[meteorite-list] Meteorite Bake-Off!

2008-04-10 Thread Eric Wichman

Was in a fun mood and thought I'd post something funny and entertaining.

OK, everyone get ready for the worlds first Meteorite Bake-Off!

Featuring meteorite recipes from all across the world from world famous 
meteorite chefs.


Fun and exotic gourmet recipes like:

Meteorite Flambé
Broiled Lemon Pepper Pallasite
7 Pepper Siderite
Crispy Chondrite Crunch
Seasoned Sikhote Kebab
Spicy Canyon Diablo Fajitas
Campo Chowder with Chives
Filet Muonionalista
Gibeon Grog
Minced Millbillillie Brule

These and other fine recipes will be available soon. Stay tuned... If 
you know of any other wonderful meteorite recipes please add a comment 
and let me know.


Post your comments here: http://www.meteoritewatch.com/mw/node/12

Bon Appétit
Eric
MW



__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Dealers: sell anything to Bosnia?

2008-04-10 Thread Darren Garrison
If the story is to believed, the stones of crazy alien guy have been confirmed
to be meteorites.  Anyone here sell them to him?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/04/10/wbosnia110.xml

'Aliens' attack Bosnian man's home with meteors
Last Updated: 10:53am BST 10/04/2008

A Bosnian man claims his home has been hit five times by meteorites.

Radivoje Lajic claims he is being targeted by aliens and has reinforced his roof
in Gornja Lamovite with a steel girder. 

He said: “I am obviously being targeted by aliens. I don’t know what I have done
to annoy them but there is no other explanation that makes sense.

“The chance of being hit by a meteorite is so small that getting hit five times
has to be deliberate.” 

The chances of just one meteor hitting your house is many billions to one. 

Belgrade University has confirmed that all the rocks Mr Lajic has handed over
were meteorites, but not that they all hit his house. 

An investigation is under way into local magnetic fields to see if they have any
influence.

The first meteorite fell on Mr Lajic’s house in November and since then a
further four have smashed into his home, he claims. 

The strikes happen when it rains, he said.

“I don’t know why they are doing this. When it rains I can’t sleep for worrying
about another strike.” 
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] AD: Rare Meteorite Stamp Extravaganza on EBay

2008-04-10 Thread Don Merchant
Hi List. I lowered my Rare Meteorite Stamp Extravaganza on EBay for the last 
time! First come first served! If you been waiting for a price break don't 
miss it.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=160225749338
Sincerely
Don Merchant
IMCA #0960


__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] any mali or bassikounou oriented pieces forsale

2008-04-10 Thread steve arnold
Hi list I am just checking to see if there are any
oriented with flowlined pieces of mali or bassikounou forsale.

Steve R.Arnold,chicago,Ill,Usa!!
   The Asteroid Belt!
  http://chicagometeorites.net/
  Collecting Meteorites since 06/19/1999
  Ebay I.D. Illinoismeteorites


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] All Canyon Diablo are Sold!!

2008-04-10 Thread Ruben Garcia

Thanks everyone...

Ruben Garcia
Phoenix, Arizona
http://www.mr-meteorite.com

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Small Canyon Diablo for sale - cheap! 2 with holes!

2008-04-10 Thread Ruben Garcia
Hi all,
I have some very sold, sculpted, uncleaned CD's for
sale. The weight is 1062 grams. If you buy for $250
i'll throw in over 400 grams of small fractured pieces
for free. 

The 400 grams are nothing special, but heck they are
free!!  $5 ships them .
http://www.mr-meteorite.com/canyondiabloforsale.htm

Also two very rare small CD's with holes $3 per gram.
http://www.mr-meteorite.com/canyondiabloswithhole.htm

Ruben Garcia
Phoenix, Arizona
http://www.mr-meteorite.com

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] 'Dino Killer' Asteroid Was Half the Size Predicted? CHICXULUB II

2008-04-10 Thread Sterling K. Webb
Hi,

After having just posted (CHICXULUB I) that the most
common size estimate for the Chicxulub impactor was
10 km, here comes:

> The most recent computer models predicted a size of
> 9 to 12 miles (15 to 19 kilometers) across...

Those whacky computer modellers are at it again!

To get up to this size, you either have to get the encounter
velocity down to hardly moving with respect to the Earth
(12 km/sec) or pump up the energy of the impact from the
"old" estimate of 500 zettaJoules to 1500 to 2000 zettaJoules,
or a bit of both.

Or you just order up a fresh long-period comet only 3200
meters across but moving at 72 km/second!


Sterling K. Webb
-
- Original Message - 
From: "Ron Baalke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Meteorite Mailing List" 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 6:13 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] 'Dino Killer' Asteroid Was Half the Size 
Predicted?



http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/04/080410-sea-meteorites.html

"Dino Killer" Asteroid Was Half the Size Predicted?
Ker Than
for National Geographic News
April 10, 2008

The meteorite that wiped out the dinosaurs
might have been less than half the size of what previous models predicted.

That's the finding of a new technique being developed to estimate the
size of ancient impactors that left little or no remaining physical
evidence of themselves after they collided with Earth.

Scientists working on the technique used chemical signatures in seawater
and ocean sediments to study the dino-killing impact that occurred at
the end of the Cretaceous period about 65 million years ago.

They also looked at two impact events at the end of the Eocene epoch,
roughly 33.9 million years ago.

In what could be a major scientific puzzle, the team's new size estimate
for the dino-killing meteorite is a mere 2.5 to 3.7 miles (4 to 6
kilometers) across.

The most recent computer models predicted a size of 9 to 12 miles (15 to
19 kilometers) across.

The team notes that their findings could also mean that the makeup of
the impactor is different from what scientists commonly assume.

"We are hoping this will lead to further work," said study leader
Gregory Ravizza of the University of Hawaii in Honolulu.

Impact Fingerprints

The fiery passage of asteroids and comets through Earth's atmosphere
leaves chemical traces in the land, sea, and air.

The most common types of meteorites to hit Earth are chondrites, stony
objects that originate in the asteroid belt.

Chondrites contain two different versions, or isotopes, of the naturally
occurring element osmium: osmium 187 and osmium 188.

Seawater and sediments also contain the two osmium isotopes, but the
ratio of osmium 187 to osmium 188 is usually much larger in the ocean
than it is in chondrites.

When a small- to medium-size meteorite enters Earth's atmosphere, much
of the object is vaporized and the osmium ratio in seawater around the
world is temporarily decreased.

Over time, this osmium imprint is transferred to sediments at the ocean
bottom, creating a more enduring record of the impact.

The new technique therefore looks for osmium spikes in ocean sediments
and analyzes the isotope ratio. Scientists can then predict when an
impact event occurred and the size of the projectile.

The research is detailed in tomorrow's issue of the journal Science.

Dramatic Upheaval

In addition to the smaller Cretaceous impact, the team estimates that
two known meteorites from the late Eocene were smaller than previously
believed.

Boris Ivanov, an impact modeler at the Russian Academy of Sciences, said
that if the new size estimates prove correct, they would create a
"dramatic controversy" within the impact physics community.

"Most numerical modeling specialists believe the current modeling gives
us fidelity of a factor of a few times the mass of a projectile with
assumed average impact velocity," Ivanov said.

Study co-author Francois Paquay, also at the University of Hawaii, said
that more work needs to be done to confirm the latest estimates.

"We think the discrepancy is important and it will need to be addressed
in future [scientific] meetings," Paquay said.

Jay Melosh, a planetary scientist at Arizona State University who was
not involved in the study, called the new method a "potentially
powerful" technique for filling gaps in the geologic impact record.

"It's a very valuable contribution to the tool kit of ways we have of
estimating the presence of impacts in the geologic record," Melosh said.

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list 

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] The wonderful wizards of Osmium CHICXULUB I

2008-04-10 Thread Sterling K. Webb
Hi, List,

There's a little bit of "straw-manning" going on here
(caution: science journalism at work -- theirs not mine).
They say the accepted size estimate of the Chicxulub
impactor is 15 km to 19 km. That's wrong. The most
commonly accepted estimate is 10 km (although
some favor 12 or 13 km).

Their size estimate is based on the idea that all the
osmium they found was ALL the osmium from the impactor.
I doubt that the transport mechanism from impactor to ocean
muck was 100% efficient.

Two-thirds of the planet is ocean, one third land. If what
what they found in the muck was two-thirds of the osmium?
The impactor would be 5 km across instead of 4.4 km, not an
astounding increase.

All we know from the Chicxulub crater is the kinetic
energy of the impact: not the size, not the speed, but the
product of the two: mass times ( speed squared ). The Bang
at Chicxulub was 100 TeraTons of TNT. (That's 500 Zetta-
Joules, zetta being 10^21), or 100,000,000 MegaTons of TNT!

A 5 km impactor weighs 1/8th of what a 10 km impactor
of the same material would and so it would have to go 2.8
times faster when it hit (2.8 squared = 8). Interestingly,
while we know the energy well, estimates of velocity are
a little shy. Those that offer up big impactors keep the
speed down and those that talk of smaller impactors boost
the speed estimate appropriately.

But if a 5 km stoney impactor did all that damage, we are
talking about velocities in the neighborhood of 35 to 45 km/sec.
A highly eccentric orbit is required to achieve those kinds of
encounter velocities with the Earth.

The most recent theory (I like it) of where the Chicxuluber
came from is the breakup of the parent body of the Baptistina
family of asteroids about 160 million years ago (the biggest
survivor of which is 298 Baptistina).

The high encounter velocity also encourages proponents
of the comet impact theory. True, the press release says:
"chemical traces of the impactors left behind in rocks...
suggest otherwise," but you can forget that. The "traces"
are of a carbonaceous chondrite, a likely composition for
a "comet," which is afterall just an asteroid with extra frosting.



Sterling K. Webb
---
- Original Message - 
From: "Darren Garrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 4:52 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] The wonderful wizards of Osmium


http://space.newscientist.com/article/dn13649-ocean-mud-yields-secrets-of-past-earth-impacts.html

Ocean mud yields secrets of past Earth impacts
20:28 10 April 2008
NewScientist.com news service
David Shiga

Mud at the bottom of the ocean holds precious clues about asteroids that 
struck
Earth in the past, a new study reveals.

Scientists would love to have a better record of asteroid and comet impacts 
to
understand how these catastrophic events have affected life and Earth's 
climate.
But most impactors that made it through the atmosphere either gouged out a
crater that was subsequently erased or splashed into the ocean.
Now, scientists have developed a new tool to uncover these events, based on
concentrations of the metal osmium found in mud at the bottom of the ocean. 
The
technique was developed by François Paquay of the University of Hawaii in
Honolulu, US, and his colleagues.

Osmium atoms come in two varieties, or isotopes, one of which is slightly
heavier than the other. Crucially, the osmium in meteorites is much richer 
in
the lighter form than the stuff native to Earth. As a result, scientists can
determine how much of the otherworldly stuff is present in any given deposit 
of
the metal they find.

Paquay's team has been looking for the metal in samples of ocean sediment
obtained by drilling into the ocean floor. The sediment was laid down in 
layers
over time, allowing scientists to date when they were deposited.

Multiple strikes
In 1995, members of Paquay's team pointed out high levels of the lighter 
osmium
isotope - associated with extraterrestrial material - in ocean sediment laid
down around the time of the impact that killed off the dinosaurs 65 million
years ago.

Since then, they have found another big spike in extraterrestrial osmium 
laid
down at the time of another known impact event that happened 35 million 
years
ago. At that time, multiple impacts shook the Earth in what is known as the 
Late
Eocene impacts.

The team estimates that 80,000 tonnes of osmium from the object that wiped 
out
the dinosaurs was vaporised by the heat of the impact. It then dissolved 
into
seawater and eventually accumulated on the ocean floor. The Late Eocene 
impacts
35 million years ago laid down an estimated 20,000 tonnes.

Smaller impacts
Based on these amounts, the team estimates that the dinosaur-killing object 
was
4.1 to 4.4 kilometres across, while the largest of the Late Eocene impactors
would have been 2.8 to 3 km across.

These are much lower than previous estimates base

[meteorite-list] Meteorite Source for Life's Handeness

2008-04-10 Thread Ron Baalke

http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/News/2008/April/08040801.asp

Meteorite source for life's handedness
Mark Peplow
Chemistry World
08 April 2008

Scientists have long speculated that life's preference for left-handed
amino acids may have been triggered by compounds brought to Earth by
meteorites. Now they've shown exactly how two crucial steps in this
process could happen.

Carbonaceous chondrites, a relatively rare type of meteorite, are rich
in carbon compounds including amino acids. One set of meteorite
fragments, which fell on Murchison in Victoria, Australia, in 1969,
contains more than 70 different amino acids. In 1997, Sandra Pizzarello
of Arizona State University found that there was a small excess of the
left-handed form, or enantiomer, of four amino acids in Murchison samples. 

Since then, scientists have been trying to prove how this handedness, or
chirality, could have been transferred to all the other amino acids and
sugars in biology; and how that small excess could have been amplified
into a total preference for one enantiomer over another.

Ronald Breslow of Columbia University, New York, and colleagues now
claim to have convincing answers to both questions. 'I think we've come
up with a credible story about how it happened,' says Breslow. He
presented his work at the American Chemical Society meeting in New
Orleans, US, on 6 April.

Handy transfer

The team studied how several amino acids - including alpha-methyl
valine, alpha-ethyl alanine and alpha-methyl isoleucine - behaved when
mixed with a primordial brew of other organic compounds and copper
sulfate. The structure of these alpha-substituted amino acids means that
they are unable to racemise, locking in their chirality.

They found that the chiral amino acids reacted with ketoacids to form
imines, which then lose carbon dioxide and fall apart to generate a new
amino acid. Crucially, these new amino acids took on the handedness of
the original chiral amino acids. Breslow says this is the first time
that this kind of chirality transfer has been shown to be possible in
plausible prebiotic conditions.

Copper ions, a common constituent of meteorites, seem to play a critical
role in shepherding the imine intermediate so that it adopts the correct
handedness, says Breslow. And although ketoacids have not been found in
meteorites, hydroxyacids and iron oxides - both present in meteorite
samples - react readily together to form ketoacids, he adds.

Once a slight excess of left-handed enantiomers had been transferred
from meteorites, the chirality imbalance could have been amplified,
Breslow's team then showed. Pairs of left- and right-handed molecules
crystallise together out of solution, leaving behind a solution that
contains more than a 90 per cent excess of the left-handed molecules.

This procedure has also been developed by Donna Blackmond's group
at Imperial College, London [1, 2], and Hiroyuki Koshino at RIKEN's
Discovery Research Institute in Japan [3]. But Breslow points out that
his team have also shown that pouring water through the mixture -
mimicking rain falling into a pool - can enhance the amplification even
further.

Universal origins

The amino acids present in the Murchison samples may have originally
formed from reactions between ketones, ammonia and hydrogen cyanide -
the kinds of simple compound that have already been found in
protoplanetary disks circling young stars.

Scientists have speculated that right-handed forms of amino acids in the
meteorites could then be preferentially destroyed by circularly
polarised light, generated by particles accelerated around neutron stars.

Both processes have previously been replicated in the laboratory,
although astronomers are still looking for more convincing evidence of
this in the heavens.

And some scientists are still not convinced that the Murchison samples
were not contaminated after arriving on Earth. However, Breslow points
out that their amino acids are rich in heavy isotopes of hydrogen,
carbon and oxygen, typical of non-terrestrial material. 'That signature
guarantees you're not talking about an Earth origin for the amino
acids,' Breslow told Chemistry World.

What's more, Pizzarello reported in February that a meteorite recovered
from the pristine conditions of Antarctica also held a similar excess of
left-handed amino acids [4].

Breslow's team is now trying to achieve the same chirality transfer and
amplification effects using the nucleosides that make up RNA - thought
by some scientists to be the first molecule on Earth to carry the
information needed to make life.
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] 'Dino Killer' Asteroid Was Half the Size Predicted?

2008-04-10 Thread Ron Baalke

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/04/080410-sea-meteorites.html  

"Dino Killer" Asteroid Was Half the Size Predicted?
Ker Than
for National Geographic News 
April 10, 2008

The meteorite that wiped out the dinosaurs
might have been less than half the size of what previous models predicted.

That's the finding of a new technique being developed to estimate the
size of ancient impactors that left little or no remaining physical
evidence of themselves after they collided with Earth.

Scientists working on the technique used chemical signatures in seawater
and ocean sediments to study the dino-killing impact that occurred at
the end of the Cretaceous period about 65 million years ago.

They also looked at two impact events at the end of the Eocene epoch,
roughly 33.9 million years ago.

In what could be a major scientific puzzle, the team's new size estimate
for the dino-killing meteorite is a mere 2.5 to 3.7 miles (4 to 6
kilometers) across.

The most recent computer models predicted a size of 9 to 12 miles (15 to
19 kilometers) across.

The team notes that their findings could also mean that the makeup of
the impactor is different from what scientists commonly assume.

"We are hoping this will lead to further work," said study leader
Gregory Ravizza of the University of Hawaii in Honolulu.

Impact Fingerprints

The fiery passage of asteroids and comets through Earth's atmosphere 
leaves chemical traces in the land, sea, and air.

The most common types of meteorites to hit Earth are chondrites, stony
objects that originate in the asteroid belt.

Chondrites contain two different versions, or isotopes, of the naturally
occurring element osmium: osmium 187 and osmium 188.

Seawater and sediments also contain the two osmium isotopes, but the
ratio of osmium 187 to osmium 188 is usually much larger in the ocean
than it is in chondrites.

When a small- to medium-size meteorite enters Earth's atmosphere, much
of the object is vaporized and the osmium ratio in seawater around the
world is temporarily decreased.

Over time, this osmium imprint is transferred to sediments at the ocean
bottom, creating a more enduring record of the impact.

The new technique therefore looks for osmium spikes in ocean sediments
and analyzes the isotope ratio. Scientists can then predict when an
impact event occurred and the size of the projectile.

The research is detailed in tomorrow's issue of the journal Science.

Dramatic Upheaval

In addition to the smaller Cretaceous impact, the team estimates that
two known meteorites from the late Eocene were smaller than previously
believed.

Boris Ivanov, an impact modeler at the Russian Academy of Sciences, said
that if the new size estimates prove correct, they would create a
"dramatic controversy" within the impact physics community.

"Most numerical modeling specialists believe the current modeling gives
us fidelity of a factor of a few times the mass of a projectile with
assumed average impact velocity," Ivanov said.

Study co-author Francois Paquay, also at the University of Hawaii, said
that more work needs to be done to confirm the latest estimates.

"We think the discrepancy is important and it will need to be addressed
in future [scientific] meetings," Paquay said.

Jay Melosh, a planetary scientist at Arizona State University who was
not involved in the study, called the new method a "potentially
powerful" technique for filling gaps in the geologic impact record.

"It's a very valuable contribution to the tool kit of ways we have of
estimating the presence of impacts in the geologic record," Melosh said.

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Mars Exploration Rover Update: March 27 - April 02, 2008

2008-04-10 Thread Ron Baalke

http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/status.html

SPIRIT UPDATE: Spirit Advances Toward Midwinter - sol 1504-1510, 
March 27 - April 02, 2008:

Seasons are about twice as long on Mars as on Earth and are offset
relative to Earth because Mars takes about twice as long to complete one
orbit around the Sun. At Spirit's location, the fall equinox -- the
start of fall, when night and day are equal in length -- arrived Dec.
12, 2007. The winter solstice -- the time of year with the shortest day
-- will arrive June 25, 2008.

Solar array energy has varied from 244 watt-hours to 256 watt-hours,
averaging 250.4 watt-hours for this period (100 watt-hours is the amount
of energy needed to light a 100-watt bulb for one hour). Tau, the
measure of atmospheric dust, has averaged 0.16, varying by only a
hundredth. The dust factor has been nearly constant at 0.35, meaning 35
percent of the sunlight reaching the arrays penetrates the dust layer to
make electricity. A low Tau is good because it means the skies are
fairly clear; a low dust factor is bad because it means the solar arrays
are coated with a fair amount of dust.

Astronomers use the symbol L(s) -- pronounced L-sub-s -- to denote how
far Mars has progressed in its orbit around the Sun. If you imagine
looking down at the solar system, with the Sun in the middle and Mars
orbiting around it, L(s) gives the location of Mars. By definition, L(s)
= 0 degrees when the Sun crosses the Martian equator. This is the first
day of Martian spring, the vernal equinox, when night and day are equal
in length, in the northern hemisphere. It's also the first day of fall,
the autumnal equinox, in the southern hemisphere. At Spirit's location
in Mars' southern hemisphere, the season is currently mid- to late fall,
and L(s) is about 55 degrees, roughly equivalent to Nov. 17 in Earth's
northern hemisphere and May 18 in Earth's southern hemisphere. L(s) will
equal 90 degrees at the time of the winter solstice.

Spirit is healthy and all subsystems are performing as expected.

Sol-by-sol summary:

To conserve energy, mission planners have restricted the number of sols
on which Spirit receives direct-from-Earth instructions via the rover's
high-gain antenna and transmits data to Earth via the Odyssey orbiter.
Spirit continues, on a daily basis, to monitor atmospheric dust levels
with the panoramic camera, check for drift (changes with time) in the
miniature thermal emission spectrometer, and survey the sky and ground
with the instrument. In addition, during the past week, Spirit completed
the following activities:

Sol 1504 (March 27, 2008): Spirit calibrated the miniature thermal
emission spectrometer and acquired a microscopic image of the capture
magnet.

Sol 1505: Upon awakening, Spirit took spot images of the sky for
calibration purposes with the panoramic camera and acquired column 6,
part 1 of the full-color "Bonestell panorama" using all 13 filters of
the panoramic camera. The rover also recharged the battery.

Sol 1506: Spirit acquired column 6, part 2 of the Bonestell panorama and
monitored dust on the panoramic-camera mast assembly. Spirit looked at
the miniature thermal emission spectrometer for calibration purposes,
acquired microscopic images of the solar panel, and acquired images of
the external magnets, which capture magnetic dust particles, using the
panoramic camera.

Sol 1507: Spirit acquired column 6, part 3 of the full-color Bonestell
panorama and recharged the battery.

Sol 1508: Spirit acquired column 7, part 1 of the full-color Bonestell
panorama and relayed data to Odyssey during the orbiter's afternoon pass
overhead.

Sol 1509: Spirit surveyed the sky at high Sun with the panoramic camera
and completed a "runout" of previously loaded activities after not being
able to receive new instructions from Earth. The rover recharged the
battery and relayed data to Odyssey.

Sol 1510: (April 2, 2008): Spirit acquired a 1-by-1-by-3 stack of
microscopic images of a soil target known informally as
"Arthur_C_Hammon" and placed the alpha-particle X-ray spectrometer on
the soil target. Plans for the following morning called for Spirit to
acquire column 7, part 2 of the full-color Bonestell panorama.

