Re: [meta-intel] Core-i7 support
Well, yes I know that. That's why I specifically said that I downloaded for Dora because that's the branch we are using. Does that mean that Core i7 support is removed from Dora-branch? Teemu Keskinarkaus -Original Message- From: Kamble, Nitin A [mailto:nitin.a.kam...@intel.com] Sent: 24. lokakuuta 2014 20:23 To: Keskinarkaus, Teemu; meta-intel@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [meta-intel] Core-i7 support The latest release is Daisy not Dora. And within few weeks Dizzy will be latest release. The latest Daisy BSP for corei7 is here. https://www.yoctoproject.org/downloads/bsps/daisy161/intel-corei7-64 And in few weeks there will be a new latest available for the BSP. Nitin From: Keskinarkaus, Teemu teemu.keskinark...@maximatecc.commailto:Teemu.Keskinarkaus@Maxima tecc.com Date: Thursday, October 23, 2014 at 10:08 PM To: meta-intel@yoctoproject.orgmailto:meta-intel@yoctoproject.org meta-intel@yoctoproject.orgmailto:meta-intel@yoctoproject.org Subject: [meta-intel] Core-i7 support Hi, It's been few months that I last time tried core i7 in Yocto. Now I downloaded latest meta-intel for dora and noticed that conf/machine/intel-corei7-64.conf is gone. I guess the core-i7 support is moved somewhere, but where? Only reference to i7 I could find was in Sugarbay so should I use that or what I should use? Teemu Keskinarkaus Actuant Corporation Email Notice This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and/or CONFIDENTIAL. This email is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this email is not an intended recipient, you have received this email in error and any review, dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by return mail and permanently delete the copy you received. Thank you. Actuant Corporation Email Notice This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and/or CONFIDENTIAL. This email is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this email is not an intended recipient, you have received this email in error and any review, dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by return mail and permanently delete the copy you received. Thank you. -- ___ meta-intel mailing list meta-intel@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
[meta-intel] Core-i7 support
Hi, It's been few months that I last time tried core i7 in Yocto. Now I downloaded latest meta-intel for dora and noticed that conf/machine/intel-corei7-64.conf is gone. I guess the core-i7 support is moved somewhere, but where? Only reference to i7 I could find was in Sugarbay so should I use that or what I should use? Teemu Keskinarkaus Actuant Corporation Email Notice This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and/or CONFIDENTIAL. This email is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this email is not an intended recipient, you have received this email in error and any review, dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by return mail and permanently delete the copy you received. Thank you. -- ___ meta-intel mailing list meta-intel@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
Re: [meta-intel] Valleyisland graphics in Dora
Hi, What does the valley-island-io - feature include? To make things not so easy and simple, we need to run our system 32-bit and not 64-bit. Valleyisland - support has both, but corei7 has only 64-bit. We are also using Dora-branch and corei7 support is only for master-branch. Any estimation for the rt-kernel support for Dora/Valleyisland? Teemu Keskinarkaus Software system engineer maximatecc - Humans in control -Original Message- From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvh...@linux.intel.com] Sent: 9. huhtikuuta 2014 19:42 To: Chang, Rebecca Swee Fun; Keskinarkaus, Teemu; 'IGI/Falk Bauer' Cc: meta-intel@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [meta-intel] Valleyisland graphics in Dora On 4/4/14, 2:58, Chang, Rebecca Swee Fun rebecca.swee.fun.ch...@intel.com wrote: Hi, For rt-kernel support, we will seriously consider about enabling the feature, please stay tuned for more features in the coming releases. This is being supported currently on the intel-corei7-64 BSP which has Bay Trail support and includes 3.10-LTSI, 3.10-LTSI-RT, and 3.14 kernel support. It is lacking the valley-island-io feature branch. If you are looking for that, the valley-island BSP is still your best bet, and working with Rebecca to get RT support added. -- Darren Hart Open Source Technology Center darren.h...@intel.com Intel Corporation Actuant Corporation Email Notice This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and/or CONFIDENTIAL. This email is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this email is not an intended recipient, you have received this email in error and any review, dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by return mail and permanently delete the copy you received. Thank you. -- ___ meta-intel mailing list meta-intel@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
