Re: [mezzanine-users] TESTING, South, Django-Redirects, and OPTIONAL_APPS
I believe none of this occurs anymore in the development version. On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 4:19 AM, shawn.vanitter...@appdynamics.com wrote: When running manage.py test, Mezzanine's utils/conf.py automatically sets settings.TESTING = True. A few lines later, it forks based on the TESTING setting: If TESTING is False, then South and OPTIONAL_APPS are added to INSTALLED_APPS. If TESTING is True, then those apps are NOT added, and furthermore django.contrib.redirects is removed from INSTALLED_APPS. 1. What is the rationale for removing django.contrib.redirects during testing? 2. What is the rationale for removing South during testing? 3. Why aren't the optional apps loaded during testing? 4. How can we override or prevent these configurations? Thanks, Shawn -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Mezzanine Users group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mezzanine-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Stephen McDonald http://jupo.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Mezzanine Users group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mezzanine-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Re: [mezzanine-users] Little bug with blog post related posts template block?
Right you are, fixed here: https://github.com/stephenmcd/mezzanine/commit/69fcdac74d6d283d9284f5e75b6869b27c81734d Thanks! On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Lee H. popov.gh...@gmail.com wrote: The template block for related posts in the blog detail template has `for post in blog_post.related_posts.all`, shouldn't it be `for post in blog_post.related_posts.published` (or rather published for that user...)? The way things are now, if a related post is unpublished it still gets linked at the bottom of a blog post, and hence the user can click it to arrive at a 404. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Mezzanine Users group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mezzanine-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Stephen McDonald http://jupo.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Mezzanine Users group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mezzanine-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
[mezzanine-users] Link model - external vs internal URLs
Hi all, We're looking at fixing some issues around the Link model. Its original intention was for external links (to other websites), but people currently use it with internal links as well to achieve different scenarios with site navigation. If you have other examples of this that you depend on, could you chime in here: https://github.com/stephenmcd/mezzanine/issues/1345#issuecomment-118676898 Thanks -- Stephen McDonald http://jupo.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Mezzanine Users group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to mezzanine-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
