Re: [uf-discuss] addresses for rural delivery

[Ciaran McNulty]

On 2/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

So far I have for this

p class=adr
span class=extended-addressBeverleigh and Grant Muir/spanbr /
span class=extended-addressRD1/spanbr /
span class=localityHari Hari/span span class=postal-code7953/classbr 
/
span class=regionSouth Westland/spanbr /
span class=country-nameNew Zealand/span
/p


I would think that the name of the recipients is the FN, not part of
the address.

Are Rural Delivery numbers similar enough to post-office-box perhaps?

-Ciaran McNulty
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss

[uf-discuss] addresses for rural delivery

[pmw57]

I've been marking up some content with the hCard format but came across a 
puzzling dilemma.

In New Zealand, rural delivery addresses are commonly presented as

Beverleigh and Grant Muir
RD1
Hari Hari 7953
South Westland
New Zealand 

Our postal system has another example of how they should be presented on their 
Rural Delivery page at 
http://www.nzpost.co.nz/Cultures/en-NZ/Personal/ManageMailDelivery/RuralDelivery/

I've been trying to work out how to mark it up in the hCard, but as far as I 
know, rural delivery situations are going to be tricky.

So far I have for this

p class=adr
span class=extended-addressBeverleigh and Grant Muir/spanbr /
span class=extended-addressRD1/spanbr /
span class=localityHari Hari/span span 
class=postal-code7953/classbr /
span class=regionSouth Westland/spanbr /
span class=country-nameNew Zealand/span
/p

Is this close to how it can be most effectively marked up?

-- 
Paul Wilkins
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss