[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 25/26] mesa/es: Remove redundant glFramebufferTexture3D textarget validation
From: Ian Romanick Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick --- src/mesa/main/APIspec.xml |4 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/mesa/main/APIspec.xml b/src/mesa/main/APIspec.xml index dd7bf90..63a2b35 100644 --- a/src/mesa/main/APIspec.xml +++ b/src/mesa/main/APIspec.xml @@ -2916,10 +2916,6 @@ - - - - -- 1.7.6.5 ___ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 25/26] mesa/es: Remove redundant glFramebufferTexture3D textarget validation
On 08/17/2012 08:11 PM, Ian Romanick wrote: > From: Ian Romanick > > Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick > --- > src/mesa/main/APIspec.xml |4 > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/mesa/main/APIspec.xml b/src/mesa/main/APIspec.xml > index dd7bf90..63a2b35 100644 > --- a/src/mesa/main/APIspec.xml > +++ b/src/mesa/main/APIspec.xml > @@ -2916,10 +2916,6 @@ > > > > - > - > - > - > > > > Hmm. I would've thought the category="OES_texture_3D" tag would cause it to only accept this when the OES_texture_3D extension is advertised. But it doesn't seem to. It looks like we happily process this function even without OES/EXT_texture_3D support. Probably wrong, but I doubt anyone is likely to run into trouble because of it... Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke ___ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 25/26] mesa/es: Remove redundant glFramebufferTexture3D textarget validation
On 08/19/2012 11:58 PM, Kenneth Graunke wrote: On 08/17/2012 08:11 PM, Ian Romanick wrote: From: Ian Romanick Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick --- src/mesa/main/APIspec.xml |4 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/mesa/main/APIspec.xml b/src/mesa/main/APIspec.xml index dd7bf90..63a2b35 100644 --- a/src/mesa/main/APIspec.xml +++ b/src/mesa/main/APIspec.xml @@ -2916,10 +2916,6 @@ - - - - Hmm. I would've thought the category="OES_texture_3D" tag would cause it to only accept this when the OES_texture_3D extension is advertised. But it doesn't seem to. Mesa always advertises GL_EXT_texture3D (part of OpenGL 1.2) and, therefore, OES_texture_3D. It doesn't check for support because it always is supported. :) It looks like we happily process this function even without OES/EXT_texture_3D support. Probably wrong, but I doubt anyone is likely to run into trouble because of it... Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke ___ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 25/26] mesa/es: Remove redundant glFramebufferTexture3D textarget validation
On 08/20/2012 09:46 AM, Ian Romanick wrote: > Mesa always advertises GL_EXT_texture3D (part of OpenGL 1.2) and, > therefore, OES_texture_3D. It doesn't check for support because it > always is supported. :) Then why is it not &dummy_true in extensions.c? ___ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev