From: Rob Clark
Not 100% sure, but I think being an unsigned literal will help:
CID 1358505 (#1 of 1): Unintended sign extension
(SIGN_EXTENSION)sign_extension: Suspicious implicit sign extension:
load1->def.num_components with type unsigned char (8 bits, unsigned) is
promoted in load1->def.num_components * (load1->def.bit_size / 8) to
type int (32 bits, signed), then sign-extended to type unsigned long (64
bits, unsigned). If load1->def.num_components * (load1->def.bit_size /
8) is greater than 0x7FFF, the upper bits of the result will all be
1.
---
src/compiler/nir/nir_instr_set.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/compiler/nir/nir_instr_set.c b/src/compiler/nir/nir_instr_set.c
index fe312a0..f93ec9d 100644
--- a/src/compiler/nir/nir_instr_set.c
+++ b/src/compiler/nir/nir_instr_set.c
@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ nir_instrs_equal(const nir_instr *instr1, const nir_instr
*instr2)
return false;
return memcmp(load1->value.f32, load2->value.f32,
-load1->def.num_components * (load1->def.bit_size / 8)) ==
0;
+load1->def.num_components * (load1->def.bit_size / 8u)) ==
0;
}
case nir_instr_type_phi: {
nir_phi_instr *phi1 = nir_instr_as_phi(instr1);
--
2.5.5
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev