On 01/09/2012 04:54 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
From: Dave Airlieairl...@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlieairl...@redhat.com
---
src/mesa/state_tracker/st_glsl_to_tgsi.cpp |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_glsl_to_tgsi.cpp
b/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_glsl_to_tgsi.cpp
index 3b8e2fe..460bc04 100644
--- a/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_glsl_to_tgsi.cpp
+++ b/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_glsl_to_tgsi.cpp
@@ -1416,7 +1416,10 @@ glsl_to_tgsi_visitor::visit(ir_expression *ir)
emit(ir, TGSI_OPCODE_ABS, result_dst, op[0]);
break;
case ir_unop_sign:
- emit(ir, TGSI_OPCODE_SSG, result_dst, op[0]);
+ if (result_dst.type == GLSL_TYPE_INT || result_dst.type ==
GLSL_TYPE_UINT)
+ emit(ir, TGSI_OPCODE_ISSG, result_dst, op[0]);
+ else
+ emit(ir, TGSI_OPCODE_SSG, result_dst, op[0]);
break;
case ir_unop_rcp:
emit_scalar(ir, TGSI_OPCODE_RCP, result_dst, op[0]);
Is ISSG going to work properly for unsigned integers? Maybe
ISSG(UINT) should be replaced by a set-not-equal-to-zero instruction?
-Brian
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev