On 11/23/2016 04:43 PM, Remi Chaintron wrote:
# HG changeset patch # User Remi Chaintron <r...@fb.com> # Date 1479915779 0 # Wed Nov 23 15:42:59 2016 +0000 # Branch stable # Node ID f9ec5cd22586138cdcf5cfebc88f1bcba41a2a20 # Parent 819f96b82fa4c4c6d07840a2b180d112b524103f censor: flag internal documentation diff --git a/mercurial/help/internals/revlogs.txt b/mercurial/help/internals/revlogs.txt --- a/mercurial/help/internals/revlogs.txt +++ b/mercurial/help/internals/revlogs.txt @@ -88,7 +88,9 @@ 0-5 (6 bytes) Absolute offset of revision data from beginning of revlog. 6-7 (2 bytes) - Bit flags impacting revision behavior. + Bit flags impacting revision behavior. The following bit offsets define: + 0 + 'censor' extension flag.
The formating is a bit strange here, it seems like it is matching the outer layer formatting but it seems less necessary for this 1 digit data. Is there any formal reason we need it this way? Or could we move to "0: 'censor' flag"
8-11 (4 bytes) Compressed length of revision data / chunk as stored in revlog. 12-15 (4 bytes) _______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
-- Pierre-Yves David _______________________________________________ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel