Re: [meteorite-list] Chelyabinsk Meteorite Sheds Light on Dinosaur Extinction Mystery

2014-07-16 Thread Galactic Stone & Ironworks via Meteorite-list
Hi Vishnu and Larry,

This is why I love the Meteorite List so much.  Ask a layman question,
and get scientists who will gladly answer that question.  :)

Thanks to both of you for taking the time to answer my query and
improve my understanding.

So, we still do not know the composition of the KT impactor.  Does
anyone else find it surprising that there are no extant remnants of
this impactor?  Or, is the fossil meteorite found by Frank Kyte
considered to be such a remnant?  Granted, the impact happened a very
long time ago, but would not an impact of that scale leave behind
something that would still remain today?

Best regards,

MikeG
-- 
-
Web - http://www.galactic-stone.com
Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone
Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone
Pinterest - http://pinterest.com/galacticstone
-


On 7/16/14, Vishnu Reddy  wrote:
> Hi Mike
>
> The original link between Baptistina Family and the K/T impactor was
> proposed based on the composition of the "fossil" meteorite that was
> discovered in the K/T layer by Frank Kyte at UCLA.
> Here is a quote from his 1998 paper.
>
> "The fossil meteorite from DSDP Hole 576 appears to be from (1) a chondritic
> meteorite with (2) significant amounts of metal and sulphide (4-8%), (3)
> large inclusions [larger than 200 um] of mafic minerals that also contained
> metal, and (4) 30-60% fine-grained matrix. The known meteorite groups that
> best fit these criteria could be the CV, CO, and CR carbonaceous
> chondrites."
>
> Bottke et al. proposed the link between K/T impactor and Baptistina family
> based on dynamical evidence and also the colors (very rudimentary analog for
> composition). Baptistina asteroid family seems to have lower albedo and
> weaker absorption bands similar to what one would expect for a carbonaceous
> asteroid.
>
> We looked at several members of Baptistina asteroid family and got their
> near-IR spectra to constrain their surface composition.  What we noted was
> that Baptistina family asteroid spectra looked very similar to the
> background Flora family but were subdued by some unknown darkening material.
> The mineralogy of Baptistina suggested that they were similar to LL
> chondrites just like the Floras. We also looked for OH/H2O absorption bands
> in Baptistina asteroid family and found none. Our rationale there was if
> some of them were mixtures of LL chondrite material and carbonaceous then
> they could show such a feature. We see these OH/H2O bands in some of the
> carbonaceous meteorites under the right laboratory conditions on Earth. We
> found no such evidence and so ruled out the possibility of the darkening
> agent being a carbonaceous impactor like we see on Vesta. There is no
> evidence from LL chondrites for widespread carbonaceous xenoliths like we
> see in howardites. So there is also not much support from the meteoritical
> side. Shock darkening and impact melt that we see on Chelyabinsk seems to be
> the most logical way to explain the spectral properties observed on
> Baptistina family.
>
> The take away message would be that if BAF is the source of the K/T impactor
> then K/T impactor is not carbonaceous contrary to what Kyte reports. A more
> logical conclusion would be that Baptistina Asteroid Family had nothing to
> do with the K/T impactor in the first place and the compositional link
> between the K/T impactor and BAF asteroids is not valid in light of what we
> see in Chelyabinsk. So the original hypothesis that K/T impactor might be
> carbonaceous remains.
>
> I hope that clears the air.
>
> Regards
> Vishnu Reddy
>
>
>
> On Jul 16, 2014, at 3:23 PM, Galactic Stone & Ironworks via Meteorite-list
>  wrote:
>
>> This is an interesting theory.  But, how does Chelyabinsk completely
>> rule out a carbonaceous KT impactor?  Until we recover an extant
>> sample of the KT impactor, the question is still unanswered.  Yes,
>> there are dark meteorites that are not carbon-rich.  But how does this
>> fact rule out a carbonaceous (or any) impactor for the KT impact?  Am
>> I missing something?
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> MikeG
>>
>> --
>> -
>> Web - http://www.galactic-stone.com
>> Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone
>> Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone
>> Pinterest - http://pinterest.com/galacticstone
>> -
>>
>>
>> On 7/16/14, Ron Baalke via Meteorite-list
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> NEWS RELEASE FROM THE PLANETARY SCIENCE INSTITUTE
>>>
>>> FROM:
>>> Alan Fischer
>>> Public Information Officer
>>> Planetary Science Institute
>>> 520-382-0411
>>> 520-622-6300
>>> fisc...@psi.edu
>>>
>>> Russian Meteorite Sheds Light on Dinosaur Extinction Mystery
>>>
>>> July 16, 2014, Tucson, Ariz. -- A long-standing debate about the source
>>> of
>>> the asteroid that im

Re: [meteorite-list] Chelyabinsk Meteorite Sheds Light on Dinosaur Extinction Mystery

2014-07-16 Thread Vishnu Reddy via Meteorite-list
Hi Mike

The original link between Baptistina Family and the K/T impactor was proposed 
based on the composition of the "fossil" meteorite that was discovered in the 
K/T layer by Frank Kyte at UCLA. 
Here is a quote from his 1998 paper. 

"The fossil meteorite from DSDP Hole 576 appears to be from (1) a chondritic 
meteorite with (2) significant amounts of metal and sulphide (4-8%), (3) large 
inclusions [larger than 200 um] of mafic minerals that also contained metal, 
and (4) 30-60% fine-grained matrix. The known meteorite groups that best fit 
these criteria could be the CV, CO, and CR carbonaceous chondrites."

Bottke et al. proposed the link between K/T impactor and Baptistina family 
based on dynamical evidence and also the colors (very rudimentary analog for 
composition). Baptistina asteroid family seems to have lower albedo and weaker 
absorption bands similar to what one would expect for a carbonaceous asteroid. 

We looked at several members of Baptistina asteroid family and got their 
near-IR spectra to constrain their surface composition.  What we noted was that 
Baptistina family asteroid spectra looked very similar to the background Flora 
family but were subdued by some unknown darkening material. The mineralogy of 
Baptistina suggested that they were similar to LL chondrites just like the 
Floras. We also looked for OH/H2O absorption bands in Baptistina asteroid 
family and found none. Our rationale there was if some of them were mixtures of 
LL chondrite material and carbonaceous then they could show such a feature. We 
see these OH/H2O bands in some of the carbonaceous meteorites under the right 
laboratory conditions on Earth. We found no such evidence and so ruled out the 
possibility of the darkening agent being a carbonaceous impactor like we see on 
Vesta. There is no evidence from LL chondrites for widespread carbonaceous 
xenoliths like we see in howardites. So there is also not much suppo
 rt from the meteoritical side. Shock darkening and impact melt that we see on 
Chelyabinsk seems to be the most logical way to explain the spectral properties 
observed on Baptistina family. 

The take away message would be that if BAF is the source of the K/T impactor 
then K/T impactor is not carbonaceous contrary to what Kyte reports. A more 
logical conclusion would be that Baptistina Asteroid Family had nothing to do 
with the K/T impactor in the first place and the compositional link between the 
K/T impactor and BAF asteroids is not valid in light of what we see in 
Chelyabinsk. So the original hypothesis that K/T impactor might be carbonaceous 
remains. 

I hope that clears the air. 

Regards
Vishnu Reddy



On Jul 16, 2014, at 3:23 PM, Galactic Stone & Ironworks via Meteorite-list 
 wrote:

> This is an interesting theory.  But, how does Chelyabinsk completely
> rule out a carbonaceous KT impactor?  Until we recover an extant
> sample of the KT impactor, the question is still unanswered.  Yes,
> there are dark meteorites that are not carbon-rich.  But how does this
> fact rule out a carbonaceous (or any) impactor for the KT impact?  Am
> I missing something?
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> MikeG
> 
> -- 
> -
> Web - http://www.galactic-stone.com
> Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone
> Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone
> Pinterest - http://pinterest.com/galacticstone
> -
> 
> 
> On 7/16/14, Ron Baalke via Meteorite-list
>  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> NEWS RELEASE FROM THE PLANETARY SCIENCE INSTITUTE
>> 
>> FROM:
>> Alan Fischer
>> Public Information Officer
>> Planetary Science Institute
>> 520-382-0411
>> 520-622-6300
>> fisc...@psi.edu
>> 
>> Russian Meteorite Sheds Light on Dinosaur Extinction Mystery
>> 
>> July 16, 2014, Tucson, Ariz. -- A long-standing debate about the source of
>> the asteroid that impacted the Earth and caused the extinction of the
>> dinosaurs has been put to rest thanks to the Chelyabinsk meteorite that
>> disintegrated over Russia in February 2013, a new paper published in the
>> journal Icarus shows.
>> 
>> Astronomers have debated whether the dinosaur killer was linked to the
>> breakup of a large asteroid forming the Baptistina Asteroid Family (BAF)
>> beyond Mars, some of which ended up on Earth-crossing orbits. The asteroid
>> impacting Earth is thought to have been dark and carbonaceous. The BAF
>> hypothesis was bolstered by them being dark and with a spectral shape
>> similar to carbonaceous meteorites.
>> 
>> Analysis of the Chelyabinsk meteorite shows that shock produced during
>> catastrophic disruption of a large asteroid can darken otherwise bright
>> silicate material. Shock darkening was first reported by Dan Britt (now at
>> the University of Central Florida) in the early 1990s. The Chelyabinsk
>> meteorite has both bright unshocked and dark shocked material. However, the
>> details of the spectra of the dark Chelyabinsk

Re: [meteorite-list] Chelyabinsk Meteorite Sheds Light on Dinosaur Extinction Mystery

2014-07-16 Thread Larry Lebofsky via Meteorite-list
Hi Mike:

That is not what the press release says.

It is still thought that the KT impactor was carbonaceous. There was also
thought, based on being dark and formation age of the BAF (when the parent
body was disrupted), that the BAF was the source of the KT impactor.
However, there is a better spectral match between the Baptistina Asteroid
Family members and the shocked-darkened material seen in the Chelyabinsk
meteorites than there is between these members and carbonaceous
meteorites. This implies that the BAF members are shock-darkened and not
carbonaceous.

Larry

> This is an interesting theory.  But, how does Chelyabinsk completely
> rule out a carbonaceous KT impactor?  Until we recover an extant
> sample of the KT impactor, the question is still unanswered.  Yes,
> there are dark meteorites that are not carbon-rich.  But how does this
> fact rule out a carbonaceous (or any) impactor for the KT impact?  Am
> I missing something?
>
> Best regards,
>
> MikeG
>
> --
> -
> Web - http://www.galactic-stone.com
> Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone
> Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone
> Pinterest - http://pinterest.com/galacticstone
> -
>
>
> On 7/16/14, Ron Baalke via Meteorite-list
>  wrote:
>>
>>
>> NEWS RELEASE FROM THE PLANETARY SCIENCE INSTITUTE
>>
>> FROM:
>> Alan Fischer
>> Public Information Officer
>> Planetary Science Institute
>> 520-382-0411
>> 520-622-6300
>> fisc...@psi.edu
>>
>> Russian Meteorite Sheds Light on Dinosaur Extinction Mystery
>>
>> July 16, 2014, Tucson, Ariz. -- A long-standing debate about the source
>> of
>> the asteroid that impacted the Earth and caused the extinction of the
>> dinosaurs has been put to rest thanks to the Chelyabinsk meteorite that
>> disintegrated over Russia in February 2013, a new paper published in the
>> journal Icarus shows.
>>
>> Astronomers have debated whether the dinosaur killer was linked to the
>> breakup of a large asteroid forming the Baptistina Asteroid Family (BAF)
>> beyond Mars, some of which ended up on Earth-crossing orbits. The
>> asteroid
>> impacting Earth is thought to have been dark and carbonaceous. The BAF
>> hypothesis was bolstered by them being dark and with a spectral shape
>> similar to carbonaceous meteorites.
>>
>> Analysis of the Chelyabinsk meteorite shows that shock produced during
>> catastrophic disruption of a large asteroid can darken otherwise bright
>> silicate material. Shock darkening was first reported by Dan Britt (now
>> at
>> the University of Central Florida) in the early 1990s. The Chelyabinsk
>> meteorite has both bright unshocked and dark shocked material. However,
>> the
>> details of the spectra of the dark Chelyabinsk material closely
>> reproduces
>> spectral signatures seen with members of the Baptistina Asteroid Family,
>> said Planetary Science Institute Research Scientist Vishnu Reddy, lead
>> author of  "Chelyabinsk meteorite explains unusual spectral properties
>> of
>> Baptistina Asteroid Family that appears in Icarus.
>>
>> "Shock and impact melt can make bright asteroids dark, Reddy said. "In
>> other words, not all dark asteroids are rich in carbon as once thought."
>> The latest measurements rule out the possibility for the Baptistina
>> family
>> being the source of the K/T impactor, he added.
>>
>> 'The link between the K/T impacator, thought to be carbonaceous, and
>> BAF,
>> has been proved invalid," Reddy said.
>>
>> Chelyabinsk provided a great opportunity to see the mixture of shocked
>> and
>> unshocked material in a single meteorite, Reddy said while cautioning
>> that
>> no clear evidence exists that the Russian meteorite itself came from the
>> Baptistina family.
>>
>> "The new finding has implications for hazards from Near-Earth Objects
>> and
>> for mining asteroids for space-based resources," Reddy said. "A
>> potential
>> target identified as primitive and rich in volatiles/organics and carbon
>> based on its spectral colors could in fact be just shocked material with
>> entirely different composition."
>>
>> PSI researchers David P. O'Brien and Lucille Le Corre were among the
>> co-authors on the paper.
>>
>> This research work was supported by grants from NASA's Planetary Mission
>> Data Analysis Program, NEOO Program and Planetary Geology and Geophysics
>> Program.
>>
>>
>> CONTACT:
>> Vishnu Reddy
>> Senior Scientist
>> 808-342-8932
>> re...@psi.edu
>>
>> PSI INFORMATION:
>> Mark V. Sykes
>> Director
>> 520-622-6300
>> sy...@psi.edu
>>
>>
>> __
>>
>> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>> http://three.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>
> __
>
> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Met

Re: [meteorite-list] Chelyabinsk Meteorite Sheds Light on Dinosaur Extinction Mystery

2014-07-16 Thread Galactic Stone & Ironworks via Meteorite-list
This is an interesting theory.  But, how does Chelyabinsk completely
rule out a carbonaceous KT impactor?  Until we recover an extant
sample of the KT impactor, the question is still unanswered.  Yes,
there are dark meteorites that are not carbon-rich.  But how does this
fact rule out a carbonaceous (or any) impactor for the KT impact?  Am
I missing something?

Best regards,

MikeG

-- 
-
Web - http://www.galactic-stone.com
Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/galacticstone
Twitter - http://twitter.com/galacticstone
Pinterest - http://pinterest.com/galacticstone
-


On 7/16/14, Ron Baalke via Meteorite-list
 wrote:
>
>
> NEWS RELEASE FROM THE PLANETARY SCIENCE INSTITUTE
>
> FROM:
> Alan Fischer
> Public Information Officer
> Planetary Science Institute
> 520-382-0411
> 520-622-6300
> fisc...@psi.edu
>
> Russian Meteorite Sheds Light on Dinosaur Extinction Mystery
>
> July 16, 2014, Tucson, Ariz. -- A long-standing debate about the source of
> the asteroid that impacted the Earth and caused the extinction of the
> dinosaurs has been put to rest thanks to the Chelyabinsk meteorite that
> disintegrated over Russia in February 2013, a new paper published in the
> journal Icarus shows.
>
> Astronomers have debated whether the dinosaur killer was linked to the
> breakup of a large asteroid forming the Baptistina Asteroid Family (BAF)
> beyond Mars, some of which ended up on Earth-crossing orbits. The asteroid
> impacting Earth is thought to have been dark and carbonaceous. The BAF
> hypothesis was bolstered by them being dark and with a spectral shape
> similar to carbonaceous meteorites.
>
> Analysis of the Chelyabinsk meteorite shows that shock produced during
> catastrophic disruption of a large asteroid can darken otherwise bright
> silicate material. Shock darkening was first reported by Dan Britt (now at
> the University of Central Florida) in the early 1990s. The Chelyabinsk
> meteorite has both bright unshocked and dark shocked material. However, the
> details of the spectra of the dark Chelyabinsk material closely reproduces
> spectral signatures seen with members of the Baptistina Asteroid Family,
> said Planetary Science Institute Research Scientist Vishnu Reddy, lead
> author of  "Chelyabinsk meteorite explains unusual spectral properties of
> Baptistina Asteroid Family that appears in Icarus.
>
> "Shock and impact melt can make bright asteroids dark, Reddy said. "In
> other words, not all dark asteroids are rich in carbon as once thought."
> The latest measurements rule out the possibility for the Baptistina family
> being the source of the K/T impactor, he added.
>
> 'The link between the K/T impacator, thought to be carbonaceous, and BAF,
> has been proved invalid," Reddy said.
>
> Chelyabinsk provided a great opportunity to see the mixture of shocked and
> unshocked material in a single meteorite, Reddy said while cautioning that
> no clear evidence exists that the Russian meteorite itself came from the
> Baptistina family.
>
> "The new finding has implications for hazards from Near-Earth Objects and
> for mining asteroids for space-based resources," Reddy said. "A potential
> target identified as primitive and rich in volatiles/organics and carbon
> based on its spectral colors could in fact be just shocked material with
> entirely different composition."
>
> PSI researchers David P. O'Brien and Lucille Le Corre were among the
> co-authors on the paper.
>
> This research work was supported by grants from NASA's Planetary Mission
> Data Analysis Program, NEOO Program and Planetary Geology and Geophysics
> Program.
>
>
> CONTACT:
> Vishnu Reddy
> Senior Scientist
> 808-342-8932
> re...@psi.edu
>
> PSI INFORMATION:
> Mark V. Sykes
> Director
> 520-622-6300
> sy...@psi.edu
>
>
> __
>
> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> http://three.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://three.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] MRO HiRISE Images: July 16, 2014

2014-07-16 Thread Ron Baalke via Meteorite-list


MARS RECONNAISSANCE ORBITER HIRISE IMAGES
July 16, 2014

o Ridges in Eridania Basin
  http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/ESP_036654_1490

  Eridania Basin has mounting geomorphic and spectral evidence that it may have 
  been the site of an ancient inland sea.

o The Icy Surface of the North Polar Cap
  http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/ESP_036867_2655

  At Mars' North Pole is a dome of icy layers ranging up to 2 kilometers thick, 
  roughly analogous to the Earth's ice caps in Greenland or Antarctica.

o Ancient Lake Sediments in a Crater
  http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/ESP_037122_2165

  Our observation shows layered deposits, some with polygonal patterns, as 
might 
  be expected from lake sediments.

All of the HiRISE images are archived here:

http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/

Information about the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter is 
online at http://www.nasa.gov/mro. The mission is 
managed by NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, a division 
of the California Institute of Technology, for the NASA 
Science Mission Directorate, Washington, D.C. Lockheed 
Martin Space Systems, of Denver, is the prime contractor 
and built the spacecraft. HiRISE is operated by the 
University of Arizona. Ball Aerospace and Technologies 
Corp., of Boulder, Colo., built the HiRISE instrument.

__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://three.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Chelyabinsk Meteorite Sheds Light on Dinosaur Extinction Mystery

2014-07-16 Thread Ron Baalke via Meteorite-list


NEWS RELEASE FROM THE PLANETARY SCIENCE INSTITUTE

FROM:
Alan Fischer
Public Information Officer
Planetary Science Institute
520-382-0411
520-622-6300
fisc...@psi.edu

Russian Meteorite Sheds Light on Dinosaur Extinction Mystery

July 16, 2014, Tucson, Ariz. -- A long-standing debate about the source of
the asteroid that impacted the Earth and caused the extinction of the
dinosaurs has been put to rest thanks to the Chelyabinsk meteorite that
disintegrated over Russia in February 2013, a new paper published in the
journal Icarus shows.

Astronomers have debated whether the dinosaur killer was linked to the
breakup of a large asteroid forming the Baptistina Asteroid Family (BAF)
beyond Mars, some of which ended up on Earth-crossing orbits. The asteroid
impacting Earth is thought to have been dark and carbonaceous. The BAF
hypothesis was bolstered by them being dark and with a spectral shape
similar to carbonaceous meteorites.

Analysis of the Chelyabinsk meteorite shows that shock produced during
catastrophic disruption of a large asteroid can darken otherwise bright
silicate material. Shock darkening was first reported by Dan Britt (now at
the University of Central Florida) in the early 1990s. The Chelyabinsk
meteorite has both bright unshocked and dark shocked material. However, the
details of the spectra of the dark Chelyabinsk material closely reproduces
spectral signatures seen with members of the Baptistina Asteroid Family,
said Planetary Science Institute Research Scientist Vishnu Reddy, lead
author of  "Chelyabinsk meteorite explains unusual spectral properties of
Baptistina Asteroid Family that appears in Icarus.

"Shock and impact melt can make bright asteroids dark, Reddy said. "In
other words, not all dark asteroids are rich in carbon as once thought."
The latest measurements rule out the possibility for the Baptistina family
being the source of the K/T impactor, he added.

'The link between the K/T impacator, thought to be carbonaceous, and BAF,
has been proved invalid," Reddy said.

Chelyabinsk provided a great opportunity to see the mixture of shocked and
unshocked material in a single meteorite, Reddy said while cautioning that
no clear evidence exists that the Russian meteorite itself came from the
Baptistina family.

"The new finding has implications for hazards from Near-Earth Objects and
for mining asteroids for space-based resources," Reddy said. "A potential
target identified as primitive and rich in volatiles/organics and carbon
based on its spectral colors could in fact be just shocked material with
entirely different composition."

PSI researchers David P. O'Brien and Lucille Le Corre were among the
co-authors on the paper.

This research work was supported by grants from NASA's Planetary Mission
Data Analysis Program, NEOO Program and Planetary Geology and Geophysics
Program.


CONTACT:
Vishnu Reddy
Senior Scientist
808-342-8932
re...@psi.edu

PSI INFORMATION:
Mark V. Sykes
Director
520-622-6300
sy...@psi.edu


__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://three.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Curiosity Rover's Images Show Laser Flash on Martian Rock

2014-07-16 Thread Ron Baalke via Meteorite-list

http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?release=2014-232  

NASA Rover's Images Show Laser Flash on Martian Rock
Jet Propulsion Laboratory
July 16, 2014

Flashes appear on a baseball-size Martian rock in a series of images
taken Saturday, July 12 by the Mars Hand Lens Imager (MAHLI) camera on
the arm of NASA's Curiosity Mars Rover. The flashes occurred while the
rover's Chemistry and Camera (ChemCam) instrument fired multiple laser
shots to investigate the rock's composition.

The images, strung together as a video, are available online at:

http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/video/?id=1317

ChemCam's laser has zapped more than 600 rock and soil targets on Mars
since Curiosity landed in the planet's Gale Crater in August 2012.

"This is so exciting! The ChemCam laser has fired more than 150,000
times on Mars, but this is the first time we see the plasma plume that
is created," said ChemCam Deputy Principal Investigator Sylvestre
Maurice, at the Research Institute in Astrophysics and Planetology, of
France's National Center for Scientific Research and the University of
Toulouse, France. "Each time the laser hits a target, the plasma light
is caught and analyzed by ChemCam's spectrometers. What the new images
add is confirmation that the size and shape of the spark are what we
anticipated under Martian conditions."

Preliminary analysis of the ChemCam spectra from this target rock,
appropriately named "Nova," indicates a composition rich in silicon,
aluminum and sodium, beneath a dust layer poor in those elements. This
is typical of rocks that Curiosity is encountering on its way toward
Mount Sharp.

MAHLI Deputy Principal Investigator Aileen Yingst of the Planetary
Science Institute, Tucson, Arizona, said, "One of the reasons we took
these images is that they allow the ChemCam folks to compare the plume
to those they imaged on Earth. Also, MAHLI has captured images of other
activities of Curiosity, for documentation purposes, and this was an
opportunity to document the laser in action."

Malin Space Science Systems, San Diego, developed, built and operates
MAHLI. The U.S. Department of Energy's Los Alamos National Laboratory,
in Los Alamos, New Mexico, developed ChemCam in partnership with
scientists and engineers funded by the French national space agency
(CNES), the University of Toulouse and France's National Center for
Scientific Research.

NASA's Mars Science Laboratory Project is using Curiosity to assess
ancient habitable environments and major changes in Martian
environmental conditions. NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, a division
of the California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, built the rover and
manages the project for NASA's Science Mission Directorate in Washington.

For more information about Curiosity, visit these sites:
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/msl , http://www.nasa.gov/msl and
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/

You can follow the mission on Facebook at:
http://www.facebook.com/marscuriosity and on Twitter at:
http://www.twitter.com/marscuriosity

Guy Webster
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.
818-354-6278
guy.webs...@jpl.nasa.gov

2014-232

__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://three.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] New Horizons Marks a 'Year Out' with a Successful Course Correction

2014-07-16 Thread Ron Baalke via Meteorite-list

http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/news_center/news/20140715.php

New Horizons Marks a 'Year Out' with a Successful Course Correction
July 15, 2014

New Horizons performed a slight course correction yesterday, a short
maneuver designed to correct the spacecraft's arrival time - a year from
now - at the precisely intended aim point at Pluto.

The maneuver - during which New Horizons fired its thrusters for just
under 88 seconds - sped the craft up by about 2.4 miles per hour and
keeps it on track for a flight past Pluto that culminates /next/ July
14. "If we hadn't performed this maneuver, we would have arrived at
Pluto about 36 minutes later than we wanted to," said Mark Holdridge,
New Horizons encounter mission manager at the Johns Hopkins Applied
Physics Laboratory (APL) in Laurel, Md. "Making the adjustment now means
we won't have to perform a bigger maneuver - and use more of the
spacecraft's fuel - down the road."

While the maneuver itself happened onboard the spacecraft at 10:45 p.m.
EDT on July 14, data indicating that the burn went as planned arrived in
the New Horizons Mission Operations Center at APL at 4:30 a.m. EDT on
July 15 - after traveling nearly four hours from the spacecraft, which
is nearly 2.7 billion miles from home, through NASA's Deep Space Network.

"It was a great burn, performed flawlessly" said Alan Stern, New
Horizons principal investigator from Southwest Research Institute,
Boulder, Colo. "You could say that New Horizons just lit a little candle
for its one year out anniversary."

It was the spacecraft's sixth course correction maneuver since launch in
January 2006, and the first since 2010. New Horizons mission design team
lead Yanping Guo, from APL, noted that the maneuver marked the first
change in the Pluto encounter trajectory since 2008, now that the team
has better information on the predicted locations of Pluto and its
largest moon, Charon. "That information is critical to making sure the
sequence of science observations, which will be programmed into New
Horizons' computers, goes exactly as planned," Guo said.

Holdridge added that New Horizons will take images of the Pluto system
as it approaches Pluto, beginning early next year, and navigation and
flight dynamics experts will them to design additional maneuvers to
further refine the spacecraft's course.

Did you know?

The first commands to perform the thruster burn were transmitted to the
spacecraft on July 11, and adjusted slightly on July 14. The
87.52-second burn, which sped New Horizons up by 1.08 meters per second
(about 2.4 miles per hour), used about a quarter of a kilogram of fuel ?
less than one-half of a percent of the approximately 53 kilograms still
onboard the spacecraft.

__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://three.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Comet Shoemake-Levy 9 20th Anniversary

2014-07-16 Thread Ron Baalke via Meteorite-list


Twenty years ago today, the first fragment of Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 (SL9) 
impacted
Jupiter.  The remaining 20 fragments of the comet proceeded to hit Jupiter over
the following  6 days. I had created a Comet SL9 website in June 1994, and 
ended up posting
over 1,000 impact images to the site. Back then, websites were relatively 
unknown and
somewhat of a novelty.  The Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 impacts became the first big 
Web event, and was key in raising the awareness of websites to the mainstream 
public, which we now take for granted today.

My Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 website is still around. 

http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/sl9

Ron Baalke
__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://three.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] New crater in Siberia?

2014-07-16 Thread Michael Mulgrew via Meteorite-list
I recognize that regional/localized warming could account for it, but
that's not what they wrote.  They should have phrased their hypothesis
better.

Michael in so. Cal.

On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Yinan Wang  wrote:
> Don't dismiss something just because it uses the phrase "Global
> Warming." In this case all it takes is regional warming in the arctic
> circle to release methane previously frozen in the permafrost, which
> can ignite underground and explode.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Michael Mulgrew via Meteorite-list
>  wrote:
>> Their "most plausible theory" involves global warming?  Global warming
>> isn't even a plausible theory any more, ask a climatologist.
>>
>> This article acknowleges that it is not a meteorite crater, which is
>> apparent from the pictures:
>> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/travel_news/article-2693105/Giant-hole-appears-Siberia-Huge-crater-emerges-end-world.html
>>
>> "A spokesman for the ministry's Yamal branch has ruled out a
>> meteorite, but says it is too early to say what caused the hole.
>>
>> 'We can definitely say that it is not a meteorite,' he says."
>>
>> Michael in so. Cal.
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Michael Farmer via Meteorite-list
>>  wrote:
>>> This is not a meteorite crater, unless you think meteorites drill holes 
>>> hundreds of feet deep.
>>>
>>> Michael Farmer
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>
 On Jul 16, 2014, at 9:01 AM, Chauncey Walden via Meteorite-list 
  wrote:

 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newsvideo/10970468/Mysterious-giant-hole-appears-in-Siberia.html
 Chauncey
 __

 Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://three.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>>> __
>>>
>>> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
>>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>>> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>>> http://three.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>> __
>>
>> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>> http://three.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://three.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] New crater in Siberia?

2014-07-16 Thread Yinan Wang via Meteorite-list
Don't dismiss something just because it uses the phrase "Global
Warming." In this case all it takes is regional warming in the arctic
circle to release methane previously frozen in the permafrost, which
can ignite underground and explode.



On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Michael Mulgrew via Meteorite-list
 wrote:
> Their "most plausible theory" involves global warming?  Global warming
> isn't even a plausible theory any more, ask a climatologist.
>
> This article acknowleges that it is not a meteorite crater, which is
> apparent from the pictures:
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/travel_news/article-2693105/Giant-hole-appears-Siberia-Huge-crater-emerges-end-world.html
>
> "A spokesman for the ministry's Yamal branch has ruled out a
> meteorite, but says it is too early to say what caused the hole.
>
> 'We can definitely say that it is not a meteorite,' he says."
>
> Michael in so. Cal.
>
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Michael Farmer via Meteorite-list
>  wrote:
>> This is not a meteorite crater, unless you think meteorites drill holes 
>> hundreds of feet deep.
>>
>> Michael Farmer
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>>> On Jul 16, 2014, at 9:01 AM, Chauncey Walden via Meteorite-list 
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newsvideo/10970468/Mysterious-giant-hole-appears-in-Siberia.html
>>> Chauncey
>>> __
>>>
>>> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
>>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>>> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>>> http://three.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>> __
>>
>> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>> http://three.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> __
>
> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> http://three.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://three.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] New crater in Siberia?

2014-07-16 Thread Michael Mulgrew via Meteorite-list
Their "most plausible theory" involves global warming?  Global warming
isn't even a plausible theory any more, ask a climatologist.

This article acknowleges that it is not a meteorite crater, which is
apparent from the pictures:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/travel_news/article-2693105/Giant-hole-appears-Siberia-Huge-crater-emerges-end-world.html

"A spokesman for the ministry's Yamal branch has ruled out a
meteorite, but says it is too early to say what caused the hole.

'We can definitely say that it is not a meteorite,' he says."

Michael in so. Cal.

On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Michael Farmer via Meteorite-list
 wrote:
> This is not a meteorite crater, unless you think meteorites drill holes 
> hundreds of feet deep.
>
> Michael Farmer
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On Jul 16, 2014, at 9:01 AM, Chauncey Walden via Meteorite-list 
>>  wrote:
>>
>> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newsvideo/10970468/Mysterious-giant-hole-appears-in-Siberia.html
>> Chauncey
>> __
>>
>> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
>> Meteorite-list mailing list
>> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>> http://three.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
> __
>
> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> http://three.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://three.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] New crater in Siberia?

2014-07-16 Thread Yinan Wang via Meteorite-list
Looks like the result of a methane-trap explosion!

On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Chauncey Walden via Meteorite-list
 wrote:
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newsvideo/10970468/Mysterious-giant-hole-appears-in-Siberia.html
> Chauncey
> __
>
> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> http://three.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://three.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] New crater in Siberia?

2014-07-16 Thread Michael Farmer via Meteorite-list
This is not a meteorite crater, unless you think meteorites drill holes 
hundreds of feet deep.

Michael Farmer

Sent from my iPad

> On Jul 16, 2014, at 9:01 AM, Chauncey Walden via Meteorite-list 
>  wrote:
> 
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newsvideo/10970468/Mysterious-giant-hole-appears-in-Siberia.html
> Chauncey
> __
> 
> Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> http://three.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://three.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] New crater in Siberia?

2014-07-16 Thread Chauncey Walden via Meteorite-list

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newsvideo/10970468/Mysterious-giant-hole-appears-in-Siberia.html
Chauncey
__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://three.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day

2014-07-16 Thread Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list
Today's Meteorite Picture of the Day: Ybbsitz

Contributed by: Paul Swartz

http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpodmain.asp
__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://three.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list