Re: [meta-intel] Valleyisland graphics in Dora
Hi, I can confirm this that it works. I had too old kernel version in my system. I updated it to 3.10.35(including the git hashes) and now the accelerated graphics works and I don't have that error anymore that I had before and also Intel-driver works on Xorg. This brings me to another problem I encountered while updating the meta-intel. We are using rt-kernel in our product and it seems that valleyisland - layer has only support for normal kernel. Is the rt-kernel support coming or should I switch to master-version to get that? I tried updating my rt-kernel recipes to be used with new kernel version and valleyisland, but even though I changed the KBRANCH to standard/preempt-rt/base and updated the git hashes the compilation fails. It seems that the configuration of the kernel doesn't go properly and valleyisland-32 - kernel is configured for 64-bit etc. I'm guessing that the kernel is missing the support for valleyisland-32? One other thing regarding the configurations too. I'm not sure if this is more of generic poky stuff or meta-intel, but feel free to answer if you wish. How is the kernel configuration going now? I mean I have those pieces of configuration files that has one or more config-options (Like CONFIG_IGB=y) and then I define them in recipe as SRC_URI and they 'just work'. That works when needing to add something, but how do I remove some configurations that I don't need/want? Ie. which is the proper way to do this? I couldn't find any proper documentation of this or I've missed something. Teemu Keskinarkaus Software system engineer maximatecc - Humans in control -Original Message- From: Chang, Rebecca Swee Fun [mailto:rebecca.swee.fun.ch...@intel.com] Sent: 4. huhtikuuta 2014 4:03 To: 'IGI/Falk Bauer'; Keskinarkaus, Teemu Cc: meta-intel@yoctoproject.org Subject: RE: Valleyisland graphics in Dora Hi both, Based on your descriptions about the problem, I can confirm that I do not see the issue on my side with the latest Dora branch meta-valleyisland recipes. I've tested glxgears and got the glxinfo from Bayley Bay CRB and also Valley Island Dev Kit. I'm building my image with LICENSE_FLAGS_WHITELIST = commercial and also the EXTRA_MACHINE_FEATURES = tools-testapps for testing purposes. I do not recommend to change the branch to standard/ltsi. Standard/base has sufficient backport support for Baytrail for the time being and we are working on to add more. You may go to bugzilla to log down the problem you've seen and provide more information for us to look into it. Thanks. Rebecca -Original Message- From: meta-intel-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:meta-intel- boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of IGI/Falk Bauer Sent: 03 April, 2014 9:30 PM To: Keskinarkaus, Teemu Cc: meta-intel@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [meta-intel] Valleyisland graphics in Dora Teemu, i had similar problems a few days ago with our E3825 based hardware. The most important thing is that you switched to the ltsi kernel where the Bay Trail support is backported from newer kernel versions. Bay Trail support was introduced from version 3.11 i think. You have to look for the following message in the kernel message buffer: [drm:i915_pci_probe] *ERROR* Preliminary hardware support disabled This means that the device file /dev/dri/card0 is not created and so the intel driver says that the device is not found. This message appears if you use the standard/base kernel version in yocto. To switch to the ltsi kernel you have to set the following statement in the meta-isg/meta-valleyisland/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.10.bbappend: KBRANCH_valleyisland-32 = standard/ltsi SRCREV is also changed to the commit id for the tagged version of ltsi 3.10.32: SRCREV_machine_valleyisland-32 = 78afd3095c9b37efbbfbfdc25eb3833ef3c6a718 Yet I do not know how to manage such changes in a layer overlay. I have directly hacked the bbappend file currently. Hope this is of help for you. Falk -- IGI - Ingenieur-Gesellschaft fuer Interfaces mbH Dipl.-Ing. Falk Bauer Applications Engineer Langenauer Str. 46 57223 Kreuztal, Germany Tel.: +49 2732 5525 0 Fax: +49 2732 5525 25 E-mail: f.ba...@igi-systems.com Internet: www.igi-systems.com ---Ursprünglic he Nachricht- Von: meta-intel-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:meta-intel- boun...@yoctoproject.org] Im Auftrag von Keskinarkaus, Teemu Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. April 2014 13:04 An: meta-intel@yoctoproject.org Betreff: [meta-intel] Valleyisland graphics in Dora Hi, I noticed that Dora branch has also finally got its Valleyisland support so I downloaded latest Dora-branch of meta-intel and also updated Dora-branch of Poky. I then rebuild my own image of it and it booted ok. The thing is that when I try to use any
