Re: [PATCH 2 of 7] copies: update _checkcopies to work in a rotated DAG
On 10/07/2016 05:41 PM, timeless wrote: Gábor Stefanik wrote: copies: update _checkcopies to work in a rotated DAG I'd argue this should be tagged (BC). I absolutely support this change, it should be changed, it is a bug. But the reason I'd argue that it's a change is that a repository constructed along this path will result in a different changeset depending on the version of hg: Looking more into what is happening here, I'm not sure it is worth a BC. This seems to be a plain bugfix for something that was just plain misbehaving in a conflicting way. I'm pretty sure nobody rely on this. Cheers, -- Pierre-Yves David ___ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
Re: [PATCH 2 of 7] copies: update _checkcopies to work in a rotated DAG
Gábor Stefanik wrote: > copies: update _checkcopies to work in a rotated DAG I'd argue this should be tagged (BC). I absolutely support this change, it should be changed, it is a bug. But the reason I'd argue that it's a change is that a repository constructed along this path will result in a different changeset depending on the version of hg: > @@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ >date:Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 + >summary: 2 > > - changeset: 14:f64defefacee > + changeset: 14:0c921c65ef1e >parent: 1:5d205f8b35b6 >user:foo >date:Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 + ___ Mercurial-devel mailing list Mercurial-devel@mercurial-scm.org https://www.mercurial-scm.org/mailman/listinfo/mercurial-devel
