Re: Order of precedence conundrum

2001-04-29 Thread Michael Kann

Where did I go wrong in my steps?  

-- false AND true  evaluates to false
-- true  AND false evaluates to false


--- Richard Gaskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 When I put this in the Message Box:
 
put value( true AND false AND true OR NOT true
 AND NOT false )
 
 I get false.  
 
 But based on the order of precedence (NOT, then AND,
 then OR), I would think
 this would evaluate like this (broken down to show
 intermediate steps as I
 understand them):
 
 
 1.true AND false AND true OR NOT true AND NOT
 false
  
 -
 
 
 2.true AND false AND true OR falseAND true
   --
 
 
 3.true   AND true OR falseAND true
   ----
 
 
 4.trueOR true
   ---
 
 
 5.true
 
 
 Where did I go wrong in my steps?  Or is this a bug
 in the MC interpreter?
 I kinda doubt the latter on this one, yet I've been
 looking at it too long
 to see where I goofed -- any clues?  Does the left
 to right rule override
 precedence for Boolean operators?

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard@lists.runrev.com/
Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
Please send bug reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not this list.




Re: Order of precedence conundrum

2001-04-29 Thread Phil Davis

Hi Richard,

- Original Message -
From: Richard Gaskin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 2:03 PM
Subject: Order of precedence conundrum



 When I put this in the Message Box:

put value( true AND false AND true OR NOT true AND NOT false )

 I get false.


To get true, shouldn't the first AND be an OR? Like this:

   put value( true OR false AND true OR NOT true AND NOT false )

I could simply misunderstand how this works, but it seems to me that
(true AND false) can only be evaluated as false. If that's the case,
statement 3 would read:

 3.false  AND true OR falseAND true
   ----

...which would make the difference.

I'm open to correction here - that's just how I see it.

Phil



 But based on the order of precedence (NOT, then AND, then OR), I
would think
 this would evaluate like this (broken down to show intermediate
steps as I
 understand them):


 1.true AND false AND true OR NOT true AND NOT false
   -


 2.true AND false AND true OR falseAND true
   --


 3.true   AND true OR falseAND true
   ----


 4.trueOR true
   ---


 5.true


 Where did I go wrong in my steps?  Or is this a bug in the MC
interpreter?
 I kinda doubt the latter on this one, yet I've been looking at it
too long
 to see where I goofed -- any clues?  Does the left to right rule
override
 precedence for Boolean operators?

 --
  Richard Gaskin
  Fourth World Media Corporation
  Multimedia Design and Development for Mac, Windows, UNIX, and the
Web

_
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.FourthWorld.com
  Tel: 323-225-3717   ICQ#60248349Fax:
323-225-0716



 Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard@lists.runrev.com/
 Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
 Please send bug reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not this list.




Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard@lists.runrev.com/
Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
Please send bug reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not this list.




Re: Order of precedence conundrum

2001-04-29 Thread Richard Gaskin

Michael Kann wrote:

 Where did I go wrong in my steps?
 
 -- false AND true  evaluates to false
 -- true  AND false evaluates to false

Doh!  Thanks for catching that.  (Man, I love this list -- all the benefits
of Xtreme Programming without the commute g.)


-- 
 Richard Gaskin 
 Fourth World Media Corporation
 Multimedia Design and Development for Mac, Windows, UNIX, and the Web
 _
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.FourthWorld.com
 Tel: 323-225-3717   ICQ#60248349Fax: 323-225-0716



Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard@lists.runrev.com/
Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
Please send bug reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not this list.




start usng libURL didn't work?

2001-04-29 Thread Sivakatirswami

I set up a small test with 2.4A2

on mouseUp
  start using libURL
  put URL http://www.whatever.org; into fld catchHTML
end mouseUp

I didn't work. What did I do wrong?

To eliminate the possibility of connection problems
I turned right around
and tested, in 2.3.2 simply

on mouseUp
  put URL http://www.whatever.org; into fld catchHTML
end mouseUp

and it worked fine...

Hinduism Today

Sivakatirswami
Editor's Assistant/Production Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
www.HinduismToday.com, www.HimalayanAcademy.com,
www.Gurudeva.org, www.hindu.org



Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard@lists.runrev.com/
Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
Please send bug reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not this list.