Re: [meta-intel] Valleyisland graphics in Dora
Hi, Any idea of the timeframe when the rt-support is coming? I have some time schedule pressure building up.. Current dora branch would be pretty much everything we need at the moment except the rt-support that is missing. Oh the config-remove goes that easily. Yes, I know that if/when I go to change the configuration it's up to me to get it working, but that's okay. I'm making the build for very specific hardware so I can remove quite a much of drivers to save space and maybe make system startup bit faster. Teemu Keskinarkaus Software system engineer maximatecc - Humans in control -Original Message- From: Chang, Rebecca Swee Fun [mailto:rebecca.swee.fun.ch...@intel.com] Sent: 4. huhtikuuta 2014 12:59 To: Keskinarkaus, Teemu; 'IGI/Falk Bauer' Cc: meta-intel@yoctoproject.org Subject: RE: Valleyisland graphics in Dora Hi, For rt-kernel support, we will seriously consider about enabling the feature, please stay tuned for more features in the coming releases. About removing unwanted kernel configs, you can do the same as what you did to add configs. In your config files, use # CONFIG_IGB is not set and this can help you to turn off the configs. FYI, this is not a proper way. This is meant for your own development. The kernel configs are set in linux-yocto-3.X meta branch. The configurations that we set are boot tested and undergone sanity tests in order to ensure our device drivers work for all. Since this removal of configs is specified to your case, you own the responsibility to maintain such customization locally. Thank you. -Original Message- From: Keskinarkaus, Teemu [mailto:teemu.keskinark...@maximatecc.com] Sent: 04 April, 2014 5:22 PM To: Chang, Rebecca Swee Fun; 'IGI/Falk Bauer' Cc: meta-intel@yoctoproject.org Subject: RE: Valleyisland graphics in Dora Hi, I can confirm this that it works. I had too old kernel version in my system. I updated it to 3.10.35(including the git hashes) and now the accelerated graphics works and I don't have that error anymore that I had before and also Intel-driver works on Xorg. This brings me to another problem I encountered while updating the meta- intel. We are using rt-kernel in our product and it seems that valleyisland - layer has only support for normal kernel. Is the rt-kernel support coming or should I switch to master-version to get that? I tried updating my rt-kernel recipes to be used with new kernel version and valleyisland, but even though I changed the KBRANCH to standard/preempt-rt/base and updated the git hashes the compilation fails. It seems that the configuration of the kernel doesn't go properly and valleyisland-32 - kernel is configured for 64-bit etc. I'm guessing that the kernel is missing the support for valleyisland-32? One other thing regarding the configurations too. I'm not sure if this is more of generic poky stuff or meta-intel, but feel free to answer if you wish. How is the kernel configuration going now? I mean I have those pieces of configuration files that has one or more config-options (Like CONFIG_IGB=y) and then I define them in recipe as SRC_URI and they 'just work'. That works when needing to add something, but how do I remove some configurations that I don't need/want? Ie. which is the proper way to do this? I couldn't find any proper documentation of this or I've missed something. Teemu Keskinarkaus Software system engineer maximatecc - Humans in control -Original Message- From: Chang, Rebecca Swee Fun [mailto:rebecca.swee.fun.ch...@intel.com] Sent: 4. huhtikuuta 2014 4:03 To: 'IGI/Falk Bauer'; Keskinarkaus, Teemu Cc: meta-intel@yoctoproject.org Subject: RE: Valleyisland graphics in Dora Hi both, Based on your descriptions about the problem, I can confirm that I do not see the issue on my side with the latest Dora branch meta-valleyisland recipes. I've tested glxgears and got the glxinfo from Bayley Bay CRB and also Valley Island Dev Kit. I'm building my image with LICENSE_FLAGS_WHITELIST = commercial and also the EXTRA_MACHINE_FEATURES = tools-testapps for testing purposes. I do not recommend to change the branch to standard/ltsi. Standard/base has sufficient backport support for Baytrail for the time being and we are working on to add more. You may go to bugzilla to log down the problem you've seen and provide more information for us to look into it. Thanks. Rebecca -Original Message- From: meta-intel-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:meta-intel- boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of IGI/Falk Bauer Sent: 03 April, 2014 9:30 PM To: Keskinarkaus, Teemu Cc: meta-intel@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [meta-intel] Valleyisland graphics in Dora Teemu, i had similar problems a few days ago with our E3825 based hardware. The most important thing
Re: [meta-intel] New valleyisland support
Hi, Okay, here is a little background and some new issues I've encountered. We have been using Yocto 1.5.1 earlier to create image for our HWs. Now the new HW uses E38xx so I started testing the new Yocto/meta-intel - branches to get (better) support for it. Since the current ValleyIsland support for meta-intel was for Dylan - branch of Yocto and also because I wasn't able to create image with working Intel HD Graphics driver I started looking for newer versions. Graphics worked with VESA-driver, but not with actual Intel HD Graphics driver. Also the kernel was quite old being 3.8.13. I did some digging and noticed that dvhart/bsp-ng had support for the intel-corei7 so that's why I ended up there. I never intended to use it other than testing if I can create working image that has working Intel HD Graphics for Valleyisland. Then I tried latest poky/meta-intel combination since dvhart/bsp-ng was merged there. When trying to create core-image-sato using the intel-corei7-64 bsp I ended up with this: ERROR: Fetcher failure: Unable to find revision 29594404d7fe73cd80eaa4ee8c43dcc53970c60e in branch meta even from upstream ERROR: Function failed: Fetcher failure for URL: 'git://git.pokylinux.org/linux-yocto-dev.git;nocheckout=1;branch=standard/base,meta;name=machine,meta'. Unable to fetch URL from any source. ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in: /opt/build/tmp/work/corei7-64-intel-common-poky-linux/linux-yocto-dev/3.14++gitAUTOINC+29594404d7_29594404d7-r0/temp/log.do_fetch.25380 ERROR: Task 73 (/opt/poky/../poky/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-dev.bb, do_fetch) failed with exit code '1' I'm not sure if that is a Yocto - bug, Meta-intel bug or my bug. Good to hear that linut-rt - support was not dropped, but merely just changed. Btw. Is it intentional that in intel-corei7-64.conf the PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel is set using = and not ?= which makes it impossible to override it from later scripts? Or am I doing something wrong again? I had to comment out that line to be able to use my own kernel version on later tests. Teemu Keskinarkaus Software system engineer maximatecc - Humans in control -Original Message- From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvh...@linux.intel.com] Sent: 12. maaliskuuta 2014 17:01 To: Keskinarkaus, Teemu; Meta Intel Cc: rebecca.swee.fun.chang; boon.leong.ong Subject: Re: [meta-intel] New valleyisland support Hi Teemu, Can you explain how you arrived at using the dvhart/bsp-ng branch? This is a development/testing branch, certainly not something meant for productization use. We're merging bits of bsp-ng into master as it's tested, verified, and fixed up. Valleyisland support specifically is available in Dylan under meta-isg/meta- valleyisland. Rebecca and her team are working on adding it to Dora with a 3.10 kernel I believe, but I'll leave it to her to comment on that. If you are just looking for Baytrail SoC support (not specifically valleyisland) then that is now available in meta-intel/master using the intel-corei7-64 BSP. This is a new approach to Intel BSPs which supports multiple boards/CPUs with a single BSP. As to linux-yocto-rt, we have not removed support for it. If you are referring to the removal of the linux-yocto-rt*bbappend files in dvhart/bsp-ng, that is done in favor of a new mechanism called the intel-common kernel, which uses a single kernel build across multiple BSPs, removing the need for the bbappend in each BSP layer - you'll note it is still present under common/recipes-kernel/linux. If you can provide some more context about what you are trying to do, we should be able to help make sure you are working with the right sources, and prioritize any development to fill any gaps. Thanks, Darren On 3/10/14, 21:45, Keskinarkaus, Teemu teemu.keskinark...@maximatecc.com wrote: Hi, I'm bit lost here. I'm looking for support for valleyisland that is for Dora branch of the Yocto. I cloned the dvhart/bsp-ng, but couldn't find any references to valleyisland or bay trail from there so I'm guessing I'm looking from the wrong place. Is there a right place? Or is the support 'coming soon' for Dora? I'm also bit disappointed to see that you chose to drop linux-rt support in favor of non-rt-linux. Mostly because I'm using the linux-rt variant. ;) So now I need to add it back there myself. Teemu Keskinarkaus Software system engineer maximatecc - Humans in control Actuant Corporation Email Notice This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and/or CONFIDENTIAL. This email is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this email is not an intended recipient, you have received this email in error and any review, dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email
Re: [meta-intel] BSP retirements from meta-intel layer
From: meta-intel-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:meta-intel- boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Chris Tapp Following on from the chiefriver BSP retirement thread, what is the general policy for BSP life-cycles within meta-intel? For example, we committed to using the Cedartrail BSP a couple of years back as if offered support for what was then a new platform with a reasonable forward buy-time. However, support for that has been dropped even though boards are still available using the chipset (e.g. ASRock DN2800MT) and these are going to be available for a few years yet. From our point of view it is a pity not to be able to make use of the improvements and enhancements that have gone into later Yocto versions, especially as we're continually updating our software. This interests me as well since we have been planning on using Yocto on our HW for a long time. We also noticed the drop of Cedartrail BSP and we ended up on porting it to newer Yocto ourselves which of course wasn't what we were hoping to get when switching to Yocto. Teemu Keskinarkaus Software system engineer maximatecc - Humans in control Chris Tapp opensou...@keylevel.com www.keylevel.com -- ___ meta-intel mailing list meta-intel@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel Actuant Corporation Email Notice This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and/or CONFIDENTIAL. This email is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this email is not an intended recipient, you have received this email in error and any review, dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by return mail and permanently delete the copy you received. Thank you. -- ___ meta-intel mailing list meta-intel@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
[meta-intel] File missing in corei7 bsp
Hi, I'm trying to use dvhart/bsp-ng to compile image for BayTrail (E3826), but I got this error: ParseError: ParseError at /mnt/teemu/proj/poky/../meta-intel-contrib/conf/machine/include/intel-corei7-64-common.inc:6: Could not include required file conf/machine/include/tune-corei7.inc There are no tune-files at all in meta-intel-contrib or in meta-intel. What am I missing or is that file missing from git-repo? -- Teemu Keskinarkaus Software system engineer maximatecc - Humans in control Actuant Corporation Email Notice This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and/or CONFIDENTIAL. This email is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this email is not an intended recipient, you have received this email in error and any review, dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by return mail and permanently delete the copy you received. Thank you. -- ___ meta-intel mailing list meta-intel@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
Re: [meta-intel] File missing in corei7 bsp
From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvh...@linux.intel.com] Sent: 11. maaliskuuta 2014 18:55 On 3/11/14, 4:15, Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com wrote: Hi Teemu, On Tuesday 11 March 2014 08:09:43 Keskinarkaus, Teemu wrote: I'm trying to use dvhart/bsp-ng to compile image for BayTrail (E3826), but I got this error: ParseError: ParseError at /mnt/teemu/proj/poky/../meta-intel-contrib/conf/machine/include/intel- cor ei 7-64-common.inc:6: Could not include required file conf/machine/include/tune-corei7.inc There are no tune-files at all in meta-intel-contrib or in meta-intel. What am I missing or is that file missing from git-repo? I think you have a case of mismatching branches here; conf/machine/include/tune-corei7.inc is part of the master branch of OE-Core (and therefore also Poky). You won't be able to use a BSP that relies upon it with earlier stable branches, unless you also add the tune files - Darren, is this supported? Thanks Paul, You are correct. dvhart/bsp-ng requires the master branch of oe-core or poky. The first Yocto Project release to support the new BSPs will be 1.6 this spring. Teemu, do you have a specific version of poky you *need* to use for other versions? If so, the backport of the tune files shouldn't be overly complicated, but there work that would need to be done there. Also note, The intel-corei7-64 bits from dvhart/bsp-ng are now (as of last night) merged into meta-intel/master. We are currently using Dora (1.5.1) version of Poky. There aren't requirement for that, but we use because it's latest 'stable' release. I guess nothing is stable in this business though. I'll check the backporting of those missing files unless it ends up backporting whole bunch of files. And maybe later upgrading to 1.6 once it's released. Teemu Keskinarkaus Software system engineer maximatecc - Humans in control Actuant Corporation Email Notice This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and/or CONFIDENTIAL. This email is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this email is not an intended recipient, you have received this email in error and any review, dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by return mail and permanently delete the copy you received. Thank you. -- ___ meta-intel mailing list meta-intel@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
