Re: [meteorite-list] Mbale TKW

2013-01-10 Thread Mendy Ouzillou
Zelimir,

The paper below is estimating what could possibly have hit the ground, right? 
TKW is an estimate or sometimes an exact weight of what has actually been 
found. These two are potentially very different numbers.

So, it is not the TKW that should be updated. Can you clarify?

Regards,

Mendy Ouzillou

On Jan 10, 2013, at 2:00 AM, Prof. Zelimir Gabelica Université de HauteAlsace 
ENSCMu, zelimir.gabel...@uha.fr wrote:

Hello Linton,

Many thanks for the Meteorite picture of the day (Mbale).

Regarding the TKW (officially 850+@~150+ kg), here is a more recent update:

The TKW officially reported was recently re-evaluated (O. Popova, in: Proc. 
Meteoroids 2010”, Breckenridge, Co, July 2011, pp 232-254).
The paper reports, among others, that the progressive fragmentation model to 
the Mbale entry allowed estimation of fallen mass as 200-250 kg in 100-3000 
fragments (in dependence on assumed breakup model) covering a strewnfield of 
about 1 x 7-9 km.

Best wishes,

Zelimir

-- 
Prof. Zelimir Gabelica
Université de Haute Alsace
ENSCMu, Lab. LPI-GSEC,
3, Rue A. Werner,
F-68093 Mulhouse Cedex, France
Tel: +33 (0)3 89 33 68 94






__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Mbale TKW

2013-01-10 Thread Prof. Zelimir Gabelica Université de Haute Alsace ENSCMu,

Hi Mendy,

You are perfectly right, this is not an exact weight (200-250 kg is  
indeed just a range). I don't have that paper but this is part of the  
summary I got. But it is clear that this figure is just deriving from  
a (here breakup) model.


I am sorry for my misleading word update. By this, I meant this  
should perhaps be added as a side remark to the writeup for Mbale,  
which I did in my own catalog, understanding that I maintained the  
official tkw and the number of pieces really collected (or at least  
reported).


Sorry for the confusion. Excellent remark though.

Regards,

Zelimir
--
Prof. Zelimir Gabelica
Université de Haute Alsace
ENSCMu, Lab. LPI-GSEC,
3, Rue A. Werner,
F-68093 Mulhouse Cedex, France
Tel: +33 (0)3 89 33 68 94


Mendy Ouzillou ouzil...@yahoo.com a écrit :


Zelimir,

The paper below is estimating what could possibly have hit the  
ground, right? TKW is an estimate or sometimes an exact weight of  
what has actually been found. These two are potentially very  
different numbers.


So, it is not the TKW that should be updated. Can you clarify?

Regards,

Mendy Ouzillou

On Jan 10, 2013, at 2:00 AM, Prof. Zelimir Gabelica Université de  
HauteAlsace ENSCMu, zelimir.gabel...@uha.fr wrote:


Hello Linton,

Many thanks for the Meteorite picture of the day (Mbale).

Regarding the TKW (officially 850+@~150+ kg), here is a more recent update:

The TKW officially reported was recently re-evaluated (O. Popova,  
in: Proc. Meteoroids 2010?, Breckenridge, Co, July 2011, pp 232-254).
The paper reports, among others, that the progressive fragmentation  
model to the Mbale entry allowed estimation of fallen mass as  
200-250 kg in 100-3000 fragments (in dependence on assumed breakup  
model) covering a strewnfield of about 1 x 7-9 km.


Best wishes,

Zelimir

--
Prof. Zelimir Gabelica
Université de Haute Alsace
ENSCMu, Lab. LPI-GSEC,
3, Rue A. Werner,
F-68093 Mulhouse Cedex, France
Tel: +33 (0)3 89 33 68 94






__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list





__

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list