Re: [meteorite-list] What doesn't this list use an online forum format?

2008-02-21 Thread Delbert Waterbury
I agree with this too! A lot of very good info here
and boy it really sucks if you go on vacation or
something because you'll have 100+ emails to clean
out.

The least that could be done for a forum is maybe
setting up something through Yahoo. It isn't that
difficult to do and it would probably take an hour or
two to setup.

Del


--- JKGwilliam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 David and List,
 I don't know the answer to your questions, but they
 sure make 
 sense.  About a year and a half ago, I finally shut
 down the 
 Meteorite Impact Forum due to a lack of
 participation.  Even with 
 nearly 200 registered members, there was very little
 traffic for the 
 final three months.  Online forums offer a lot of
 updated features 
 that the old mail servers don't.  The one feature
 that I really like, 
 and is reason enough to use a forum, is that replies
 stay in 
 chronological order.  I don't know about the rest of
 you, but it's 
 very frustrating for me to try and read all the
 replies to a thread 
 in order. I end up reading all the replies and then
 try guessing what 
 order they should be in.  If you miss even one
 reply, some threads 
 don't make sense. With a forum, this doesn't happen.
 My only guess is that the Meteorite List has been
 around for a long 
 time ( I've been here for 10 years) that no one
 wants to mess with 
 convention.   Or, could it be an old dog/new trick
 issue?
 
 Best,
 
 John
 
 At 12:56 PM 2/21/2008, David  Kitt Deyarmin wrote:
 I'm not trying to stir up trouble or incite
 arguments I'm just curious.
 
 Email lists are by today's standard an antiquated
 venue for 
 discussing any hobby.
 
 They have many limitations and can be taxing on
 your email inbox, 
 which is why I receive the Dailey Digest. I delete
 them and do all 
 of my reading from the archives.
 
 Online forums are easier to use and the posted info
 is easier to track.
 
 Plus it's easy to ignore topics that you're not
 interested in 
 without having to pick through a bunch of emails.
 
 However, I would like to understand why so many of
 the members here 
 prefer not to use forums.
 
 I want to make it clear that I'm not trying stir up
 trouble, I'm 
 just trying to understand the aversion most of this
 list has to using a forum.
 
 
 __
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com

http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
 __
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com

http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 



  

Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] What doesn't this list use an onlineforum format?

2008-02-21 Thread Delbert Waterbury
I'll give that a try Norton. Thanks!

Del


--- Norbert Classen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi Del  Greg,
 
 If you visit the meteoritecentral site (the home of
 this list), and check
 your own subscription settings you will notice that
 there is an option to
 deactivate email delivery for times such as vacation
 - it's just one click,
 and you won't have to wade through hundreds of
 emails after your return. And
 then there is the digest mode, and much more. Yeap,
 mailing lists did evolve
 during the last decade, and they are surely not out
 of time ,-)
 To me, being part of this list is like walking into
 my favorite pub after
 work. I often meet old friends, make new friends,
 and I'm free to
 participate in discussions, and I'm free to relax or
 to listen to all the
 meteorite gossip going on. Sometimes there's even a
 good deal to be had, or
 firsthand information on new finds and falls that
 would be hard to find
 without having to search the net for hours and
 hours. And if I don't like a
 post or a thread there's always the good old delete
 key.
 Forums can be neat, for sure - but they are usually
 more like that modern
 type of bar with separate rooms where some folks get
 together at this, and
 others on that table. Most of the meteorite forums
 I've visited thus far are
 lacking the chaotic but familiar charm of this list.
 Thanks to Art for all
 his efforts to keep this good old list up and
 running!
 
 Cheers,
 Norbert
 
 -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
 
   Hi Del,
 
   I agree with you.  If I'm away from my computer
 for just a few days, I
 have a couple of hundred e-mails to go through. 
 What a pain.  Plus, I have
 to look very carefully at the e-mails because I
 delete the vast majority of
 the ones from the meteorite list.  If I don't check
 the e-mails carefully, I
 may delete an actual e-mail from a friend.  It's
 happened before.
   I've moderated a Yahoo Group (forum) for about 6
 years and it is much more
 user friendly than the Meteorite List.  I love all
 of the knowledge that is
 given out by the members of this list.  I just wish
 it didn't come to me in
 my e-mail.
 
   With respect,
Greg Lindh 
 
 
 
  Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:35:18 -0800
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
 meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] What doesn't this
 list use an online forum
 format?
 
  I agree with this too! A lot of very good info
 here
  and boy it really sucks if you go on vacation or
  something because you'll have 100+ emails to clean
  out.
 
  The least that could be done for a forum is maybe
  setting up something through Yahoo. It isn't that
  difficult to do and it would probably take an hour
 or
  two to setup.
 
  Del
 
 
  --- JKGwilliam  wrote:
 
  David and List,
  I don't know the answer to your questions, but
 they
  sure make
  sense. About a year and a half ago, I finally
 shut
  down the
  Meteorite Impact Forum due to a lack of
  participation. Even with
  nearly 200 registered members, there was very
 little
  traffic for the
  final three months. Online forums offer a lot of
  updated features
  that the old mail servers don't. The one feature
  that I really like,
  and is reason enough to use a forum, is that
 replies
  stay in
  chronological order. I don't know about the rest
 of
  you, but it's
  very frustrating for me to try and read all the
  replies to a thread
  in order. I end up reading all the replies and
 then
  try guessing what
  order they should be in. If you miss even one
  reply, some threads
  don't make sense. With a forum, this doesn't
 happen.
  My only guess is that the Meteorite List has been
  around for a long
  time ( I've been here for 10 years) that no one
  wants to mess with
  convention. Or, could it be an old dog/new trick
  issue?
 
  Best,
 
  John
 
  At 12:56 PM 2/21/2008, David  Kitt Deyarmin
 wrote:
 I'm not trying to stir up trouble or incite
  arguments I'm just curious.
 
 Email lists are by today's standard an antiquated
  venue for
 discussing any hobby.
 
 They have many limitations and can be taxing on
  your email inbox,
 which is why I receive the Dailey Digest. I
 delete
  them and do all
 of my reading from the archives.
 
 Online forums are easier to use and the posted
 info
  is easier to track.
 
 Plus it's easy to ignore topics that you're not
  interested in
 without having to pick through a bunch of emails.
 
 However, I would like to understand why so many
 of
  the members here
 prefer not to use forums.
 
 I want to make it clear that I'm not trying stir
 up
  trouble, I'm
 just trying to understand the aversion most of
 this
  list has to using a forum.
 
 
 __
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 

http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
  __
  

Re: [meteorite-list] Metal detector and Tucson collecting advice requests

2007-11-13 Thread Delbert Waterbury
Jon get the White's GMT model! A lot of the guys I
hunt with use these and they're excellent for
meteorite hunting. I've seen guys pluck 1/4 gram
Chondrites with these with no problem.

Dealers try to pedal the MXT because it is one of the
most popular detectors and it's more expensive than
the GMT. It's an all around detector meaning it's
designed to use for coin/relic and gold hunting. It
has a lower frequency than the GMT so you probably
wouldn't be able to pick up really small Chondrites
with it.

To learn more about detecting sign up on this forum-

http://www.nuggetshooter.ipbhost.com/index.php?showforum=8

There's a lot of knowledgeable people on it that will
be glad to help you get started in hunting.

Hope this helps!

Del



--- Frederick J. Wallace [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,
 I'm a science teacher and have been collecting
 meteorites for decades
 and have amassed a wonderful teaching collection.
 The one thing I
 haven't done yet is search for my own meteorites and
 I'd like to do that
 now. I visited the White's dealer in CT and he
 recommended the MXT or
 DFX models and I wondered what people thought of
 those models compared
 to the more highly recommended Gold Master model. It
 doesn't appear that
 there is much difference between models but I'm sure
 there is some. All
 models seem capable of detecting iron and nickel as
 well as other
 minerals found in meteorites. I'd like to get the
 best model I can
 afford for the job so if I don't find anything I
 don't have to blame it
 on the detector. I majored in Geology and did quite
 a lot of field
 collecting and work and am really looking forward to
 trying my hand at
 this. I also will be traveling to Tucson, AZ to
 visit relatives in a few
 months and hoped that if you have searched for
 meteorites near Tucson
 you might be willing to e-mail me about your
 experiences and share
 location info. and/or advice.
 Thanks for any help you can give!
 Jon Wallace
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com

http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 



  

Get easy, one-click access to your favorites. 
Make Yahoo! your homepage.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs 
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Bill - LIST ADMIN PLEASE READ

2007-11-12 Thread Delbert Waterbury
I agree with Moni 100% (hi Moni!). I want to hear
about meteorites, not some person whining about
whomever for whatever. I just figure a lot of the
people on this list like the nonsense drama or
something.

Maybe this list should be turned into a forum? It's a
good idea! Then I won't have to delete the 100+ daily
emails that isn't useful info and the people tho like
the drama can do it in there own posts.

Del


--- Moni Waiblinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 Hi Geoff and list members,
 
 I agree with you100%.
 
 I had it also when people have no compassion and
 when people send posts that are so negative and give
 false informations about another.
 You know it happens way too often.
 
 Regards,
 Moni
 
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 10:26:42 -0700
  To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Bill - LIST ADMIN
 PLEASE READ
 
  Dear Listees and List Admin:
 
  I have been a member of this forum for well over
 ten years. I follow
  the List guidelines and try to contribute positive
 information to the
  community. Like many of you, I post occasional ads
 for my meteorite
  website or eBay sales. Apologies for forgetting to
 include AD in the
  header of one email, one time. Big deal.
 
  As best I can remember, Bill has contributed
 nothing of note to our
  community except for sarcastic one-liners and
 REPEATED criticism of,
  and attacks upon, other List members. Why is this
 kind of behavior
  allowed in our friendly community?
 
  I take issue with Bill's comment that I am almost
 as special as both
  Steves as it implies that there is something
 wrong with the Steve
  Arnolds, both of whom are friends of mine.
 
  Further, a sweet young lady who is only in her
 twenties, is very
  popular in our community, and is in hospital
 undergoing
  life-threatening heart surgery, has been accused
 in front of her
  friends of being a notorious swindler with a
 myriad of ebay shills.
  How will a public post like that impact a
 sensitive young person while
  she is trying to recover from major surgery? How
 vile must a person be
  to write something like that at a time like this?
 
  LIST ADMIN PLEASE TAKE NOTE: We have rules in
 place regarding behavior
  in our community. Bill contributes absolutely
 nothing useful to this
  forum, and has gone too far this time. Please
 remove this do-nothing
  troublemaker permanently from this List.
 
  Anyone who feels the same way, please forward your
 comments to the List
  Admin, or write to me off-List, and I will supply
 you with his email
  address.
 
 
 
  Geoff N.
  www.aerolite.org
 
  __
  Meteorite-list mailing list
  Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 

http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 

_
 Boo! Scare away worms, viruses and so much more! Try
 Windows Live OneCare!

http://onecare.live.com/standard/en-us/purchase/trial.aspx?s_cid=wl_hotmailnews
 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com

http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Since Scale Cubes are a topic today

2007-11-09 Thread Delbert Waterbury
Yeah I guess it would be nice to have a 3D laser
scanning machine to scan all my meteorites into.
However I don't have a few hundred thousand dollars
(or maybe millions) to spend right now on something
like this. So I'll have to settle for the next best
thing (and the cheapest) using my very own scale cube
I paid 25 bucks for.

Either way, I think the scale cube is excellent for
figuring out the general size of an object in a
photograph. It's better than using a coin because you
get that third dimension that coins lack. 

Del


--- Sterling K. Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Hi,
 
 Matthias said the introduction of the scalecube
 into the natural scene is the insertion of the
 Absolute,
 the Platonic Ideal. Yes, true, and, as such, tells
 us so
 much more about the beings making the photograph
 than it does about the object being photographed.
 
 As for using scalecubes as a basis for
 measuration,
 you can utilize an existing arsenal of projective
 geometric
 calculation in a pinch. But, if what you wanted from
 the
 start was measurement, you would photograph
 everything
 by placing it inside a half cube -- floor, back, and
 side -- 
 that was white and gridded off in your choice of
 units
 (centimeters, inches, or the 60th part of a
 Babylonian
 cubit), and shooting it at different orientations
 (6). It
 would then be medium easy to use a computer
 algorithm
 that would convert the images to measurements or a
 3D
 model in a few teraflops.
 
 This is what should be done with meteorites (and
 Moon Rocks, and pieces of UFO's if you got'em).
 Then, instead of pictures of the Meteorite of the
 Day,
 we would have the virtual object of the Meteorite of
 the Day. It wouldn't be scientifically useless to be
 doing
 that with important pieces even today.
 
 Maybe, scalecubes are just more Fun? Cooler?
 
 
 Sterling K. Webb

---
 - Original Message - 
 From: David  Kitt Deyarmin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 4:19 PM
 Subject: [meteorite-list] Since Scale Cubes are a
 topic today
 
 
 I'm going to have to disagree with you.
 
 Another hobby I have is making replicas of props
 from various science
 fiction movies
 
 I have used photos to reverse engineer parts and
 have done so with amazing
 accuracy
 
 A perfect example is an MG-81 Flash Hider/ Booster
 that was use on Han
 Solo's Blaster from Star Wars.
 
 This part went unidentified for 26 years but I and a
 small group of
 hobbyists created and manufactured replica of this
 part from the various
 available photos.
 
 About 3 years ago, it was finally identified and a
 mint specimen was found
 and borrowed, they have a value of about $3000 so we
 were lucky the guy let
 use it.
 
 To even my own surprise my Flash Hider was
 surprisingly accurate to the real
 thing.
 
 Here is a picture, the real prop is on top and my
 replica is on the bottom
 

http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p298/BobaDebt/Flashhiders.jpg
 
 Bear in mind that this is just one image of a single
 prop, they used a
 variety of props and each had variances in the
 parts. For instance in the
 above picture the holes are look smaller but there
 are other pictures that
 they look bigger.
 
 However, when I compared my replica to a real MG-81
 Flash Hider most of my
 measurements were off by less then .005 of an inch
 which is pretty good.
 