[meta-intel] New valleyisland support
Hi, I'm bit lost here. I'm looking for support for valleyisland that is for Dora branch of the Yocto. I cloned the dvhart/bsp-ng, but couldn't find any references to valleyisland or bay trail from there so I'm guessing I'm looking from the wrong place. Is there a right place? Or is the support 'coming soon' for Dora? I'm also bit disappointed to see that you chose to drop linux-rt support in favor of non-rt-linux. Mostly because I'm using the linux-rt variant. ;) So now I need to add it back there myself. Teemu Keskinarkaus Software system engineer maximatecc - Humans in control Actuant Corporation Email Notice This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and/or CONFIDENTIAL. This email is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this email is not an intended recipient, you have received this email in error and any review, dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by return mail and permanently delete the copy you received. Thank you. -- ___ meta-intel mailing list meta-intel@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
Re: [meta-intel] [PATCHv3 0/5] meta-valleyisland: add new bsp layer into meta-intel
From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvh...@linux.intel.com] Sent: 19. helmikuuta 2014 20:20 Subject: Re: [meta-intel] [PATCHv3 0/5] meta-valleyisland: add new bsp layer into meta-intel On 2/18/14, 21:54, Keskinarkaus, Teemu teemu.keskinark...@maximatecc.com wrote: When do you think the intel-corei7-64 BSP Bay Trail support will be out? I'm aiming for Friday. Did you make it to Friday? At least I don't seem to find it from meta-intel repository. Teemu Keskinarkaus Software system engineer maximatecc - Humans in control Actuant Corporation Email Notice This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and/or CONFIDENTIAL. This email is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this email is not an intended recipient, you have received this email in error and any review, dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by return mail and permanently delete the copy you received. Thank you. ___ meta-intel mailing list meta-intel@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
Re: [meta-intel] [PATCHv3 0/5] meta-valleyisland: add new bsp layer into meta-intel
From: Darren Hart [mailto:dvh...@linux.intel.com] Sent: 14. helmikuuta 2014 18:54 I leave the rationale that to Boon Leon and Rebecca. However, if you are looking for something newer to support Bay Trail, the newly added intel-corei7-64 BSP will have support for Bay Trail shortly (currently building and testing on my workstation). This will have support on both linux- yocto-dev (3.13...3.14...) and linux-yocto_3.10 (which is now 3.10 LTSI based). The 3.8 BSP does have a couple additional drivers that are still working their way upstream, but if you don't need those specific things, the newer BSP might suit your needs better. Let us know what you need and we'll be happy to help. That sounds what I'm looking for. Our current Yocto-system is using Dora-branch and using Dylan-branch in meta-intel causes some problems although so far only one I've noticed is mesa - recipe version. I'm guessing video need some configuration since core-image-sato cannot get X-server started. When do you think the intel-corei7-64 BSP Bay Trail support will be out? -Teemu Thanks, Darren Teemu Keskinarkaus Software system engineer maximatecc - Humans in control -Original Message- From: meta-intel-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:meta-intel-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Darren Hart Sent: 13. helmikuuta 2014 21:09 To: Darren Hart; Chang, Rebecca Swee Fun; Kamble, Nitin A; meta-intel@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [meta-intel] [PATCHv3 0/5] meta-valleyisland: add new bsp layer into meta-intel On 2/13/14, 8:16, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote: On 2/13/14, 8:06, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote: On 2/11/14, 16:59, Chang, Rebecca Swee Fun rebecca.swee.fun.ch...@intel.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Kamble, Nitin A Sent: 12 February, 2014 1:34 AM To: Chang, Rebecca Swee Fun; meta-intel@yoctoproject.org Cc: ch...