Odometry:

As of sol 1509 (April 1, 2008), Spirit's total odometry was 7,528 meters
(almost 4.7 miles).

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] The wonderful wizards of Osmium

2008-04-10 Thread Darren Garrison
http://space.newscientist.com/article/dn13649-ocean-mud-yields-secrets-of-past-earth-impacts.html

Ocean mud yields secrets of past Earth impacts
20:28 10 April 2008 
NewScientist.com news service 
David Shiga 

Mud at the bottom of the ocean holds precious clues about asteroids that struck
Earth in the past, a new study reveals.

Scientists would love to have a better record of asteroid and comet impacts to
understand how these catastrophic events have affected life and Earth's climate.
But most impactors that made it through the atmosphere either gouged out a
crater that was subsequently erased or splashed into the ocean.
Now, scientists have developed a new tool to uncover these events, based on
concentrations of the metal osmium found in mud at the bottom of the ocean. The
technique was developed by François Paquay of the University of Hawaii in
Honolulu, US, and his colleagues.

Osmium atoms come in two varieties, or isotopes, one of which is slightly
heavier than the other. Crucially, the osmium in meteorites is much richer in
the lighter form than the stuff native to Earth. As a result, scientists can
determine how much of the otherworldly stuff is present in any given deposit of
the metal they find.

Paquay's team has been looking for the metal in samples of ocean sediment
obtained by drilling into the ocean floor. The sediment was laid down in layers
over time, allowing scientists to date when they were deposited.

Multiple strikes
In 1995, members of Paquay's team pointed out high levels of the lighter osmium
isotope – associated with extraterrestrial material – in ocean sediment laid
down around the time of the impact that killed off the dinosaurs 65 million
years ago.

Since then, they have found another big spike in extraterrestrial osmium laid
down at the time of another known impact event that happened 35 million years
ago. At that time, multiple impacts shook the Earth in what is known as the Late
Eocene impacts.

The team estimates that 80,000 tonnes of osmium from the object that wiped out
the dinosaurs was vaporised by the heat of the impact. It then dissolved into
seawater and eventually accumulated on the ocean floor. The Late Eocene impacts
35 million years ago laid down an estimated 20,000 tonnes.

Smaller impacts
Based on these amounts, the team estimates that the dinosaur-killing object was
4.1 to 4.4 kilometres across, while the largest of the Late Eocene impactors
would have been 2.8 to 3 km across.

These are much lower than previous estimates based on the size of the craters
associated with these events. These have given impactor size estimates of 15 to
19 km for the one that killed off the dinosaurs, and 8 km for the larger of two
impactors involved in the Late Eocene impacts.

What accounts for the difference? For one thing, the calculations by Paquay's
team assume that 100% of the osmium from the impactors was vaporised and
dissolved into seawater. If a smaller percentage actually ended up on the ocean
floor, then the impactors could have been bigger.

Comet impacts?
But even after taking this into account, Paquay thinks the impactors were
smaller than the crater-based calculations suggest. If the impactors were as
large as these calculations imply, then 90% of the osmium from the impactors is
hiding somewhere other than in ocean sediment. "We think that this is unlikely,
but we can't rule this possibility out without additional work," he says.

Another possibility is that the impacting objects were comets rather than
asteroids, and contained much less osmium to begin with. But chemical traces of
the impactors left behind in rocks and reported in previous studies suggest
otherwise.

Kenneth Farley of Caltech in Pasadena, US, who has studied other traces of
impacts in sediment, but is not a member of Paquay's team, is impressed with the
new method.

"I am hoping that this technique will allow the detection of previously unknown
impacts so we can get a better handle on impact frequency and assess whether –
and how – impacts affect life and climate," he told New Scientist.

Unique signature
Although impacts are also known to contribute unusually large amounts of an
element called iridium to sediment, the iridium concentrations are much harder
to translate into impactor sizes, Farley says.

Unlike osmium, extraterrestrial iridium does not have a unique isotope
signature, so is harder to distinguish from iridium native to Earth.

And while samples show osmium is laid down evenly across the planet, the
distribution of iridium is very patchy, making it hard to draw conclusions
without a large number of samples from different parts of the planet.


__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Cracks

2008-04-10 Thread Michael Murray

Hi List,
I enjoy seeing a whole individual meteorite of course, but when going  
over some stones close up, one of my favorite surface features to see  
are cracks.  One particular favorite aspect of cracks for me is to  
see where molten material has flowed across both sides partially  
filling and adhering them together again.  And then there is the  
different ablation effects that show up inside a crack that you might  
not see anywhere else on the stone.  One example I can think of is   
where some of the material has been excavated and some left in place  
leaving a honeycomb appearance.  I might not understand the dynamics  
involved in the formation of the cracks, but it appears to me in some  
cases that parts of the stone may have warped causing the crack to  
develop.


On some stones where a fragment has split off early on in the passage  
through the atmosphere, I get the sense that the crack was a long  
time in developing (relatively speaking) as I have seen the honeycomb  
appearance on the newly exposed surface which I am assuming could  
have just as likely been made while the crack was developing.
Anyway, I just find the (meteorite) cracks interesting and would  
always be interested in seeing examples if someone has some they  
wouldn't mind sharing.


Mike in CO
micro-hunter of southwest Colorado
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] original Ensisheim

2008-04-10 Thread Pelé Pierre-Marie
Hello Dave,

you're searching for a picture and text from the
Ensisheim woodcut. You can find it in my book which is
considered as the reference for french meteorites.  It
has all falls since Ensisheim up to Alby-sur-Cheran
(the latest fall). Therefore it's the most complete
source of information about french meteorites. I also
added many meteorite falls or unofficial finds (of
meteorites or terrestrial rocks once considered as
meteorites) from 52 BC to today.

The title of my book is "Les Meteorites de France" :
http://meteor-center.com/books/lesmeteoritesdefrance.asp

To order, you can get it from there :
http://www.abebooks.com/servlet/SearchResults?an=pele&tn=meteorite&sortby=2


Best regards,

Pierre-Marie PELE
www.meteor-center.com
www.encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com


  
_ 
Envoyez avec Yahoo! Mail. Une boite mail plus intelligente http://mail.yahoo.fr

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Effect of fall of dollar against Euro/ dirham's

2008-04-10 Thread Sterling K. Webb
Hi, Michael,

Not sure what comments you refer to. I said:

> Things always cost more, as a function of time.

This does not imply the two things you imply
that I implied. (Huh?)

If prices always go up, then you should buy as
soon as possible, before they go up more. And
conversely, if you own something the price of which
will go up, why sell now, when it will be worth more
later?

Changing prices influence but do not determine
what a collector does with his collection. Collecting
is an activity of desire. Collectors buy because they
want the thing sold more than they want the money.
Collectors sell the thing because they want the money
more.

Collectors are not investors. Some may invoke the
rationale and sometimes they may even convince a
spouse, for a while. Collectors are Collectors. Some
buy and sell constantly, because they like the action
(Windy City Steve?). Some juggle, improve, upgrade,
expand. Some just Collect.

So, is this a general offer to the List, to buy whole
collections?


Sterling K. Webb
-
- Original Message - 
From: "Michael L Blood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Sterling K. Webb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Meteorite List" 

Cc: "Rob Matson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 4:13 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Effect of fall of dollar against Euro/ 
dirham's


Sterling,
Your comments imply 2 things:

1) If this is a BAD time to buy meteorites, it would be a GOOD time
For you to sell your collection - even if you had to take wholesale for
It - then just wait and buy a much bigger collection later. Please contact
me off list re selling me your collection.

2) This is a BAD time to buy, because prices will surely go down, the
Meteorite market is simply at a temporary high. HOWEVER, what if
These are the LOWEST prices that will be seen for the indefinite future?
What if these prices are much lower than they will be next year, the
Year after and so on?

Just some interesting questions, but I would like to buy your
Collection if you really trust your comments are solid ones.
Best wishes, Michael

on 4/9/08 1:09 AM, Sterling K. Webb at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Hi, Marketeers!
>
>
> Rob wrote:
>> Wouldn't it be interesting if there was a futures market
>> for meteorites?  That would add some price stability...
>
> Like the futures market equivalents for bundled subprime
> loans, the credit insurers and their "credit default slops"?
> Buy them for pennies on the dollar. They helped a lot (not).
>
>
> Dave wrote:
>> big oil is probably a good business to invest in at the
>> moment..."
>
> When everybody thinks a certain business is a good
> business to be in, the stock price is at a recent peak. You
> never buy a stock at its peak. Stocks never stay at their peaks;
> they fall off. If you wait and wait, maybe you can sell it
> again at the price you paid for it... someday. How can
> you make money that way?
>
> What you want to do is look around for a perfectly good
> business that is, however, NOT a good business to be in
> right this moment. [This is an example, not a recommendation.]
> Most of you know what flash memory is. That's the little card
> that goes in your camera to record the pictures on. It's the
> memory in Mp3 players and iPod Nano's and dozens of other
> devices.
>
> But these items are all consumer goods and folks are not
> buying consumer goods as fast as they used to, so the predictions
> for the growth of flash memory sales for the next year has fallen
> from a nearly 30% increase in sales to only a 7% increase. The
> herds of "stock sheep" have all run away from companies that
> make flash memory chips because they will probably have a
> low-growth year. Not a loss, just less growth.
>
> The largest maker of NAND flash chips in the US, SanDisk,
> had a stock price of nearly $60 last April. This April, a few days
> ago, it slipped down to $19.54 A smart buyer would know that
> after this current upset is over, consumer sales will rebound with
> pent up demand ("I can finally that new Mp3 player!") and SanDisk
> will be selling flash memory as fast as they can make it. I know
> this about smart buyers because, sure enough, SanDisk popped
> back up to nearly $30 in just one day as the smart ones swooped
> in and snapped it up at $20 (and dumped it again at $30). The really
> smart ones will hold it back to $60.
>
> I use this example because I missed it. Drat!
>
>
> Michael wrote:
>> I don't think anything will be available "cheaper" than it was
>> at the height of the market 7 or 8 years ago...
>
> Markets are just accumulated psychology. Things will get
> "worse" through this year. In January 2009, we will have a major
> change in government that will propose a lot of changes they say
> will make things "better." By spring 2009, many of them will
> become law. People will feel hopeful instead discouraged. They
> wi

Re: [meteorite-list] Re-2: Rocks from Space Picture of the Day -April 10, 2008

2008-04-10 Thread Mike Bandli
Good catch, Martin! I never looked at the detail of that pic, but now that I
have, I agree. Bummer! Farmer's specimen card said 'Pictured in Norton's
RFS,' so I assumed the caption was correct in the book. Looks like it is the
book that is incorrect.

Michael Johnson, if you could delete that RFS reference in your RFSPOD April
10, 2008, that would be great.

Thanks!

Mike Bandli
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dark
Matter
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 9:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Re-2: Rocks from Space Picture of the Day
-April 10, 2008

Hi Bernd,

Thanks for corrected correction.

I remember talking to Richard a few years ago about a couple picture /
caption issues in RFS, and I recall him saying something about the
proofs from the publisher do not have the pictures embedded in them so
all he can do is check the text of the pic without knowing for sure
what pic will end up above the caption.

Mislabeled pics, sideways pics and upsidedown pics are not rare in
meteorite pubs. But either way, I think the system is better than
having the captions many pages away and in need of a cross-reference
to a plate and page number just to identify what's in the pic (ala
Nininger).

Cheers,

Martin


On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 4:45 PM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Martin, Mike and all,
>
>  "How do I know this? Because the exact same picture
>  appears on page 188 with the presumed correct caption"
>
>  I concur. Bruderheim is a beautiful chondrite. My partially crusted
>  part slice (6.2 gr) also comes from Mike Farmer and it looks pretty
>  much like Mike B's with those "rusty halos".
>
>  As for the captions in RFS, it depends on the edition we have. The
>  1998 edition still has the wrong cption while everything is properly
>  rendered in the 2001 (hardcover) edition.
>
>  Cheers,
>
>  Bernd
>
>  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  Cc: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>
>  __
>  http://www.meteoritecentral.com
>  Meteorite-list mailing list
>  Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>  http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] How to become rich - FAST!!

2008-04-10 Thread Charles O'Dale
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=558478&in_page_id=1811
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Re-2: Rocks from Space Picture of the Day - April 10, 2008

2008-04-10 Thread Dark Matter
Hi Bernd,

Thanks for corrected correction.

I remember talking to Richard a few years ago about a couple picture /
caption issues in RFS, and I recall him saying something about the
proofs from the publisher do not have the pictures embedded in them so
all he can do is check the text of the pic without knowing for sure
what pic will end up above the caption.

Mislabeled pics, sideways pics and upsidedown pics are not rare in
meteorite pubs. But either way, I think the system is better than
having the captions many pages away and in need of a cross-reference
to a plate and page number just to identify what's in the pic (ala
Nininger).

Cheers,

Martin


On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 4:45 PM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Martin, Mike and all,
>
>  "How do I know this? Because the exact same picture
>  appears on page 188 with the presumed correct caption"
>
>  I concur. Bruderheim is a beautiful chondrite. My partially crusted
>  part slice (6.2 gr) also comes from Mike Farmer and it looks pretty
>  much like Mike B's with those "rusty halos".
>
>  As for the captions in RFS, it depends on the edition we have. The
>  1998 edition still has the wrong cption while everything is properly
>  rendered in the 2001 (hardcover) edition.
>
>  Cheers,
>
>  Bernd
>
>  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  Cc: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>
>  __
>  http://www.meteoritecentral.com
>  Meteorite-list mailing list
>  Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>  http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] April Meteorite-Times now up (Thin section examination!)

2008-04-10 Thread STARSANDSCOPES
Hi Martin,  It is good to hear from  you.  I think I can safely speak for 
every one and say we missed Accretion  Desk!  Let us all know how you are doing 
in Montana.  Any meteorite  hunting grounds!

And list members, check out Martin's April Accretion  Desk.  There has been 
some recent discussion about oriented  meteorites.  How would you like to find 
the one pictured in the  article.  The Miller, Arkansas meteorite.  Great 
story!  

Tom

In a message dated 4/10/2008 10:41:06 A.M. Central Daylight  Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Amazing pictures as usual Tom.  Thanks!

It is an honor to see your work since it seems every month you  go
where no man has gone before. Ever.

Now I assume you didn't  dismantle your son's Play Station 3 just to
get your wave plate? And as I  recall, last time I was at your house,
you had a Wii.  Maybe there's  something good hidden in there to hook
up to a microscope, and I know you  have a screwdriver.

Cheers and thanks again for the amazing  pics.

Martin  




**Planning your summer road trip? Check out AOL Travel Guides.
  (http://travel.aol.com/travel-guide/united-states?ncid=aoltrv000316)
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] price of meteorites

2008-04-10 Thread Laurence Garvie
I was looking through some of Niningers old letters from the 1930s and  
found that he bought the Springwater pallasite for 1US dollar per  
pound of meteorite. Taking into account inflation that amounts to  
about 12US dollars per pound today. Compare this with current prices  
which are running near 11,400US dollars per pound.


Laurence


__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Re-2: Rocks from Space Picture of the Day - April 10, 2008

2008-04-10 Thread bernd . pauli
Hi Martin, Mike and all,

"How do I know this? Because the exact same picture
appears on page 188 with the presumed correct caption"

I concur. Bruderheim is a beautiful chondrite. My partially crusted
part slice (6.2 gr) also comes from Mike Farmer and it looks pretty
much like Mike B's with those "rusty halos".

As for the captions in RFS, it depends on the edition we have. The
1998 edition still has the wrong cption while everything is properly
rendered in the 2001 (hardcover) edition.

Cheers,

Bernd

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] April Meteorite-Times now up (Thin section examination!)

2008-04-10 Thread Dark Matter
Amazing pictures as usual Tom. Thanks!

It is an honor to see your work since it seems every month you go
where no man has gone before. Ever.

Now I assume you didn't dismantle your son's Play Station 3 just to
get your wave plate? And as I recall, last time I was at your house,
you had a Wii.  Maybe there's something good hidden in there to hook
up to a microscope, and I know you have a screwdriver.

Cheers and thanks again for the amazing pics.

Martin



On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 7:49 AM,  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi List,  Each month I put a few images in  an article called Micro Visions.
>  This month I show the use of an  inexpensive wave plate for meteorite thin
>  section examination in cross polarized  light.  I have some very cool shots, 
> but
>  even better I have a series of 6  shots where I show one structure in bright
>  field, standard full cross polarized  light and then in rotation with the use
>  of this wave plate.
>
>  Please check  it out.
>
>  Tom Phillips
>
>  In a message dated 4/8/2008 12:17:09 P.M.  Central Daylight Time,
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>  Greetings  Everyone,
>
>  The April Meteorite-Times is now up.
>  http://www.meteorite-times.com/
>
>  Thank you again to all the  writers!
>
>  Paul and  Jim
>
>  __
>  http://www.meteoritecentral.com
>  Meteorite-list  mailing  list
>  Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>  http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
>
>
>
>  **Planning your summer road trip? Check out AOL Travel Guides.
>   (http://travel.aol.com/travel-guide/united-states?ncid=aoltrv000316)
>  __
>  http://www.meteoritecentral.com
>  Meteorite-list mailing list
>  Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>  http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] What Started It All...?

2008-04-10 Thread Eric Wichman
This is a two fold Statement/Question. It could mean "What started it 
all! referring to my meteorite collection and adventures, or it could 
mean something way more profound than my insignificant little 
explanation... I'll leave it for you to decide.


Some people have asked me what got me into meteorites. I've combined 
some old posts from my old list, and my original post with some updated 
info. Here it is...


What do I love about meteorites? Short quick and dirty answer, EVERYTHING!

The long answer... I love meteorites because of what they are, what they 
mean, and where they come from. I love meteorites because they are part 
of something way bigger than I am but I can hold them in the palm of my 
hand. I love meteorites because they make me wonder more about the 
origins of EVERYTHING!


My Meteorite Obsession: It all started way back in August of 2007 
when my girlfriend bought me my first meteorite. From there I started my 
first meteorite site MeteoriteWatch.com to showcase my meteorite and new 
found hobby. UPDATE: Since then, the site has evolved into something 
much more than a personal site about meteorites. My newfound hobby 
turned into and addiction and the addiction turned into a full blown 
obsession!


I found myself asking the same old questions with new insight. How long 
did it take our planet to form? Where did all the material come from? 
What makes a planet form in the first place? Is our planet actually 
growing? What's at the core of our planet? How long does the Earth have 
left in it's planetary life cycle?


This is why I love meteorites, because they can answer all these 
questions and more. They may even be able to tell us how life got here 
and ultimately where we come from! The possibility is there.


That is amazing!

I think that is why most people become researchers, scientists, 
physicists, cosmologists, and all the other related fields have one 
thing in common. They look for answers to the bigger question. Where are 
we from, and why are we here?


Too deep? Maybe, but hey you asked for it... ;)

Here are a few excerpts from an article I wrote for my meteorite dealer 
site.


The Popularity Of Meteorites: Meteorites are ever increasing in 
popularity. Over the last few years more and more people are realizing 
the potential of meteorites. Intrinsically speaking meteorites are one 
of the very few things on this planet that ALL people can relate to. I 
don't know anyone that isn't fascinated by a meteorite once they hold 
one in their hand. There's something about meteorites that just make you 
"want" to hold it, and it give you some sense of knowledge.


Read my article simply titled "11 Reasons Everyone Should Own A 
Meteorite." http://www.meteoritewatch.com/mw/node/20


Meteorites As Art: Many people view meteorites with an artistic 
eye. Meteorites are beautiful pieces of art from space and some sell for 
massive amounts of money. As meteorites grow in popularity so will this 
area of the industry. Bonhams' New York natural history auctions off 
some meteorites for as much as $105,000.00. This is a huge amount of 
money for a rock from space.


The Demand For Meteorites Is High: As the popularity of 
meteorites grows, so too does the price. The are only so many meteorites 
on the planet, as more and more people buy meteorites, the supply will 
dwindle, demand will grow and the price for your average iron, or 
pallasite, will rise substantially. These treasured rocks from space are 
highly sought after by collectors and dealers alike and the price is 
only going to rise as more and more people buy them up. Take a look at 
the latest fall in Carancas, Peru. This chondrite is extremely valuable. 
Meteorite hunters and dealers traveled from all over the world to pick 
up pieces of this meteorite before it was all grabbed up. Now these 
specimens go for as much as $100 per gram or more. There are very few 
pieces of this meteorite available on the market right now.


On a lighter note I like meteorites because they are a way for me to do 
what I like to do, travel, search, find, treasure hunt, adventure, and 
learning. I sell meteorites so I can collect, to finance my adventure, 
travels and equipment. Adventure unfortunately costs money, and 
meteorites afford me that fun!


Hope this answers all your questions... ;)

So, I answered! What do meteorites mean to you?

Post Your Answers Here: http://www.meteoritewatch.com/mw/node/21

Regards,
Eric
MW

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Rocks from Space Picture of the Day - April 10, 2008

2008-04-10 Thread Dark Matter
Hi Mike and all.

Wonderful piece of Bruderheim.  One of my favorites. Here's a pic of
my specimen if interested:

http://www.meteorite-times.com/Back_Links/2007/February/bruderheim1.jpg

However, upon further study of both your slice and that in Norton's
RFS book, to me, the pic in the book looks more like Millbillillie
then Bruderheim. The matrix of the picture you cited looks like it's
filled with plagioclase needles and crystals characteristic of a
glomeroporphyritic texture rather than that of an L6 chondrite. Also,
Millbillillie is known for an extremely thin overall crust while
Bruderheim often has a thick crust.

And of course most readers have likely noticed that the picture of
Bruderheim on page 189 looked a little too rich in chondrules. This
is, of course, because that picture is not Bruderhiem at all but
likely Moorabie, an L3 from Australia. How do I know this? Because the
exact same picture appears on page 188 with the presumed correct
caption.

My suggestion is to scale a frontal shot of your piece and try to
match the exact corner to one on the RFS pictured face. My eyeballed
attempt could not find a match.

Other thoughts?

Best,

Martin







On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 4:19 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.rocksfromspace.org/April_10_2008.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> **Planning your summer road trip? Check out AOL Travel Guides.
>  (http://travel.aol.com/travel-guide/united-states?ncid=aoltrv000316)
> __
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] European/US market comparison

2008-04-10 Thread Mark Ford
Hi Graham,

The Meteorite day will take place on Sunday, October 12th at the Cambridge 
Institute of Astronomy, Maddingly Road, Cambridge (uk), there will be a 
combination of short talks/lectures and stalls etc.

Best Regards,
Mark F.

-Original Message-
From: ensoramanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 10 April 2008 10:36
To: Mark Ford
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] European/US market comparison

Hi Mark,

So where is the meteorite festival this year?  Any details yet?

