survey

2003-08-14 Thread xbury . cs

Hi all,

Just wondering whether the efforts are justified...

How many of you would like me to finish:
a) the enhanced script editor (incl. variable browser) I've made?
b) complete Control Browser (with all properties available for editing in any object)
c) both a and b
d) you prefer the editor in MC/RR

Survey 2
Assuming these tools work seemesly with (at least) MC
a) it should be freeware (no support guarantee, infrequent updates)
b) it should be shareware (some support for licensees, updates once in a while)
c) it should be commercial (support + regular updates)

Thanks very much for your answers.

-=-
Xavier Bury
TNS NT LAN Server
ext 6465

Visit us at http://www.clearstream.com
  
IMPORTANT MESSAGE

Internet communications are not secure and therefore Clearstream International does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message.

The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Clearstream International or of any of its affiliates or subsidiaries.

END OF DISCLAIMER


RE: survey

2003-08-14 Thread Ken Ray
Title: Message



Xavier,
 
I 
generally prefer the editor in MC/RR, but I have used your script editor several 
times, so I'd have to say (D), then (A) (if that makes any sense). As to whether 
it should be freeware, etc. that should be your call. Obviously if it's 
freeware, more people are likely to use it (since it's an alternative to what 
they've already got and not something completely new).
 
Thanks 
for asking,
 

Ken RaySons of Thunder SoftwareEmail: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Web Site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/ 


  
  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
  Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 
  1:56 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: 
  surveyHi all, 
  Just wondering whether the efforts are 
  justified... How many of you would 
  like me to finish: a) the enhanced 
  script editor (incl. variable browser) I've made? b) complete Control Browser (with all properties 
  available for editing in any object) c) both a and b d) you prefer 
  the editor in MC/RR Survey 
  2 Assuming these tools work seemesly 
  with (at least) MC a) it should be 
  freeware (no support guarantee, infrequent updates) b) it should be shareware (some support for licensees, 
  updates once in a while) c) it should 
  be commercial (support + regular updates) Thanks very much for your answers. -=-Xavier BuryTNS 
  NT LAN Serverext 6465Visit us at 
  http://www.clearstream.comIMPORTANT MESSAGEInternet 
  communications are not secure and therefore Clearstream International does not 
  accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message.The 
  information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally 
  privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the 
  intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken 
  or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. 
  Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual sender, except 
  where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Clearstream 
  International or of any of its affiliates or subsidiaries.END OF 
  DISCLAIMER


Re: survey

2003-08-14 Thread Pierre Sahores
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,

Just wondering whether the efforts are justified...

How many of you would like me to finish:
a) the enhanced script editor (incl. variable browser) I've made?
b) complete Control Browser (with all properties available for editing 
in any object)
c) both a and b
d) you prefer the editor in MC/RR

Survey 2
Assuming these tools work seemesly with (at least) MC
a) it should be freeware (no support guarantee, infrequent updates)
b) it should be shareware (some support for licensees, updates once in a 
while)
c) it should be commercial (support + regular updates)

Thanks very much for your answers.

-=-
Xavier Bury
TNS NT LAN Server
ext 6465|
Visit us at http://www.clearstream.com

IMPORTANT MESSAGE

Internet communications are not secure and therefore Clearstream 
International does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of 
this message.

The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be 
legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are 
not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any 
action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and 
may be unlawful. Any views expressed in this e-mail are those of the 
individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to 
be the views of Clearstream International or of any of its affiliates or 
subsidiaries.

END OF DISCLAIMER
|
Xavier,

The IDEs provided to us by the RR/MC team one side, by you second side, 
are not, for me, the most important parts of what i expect from our, 
even, greatfull, development tool of choice ;-/

In the way i'm using RR/MC to develop (80% of three-part networked apps, 
20 of statistics reports engines), the power i need comes from what is 
available inside Transcript/Metatalk, not how the IDE will help me to 
code the handlers. In other words, when my coding is up, it's always, in 
the standards RR/MC IDEs, enough power to let me build the end-users GUI 
needed to control the apps and the ways they are running and/or 
reporting calculations results.

Beside what ('1), i know you did a very great job to provide us the 
Xavier's MC GUI and i'm respectfully of that but i hope you can 
understand friendly my position.

Beside what ('2) and because i don't have time to build them myself, i'm 
looking for two unavailable tools, to be build from ground in 
Transcript/Metatalk... and i would pay lots (aka US $ 500, each) to have 
them available for a professional-grade use. The first tool i need is an 
app dedicated to build, from a RR/MC front-end app, great *NIX 
Firewalls, including multiple boxes solutions (IPTables, DMZ and 
such...). The second app i would pay for, if it could be done available 
: a Nessus/Saint clone, able to let me scan and control all the 
components of my networked processes, including "over IP" datas serving 
and corporate LAN management. Because the *NIX security management is 
still far from beeing a piece of cake, i believe it could be a 
interesting market for such kind of RR/MC apps.

Hope this help.

--
Kind Regards, Pierre Sahores
Inspection académique de Seine-Saint-Denis
Serveurs d'applications et SGBDR (Web/PGI)
Penser et produire l'avantage compétitif
___
metacard mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard


Re: survey

2003-08-12 Thread Klaus Major
Bon soir MonsieurX,

you asked for it ;-)

Hi all,

Just wondering whether the efforts are justified...

How many of you would like me to finish:
a) the enhanced script editor (incl. variable browser) I've made?
b) complete Control Browser (with all properties available for editing 
in any object)
c) both a and b
d) you prefer the editor in MC/RR
D (MC ;-)

Work fine for me.

Otherwise i could easily change it to my needs by myself ;-)

Survey 2
Assuming these tools work seemesly with (at least) MC
a) it should be freeware (no support guarantee, infrequent updates)
b) it should be shareware (some support for licensees, updates once in 
a while)
c) it should be commercial (support + regular updates)
I'd vote for freeware: A

..but that's definitively up to you...

Thanks very much for your answers.

Xavier Bury
Regards

Klaus Major
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.major-k.de
___
metacard mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard


RE: Survey needs your help

2003-02-12 Thread xbury . cs
Cool from Scott Raney though a bit stale! 
Worth the read!

http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=2110


Visit us at http://www.clearstream.com
  
IMPORTANT MESSAGE

Internet communications are not secure and therefore Clearstream International does 
not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message.

The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally 
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended 
recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be 
taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any views expressed in 
this e-mail are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically 
states them to be the views of Clearstream International or of any of its affiliates 
or subsidiaries.

END OF DISCLAIMER
___
metacard mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard



Survey needs your help

2003-02-12 Thread xbury . cs
all go to vote to
http://www.phpnuke.org/modules.php?name=Surveys&pollID=24


Visit us at http://www.clearstream.com
  
IMPORTANT MESSAGE

Internet communications are not secure and therefore Clearstream International does 
not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message.

The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally 
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended 
recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be 
taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any views expressed in 
this e-mail are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically 
states them to be the views of Clearstream International or of any of its affiliates 
or subsidiaries.

END OF DISCLAIMER
___
metacard mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard