Re: [meteorite-list] Some thoughts on Larry Atkin's Recent Holbrook Find

2007-02-14 Thread DNAndrews

Hola Johnny Q,
You may be right, but as large as that piece was, it might have taken a 
couple of years or so for it to be washed or eroded out. But you are 
right, it was found near the top of a moundjust slightly down from 
the top. Even one fragment was found under a cow pie. ;-)


The miniscule 69 gms. I found that day (largest fragment 43 gms...one of 
my better days), just didn't seem worth fussing over after Larry's 
whopper Holy Grail find. ;-)


Congrats to Larrydon't know how you did it, but you did it.

Dave


JKGwilliam wrote:


Bernd, Larry, Maria and List,
Here's some more food for thought concerning the Holbrook strewnfield.

One of my best friends, Dave Andrews, lives in Holbrook and has hunted the 
strewnfield hundreds of times.  He was Larry and Maria when Larry made his 
find of a lifetime.  Dave and I talked on the phone while the three of them 
were still out in the field, and Dave told me it was found in an area that 
many of us had been over dozens of times.


How could that be?

Over the years, Dave has noted that wind and water erosion probably come 
into play.  After a good wind or rain storm, artifacts ( indian pottery 
shards) and meteorites become exposed. They seem to appear in places 
where they weren't just days before.  In actuality, they were there all 
along but were hidden below a thin layer of sand.  Anyone who has ever 
hunter there has noticed that there are small hillocks of sand mounded up 
around the bases of some of the indigenous shrubs.  My guess is that once 
these shrubs die and are blown away by the winds (which can last for days 
and reach speeds of  50 MPH and more)  the sand moves on without the shrubs 
there to hold it in place.


Several years ago, Dave, John Blennert and I were hunting in 
Holbrook.  While walking along with Dave, he bent over and picked up a 
small complete stone of about 2 grams.  It was perched atop a small column 
of soil very much like a golf ball sitting on a tee.  The soil (mostly 
sand) around it had blown away leaving the small stone nearly half an inch 
above the surrounding soil.


Best,

John Gwilliam
At 01:09 PM 2/12/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 


Hello Larry, Maria, and List,

First of all, of course, sincere congratulations!

They came to the Southwest and did an amazing job, finding
meteorites at Holbrook, Franconia and Gold Basin.

.. which should remind us all of Bob Haag's famous words:

The key is to get out there and look for them.
Usually some pieces were missed in the initial search.

But: I had been within 50 feet of Larry's find many, many
 times and driven by it many more.

.. which shows how difficult it can be, even for experienced
meteorite hunters like Ruben Garcia.

.. which should not discourage anyone willing to search the strewnfield
again and again, even though Foote (no, not Gary ;-) remarked in his pre-
liminary note on the Holbrook shower in 1912:

the field is now pretty well cleaned up.

Hmm! If he had known what he didn't know then, ... he was wrong!

Here is one of the die-hard observations from Foote's notes:

One piece larger than an orange fell into a tree in a yard at Aztec 
cutting the limb
off slick and clean and falling to the ground, and when picked up was 
almost red-hot.


Von Achen, who saw them fall, reported that they were too hot to pick
up. Two accounts state that they became lighter in color after cooling.

According to Foote's notes, the ellipsoidal strewnfield extended 
west-east but one question
has not yet been answered satisfactorily: Were the stones 
indiscriminately spread over the
ground, or were they found sorted according to size (and weight)? How do 
Larry's find of

a lifetime and Maria's finds fit into this puzzle?

Happy to own an 8.3-gram individual (label no. 331) purchased
   


from the Zeitschels in 1987 and a 0.45-gram thin platelet,
 


Bernd

P.S.: Please, don't forget to include the Branch
 family in your thoughts and your prayers !

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
   



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

 

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Some thoughts on Larry Atkin's Recent Holbrook Find

2007-02-13 Thread mexicodoug
Hello from the field, after being blasted out of Holbrook yesterday 
morning.

I can say that two days ago in the Holbrook strewn field, I was camping 
in the middle of it, which is basically an erroded shrub, dry lake mud 
flat.  It was drizzling all day long, making a wicked cold burn, but 
other than that and all the mud cakes on my sneakers, it was a fine day 
for hunting.

I was caught rather far away from my truck after spiraling around my 
well-worked strewn field base and a nice juicy rainstorm came rolling 
down the plains.  I kept hunting until thoroughly soaked, cold and then 
remembering that I was parked in a mud flat.  It was pretty comical to 
run all the way back jumping from errosion cone to errosion cone in 
this alluvial mess where it looks like mostly dried sagebrush type 
vegetation, and the mud on the sneakers became ruddy sliding disks the 
sizes of tennis rackets inviting a slip landing on the rump.

The camp and vehicle was in the middle of a lake now, but luck was with 
me I got some new tires.   I did make it out, and now am reflecting on 
the comments in this message by John - which are all very reasonable.

One pleasant side effect was plenty of time to hurridly contemplate a 
run clear across the strewn field during the rain.  First the water 
puddled in the low spots, but as in any dry lake type plain, it then 
started flowing.  Holbrook is like a sandy beach with dunes and weak 
root systems in scattered bush holding together for its life.  This 
flowing when wet in the silt and clay continually shifts the sands and 
the clays, which one can see evidence of cracking.  The cracks 
themselves in drying areas can be a couple of cm's thick easily where 
all kinds of grapeshot meteorites and a myriad of stones can fall and 
get recycled to the surface.  Even a big rock can easily get silt 
covered, and depending where it is, hide until its predestined lucky 
finder walks up to it.

As to the big hole, I stumbled across it a day earlier.  I had parked 
about 125 meters from it without having the slightest idea of its 
whereabouts, nor actually caring too much since I was out to make 
history, not record it.  Also in the vicinity were a duo of cool 
hunters - Ruben (who looked like a bad ninja on a quadrimoto) and Earl 
(who looked like Ghost Rider).  I found three tiny specks of fragments 
left in what I thought to be and the fellow hunters confrmed to be that 
unique Holbrook space rock rich uric color, so unless someone is 
playing a joke, I can personally confirm that the big hole had 
meteorite residue in it.  It was on the corner of an errosion cone, 
near an active arroyo and where lots of water flowed during rains - so 
it is easy to imagine what happened in this case.  As John mentioned 
and I also did above...it was a lot like the dunes at the high tide 
line of a Florida or Venetian beach  Larry Luck hit the jackpot, 
but after spending some time there and getting all muddy again, it was 
time to move on.  There is more to be found, but Holbrook for me was 
not as beautiful as other strewn fields, suffering a bit from the 
taming of the west as a strewn field of garbage in places.  I did see 
the main mass of all the little Holbrooks on several ocassions.  It was 
a very old and big desert hare.  I found a fresh dime and a nickel 
which excited meteorite hunters no doubt had lost, plus a very old 
marble that maybe Nininger lost early on.  And there was a coyote's 
tail and the tailfeather of a blue bird, most probably a common jay.

Best wishes, Doug


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 3:03 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Some thoughts on Larry Atkin's Recent 
Holbrook Find

Bernd, Larry, Maria and List,
Here's some more food for thought concerning the Holbrook strewnfield.

One of my best friends, Dave Andrews, lives in Holbrook and has hunted 
the
strewnfield hundreds of times.  He was Larry and Maria when Larry made 
his
find of a lifetime.  Dave and I talked on the phone while the three of 
them
were still out in the field, and Dave told me it was found in an area 
that
many of us had been over dozens of times.

How could that be?

Over the years, Dave has noted that wind and water erosion probably 
come
into play.  After a good wind or rain storm, artifacts ( indian pottery
shards) and meteorites become exposed. They seem to appear in places
where they weren't just days before.  In actuality, they were there all
along but were hidden below a thin layer of sand.  Anyone who has ever
hunter there has noticed that there are small hillocks of sand 
mounded up
around the bases of some of the indigenous shrubs.  My guess is that 
once
these shrubs die and are blown away by the winds (which can last for 
days
and reach speeds of  50 MPH and more)  the sand moves on without the 
shrubs
there to hold it in place.

Several years ago, Dave, John Blennert and I were hunting

[meteorite-list] Some thoughts on Larry Atkin's Recent Holbrook Find

2007-02-13 Thread Robert Verish
Thanks to John Gwilliam for posting his observations
from previous years experiences at Holbrook.  Similiar
observations have been repeatably made at other strewn
fields in the SW USA.  

Those who have had the benefit of being able to return
to strewn fields year after year (or even at different
seaons of the year), have been able to observe the
long-term changes, as well as, the seasonal
fluctuations.  Those that have made subsequent finds
on previously searched surfaces have seen the evidence
of gradual deflation, or in the case of seasonal
changes, have witnessed surfaces that alternate
between being buried and then being exposed again. 
Those people know full well how presumptive the phrase
the field is now pretty well cleaned up can be.

So Ruben, don't be so hard on yourself.  Larry Atkin's
recent find may not even have been exposed on the
surface at the time you were searching.

But regarding the 21 fragments that were found just
last weekend by that dynamic father and son duo of
Erik and Ben Fisler, now there you can make a case
that these were missed by all of the hunters from
the previous weekend.  But then again, we just had a
field report by Mexico Doug about all the rain he
recently encountered at Holbrook.  Again, timing is
everything.  

So, unless it can be proven that these have always
been exposed on the surface, it would still be very
presumptive to say that those 21 pieces, or even Larry
Atkin's find, were missed by ALL the previous
hunters of the Holbrook strewnfield.  

Congratulations to all of the finders of the recently
found Holbrook meteorites.  Your timing is impeccable.
:-)
Bob V.

- Original Message -
[meteorite-list] Some thoughts on Larry Atkin's Recent
Holbrook Find
JKGwilliam h3chondrite at cox.net
Mon Feb 12 17:03:22 EST 2007

* Previous message: [meteorite-list] Some thoughts
on Larry Atkin's Recent Holbrook Find
* Next message: [meteorite-list] Some thoughts on
Larry Atkin's Recent Holbrook Find

Bernd, Larry, Maria and List,
Here's some more food for thought concerning the
Holbrook strewnfield.

One of my best friends, Dave Andrews, lives in
Holbrook and has hunted the strewnfield hundreds of
times. He was Larry and Maria when Larry made his find
of a lifetime. Dave and I talked on the phone while
the three of them
were still out in the field, and Dave told me it was
found in an area that many of us had been over dozens
of times.

How could that be?

Over the years, Dave has noted that wind and water
erosion probably come into play. After a good wind or
rain storm, artifacts ( indian pottery shards) and
meteorites become exposed. They seem to appear in
places where they weren't just days before. In
actuality, they were there all along but were hidden
below a thin layer of sand. Anyone who has ever hunted
there has noticed that there are small hillocks of
sand mounded up around the bases of some of the
indigenous shrubs. My guess is that once these shrubs
die and are blown away by the winds (which can last
for days and reach speeds of 50 MPH and more) the sand
moves on without the shrubs there to hold it in place.

Several years ago, Dave, John Blennert and I were
hunting in Holbrook. While walking along with Dave, he
bent over and picked up a small complete stone of
about 2 grams. It was perched atop a small column of
soil very much like a golf ball sitting on a tee. The
soil (mostly
sand) around it had blown away leaving the small stone
nearly half an inch above the surrounding soil.

Best,

John Gwilliam

--
At 01:09 PM 2/12/2007, bernd.pauli at paulinet.de
wrote: 


Hello Larry, Maria, and List,

First of all, of course, sincere congratulations!

They came to the Southwest and did an amazing job,
finding meteorites at Holbrook, Franconia and Gold
Basin.

.. which should remind us all of Bob Haag's famous
words:

The key is to get out there and look for them.
Usually some pieces were missed in the initial
search.

But: I had been within 50 feet of Larry's find many,
many times and driven by it many more.

.. which shows how difficult it can be, even for
experienced meteorite hunters like Ruben Garcia.

.. which should not discourage anyone willing to
search the strewnfield again and again, even though
Foote (no, not Gary ;-) remarked in his preliminary
note on the Holbrook shower in 1912:

the field is now pretty well cleaned up.

Hmm! If he had known what he didn't know then, ... he
was wrong! 
+

- End of Original Messages --

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Some thoughts on Larry Atkin's Recent Holbrook Find

2007-02-12 Thread bernd . pauli
Hello Larry, Maria, and List,

First of all, of course, sincere congratulations!

They came to the Southwest and did an amazing job, finding
 meteorites at Holbrook, Franconia and Gold Basin.

.. which should remind us all of Bob Haag's famous words:

The key is to get out there and look for them.
Usually some pieces were missed in the initial search.

But: I had been within 50 feet of Larry's find many, many
  times and driven by it many more.

.. which shows how difficult it can be, even for experienced
meteorite hunters like Ruben Garcia.

.. which should not discourage anyone willing to search the strewnfield
again and again, even though Foote (no, not Gary ;-) remarked in his pre-
liminary note on the Holbrook shower in 1912:

the field is now pretty well cleaned up.

Hmm! If he had known what he didn't know then, ... he was wrong!

Here is one of the die-hard observations from Foote's notes:

One piece larger than an orange fell into a tree in a yard at Aztec cutting 
the limb
 off slick and clean and falling to the ground, and when picked up was almost 
red-hot.

Von Achen, who saw them fall, reported that they were too hot to pick
 up. Two accounts state that they became lighter in color after cooling.

According to Foote's notes, the ellipsoidal strewnfield extended west-east but 
one question
has not yet been answered satisfactorily: Were the stones indiscriminately 
spread over the
ground, or were they found sorted according to size (and weight)? How do 
Larry's find of
a lifetime and Maria's finds fit into this puzzle?

Happy to own an 8.3-gram individual (label no. 331) purchased
from the Zeitschels in 1987 and a 0.45-gram thin platelet,

Bernd

P.S.: Please, don't forget to include the Branch
  family in your thoughts and your prayers !

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Some thoughts on Larry Atkin's Recent Holbrook Find

2007-02-12 Thread JKGwilliam
Bernd, Larry, Maria and List,
Here's some more food for thought concerning the Holbrook strewnfield.

One of my best friends, Dave Andrews, lives in Holbrook and has hunted the 
strewnfield hundreds of times.  He was Larry and Maria when Larry made his 
find of a lifetime.  Dave and I talked on the phone while the three of them 
were still out in the field, and Dave told me it was found in an area that 
many of us had been over dozens of times.

How could that be?

Over the years, Dave has noted that wind and water erosion probably come 
into play.  After a good wind or rain storm, artifacts ( indian pottery 
shards) and meteorites become exposed. They seem to appear in places 
where they weren't just days before.  In actuality, they were there all 
along but were hidden below a thin layer of sand.  Anyone who has ever 
hunter there has noticed that there are small hillocks of sand mounded up 
around the bases of some of the indigenous shrubs.  My guess is that once 
these shrubs die and are blown away by the winds (which can last for days 
and reach speeds of  50 MPH and more)  the sand moves on without the shrubs 
there to hold it in place.

Several years ago, Dave, John Blennert and I were hunting in 
Holbrook.  While walking along with Dave, he bent over and picked up a 
small complete stone of about 2 grams.  It was perched atop a small column 
of soil very much like a golf ball sitting on a tee.  The soil (mostly 
sand) around it had blown away leaving the small stone nearly half an inch 
above the surrounding soil.

Best,

John Gwilliam
At 01:09 PM 2/12/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Larry, Maria, and List,

First of all, of course, sincere congratulations!

They came to the Southwest and did an amazing job, finding
  meteorites at Holbrook, Franconia and Gold Basin.

.. which should remind us all of Bob Haag's famous words:

The key is to get out there and look for them.
Usually some pieces were missed in the initial search.

But: I had been within 50 feet of Larry's find many, many
   times and driven by it many more.

.. which shows how difficult it can be, even for experienced
meteorite hunters like Ruben Garcia.

.. which should not discourage anyone willing to search the strewnfield
again and again, even though Foote (no, not Gary ;-) remarked in his pre-
liminary note on the Holbrook shower in 1912:

the field is now pretty well cleaned up.

Hmm! If he had known what he didn't know then, ... he was wrong!

Here is one of the die-hard observations from Foote's notes:

One piece larger than an orange fell into a tree in a yard at Aztec 
cutting the limb
  off slick and clean and falling to the ground, and when picked up was 
 almost red-hot.

Von Achen, who saw them fall, reported that they were too hot to pick
  up. Two accounts state that they became lighter in color after cooling.

According to Foote's notes, the ellipsoidal strewnfield extended 
west-east but one question
has not yet been answered satisfactorily: Were the stones 
indiscriminately spread over the
ground, or were they found sorted according to size (and weight)? How do 
Larry's find of
a lifetime and Maria's finds fit into this puzzle?

Happy to own an 8.3-gram individual (label no. 331) purchased
from the Zeitschels in 1987 and a 0.45-gram thin platelet,

Bernd

P.S.: Please, don't forget to include the Branch
   family in your thoughts and your prayers !

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list