on 5/09/2000 1:02 AM, Scott Rossi wrote: > I disagree -- the latter behavior would be fine. If I really needed to, I > could lock and unlock the screen to update the outer card regions. > > For example: I have a series of cards in a stack that use the same header > imagery at the top of each card (in a shared group). I'd like to use a > localized visual effect on the lower portion of the cards, to update the > content that appears in that region, without affecting the header images. > Currently there's no way to do this except by placing all the images/data on > a single card and hiding/showing the desired content. Why limit this effect > to a single card? Why not allow the use of MC's card structure to organize > content for transitions (visual effects)? > OK, this is untested, untried, etc. Make your header another stack (say a substack). Show it as a palette with decorations set to empty so it can't move and set its loc on the stack where you want it. You should be able to use the visual effects on the card without affecting the image. At least try it and let me know! Raymond > Regards, > > Scott > > _____________________________________________________________________ > Scott Rossi Tactile Media - Multimedia & Design > Creative Director Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Web: www.tactilemedia.com Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard%40lists.best.com/ Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm Please send bug reports to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, not this list.