Graham Ensor, Nr Barwell

Mark Ford wrote:

>Well put ... And ... don't forget in the UK we have The British and Irish 
>Meteorite Society too, with well over a hundred members (both collectors and 
>researchers). Additionally our members are always putting on exhibitions, as 
>well as donating rocks to planetariums and museums. Many members give lectures 
>and talks all the time. We also are holding a meteorite festival later in the 
>year.
>
>Best
>Mark Ford
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Altmann
>Sent: 09 April 2008 16:54
>To: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] European/US market comparison
>
>Hi E.P.
>
>In Europe is going on more than you would expect!
>It only isn't noticed that much here on the US-list.
>
>I can speak only for Germany and there happened a lot in the very recent
>times, bringing meteorites to a broader attention.
>
>List member Dieter Heinlein designed and equipped a meteorite exhibition
>with accompanying booklet, which is on tour through museums and larger
>planetaria (planetariums?).
>
>Stephan Decker, dealer and collector, made last year also an exhibition.
>
>Famous meteorite hunter Haberer is travelling around with power point and
>slide shows about meteorites and his expeditions in Oman.
>
>Currently there is a special exhibition at the Planetarium/Observatory
>Berlin.
>
>Last year there was a larger thematic exhibition, 3d-show ect about Planet
>Mars at the planetarium/observatory Laupheim, also exhibiting Mars
>Meteorites.
>
>The meteorite section in the Nat.Hist.Museum of Berlin was restored and
>newly arranged.
>
>The Senckenberg-Museum in Frankfurt inherited the collections of the IMP
>Mainz/Heidelberg and will install a permanent meteorite exhibition.
>(Anyone involved here? When will it be ready?).
>
>We have the specialized meteorite fair in Gifhorn each year,
>
>and Ensisheim is only within a stone's throw from the boarder.
>
>The Munich show, as the largest fair in Europe is a meeting point for
>meteorites too.
>
>Last year at the Dortmund mineral show the principal topic was meteorites.
>
>With the Ries Crater Museum we have a museum, specialized in meteorites and
>craters only.
>
>The mighty curators and classifcators give talks and popular lectures about
>meteorites at popular observatories.
>
>Two new meteorite books were published,
>one a cool anthology of texts from all millennia and cultures related to
>meteorites - edited by list member Matthias Baermann.
>Second is a collection of various texts illuminating meteorites from
>different angles to come to a more philosophical and cultural view.
>
>A public internet forum was installed, and is still growing.
>
>The iron now found in Antarctica was introduced with a press conference,
>it was in all news, on tv, on radio, in the newspaper.
>Soon it will be on display in a museum in Munich here, accompanied by
>lectured, where the scientists will report about their experiences on the
>Antarctic hunt.
>
>In a few weeks, a course of popular lectures will be held by several
>meteoriticists in the Ries Crater, also with excursion to the crater
>formations.
>
>And a lot of museums, popular observatories and planetaria do have
>meteorites on display.
>
>A few years ago, the fall of Neuschwanstein was huge event, occupying the
>media for many months - and also later, when the additional pieces were
>found (and recently, when the lawsuit about the 3rd stone took place).
>Villalbeto was reported in media too, Carancas of course.
>Whenever a promising fireball as now over Switzerland and South-West Germany
>appears, Thomas Grau is making wind in regional newspaper to get as much
>eye-witnesses as possible.
>And finally almost no week, where there isn't any documentation in TV about
>meteorites, comets, impacts.
>
>In Austria list member Herbert Raab and the Austrian crew made an exhibition
>last year, and at present list member Klaus Tschernschitz is planning one.
>
>  
>
>>>My guess would be museum sales of inexpensive slices
>>>  
>>>
>
>But happened already, is happening all the time.
>Many gift shops of natural history museums or technical museums are offering
>here small Canyons, 869ers, Campos, as well as some planetarium shops,
>science centers and smaller and larger observatories too.
>
>But one special German problem we have, that most of those places with the
>highest visitor numbers don't run their shops by their own,
>but lease the

[meteorite-list] AD - Ebay Auctions ending

2008-04-10 Thread Jim Strope

Good Morning All

I have auctions ending tonight, ebay ID catchafallingstar.com.  ALL started
just at 99  Cents!!!

http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZcatchafallingstar.com

Of Special Note is Campo and NWA 869 Coins/Medals LOW #4

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=200213381523

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=200213382691

Thanks for looking 

Jim Strope
421 Fourth Street
Glen Dale, WV  26038

http://www.catchafallingstar.com


__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Rocks from Space Picture of the Day - April 10, 2008

2008-04-10 Thread SPACEROCKSINC
http://www.rocksfromspace.org/April_10_2008.html








**Planning your summer road trip? Check out AOL Travel Guides.
  (http://travel.aol.com/travel-guide/united-states?ncid=aoltrv000316)
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] NEW ZEALAND ROCK SHOW THIS WEEKEND

2008-04-10 Thread dean bessey
I am not sure if there are any New Zealand list
members becides me and Joel but if there is anybody in
Auckland this weekend there will be a rock and mineral
show in Auckland's North Shore (Senior citizens center
in Milford - across the parking lot facing the main
entrance to Milford Mall). Email me if you need more
details.
I will be having some meteorites for sale including
the ones in these two ebay auctions 180219010423 and
180219010434 (Email me also if you want a deal on
these two). 
Cheers
DEAN
http://www.meteoriteshop.com

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Effect of fall of dollar against Euro/ dirham's

2008-04-10 Thread Michael L Blood
Sterling,
Your comments imply 2 things:

1) If this is a BAD time to buy meteorites, it would be a GOOD time
For you to sell your collection - even if you had to take wholesale for
It - then just wait and buy a much bigger collection later. Please contact
me off list re selling me your collection.

2) This is a BAD time to buy, because prices will surely go down, the
Meteorite market is simply at a temporary high. HOWEVER, what if
These are the LOWEST prices that will be seen for the indefinite future?
What if these prices are much lower than they will be next year, the
Year after and so on?

Just some interesting questions, but I would like to buy your
Collection if you really trust your comments are solid ones.
Best wishes, Michael

