Re: [meteorite-list] NASA Finds New Life Form

2010-12-08 Thread Shawn Alan
Hello Listers,
 
The question with science is no science is bad science. Without the 
unimaginable, unthinkable, where would science be? 1492 a rock feel from the 
sky and to many it was a sign from GOD. But to us now this sign is Ensisheim 
meteorite. However, during the ages of doubt and disbelief of rock coming from 
space a select few push forth, Chladni, Howard, and Biot. They gave way to the 
science of meteoritics while others thought that these rock were mere objects 
ejected from volcanoes, windstorms, or lighting. It wasn’t until 1812 that 
science accepted that stones come from space and now we know it as meteorites 
today. Now this comes back to the question about science, why, and the answer 
is how come. In the coming months I do believe these new findings about arsenic 
based life will take science in a new perspective like how science took a new 
approach with meteoritic science. Again, the only bad science is no science. 


Shawn Alan
IMCA 1633
eBaystore
http://shop.ebay.com/photophlow/m.html
 
 
 
[meteorite-list] NASA Finds New Life Form
Mark Ford mark.ford at ssl.gb.com 
Wed Dec 8 04:54:03 EST 2010 

Previous message: [meteorite-list] NASA Finds New Life Form 
Next message: [meteorite-list] NASA Finds New Life Form 
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] 




To be honest i'm not sure their paper is that much more flawed than many 
papers of this type are - after all the point of publishing a paper is 
simply to initiate discussion, encourage people to repeat the experiment 
and prompt for counter arguments. They can't answer all the questions in 
one paper. I think the mistake many people make is attach too much 
weight to one lonely science paper, rather, we should wait until others 
have repeated/refuted the claims. 


I think the problem comes from a PR point of view when they do 'world 
wide' announcements, that are over hyped up. They seemingly didn't learn 
from the Martian meteorite life one did they.. 

The danger of using the 'NASA' name to seemingly add creedance to a 
claim in this way, is at some point you are going to shoot yourself in 
the foot, and when (if) they do ever find real alien life, is any one 
going to believe it? 

Mark 




-Original Message- 
From: meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com 
[mailto:meteorite-list-bounces at meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of 
JoshuaTreeMuseum 
Sent: 08 December 2010 08:00 
To: meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com 
Subject: [meteorite-list] NASA Finds New Life Form 

What's up with the NASA junk science? First it's psuedo-fossils in 
meteorites, now a phony not-new life form. What's next, cold fusion? 
-- 
For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism. (SW) 

Phil Whitmer 





And, the blowback: 

http://rrresearch.blogspot.com/2010/12/arsenic-associated-bacteria-nasas 
.html 

http://www.slate.com/id/2276919/ 

__ 
Visit the Archives at 
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html 
Meteorite-list mailing list 
Meteorite-list at meteoritecentral.com 
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list 

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: 

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential. If you are not 
the intended recipient, please notify us. Email info at ssl.gb.com. You should 
not copy or use this email or attachment(s) for any purpose nor disclose their 
contents to any other person. 

GENERAL STATEMENT: 

Southern Scientific Ltd's computer systems may be monitored and communications 
carried on them recorded, to secure the effective operation of the system and 
for other lawful purposes. 

Registered address Rectory Farm Rd, Sompting, Lancing, W Sussex BN15 0DP. 
Company No 1800317 








Previous message: [meteorite-list] NASA Finds New Life Form 
Next message: [meteorite-list] NASA Finds New Life Form 
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] 


More information about the Meteorite-list mailing list
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] NASA Finds New Life Form

2010-12-08 Thread Chris Peterson
I'm not defending the quality of the paper, only making a distinction 
between incomplete or poor quality science, and "junk science". The paper 
may fall into one or both of the former categories; I don't think it falls 
into the latter. As I noted, the hypothesis is a sound one, and this work is 
sure to generate additional research along these lines. Junk science does 
not.


I see absolutely nothing wrong with the first sentence you quote. I can't 
imagine any well educated biologist having a problem with it.


Chris

*
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com


- Original Message - 
From: "JoshuaTreeMuseum" 

To: 
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 10:07 AM
Subject: [meteorite-list] NASA Finds New Life Form


According to that vast repository of all human knowledge, the modern day 
Library of Alexandria; Wikipedia, junk science is defined as:
Junk science is a term used in U.S. political and legal disputes that 
brands an advocate's claims about scientific data, research, or analyses 
as spurious. The term may convey a pejorative connotation that the 
advocate is driven by political, ideological, financial, or other 
unscientific motives.


The term cargo cult science was first used by the physicist Richard 
Feynman during his commencement address at the California Institute of 
Technology, United States, in 1974, to negatively characterize research in 
the soft sciences (psychology and psychiatry in particular) - arguing that 
they have the semblance of being scientific, but are missing "a kind of 
scientific integrity, a principle of scientific thought that corresponds 
to a kind of utter honesty".


Check out their first sentence:

" Life is mostly composed of the elements carbon, hydrogen,
nitrogen, oxygen, sulfur and phosphorus. Although these
six elements make up nucleic acids, proteins and lipids
and thus the bulk of living matter, it is theoretically
possible that some other elements in the periodic table
could serve the same functions."

This would be news to my freshman biology 101 professor who taught that 
the bulk of living matter was composed of water and carbohydrates.


If you read the paper, they talk a lot about impurities in the salts and 
reagants. (!??!)  They talk a lot about how you can grow this bacteria by 
feeding  it arsenic and how the arsenic is assimilated into its 
biomolecules. They analyze lots of  extracted fracionated nucleic acid. As 
for showing that the arsenic actually replaces the phosphorus in the DNA 
helix...not so much. Their evidence for this is weak and cold fusiony. 
I quote: "Show me the money!" and: "Where's the beef?"


I can only conclude that this research is motivated by a political 
hype-driven agenda to get funding during the Great Recession. This isn't 
sound science, it's press conference science. I don't really blame them, 
things are tough all over and NASA needs money to conduct their important 
work. It's just that you can only yell "Wolf!" so many times.


__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] NASA Finds New Life Form

2010-12-08 Thread Chris Peterson
There is a big difference between "junk science" and science which is 
incomplete, or published too early, or even of generally marginal quality. 
In the case of this recent work, the hypothesis is sound and the techniques 
used are reasonable. Certainly, there is reason to suspect that more work 
should have been done before publishing (although that is far from certain 
at this point).


I don't know how this will all shake out in the long run. I'm sure that 
others will be pursuing similar work, and applying additional tests. In any 
case, having read the paper, I don't think this work can fairly be called 
"junk science". At worst, it is incomplete.


Chris

*
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com


- Original Message - 
From: "JoshuaTreeMuseum" 

To: 
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 1:00 AM
Subject: [meteorite-list] NASA Finds New Life Form


What's up with the NASA junk science? First it's psuedo-fossils in 
meteorites, now a phony not-new life form. What's next,  cold fusion?


__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] NASA Finds New Life Form

2010-12-08 Thread Mark Ford

To be honest i'm not sure their paper is that much more flawed than many
papers of this type are -  after all the point of publishing a paper is
simply to initiate discussion, encourage people to repeat the experiment
and prompt for counter arguments. They can't answer all the questions in
one paper. I think the mistake many people make is attach too much
weight to one lonely science paper, rather, we should wait until others
have repeated/refuted the claims.


 I think the problem comes from a PR point of view when they do 'world
wide' announcements, that are over hyped up. They seemingly didn't learn
from the Martian meteorite life one did they.. 

The danger of using the 'NASA' name to seemingly add creedance to a
claim in this way, is at some point you are going to shoot yourself in
the foot, and when (if) they do ever find real alien life, is any one
going to believe it?

Mark




-Original Message-
From: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
[mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of
JoshuaTreeMuseum
Sent: 08 December 2010 08:00
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: [meteorite-list] NASA Finds New Life Form

What's up with the NASA junk science? First it's psuedo-fossils in 
meteorites, now a phony not-new life form. What's next,  cold fusion?
--
For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism. (SW)

Phil Whitmer





And, the blowback:

http://rrresearch.blogspot.com/2010/12/arsenic-associated-bacteria-nasas
.html

http://www.slate.com/id/2276919/

__
Visit the Archives at
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: 

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential. If you are not 
the intended recipient, please notify us. Email i...@ssl.gb.com. You should not 
copy or use this email or attachment(s) for any purpose nor disclose their 
contents to any other person. 

GENERAL STATEMENT:

Southern Scientific Ltd's computer systems may be monitored and communications 
carried on them recorded, to secure the effective operation of the system and 
for other lawful purposes.

Registered address Rectory Farm Rd, Sompting, Lancing, W Sussex BN15 0DP. 
Company No 1800317


__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] NASA Finds New Life Form

2010-12-07 Thread Darren Garrison
And, the blowback:

http://rrresearch.blogspot.com/2010/12/arsenic-associated-bacteria-nasas.html

http://www.slate.com/id/2276919/
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] NASA Finds New Life Form

2010-12-05 Thread Thomas

God is the strange attractor at the end of the universe.

Thomas M
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] NASA Finds New Life Form

2010-12-05 Thread Meteorites USA

Didn't you know...? The Earth is flat! Sheesh... ;)

Eric


On 12/5/2010 4:33 PM, Michael Blood wrote:

Hi Jim and all,
 Personally, I am weary of hearing about "God is dead"
.and Atheists - not to mention figures from various "religious"
Sects - they ALL seem to think of "God" as some anthropomorphic
Male big know-it-all, vengeful, anti sex, homophobic HUMAN - not
all that far removed from Greek mythological "gods."
 I don't believe in the same "God" the atheists don't believe in.
Ironically, they seem to be willing to throw out everything not of this
Physical plane as well. Being anti religion does not require being anti
Metaphysical.
 How it was that "Christians" (and I use the term VERY loosely)
Decided that "God" and evolution are somehow magically incompatible
Is beyond me as well. To conclude that if life did not originate on Earth
somehow negates anything at all flabbergasts me. Is this the 1600s or
what?
 Amen and hookie zookie, Michael

On 12/5/10 6:02 AM, "jimsk...@aol.com"  wrote:

   

The debate begins.

Does a New Life Form Mean God Is Dead?

_http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/12/04/does-a-new-life-form-mean-god-is-de
ad/?icid=main%7Chtmlws-main-n%7Cdl1%7Csec1_lnk3%7C188214_
(http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/12/04/does-a-new-life-form-mean-god-is-dead
/?icid=main|html
ws-main-n|dl1|sec1_lnk3|188214)

Jim K
__
Visit the Archives at
http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 


__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

   

__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] NASA Finds New Life Form

2010-12-05 Thread Michael Blood
Hi Jim and all,
Personally, I am weary of hearing about "God is dead"
.and Atheists - not to mention figures from various "religious"
Sects - they ALL seem to think of "God" as some anthropomorphic
Male big know-it-all, vengeful, anti sex, homophobic HUMAN - not
all that far removed from Greek mythological "gods."
I don't believe in the same "God" the atheists don't believe in.
Ironically, they seem to be willing to throw out everything not of this
Physical plane as well. Being anti religion does not require being anti
Metaphysical.  
How it was that "Christians" (and I use the term VERY loosely)
Decided that "God" and evolution are somehow magically incompatible
Is beyond me as well. To conclude that if life did not originate on Earth
somehow negates anything at all flabbergasts me. Is this the 1600s or
what?
Amen and hookie zookie, Michael

On 12/5/10 6:02 AM, "jimsk...@aol.com"  wrote:

> The debate begins.
>  
> Does a New Life Form Mean God Is Dead?
> 
> _http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/12/04/does-a-new-life-form-mean-god-is-de
> ad/?icid=main%7Chtmlws-main-n%7Cdl1%7Csec1_lnk3%7C188214_
> (http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/12/04/does-a-new-life-form-mean-god-is-dead
> /?icid=main|html
> ws-main-n|dl1|sec1_lnk3|188214)
>  
> Jim K
> __
> Visit the Archives at
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] NASA Finds New Life Form

2010-12-05 Thread Count Deiro
Hi List, 

Just want to share a smile I got while answering a call of nature in a stall at 
Indiana University many years ago. The scratches on the wall proclaimed:

"GOD IS DEAD! NITEZSCHE."

Under this.. and in a different hand.

"NITZSCHE IS DEAD! GOD."

Regards,

Guido


-Original Message-
>From: jimsk...@aol.com
>Sent: Dec 5, 2010 6:02 AM
>To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] NASA Finds New Life Form
>
>The debate begins.
> 
>Does a New Life Form Mean God Is Dead?
>
>_http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/12/04/does-a-new-life-form-mean-god-is-de
>ad/?icid=main%7Chtmlws-main-n%7Cdl1%7Csec1_lnk3%7C188214_ 
>(http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/12/04/does-a-new-life-form-mean-god-is-dead/?icid=main|html
>ws-main-n|dl1|sec1_lnk3|188214) 
> 
>Jim K
>__
>Visit the Archives at 
>http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>Meteorite-list mailing list
>Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
>http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] NASA Finds New Life Form

2010-12-05 Thread Jimski47
The debate begins.
 
Does a New Life Form Mean God Is Dead?

_http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/12/04/does-a-new-life-form-mean-god-is-de
ad/?icid=main%7Chtmlws-main-n%7Cdl1%7Csec1_lnk3%7C188214_ 
(http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/12/04/does-a-new-life-form-mean-god-is-dead/?icid=main|html
ws-main-n|dl1|sec1_lnk3|188214) 
 
Jim K
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] NASA Finds New Life Form

2010-12-02 Thread Meteorites USA
Interestingly enough NASA announces a discovery that helps change and 
expand our understanding of what kind of life is possible in the 
universe. This worldwide scientific news gets a few little blurbs on the 
Met-List. ;)


For those who'd like to read more on this discovery:
NASA: 
http://www.nasa.gov/topics/universe/features/astrobiology_toxic_chemical.html
Astrobiology Magazine: 
http://www.astrobio.net/exclusive/3698/thriving-on-arsenic
Scientific American: 
http://www.scientificamerican.com/podcast/episode.cfm?id=bacteria-use-arsenic-as-basic-build-10-12-02
Space.com: 
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/arsenic-bacteria-alien-life-101202.html
Discover Magazine: 
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2010/12/02/of-arsenic-and-aliens/
Wall Street Journal: 
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703377504575650840897300342.html
USA Today: 
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/space/2010-12-03-microbe03_ST_N.htm
Christian Science Monitor: 
http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2010/1202/Arsenic-microbe-in-Mono-Lake-may-reshape-hunt-for-extraterrestrial-life

BBC News: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-11886943
CNN: http://edition.cnn.com/2010/US/12/02/nasa.extraterrestrial.life/?hpt=T2

Enjoy...

Regards,
Eric





On 12/2/2010 10:03 AM, Adam Hupe wrote:

Supposedly the cat is out of the bag

Here is the link:

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/12/nasa-finds-new-life/

Best Regards,

Adam
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

   

__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] NASA Finds New Life Form

2010-12-02 Thread Carl 's

I saw something else on (I think) The History Channel with another life form 
near Mono Lake:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3o2-xj_axpY&feature=related
 
NASA didn't mention anything about this, did they?
 
Carl2

 
 
Adam wrote:
>I saw a show on one of the educational channels over a year ago which 
>discussed 
the bacteria living in poisonous Mono Lake.  They nearly touched on this very 
issue when discussing extremaphiles.  Look at how small (~1 micron) the 
bacteriais.  I remember this being one of the reasons for discounting the 
fossils in 
ALH84001 which were said to be too small to support DNA...  
  
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] NASA Finds New Life Form

2010-12-02 Thread Darren Garrison
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010 10:03:00 -0800 (PST), you wrote:
>
>http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/12/nasa-finds-new-life/
>

Jesus, is Jesus there heavy on the hyperbole!

Here's an article written by someone who ISN'T a complete idiot.

http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2010/12/bacteria-can-integrate-arsenic-into-its-dna-and-proteins.ars
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] NASA Finds New Life Form

2010-12-02 Thread Pete Pete


 
 
Another big change to the Drake Equation!
 
Very exciting! Little boundries for life!
 
Cheers,
Pete

 
 
 

> Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 10:03:00 -0800
> From: raremeteori...@yahoo.com
> To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> Subject: [meteorite-list] NASA Finds New Life Form
> 
> 
> Supposedly the cat is out of the bag
> 
> Here is the link:
> 
> http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/12/nasa-finds-new-life/
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Adam
> __
> Visit the Archives at 
> http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list   
>   
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] NASA Finds New Life Form

2010-12-02 Thread Adam Hupe
I saw a show on one of the educational channels over a year ago which discussed 
the bacteria living in poisonous Mono Lake.  They nearly touched on this very 
issue when discussing extremaphiles.  Look at how small (~1 micron) the 
bacteria 
is.  I remember this being one of the reasons for discounting the fossils in 
ALH 
84001 which were said to be too small to support DNA.

I am waiting patiently for them to announce the too numerous to count organized 
elements in NWA 998 which is the subject of intense study right now.  I thought 
this would be announced this year as they predicted at the begging of the year.


Best Regards,

Adam






- Original Message 
From: Adam Hupe 
To: Adam 
Sent: Thu, December 2, 2010 10:03:00 AM
Subject: [meteorite-list] NASA Finds New Life Form


Supposedly the cat is out of the bag

Here is the link:

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/12/nasa-finds-new-life/

Best Regards,

Adam
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list