Re: [meteorite-list] Confirmed September 2012 BLM Regulations.
Good info Count thanks Bryan Couch Wildomar Ca Dare to fail On Feb 6, 2013, at 9:47 PM, Count Deiro countde...@earthlink.net wrote: Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 10:48:27 -0800 (GMT-08:00) Subject: Fw: Meteorite Instructional Memo Hi All, In the process of planning new collecting trips in Arizona, Utah and Nevada, I confirmed with BLM the latest regulations concerning the collection of meteorites on Federal Land. (Private property and State owned land are subject to different law and regulations.). The attached message has a link to the current, nationally implimented, Federal regulations sent to me by Dan Erbes, Nevada Lands Manager, Carson City, Nevada - BLM. Metal detectors and magnets are an allowable device for aid in the casual collecting of meteorites. A limit of ten pounds PER PERSON annually. I was told that if you find a thirty pound individual, or individuals, just make sure you have three people involved. Permits are available for scientific collection and commercial activities. Amendments have already been discussed, but not approved, to take care of the obvious unworkability of some aspects of the commercial permit regs, especailly the fee based on the estimated value of the land to be hunted. http://www.blm.gov/wo/st/en/info/regulations/Instruction_Memos_and_Bulletins/national_instruction/2012/IM_2012-182.html Good hunting, Count Deiro IMCA 3536 __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] BLM and Meteorite Recovery Policy
Nick I'm with you, I think if we can get the FACTS out together we can make a change. All the finger pointing is pointless to point of making things worse. Wow a lot of points there. Most all activity is in some way regulated on fed land and we were lucky enough to skirt regulation so long so I agree we need to try to mold the new regulations to work for us. So what ever you need count me in. In the mean time you can find me out there just rock hounding. Bryan Couch Wildomar Ca Dare to fail On Dec 2, 2012, at 4:21 PM, Nicholas Gessler, Ph.D. nick.gess...@duke.edu wrote: I think if we work together we can make some changes: I just wrote to the editor of MAPS suggesting that it was time for a rejoinder to Schmitt's article. I also suggested that I will put my 18 students on the task of data-mining the Meteoritical Data Base for information on who found what, who analyzed what, what institutions received what, etc., to get some quantitative information on the contribution of all of us to advancing the science of meteoritics. Having a background in Anthropology, I think I can prepare a more realistic view of what is going on than Schmitt. Also, having practiced archaeology professionally, I think I may be in a good position to argue that meteorites have no relation to Antiquities or even fossils. I think we need to pull together as much validly collected information on the recovery and trade in meteorites, not only by hunters, but by institutions, both historically and at present. I think the drafters of the BLM legislation do not see the realities of the public's interest in meteorites and their contribution to the community at large. A well-written questionnaire sent out to all interested parties might also serve us well. But let's spend the time to design one well before we circulate it. We also need not just to express our opposition to their legislation, but to propose something to replace it with. I am willing to pull together as much information as I can, in collaboration and with the help of others on this list, and also begin to consult (in a less biased manner than Schmitt) with professionals, amateurs and dealers. I have to teach and deal with other matters, so I cannot digest all your postings at one sitting. I will, with some encouragement, try to pull much of this together and post it on the Web. I will start to do some work on this beginning in January and perhaps by the time many of us get together in Tucson, we can sit together and do some planning. Later we can take our work to the MAPS to see if they concur. Nick __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] AD: Wanted - Alamo Breccia
Craig Send me your address and I will send you a nice chunk. You will have to cut and polish it yourself. Glad to help. Bryan Couch Wildomar Ca Dare to fail On Oct 17, 2012, at 6:15 AM, Craig Moody meteoritesno...@hotmail.ca wrote: Hello List: I am looking for a nice small piece of Alamo Breccia at a reasonable price. If you are willing to trade, I have some nice Black Onaping and Wanapitei Breccia samples. Thanks, Craig __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] Met Bulletin Update - 17 Desert Meteorites
Great job John way to go. Bryan Couch Wildomar Ca Dare to fail On Oct 12, 2012, at 11:57 PM, Robert Verish bolidecha...@yahoo.com wrote: Congratulations goes out to Met-Listee John Harrison and his hunting partner, Nola Lightheart, for getting their meteorites into the MetBull. Johns first find in the Met Bulletin was Yelland 001. http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?code=54765 Bob V. --- On Fri, 10/12/12, Galactic Stone Ironworks meteoritem...@gmail.com wrote: From: Galactic Stone Ironworks meteoritem...@gmail.com Subject: [meteorite-list] Met Bulletin Update - 17 Desert Meteorites To: Meteorite List meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Date: Friday, October 12, 2012, 3:55 PM Greetings again Bulletin Watchers, I jumped the gun with the previous post, and there were 17 more approvals today. All are desert meteorites and they are all OC's. One is a melt-rock. Link - http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?sea=sfor=namesants=falls=valids=stype=containslrec=50map=gebrowse=country=Allsrt=namecateg=Allmblist=Allrect=phot=snew=1pnt=Normal%20tabledr=page=0 Best regards, MikeG -- __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] New BLM regs: Tempest in a teacup?
Pat you asked, Pat Are finds made before the 'new' rule exempt of the selling/bartering requirement? From what I read on the blm sites in the past and told by one blm officer that was in effect before this memo was sent. It just that the rules were so vague that almost all the offices had their own rules this new one spells it out clear which is in some ways good but they keep tightening the noose. Bryan Couch Wildomar Ca Dare to fail On Sep 30, 2012, at 8:48 PM, Pat Brown scientificlifest...@hotmail.com wrote: Hi Norm and the List, Norm, I agree with you that for those of us who are not interested in selling the meteorites that we find on BLM land the 'new' rules are not a problem. In fact the new rules explicitly grant ownership (with some limits about selling or bartering) of the first 9.999 pounds of meteorites to the finder. The general rule stating that 'the meteorite belongs to the land owner' could easily be interpreted as all meteorites found on all federal lands belong to the US government. This 'new' rule says that with some limitations the meteorite belongs to the finder. For the professional hunters who want to profit from their finds, there is a clear route to be able to be able to do so. I hate bigger government and more rules in general. However, if I were to sell, I would want to know that I could do so without a governmental claim of ownership. Yes, there is some paperwork and delay. Just my 2 cents worth. Best Regards, Pat Are finds made before the 'new' rule exempt of the selling/bartering requirement? Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 20:17:21 -0700 From: nlehr...@nvbell.net To: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Subject: [meteorite-list] New BLM regs: Tempest in a teacup? All, I have been following this thread with great confusion, and maybe there IS something I don't understand. Meteorite collecting has previously fallen under the general rules of rockhounding, and the new changes merely formalize a specific policy that is no great change from the past rules. I am quite sure I will be hugey chastised for my ignorance. Please correct me if I missed something. The previous rules said 25 pounds and/or one rock. Now it's 10 pounds and no provision for the big one with respect to meteorites. How often will that actually afect us? Almost never. The use of motorized vehicles off marked roads is also a general policy, not just for us. Metal detectors are explicitly allowed. Surely a magnet on a stick is also still fine. Commercial exploitation of BLM ground is subject to a long standing guideline. Find a monster? It is only fair that the land-owner (all Americans) should get some benefit. This is no change. If you want to harvest building stones or ornamental boulders, you pay a fee. We will too. No real change. I see no great disaster here. Just a formalization of a specific policy, thanks (?) to our own loud self-promotion in its various forms. Of course they had to get explicit. It is not much more than a clear, specific, restatement of the rules we were all subject to before now. Or did no one understand this? Yes, they may choose to make their point by prosecuting someone, but I will be amazed if this involves changes in the law. Just enforcement of those already extant. At worst with fairly minor changes. Have at it. I am waiting to be reprimanded for my folly. What am I missing? Best, Norm (www.tektitesource.com) __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] New BLM Rules
Michael, I totally agree I think that this whole thing is blown out of proportion, the way I see it is the rules are almost the same the blm has previously stated that selling or bartering of meteorites on blm land is not permitted. I do feel for those that make a living at this due to the crazy permit requirements. But for me it makes it clear that I can hunt and keep what I find. As for the ten pound limit I think it would be unlikely that someone could meet the ten pound limit in a year so to me that's no big deal. And I too have a use permit for ivanpah dry lake and yes it only gives me the right to drive to the staging area and the use of the lake but nowhere states anything about the use of magnets or metel detectors ?? Also I don't think the blm has ever had or for sure now have the man power to police. I have spent more days then I wish to count over the last 30 years or more using blm land and can count on one hand the amount of times I've even seen a ranger in the field. This changes nothing for me I will still hunt and spend my time on public land as I like as it is still public. Don't get me wrong there are bad policy and that this is. Bryan Couch Wildomar Ca Dare to fail On Sep 26, 2012, at 9:50 AM, Michael Mulgrew mikest...@gmail.com wrote: Adam, you wrote: ...You can no longer use four-wheelers, off-road vehicles or bicycles to aid in your search because they are motorized or mechanical. I believe you are misinterpreting the following statement from the BLM's memo: Only surface collection of meteorites using non-motorized and non-mechanical equipment is allowed (metal detectors may be used); This statement refers to the actual act of collecting the meteorite, not how you arrived at the location. Extrapolating your line of thinking we could not use an automobile to get to the hunt location either, nor would you be able to wear glasses or use a radio or gps. The intent of this statement is to keep people from using backhoes, bulldozers, and steam shovels to dig up public lands; this advisory memo does not supersede other approved land uses for the area you are it. If it is legal to ride an ATV or a bicycle where you are hunting for meteorites then using your ATV or bicycle in your hunt is ok, too. I seriously doubt anyone could call a magnet on a stick mechanical and have it hold any water (although protestors can no longer have sticks to hold their signs up because the sticks are considered weapons...). So far the BLM staff I have spoken with think this memo is much ado about nothing, and I hope that perception sticks until our community can work with the BLM to produce a policy that is fair to everyone involved. -Michael in so. Cal. On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Adam Hupe raremeteori...@yahoo.com wrote: I think you have to turn over the entire meteorite if it weighs more than 10 pounds or leave it where it sits to the benefit of no one. You can no longer use four-wheelers, off-road vehicles or bicycles to aid in your search because they are motorized or mechanical. A magnet on a stick could also be considered mechanical and this was mentioned to me by a BLM agent before these new rules were even in place besides it would not be a casual search if you are using tools. Giving it to a friend to sell will only result in getting him/her in trouble. The barter clause covers this. Just like taxes, all of the loop-holes or breaks have nearly been closed. I noticed that dealers are becoming smart and new eBay listing of U.S. meteorites possibly found on federal land has dropped off considerable including Franconia, Gold Basin, Sacramento Wash and some Nevada dry lake finds. I have a feeling there will be some busts soon. It will be interesting to see what happens in Tucson at the show. I think the best advice is to stay away from the media on U.S. finds and lay low. We do not need any more attention at this critical juncture were are entire hobby is at stake! It may be too late. Happy Hunting, Adam From: Shawn Alan photoph...@yahoo.com To: h...@meteorhall.com h...@meteorhall.com Cc: Meteorite Central meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 7:16 AM Subject: [meteorite-list] New BLM Rules Hello Listers I know this topic has been reworked and then some but this is what I think. I am not a hunter yet :) ( Being in NYC isnt the best place to hunt on land) but from what I gather is this from the BLM law for the casual collector that finds and meteorite Casual Collection: Meteorites may be casually collected (i.e., free and without a permit), pursuant to BLM’s regulations at 43 CFR 8365.1-5. In accordance with those regulations: * Collection of meteorites is limited to certain public lands
Re: [meteorite-list] Some thoughts on find coords
Hi Marc and list, I think your right with the Radar pin pointing the field of fall I think there is no need to hold back cords of finds. We all know that they are there and for the most part we all know that if you find one the finder will search the whole surrounding area so what's the point. And Marc great work on your radar data you for sure have a new customer. Bryan Couch Wildomar Ca Dare to fail On Sep 7, 2012, at 8:12 AM, Marc Fries chief_scient...@galacticanalytics.com wrote: Greetings all I've been talking with a few people about logging the Battle Mountain meteorites, and I'd like to start some discussion on the topic of find coordinates. This is NOT directed at any one person, but I would like to editorialize a bit. I'm getting a lot of push-back about printing find coordinates and I'd like to open the topic to general discussion. Historically, the locations of found meteorites have been a closely guarded secret. That made a lot of sense when meteorite hunting relied most heavily on eyewitness reports. A hunter could easily put in many, many miles of walking before coming across a meteorite. For finds that are made with weather radar, however, I don't think its the same situation. When I post radar analyses, it is like posting a treasure map that says, Go Here. At that point everyone knows where the meteorites are, and it seems to me that the locations of individual stones aren't nearly as important as they were in the past. (Strewn fields without detailed radar data are another matter, of course.) Where those locations do matter are to A) the science behind describing the meteorite fall, and B) the value of the individual meteorite since a well-documented meteorite should be worth more than a random stone from a given fall. I am a scientist, and my first instinct is to collect, analyze, and -share- data. I understand where that is at odds with the level of secrecy needed in the past, but I think that that level of secrecy is no longer needed and actually works contrary to the value of meteorites, both monetary and scientific. On the Galactic Analytics website, I'm willing to go against my better instincts and hide find locations, at least until a scientific paper is released describing the fall. But to be honest, I think that's a little silly - I'll basically have a table showing meteorites with the find locations redacted, and then you can scroll down the page a bit and see a map showing where the meteorites are. So let me throw this out there as a general question - is it really important to hide the find locations? Cheers, Marc Fries __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] Some thoughts on find coords
Well said Michael Bryan Couch Wildomar Ca Dare to fail On Sep 7, 2012, at 9:35 AM, michael cottingham mikew...@gilanet.com wrote: You already have professional riff raffs that cause trouble ... does not seem to matter. The goal is to get the meteorites out of the field as soon as possible, get them to science, get them to collectors, get them preserved. I say publish all available information as soon as possible ... anything that can aid in the recovery of the meteorites now, instead of later. Michael Cottingham On Sep 7, 2012, at 10:30 AM, dorifry wrote: Keeping it secret would weed out the unprofessional riff raffs that could potentially cause problems for everybody. Phil Whitmer Joshua Tree Earth Space Musuem - Original Message - From: Marc Fries chief_scient...@galacticanalytics.com To: Meteorite List meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 11:12 AM Subject: [meteorite-list] Some thoughts on find coords Greetings all I've been talking with a few people about logging the Battle Mountain meteorites, and I'd like to start some discussion on the topic of find coordinates. This is NOT directed at any one person, but I would like to editorialize a bit. I'm getting a lot of push-back about printing find coordinates and I'd like to open the topic to general discussion. Historically, the locations of found meteorites have been a closely guarded secret. That made a lot of sense when meteorite hunting relied most heavily on eyewitness reports. A hunter could easily put in many, many miles of walking before coming across a meteorite. For finds that are made with weather radar, however, I don't think its the same situation. When I post radar analyses, it is like posting a treasure map that says, Go Here. At that point everyone knows where the meteorites are, and it seems to me that the locations of individual stones aren't nearly as important as they were in the past. (Strewn fields without detailed radar data are another matter, of course.) Where those locations do matter are to A) the science behind describing the meteorite fall, and B) the value of the individual meteorite since a well-documented meteorite should be worth more than a random stone from a given fall. I am a scientist, and my first instinct is to collect, analyze, and -share- data. I understand where that is at odds with the level of secrecy needed in the past, but I think that that level of secrecy is no longer needed and actually works contrary to the value of meteorites, both monetary and scientific. On the Galactic Analytics website, I'm willing to go against my better instincts and hide find locations, at least until a scientific paper is released describing the fall. But to be honest, I think that's a little silly - I'll basically have a table showing meteorites with the find locations redacted, and then you can scroll down the page a bit and see a map showing where the meteorites are. So let me throw this out there as a general question - is it really important to hide the find locations? Cheers, Marc Fries __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] Meteoroids Change Atmospheres of Earth, Mars, Venus
Interesting thanks Ron Bryan Couch Wildomar Ca Dare to fail On Sep 4, 2012, at 2:44 PM, Ron Baalke baa...@zagami.jpl.nasa.gov wrote: http://www.space.com/17440-meteoroids-mars-venus-atmospheres.html Meteoroids Change Atmospheres of Earth, Mars, Venus by Nola Taylor Redd space.com 04 September 2012 Meteoroids streaking through the atmospheres of planets such as Earth, Mars and Venus can change these worlds' air, in ways that researchers are just now beginning to understand. Most planetary atmospheres are made up of simple, low-mass elements and compounds such as carbon dioxide, oxygen and nitrogen. But when a debris particle, or meteoroid passes through, it can shed heavier, more exotic elements such as magnesium, silicon and iron. Such elements can have a significant impact on t dynamics of winds in the atmosphere, researchers say. That opens up a whole new network of chemical pathways not usually there, said Paul Withers of Boston University. Contaminating the outer layers Part of a planet's upper atmosphere, the ionosphere contains plasma - a mixture of positively charged (ionized) atoms or molecules and the negatively charged electrons stripped from them. When simple elements such as oxygen move into this outer shell, they break apart easily, decaying in a matter of minutes. But meteoroids streaking toward a planet's surface carry heavier metals that can be removed in a variety of ways. A grain of dust, for instance, may rapidly burn up, shedding already-ionized magnesium as it falls. Or, neutral magnesium may be torn from the small rock, then receive a charge from sunlight or from stripping an electron from another particle. The newly charged elements can take as much as a full day to decay. Meteoroids that blaze a trail through the atmosphere are called meteors, or shooting stars, Only those that make it to the ground are meteorites. When we add metal ions to the ionosphere as a result of this meteoroid input, we create plasma in regions where there wasn't any plasma there to start out with, Withers told SPACE.com. In a recent article for Eos, the American Geophysical Union's newspaper covering Earth and space sciences, Withers discusses important questions raised by the recent wealth of research on the upper atmosphere of Mars and Venus. Shocking similarities, strange differences Over the last decade, scientists have collected more and more information about the ionospheres of Mars and Venus. Though one might envision the composition and location of the two planets would create different interactions in the ionosphere, the two are actually very similar, scientists say. If you stand at the surface of the two planets, they are very different, Withers said. But up at about 100 kilometers (62 miles), conditions are surprisingly similar. The pressures, temperatures, and chemistry at high altitudes are comparable for the two planets. So too are many of the properties of the layers of charged particles shed by meteoroids. The plasma densities are quite similar on average on all three planets, which is not what you might expect on the first impression, Withers said, referring to Earth, Mars and Venus. Since the sun is the ultimate driving force for most ionization processes, it's tempting to assume that Venus has more particles in a given area than Mars does because it orbits twice as closely to our star. Instead, the two planets have similar densities, which differ from Earth's measurements by only a factor of ten. At the same time, the layers affected by the meteoroids on Earth are very narrow, maybe only a mile or two wide, while Venus and Mars both have layers stretching six to eight miles. According to Withers, the difference may come from the presence of Earth's strong magnetic field, a feature lacking on the other two planets. But scientists aren't certain how much of a role the field actually plays. Finding the source To study Earth's ionosphere, scientists can launch rockets to take measurements in the region. But the process is more complicated for other planets. As a spacecraft travels through the solar system, a targeted radio signal sent back to Earth can be aimed through the ionosphere of a nearby planet. Plasma in the ionosphere causes small but detectable changes in the signal that allow scientists to learn about the upper atmosphere. This process - known as radio occultation - doesn't require any fancy equipment, only the radio the craft already uses to communicate with scientists on Earth. It's really one of the workhorse planetary science instruments, Withers said. Because it is so simple, the process has been applied to every planet ever visited by spacecraft. Only in recent years has enough data come back on Venus and Mars to seriously
Re: [meteorite-list] First meteorite found at Battle Mountain!
Congrats Bob and Moni on your new Nevada find you two rock. Bryan Couch Wildomar Ca Dare to fail On Sep 3, 2012, at 9:16 AM, Doug Ross d...@dougross.net wrote: There they go again! ;-) Big congratulations to Bob and Moni on their latest conquest! Doug Ross Greetings I am very pleased to announce that Bob and Moni Verish have found the first meteorite from the Battle Mountain meteorite fall, which occurred on 22 August 2012! They have located a 19.25g meteorite that appears to be an H chondrite at first examination. According to the Meteoritical Society database, this makes Bob and Moni the first to ever recover an observed fall in the state of Nevada! We offer our hearty congratulations for this history-making find! __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
Re: [meteorite-list] Meteorite Picture of the Day
Vary nice. Bryan Couch Wildomar Ca Dare to fail On Sep 2, 2012, at 4:00 AM, valpar...@aol.com wrote: Today's Meteorite Picture of the Day: Sikhote Alin Contributed by: Arlene Schlazer http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpod.asp __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list __ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