 
 

-
 
 
 Hi, All
 
 Measurement from a photo with a scalecube in it is
 impossible except in the
 case of a very elaborate photo setup designed to
 make such measurements
 possible and even then, the precision is low. aying
 
 Sterling K. Webb
 
 

-
 
 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com

http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
 
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Since Scale Cubes are a topic today

2007-11-08 Thread Delbert Waterbury
I seem to remember a few months back someone posted a
link that told the sory of the Scale Cube. I was
wondering what that link is so I can read it.

Del

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Since Scale Cubes are a topic today

2007-11-08 Thread Delbert Waterbury
Thanks Mike!

Del

--- Mike Bandli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


http://www.niger-meteorite-recon.de/en/meteorite-scalecube.htm
 
 Best,
 Mike
  
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of Delbert
 Waterbury
 Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 11:04 AM
 To: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Subject: [meteorite-list] Since Scale Cubes are a
 topic today
 
 I seem to remember a few months back someone posted
 a
 link that told the sory of the Scale Cube. I was
 wondering what that link is so I can read it.
 
 Del
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
 protection around 
 http://mail.yahoo.com 
 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com

http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
 
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Since Scale Cubes are a topic today

2007-11-08 Thread Delbert Waterbury
Hi Sterling, yeah I agree with you to a point. However
I'll throw this in there for you:

I am a Mechanical Design Engineer and occasionally I
pick up projects of something someone built and all
they have is a picture with no documentated dimensions
or anything to help you figure the size out. So I have
to get an X dimension and a Y dimension from that
person, calculate the scale of the photograph, then
start designing away. This is not the most accurate
way to design things, but you can get the design in
the ballpark range.

So in a situation like I describe above, do you think
a scale cube could help out? Absolutely! I've
experienced this first hand. Using a scale cube is a 
lot better and more accurate that someone telling me
oh yeah, that part is about XX long. So if you ask
me about taking measurements from a photo's I'll
tell heck yeah you can do it.

As for putting a quarter in a picture for scale. Yea I
think this is good too because most people know the
exact size of a quarter and they can visualise  it a
lot easier. However the major problem with a quarter
is the fact that it lacks the third dimension.

Since I hunt meteorites, a scale cube is perfect for
my in-situ pics. And no, I'm not planning on using it
for exact measurements because I have no intention
of selling any of my finds.

Just my two cents.

Del


--- Sterling K. Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Hi, All
 
 I hate to sound a sour note, but these artifacts
 are
 for SCALE, not measurement. I think it's wonderful
 that folks make them accurate to +/- 0.001 inch or
 millimeter, out of materials with low coefficients
 of
 expansion, and so forth, but that is purely an
 exercise
 in personal perfectionism.
 
 Measurement from a photo with a scalecube in it
 is impossible except in the case of a very elaborate
 photo setup designed to make such measurements
 possible and even then, the precision is low. The
 purpose of a scalecube is SCALE ONLY. Scale
 is a measurement so crude that we don't even apply
 the word measurement to it.
 
 Originally, they were for use in the field only.
 You
 could carry it in your pocket and drop it on the
 ground
 for the in situ photo. Putting them into a lab
 photo is
 an affectation and serves only the PR purpose of
 making
 a photo of a rock look scientific. (There were
 people
 who said, We paid billions to go to the Moon, and
 this
 is what we get: a picture of a rock? And you could
 point
 to the scalecube and say, Nah! See, it's Science.)
 
 During the scalecube threadflood, Dean Bessey kept
 saying, Just put a quarter in the photo.
 Apparently,
 he understands that the purpose of the object is
 Scale,
 not Measurement! If you see a picture of a rock with
 a featureless white background and there's a quarter
 next to it, you know it's a little rock. If you see
 a picture
 of a rock with a featureless white background and
 there's me standing next to it, you know it's a big
 rock.
 
 Making the scalecube artifact with such great care
 and
 precision is admirable and very enjoyable, but let's
 apply
 a little perspective to the purpose of the cube. And
 I DO
 admire the makers' pride in precision. Precision is
 a fine
 thing (say I, who have ancient Starrett verniers and
 micro-
 meters in their old wooden boxes, so I understand),
 but
 precision is NOT the purpose of the cube.
 
 
 Sterling K. Webb

--
 - Original Message - 
 From: Mike Bandli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'Delbert Waterbury' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 1:11 PM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Since Scale Cubes are
 a topic today
 
 

http://www.niger-meteorite-recon.de/en/meteorite-scalecube.htm
 
 Best,
 Mike
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of Delbert
 Waterbury
 Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 11:04 AM
 To: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Subject: [meteorite-list] Since Scale Cubes are a
 topic today
 
 I seem to remember a few months back someone posted
 a
 link that told the story of the Scale Cube. I was
 wondering what that link is so I can read it.
 
 Del
 
 __
 
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list