@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [meta-intel] [PATCHv3 0/5] meta-valleyisland: add new bsp layer into meta-intel On 2/11/2014 7:52 AM, rebecca.swee.fun.ch...@intel.com wrote: From: Chang, Rebecca Swee Fun rebecca.swee.fun.ch...@intel.com Hi all, This patchset is to add new BSP layer into meta-intel. meta-valleyisland is a BSP maintained by ISG. The BSP is made specifically for Intel Atom E38XX Processor E38XX Development Kit (formerly known as Valley Island). Valley Island BSP is meant to support Valley Island Development Kit, Bayley Bay CRB and Bakersport CRB. Please pull this patch set into meta-intel Dylan branch. Thank you. Rebecca Other than the PRINC and the SRCREV update from Boon Leon, does anyone have anymore feedback on this? If not, I'll make those two changes myself and merge the series. I'll wait two hours for additional feedback and then merge. This is what I have queued, please review to confirm this is exactly what you want merged: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-intel-contrib/log/?h=dv h art / dylan/valleyisland Merged, thanks Rebecca. -- Darren Hart Yocto Project - Linux Kernel Intel Open Source Technology Center ___ meta-intel mailing list meta-intel@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel Actuant Corporation Email Notice This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and/or CONFIDENTIAL. This email is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this email is not an intended recipient, you have received this email in error and any review, dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by return mail and permanently delete the copy you received. Thank you. ___ meta-intel mailing list meta-intel@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel -- Darren Hart Yocto Project - Linux Kernel Intel Open Source Technology Center Actuant Corporation Email Notice This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and/or CONFIDENTIAL. This email is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this email is not an intended recipient, you have received this email in error and any review, dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by return mail and permanently delete the copy you received. Thank you. ___ meta-intel mailing list meta-intel@yoctoproject.org
Re: [meta-intel] Silvermont support
Hi, Wonderful! Any idea on when it would be available? Teemu Keskinarkaus From: Seow, Chen Yong [mailto:chen.yong.s...@intel.com] Sent: 2. joulukuuta 2013 4:33 To: Keskinarkaus, Teemu; meta-intel@yoctoproject.org Subject: RE: Silvermont support Hi, We are in the progress to add E3800 to the meta-intel currently. From: meta-intel-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:meta-intel-boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Keskinarkaus, Teemu Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 7:40 PM To: meta-intel@yoctoproject.org Subject: [meta-intel] Silvermont support Hi, Hopefully this is correct mailinglist. Are there any plans on adding Silvermont(Atom E3800/Bay Trail-I) support to meta-intel anytime soon or has there already been some discussion about it? -Teemu Keskinarkaus Actuant Corporation Email Notice This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and/or CONFIDENTIAL. This email is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this email is not an intended recipient, you have received this email in error and any review, dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by return mail and permanently delete the copy you received. Thank you. Actuant Corporation Email Notice This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and/or CONFIDENTIAL. This email is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this email is not an intended recipient, you have received this email in error and any review, dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by return mail and permanently delete the copy you received. Thank you. ___ meta-intel mailing list meta-intel@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
[meta-intel] Silvermont support
Hi, Hopefully this is correct mailinglist. Are there any plans on adding Silvermont(Atom E3800/Bay Trail-I) support to meta-intel anytime soon or has there already been some discussion about it? -Teemu Keskinarkaus Actuant Corporation Email Notice This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and/or CONFIDENTIAL. This email is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this email is not an intended recipient, you have received this email in error and any review, dissemination, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately by return mail and permanently delete the copy you received. Thank you. ___ meta-intel mailing list meta-intel@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-intel
