Re: [Fwd: Re: Mersenne: Distributed Computing Mandatory For Juno's Free ,Users]

2001-04-20 Thread Russel Brooks

David L. Nicol wrote:
 I imagine a better GIMPS graphical display would look like part of
 the set from "twelve monkeys" with fake big black dials and twitching
 needles, that indicate system performance and available swap space
 and so forth.  It could be a cute graphical system monitor application.

You know, this isn't a bad idea.  Over clockers already use
Gimps to test their systems, why not provide some useful info
too?  If an OPTIONAL screen saver came with Gimps that provided
useful system info we might get people attracted to Gimps to get
the "cool system info panel" (which by the way requires Gimps to
be running in the background).

Cheers... Russ

_
Unsubscribe  list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
Mersenne Prime FAQ  -- http://www.tasam.com/~lrwiman/FAQ-mers



Re: [Fwd: Re: Mersenne: Distributed Computing Mandatory For Juno's Free Users]

2001-04-20 Thread Aaron Blosser

  As another point, I know many who are in SETI solely for the nice
  graphical display.  I don't know whether GIMPS, given the abstract
  nature of the work we do, could ever really develop such a display.

 I imagine a better GIMPS graphical display would look like part of
 the set from "twelve monkeys" with fake big black dials and twitching
 needles, that indicate system performance and available swap space
 and so forth.  It could be a cute graphical system monitor application.

 Of course you can maximize your prime95 window.

Hmm... not all that interesting to most folks...

perhaps just have Prime95 update some SNMP counters... I think it'd be
"neato" to use MRTG to track various counters of the machines I have running
Prime95/NTPrime.  Then you're just offloading the task of doing charts and
stuff to some other machine.

Doesn't really address the issue of having it show some cool stuff locally,
although someone could write a screen saver that takes those counters and
does something with it on the client itself.  Also has the nice benefit of
keeping the task of groovy displays out of the code of the program, and lets
others write their own "plug ins" in any way they want.

Aaron

_
Unsubscribe  list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
Mersenne Prime FAQ  -- http://www.tasam.com/~lrwiman/FAQ-mers



Re: [Fwd: Re: Mersenne: Distributed Computing Mandatory For Juno's Free Users]

2001-04-20 Thread Nathan Russell

On Fri, 20 Apr 2001 14:15:13 -0700, Aaron Blosser wrote:


perhaps just have Prime95 update some SNMP counters... I think it'd be
"neato" to use MRTG to track various counters of the machines I have running
Prime95/NTPrime.  Then you're just offloading the task of doing charts and
stuff to some other machine.

Doesn't really address the issue of having it show some cool stuff locally,
although someone could write a screen saver that takes those counters and
does something with it on the client itself.  Also has the nice benefit of
keeping the task of groovy displays out of the code of the program, and lets
others write their own "plug ins" in any way they want.

Aaron

Earlier, I suggested the idea of a graphical display that would show
the Tower of Hanoi, with either one (or two, as needed) steps for each
iteration done.  This would make it look like things were continiously
done, and I wouldn't think it'd be very hard to code.  

Nathan
_
Unsubscribe  list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
Mersenne Prime FAQ  -- http://www.tasam.com/~lrwiman/FAQ-mers



Re: [Fwd: Re: Mersenne: Distributed Computing Mandatory For Juno's Free Users]

2001-04-19 Thread David L. Nicol



Its true, I read mersenne list archive about as often as there
are lunar eclipses.  


"Halliday, Ian" wrote:
 
 As another point, I know many who are in SETI solely for the nice
 graphical display.  I don't know whether GIMPS, given the abstract
 nature of the work we do, could ever really develop such a display.


I imagine a better GIMPS graphical display would look like part of
the set from "twelve monkeys" with fake big black dials and twitching
needles, that indicate system performance and available swap space
and so forth.  It could be a cute graphical system monitor application.

Of course you can maximize your prime95 window.



-- 
  David Nicol 816.235.1187 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home of the V-90 modern

_
Unsubscribe  list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
Mersenne Prime FAQ  -- http://www.tasam.com/~lrwiman/FAQ-mers



[Fwd: Re: Mersenne: Distributed Computing Mandatory For Juno's Free Users]

2001-02-04 Thread Halliday, Ian

From Nathan, for the list

From: Nathan Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Halliday, Ian wrote:

 http://au.dailynews.yahoo.com/headlines/20010203/nbtech/981156900-2685255736.html
 describes new conditions for free juno users - once again SETI is cited
 as a "successful" example of distributed computing. IIRC, we have had
 four successes, they haven't had any...

Yes, we have.  If GIMPS succeeds yet again, the finder of the prime will 
get money, and fame within the mathematical community.  Ditto if a user 
of the distributed.net project finds a RC5 key (except less money and 
more transitory fame).  It could be argued that someone who finds /them/ 
with SETI and is announced as a co-discoverer will not be wanting for 
fame or money for the rest of his/her life.  Additionally, SETI is as 
likely to make a discovery now as it ever was (read: not very).  d.net 
and GIMPS are both attempting tasks which are orders of magnitude less 
likely to succeed than those they have completed in the past. 

As another point, I know many who are in SETI solely for the nice 
graphical display.  I don't know whether GIMPS, given the abstract 
nature of the work we do, could ever really develop such a display. 

 
 How will the new conditions described in their terms affect us (or any
 other voluntary distributed project for that matter) ?

I sincerely doubt that many Juno users will stick with that service if 
Juno ever attempts to fully enforce the terms:

"[users permit Juno to] upload such results to Juno's central computers 
during a subsequent connection, whether initiated by you in the course 
of using the Service or by the Computational Software."

(snip)  "Juno may require you to leave your computer turned on at all 
times, and may replace the 'screen saver' software that runs on your 
computer while the computer is turned on but you are not using it. "

Does that mean that Juno will become angry at subscribers who take their 
machines down for maintence, or do a reboot mandated by the operating 
system? 

My ex-girlfriend from high school and her family use Juno as their free 
email provider.  I sincerely doubt that, if Juno began enforcing these 
sorts of terms, they would switch to e.g. NetZero or another adware 
internet provider, and begin using web-based email. 

The privacy concerns alone of Juno running software quasi-voluntary on 
customer systems are chilling.  I just checked Slashdot, but they've had 
something up since yesterday:

http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/02/01/2127239mode=nested


 
 
 On a different matter, what happened to Lennart's offer of champagne to
 the person who guessed a milestone date correctly? Have we reached that
 milestone yet? If so, who won?
 
 Regards,
 
 Ian

Nathan Russell
_
Unsubscribe  list info -- http://www.scruz.net/~luke/signup.htm
Mersenne Prime FAQ  -- http://www.tasam.com/~lrwiman/FAQ-mers