on 4/9/08 1:09 AM, Sterling K. Webb at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Hi, Marketeers!
> 
> 
> Rob wrote:
>> Wouldn't it be interesting if there was a futures market
>> for meteorites?  That would add some price stability...
> 
> Like the futures market equivalents for bundled subprime
> loans, the credit insurers and their "credit default slops"?
> Buy them for pennies on the dollar. They helped a lot (not).
> 
> 
> Dave wrote:
>> big oil is probably a good business to invest in at the
>> moment..."
> 
> When everybody thinks a certain business is a good
> business to be in, the stock price is at a recent peak. You
> never buy a stock at its peak. Stocks never stay at their peaks;
> they fall off. If you wait and wait, maybe you can sell it
> again at the price you paid for it... someday. How can
> you make money that way?
> 
> What you want to do is look around for a perfectly good
> business that is, however, NOT a good business to be in
> right this moment. [This is an example, not a recommendation.]
> Most of you know what flash memory is. That's the little card
> that goes in your camera to record the pictures on. It's the
> memory in Mp3 players and iPod Nano's and dozens of other
> devices.
> 
> But these items are all consumer goods and folks are not
> buying consumer goods as fast as they used to, so the predictions
> for the growth of flash memory sales for the next year has fallen
> from a nearly 30% increase in sales to only a 7% increase. The
> herds of "stock sheep" have all run away from companies that
> make flash memory chips because they will probably have a
> low-growth year. Not a loss, just less growth.
> 
> The largest maker of NAND flash chips in the US, SanDisk,
> had a stock price of nearly $60 last April. This April, a few days
> ago, it slipped down to $19.54 A smart buyer would know that
> after this current upset is over, consumer sales will rebound with
> pent up demand ("I can finally that new Mp3 player!") and SanDisk
> will be selling flash memory as fast as they can make it. I know
> this about smart buyers because, sure enough, SanDisk popped
> back up to nearly $30 in just one day as the smart ones swooped
> in and snapped it up at $20 (and dumped it again at $30). The really
> smart ones will hold it back to $60.
> 
> I use this example because I missed it. Drat!
> 
> 
> Michael wrote:
>> I don't think anything will be available "cheaper" than it was
>> at the height of the market 7 or 8 years ago...
> 
> Markets are just accumulated psychology. Things will get
> "worse" through this year. In January 2009, we will have a major
> change in government that will propose a lot of changes they say
> will make things "better." By spring 2009, many of them will
> become law. People will feel hopeful instead discouraged. They
> will feel "better," and guess what? Things will get "better."
> Accumulated psychology. Sympathetic magic.
> 
> Everything will be "worth" more, says the science of economics,
> because they cost more. How do we know things will cost more?
> Things always cost more, as a function of time. Just dig up anybody
> over the age of 70 (with a working brain) and ask them what they
> once paid for a loaf of bread? A gallon of milk? Gasoline? A new car?
> (Answers to quiz: 11 cents, 50 cents, 19.9 cents, $1700.)
> 
> The milk costs more because the cow costs more, the corn costs
> more, the gasoline to haul it costs more, and so forth. That, say the
> economists, is because they're "worth" more, whatever that means.
> Have you noticed any major improvements in cows? Corn? Gasoline?
> Me neither, but they're "worth" more now than they used to be. I'll
> bet those cows feel proud...
> 
> As Rob pointed out, gasoline is "worth" just what it was in the
> 1970's. It only costs more because the dollar is worth less.
> 
> As for what the dollar is "worth," Americans love to blame the
> behavior of their government's debt policy. Government debt is just
> an investment: bonds are sold, interest is paid on them. Buyers of
> debt do not think the dollar is worthless; afterall, they are going to
> be paid that interest in the debtor nation's currency, and be repaid in
> them too.

Re: [meteorite-list] original Ensisheim

2008-04-10 Thread Philippe Thomas
Hi Dave,

I suppose that you speak about the broadsheet of Sebastian Brant.
This broadsheet was reproduced in numerous publications. The oldest book which 
we have in our library with the reproduction of the broadsheet dates 1915. 
Often we see only the woodcut illustrating the event and often in black and 
white.
The original is in library of the university of Basel and will be again 
reproduced in our next book to seem in some months treating in detail all the 
French falls since Ensisheim up to Lançon. 
Here, you can see the woodcut in color: 
http://www.meteoritica.com/ensisheim_sale.html

Best wishes,
Philippe & Léa
METEORITICA
http://www.meteoritica.com/


Hi
I was wondering where the orginal woodcut of the Ensi fall was actually 
reproduced? Was it a publication?
Any knowledge on the original source?!

thanks

dave
IMCA #0092
Sec.BIMS
www.bimsociety.org 
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] European/US market comparison

2008-04-10 Thread Mark Ford
Well put ... And ... don't forget in the UK we have The British and Irish 
Meteorite Society too, with well over a hundred members (both collectors and 
researchers). Additionally our members are always putting on exhibitions, as 
well as donating rocks to planetariums and museums. Many members give lectures 
and talks all the time. We also are holding a meteorite festival later in the 
year.

Best
Mark Ford



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Altmann
Sent: 09 April 2008 16:54
To: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] European/US market comparison

Hi E.P.

In Europe is going on more than you would expect!
It only isn't noticed that much here on the US-list.

I can speak only for Germany and there happened a lot in the very recent
times, bringing meteorites to a broader attention.

List member Dieter Heinlein designed and equipped a meteorite exhibition
with accompanying booklet, which is on tour through museums and larger
planetaria (planetariums?).

Stephan Decker, dealer and collector, made last year also an exhibition.

Famous meteorite hunter Haberer is travelling around with power point and
slide shows about meteorites and his expeditions in Oman.

Currently there is a special exhibition at the Planetarium/Observatory
Berlin.

Last year there was a larger thematic exhibition, 3d-show ect about Planet
Mars at the planetarium/observatory Laupheim, also exhibiting Mars
Meteorites.

The meteorite section in the Nat.Hist.Museum of Berlin was restored and
newly arranged.

The Senckenberg-Museum in Frankfurt inherited the collections of the IMP
Mainz/Heidelberg and will install a permanent meteorite exhibition.
(Anyone involved here? When will it be ready?).

We have the specialized meteorite fair in Gifhorn each year,

and Ensisheim is only within a stone's throw from the boarder.

The Munich show, as the largest fair in Europe is a meeting point for
meteorites too.

Last year at the Dortmund mineral show the principal topic was meteorites.

With the Ries Crater Museum we have a museum, specialized in meteorites and
craters only.

The mighty curators and classifcators give talks and popular lectures about
meteorites at popular observatories.

Two new meteorite books were published,
one a cool anthology of texts from all millennia and cultures related to
meteorites - edited by list member Matthias Baermann.
Second is a collection of various texts illuminating meteorites from
different angles to come to a more philosophical and cultural view.

A public internet forum was installed, and is still growing.

The iron now found in Antarctica was introduced with a press conference,
it was in all news, on tv, on radio, in the newspaper.
Soon it will be on display in a museum in Munich here, accompanied by
lectured, where the scientists will report about their experiences on the
Antarctic hunt.

In a few weeks, a course of popular lectures will be held by several
meteoriticists in the Ries Crater, also with excursion to the crater
formations.

And a lot of museums, popular observatories and planetaria do have
meteorites on display.

A few years ago, the fall of Neuschwanstein was huge event, occupying the
media for many months - and also later, when the additional pieces were
found (and recently, when the lawsuit about the 3rd stone took place).
Villalbeto was reported in media too, Carancas of course.
Whenever a promising fireball as now over Switzerland and South-West Germany
appears, Thomas Grau is making wind in regional newspaper to get as much
eye-witnesses as possible.
And finally almost no week, where there isn't any documentation in TV about
meteorites, comets, impacts.

In Austria list member Herbert Raab and the Austrian crew made an exhibition
last year, and at present list member Klaus Tschernschitz is planning one.

>>My guess would be museum sales of inexpensive slices

But happened already, is happening all the time.
Many gift shops of natural history museums or technical museums are offering
here small Canyons, 869ers, Campos, as well as some planetarium shops,
science centers and smaller and larger observatories too.

But one special German problem we have, that most of those places with the
highest visitor numbers don't run their shops by their own,
but lease them to extern firms - often firms which run shops in several
museums. (they aren't so clever here like in other countries, where the
shops and an own marketing bring good money for the museums).
And the people in these firms have a background as accountants and as
booksellers. - But you can't run a store of a Nat.Hist.Museum like a store
of an arts museum. - They have indeed no clues about scientific stuff, the
assortments in such shops are uniform - and it costs a lot of stamina to
convince them to try some meteorites. (If they finally take them, they see
that they are working well and selling).
Not so regional and smaller museums, astronomy clubs ec

[meteorite-list] original Ensisheim

2008-04-10 Thread Dave Harris

Hi
I was wondering where the orginal woodcut of the Ensi fall was actually 
reproduced? Was it a publication?

Any knowledge on the original source?!

thanks

dave
IMCA #0092
Sec.BIMS
www.bimsociety.org 


__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Science tattoos

2008-04-10 Thread Mark Crawford

ROFLMAO :)

Martin Altmann wrote:

And I need some galaxies on my belly,

Then I can demonstrate the expanding universe.

  


--
Mark's Meteorite Pages: http://meteorites.cc

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list