RE: [meteorite-list] NWA's and Counting Localities
This is basically a personal preference and how you want to organize your collection. Different people have different ideas on this topic. Each number has its own mass and official recogonition. Many are obviously paired but you still have an opportunity to own a main mass at a very low price. Personally, I call them "desert main masses" but that term is not a recogonized meteorite term. Many people love the idea of getting meteorites so cheap and can put up with incomplete scientific data for the 80% savings that they get and are happy with getting five times the meteoritic material at the same cost as another meteorite. Other people put more importance on the coordinates where they fell than on the meteorite itself and wouldent touch them. Maybe they are just so cheap that buying something at that price is beneath them. Whatever turns a person on I guess. But no matter what, collect what you like and how you like. Dont let somebody tell you how you are supposed to collect or enjoy your meteorites. You are collecting for you and not how somebody else thinks that the meteorite world should work. Each numbered NWA meteorite has an official (Or provisional if it is not classified) name and is recogonized seperately. If you have 300 different NWAs you have 300 seperately recogonized meteorites. Likely some will be paired. If you want to take this as different stones do so. If you like the idea of owning a main mass (even if it is Desert main mass) buy one. If you want likely paired NWAs buy them. If you put more importance on some imaginary line on a map drawn by man then dont. Its all a personal preference. If you do like all of the NWAs you can rest easy knowing that you are getting a tremendous price break for the small amount of left out information when you buy your meteorites. And the stones themselves are not somehow inferior just because the finder never had a GPS unit. The GPS unit dont come with the meteorites. When it fell the meteorite never had a GPS signal to follow. And there certainly will not be enough government funding to provite researcher time to get a better analysis of the NWA situation anytime soon or to study every H5 in detail. The important thing is that you buy what you enjoy (And finances permit) and you enjoy them how you want. There is no correct answer to your question. Its all a matter of personal preference. When you show somebody your collection you will have it displayed the way that you like best. Cheers DEAN > _ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com Show your support at the Red Cross Disaster Relief Fund - http://s1.amazon.com/exec/varzea/ts/my-pay-page/PKAXFNQH7EKCX/058-5084202-7156648 ___ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
RE: [meteorite-list] NWA's and Counting Localities
Personally, I count each specimen when talking about how many unique meteorites are in my collection. Then again, you are talking about localities and when I talk about how many meteorites I have its usually how many I have and not where they came from. Best wishes, Rhett Bourland www.asteroidmodels.com www.asteroidmodels.com/personal -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Charlie Devine Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 7:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [meteorite-list] NWA's and Counting Localities Dear List: I want to sit down soon and count the number of localities in my collection. It's a modest number, but in recent years I've purchased quite a few classified NWA meteorites and I'm wondering: do I count each classified specimen as a separate locality ( and if I have 2 with different numbers but I know they're paired I would count that as one locality ), or is it more "honest" or is it even a convention to simply lump all my different NWA's together and count them all as one locality? When I try to think this out I keep coming up with arguments for both approaches. It seems silly to lump a lunar with an L6 but classification and locality are 2 different things and with no, or very few, GPS coordinates for any of them maybe lumping them all together as one vast locality is correct? Any thoughts on what may seem a "splitting-hairs" question? Thanking you in advance, Charlie Show your support at the Red Cross Disaster Relief Fund - http://s1.amazon.com/exec/varzea/ts/my-pay-page/PKAXFNQH7EKCX/058-5084202-71 56648 ___ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list Show your support at the Red Cross Disaster Relief Fund - http://s1.amazon.com/exec/varzea/ts/my-pay-page/PKAXFNQH7EKCX/058-5084202-7156648 ___ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
[meteorite-list] NWA's and Counting Localities
Dear List: I want to sit down soon and count the number of localities in my collection. It's a modest number, but in recent years I've purchased quite a few classified NWA meteorites and I'm wondering: do I count each classified specimen as a separate locality ( and if I have 2 with different numbers but I know they're paired I would count that as one locality ), or is it more "honest" or is it even a convention to simply lump all my different NWA's together and count them all as one locality? When I try to think this out I keep coming up with arguments for both approaches. It seems silly to lump a lunar with an L6 but classification and locality are 2 different things and with no, or very few, GPS coordinates for any of them maybe lumping them all together as one vast locality is correct? Any thoughts on what may seem a "splitting-hairs" question? Thanking you in advance, Charlie Show your support at the Red Cross Disaster Relief Fund - http://s1.amazon.com/exec/varzea/ts/my-pay-page/PKAXFNQH7EKCX/058-5084202-7156648 ___ Meteorite-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
