[uf-discuss] datetime-design-pattern and the hAtom spec
Can the references in the hAtom draft: http://microformats.org/wiki/hatom to datetime-design-pattern (for published and updated) be safely modified to point instead to: http://microformats.org/wiki/machine-data#Embedding_Fixed_Data_Formats_in_Microformats -- Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis ___ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
Re: [uf-discuss] Datetime design pattern
On 4/16/07, Ryan King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's a great suggestion. At the very least, any page could have a section at the bottom for discussion elsewhere, for linking to resources outside the wiki that provide background information. Hm, that's probably a better idea than my one of a separate page per uF, in that there's lower overhead in adding it to the existing pages, and the fact it's visible on the page could prompt people to add links, rather than it being tucked away. -Ciaran McNulty ___ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
Re: [uf-discuss] Datetime design pattern
I see. Thanks Ciaran! On 16/04/07, Ciaran McNulty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/16/07, victor jalencas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is the datetime design pattern strictly limited to the abbr element, or can it be used on other elements (like a list item for example). Yes, it's limited to ABBR [1] -- Victor Jalencas [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
Re: [uf-discuss] Datetime design pattern
On 4/16/07, Ryan King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 16, 2007, at 1:17 AM, Ciaran McNulty wrote:
It would be nice, IMO, if the wiki linked to the relevant sections of
the mailing list, IRC logs and influential blog posts for decisions
like this. It would help to explain a lot of the thinking behind
'controversial' decisions like the datetime design pattern, rel-tags
url scheme and a few other things that seem to cause puzzlement.
That's a great suggestion. At the very least, any page could have a
section at the bottom for discussion elsewhere, for linking to
resources outside the wiki that provide background information.
And when there's a whole set of related pages, templates are very useful.
For example, on page [1] I have the See Also section as:
{{item-see-also}}
This can then be reused on all item-* pages
Regards, etc...
[1] http://microformats.org/wiki/items-formats
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
