7 +1046,7 @@
  followingdata = []
  
  if b'revision' in fields:

-revisiondata = cl.rawdata(node)
+revisiondata = cl.revision(node)
  followingmeta.append((b'revision', len(revisiondata)))
  followingdata.append(revisiondata)
  




To: joerg.sonnenberger, #hg-reviewers
Cc: mercurial-patches, mercurial-devel
___
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel



--
Pierre-Yves David
___
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel


D9445: sidedata: send the correct revision data for wireproto v2

2020-11-28 Thread joerg.sonnenberger (Joerg Sonnenberger)
joerg.sonnenberger created this revision.
Herald added a reviewer: hg-reviewers.
Herald added a subscriber: mercurial-patches.

REVISION SUMMARY
  When no sidedata is present, rawdata() and revision() are the same. But
  as soon as sidedata is present, the way it is currently stored will
  change the rawdata and that is not desired here, so switch to the
  correct data accessor.

REPOSITORY
  rHG Mercurial

BRANCH
  default

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9445

AFFECTED FILES
  mercurial/wireprotov2server.py

CHANGE DETAILS

diff --git a/mercurial/wireprotov2server.py b/mercurial/wireprotov2server.py
--- a/mercurial/wireprotov2server.py
+++ b/mercurial/wireprotov2server.py
@@ -1046,7 +1046,7 @@
 followingdata = []
 
 if b'revision' in fields:
-revisiondata = cl.rawdata(node)
+revisiondata = cl.revision(node)
 followingmeta.append((b'revision', len(revisiondata)))
 followingdata.append(revisiondata)
 



To: joerg.sonnenberger, #hg-reviewers
Cc: mercurial-patches, mercurial-devel
___
Mercurial-devel mailing list
Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel