Re: [Mikrotik] Need OSPF help !
On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 16:08 +, Paul McCall wrote: Any of you experts want to remote in and fix an OSPF problem? (for pay) I see you got this fixed. Can't find Butch Today was an odd day. I volunteered to work on a local community center issue today and what I thought would be a 2 or 3 hour issue ended up taking about 9 or 10 hours. There are certainly too many experts in this town. :-) Glad you got it fixed! -- * Butch Evans* Professional Network Consultation * * http://www.butchevans.com/ * Network Engineering * * http://store.wispgear.net/ * Wired or Wireless Networks * * http://blog.butchevans.com/ * ImageStream, Mikrotik and MORE!* * NOTE THE NEW PHONE NUMBER: 702-537-0979 * ___ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
Re: [Mikrotik] Need OSPF help !
On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 16:20 +, Paul McCall wrote: The problem tower's OSPF state for the desired new leg is dr other if that is a clue This is not really a state per se. OSPF State describes a relationship status in terms of adjacency. This is visible on the neighbors tab in RouterOS. It will be either init, two-way, exchange, full or one of about 2 or 3 other possible states. What you are referring to is something that happens upon OSPF startup on a network that is a broadcast type network (such as ethernet, frame-relay, wireless, etc.) On these network types, the routers on a given network segment will initiate an election to determine which device will be the DR (designated router), BDR (backup dr) and which will be simply participants in the network. This election is based first on the OSPF priority of each interface in the segment. The priority is configured per interface. In RouterOS, the default priority is 1. Highest priority wins the election. In the event of a tie in this election, the highest (32-bit value) RouterID will win. In this election, second place will become the BDR. On a router, each of it's ospf interfaces is either DR, BDR or dr other (that is a routeros term). A router may have various status on each of it's ospf interfaces. There is a really good description of this here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Shortest_Path_First I know you got this working, but it is the teacher in me that feels the need to explain things when I see a misunderstanding. :-) -- * Butch Evans* Professional Network Consultation * * http://www.butchevans.com/ * Network Engineering * * http://store.wispgear.net/ * Wired or Wireless Networks * * http://blog.butchevans.com/ * ImageStream, Mikrotik and MORE!* * NOTE THE NEW PHONE NUMBER: 702-537-0979 * ___ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
Re: [Mikrotik] Need OSPF help !
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 02:12 -0500, Butch Evans wrote: On Mon, 2012-07-23 at 16:20 +, Paul McCall wrote: The problem tower's OSPF state for the desired new leg is dr other if that is a clue I know you got this working, but it is the teacher in me that feels the need to explain things when I see a misunderstanding. :-) One thing further on this topic is that this is not in any way related to path preference for data. Also, it really has little bearing on anything which router becomes the DR/BDR/DR OTHER in most cases. For what it's worth, this is part of the topic that will be discussed in GREAT DETAIL at my class before the MUM this year (assuming I stick with the MTCTCE course). -- * Butch Evans* Professional Network Consultation * * http://www.butchevans.com/ * Network Engineering * * http://store.wispgear.net/ * Wired or Wireless Networks * * http://blog.butchevans.com/ * ImageStream, Mikrotik and MORE!* * NOTE THE NEW PHONE NUMBER: 702-537-0979 * ___ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
Re: [Mikrotik] Need OSPF help !
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 02:17 -0500, Butch Evans wrote: For what it's worth, this is part of the topic that will be discussed in GREAT DETAIL at my class before the MUM this year (assuming I stick with the MTCTCE course). I guess I may as well give you the troubleshooting tips for this type of issue as well. When you are first turning OSPF up on an interface (adding the network setting), you should first ensure that the interface was added (dynamic) to Routing-OSPF-Interfaces tab. You will see a neighbor count - this would have been your first indication that there was a communication problem between this router and the others on the network. You SHOULD have exactly the same number of neighbors on every router on the segment. In your case, you probably did NOT. The problem router was not seeing all the other routers on the segment. Looking on the Routing-OSPF-Neighbors tab would have shown you which router(s) it WAS seeing, along with the state. You should always see state full with the DR and BDR, and 2-way with all other routers (grouped per interface), UNLESS you ARE either the DR or BDR, in which case you will see ALL other routers with state full. I will not bore you all with any other scenarios, but by looking at these things on all routers on the segment would allow you to determine where the problem was located in this instance. -- * Butch Evans* Professional Network Consultation * * http://www.butchevans.com/ * Network Engineering * * http://store.wispgear.net/ * Wired or Wireless Networks * * http://blog.butchevans.com/ * ImageStream, Mikrotik and MORE!* * NOTE THE NEW PHONE NUMBER: 702-537-0979 * ___ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
[Mikrotik] Route marking problem
Hello, i have 2 Links in my MT one DSL and one fiber i use DSL for our lan and fiber for my server. i want the lan subnet's (172.16.100.0/24) for now to go out through DSL and servers (172.16.101.0/24 through Fiber so i did in firewall mangle mark the traffic comming from 172.16.100.0/24 as a lan and added a default route (0.0.0.0) with routing mark of lan to the DSL router while the server subnet (172.16.101.0/24 remind unmarked all is working werll so far nat also same using address list but for now my server's can't ping my lan and my lan can't ping my servers any idea ? thank you all Meftah Tayeb IT Consulting http://www.tmvoip.com/ phone: +21321656139 Mobile: +213660347746 __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7324 (20120724) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com ___ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
Re: [Mikrotik] Route marking problem
/ip fi man add chain=prerouting dst-address=172.16.0.0/12 action=accept place-before=0 -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2012/7/24 Meftah Tayeb tayeb.mef...@gmail.com Hello, i have 2 Links in my MT one DSL and one fiber i use DSL for our lan and fiber for my server. i want the lan subnet's (172.16.100.0/24) for now to go out through DSL and servers (172.16.101.0/24 through Fiber so i did in firewall mangle mark the traffic comming from 172.16.100.0/24as a lan and added a default route (0.0.0.0) with routing mark of lan to the DSL router while the server subnet (172.16.101.0/24 remind unmarked all is working werll so far nat also same using address list but for now my server's can't ping my lan and my lan can't ping my servers any idea ? thank you all Meftah Tayeb IT Consulting http://www.tmvoip.com/ phone: +21321656139 Mobile: +213660347746 __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7324 (20120724) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __**_ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotikhttp://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20120724/eafa9415/attachment.html ___ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
Re: [Mikrotik] Route marking problem
done it but still no effect :( thank you - Original Message - From: Chupaka chup...@gmail.com To: Mikrotik discussions mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 3:02 PM Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] Route marking problem /ip fi man add chain=prerouting dst-address=172.16.0.0/12 action=accept place-before=0 -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2012/7/24 Meftah Tayeb tayeb.mef...@gmail.com Hello, i have 2 Links in my MT one DSL and one fiber i use DSL for our lan and fiber for my server. i want the lan subnet's (172.16.100.0/24) for now to go out through DSL and servers (172.16.101.0/24 through Fiber so i did in firewall mangle mark the traffic comming from 172.16.100.0/24as a lan and added a default route (0.0.0.0) with routing mark of lan to the DSL router while the server subnet (172.16.101.0/24 remind unmarked all is working werll so far nat also same using address list but for now my server's can't ping my lan and my lan can't ping my servers any idea ? thank you all Meftah Tayeb IT Consulting http://www.tmvoip.com/ phone: +21321656139 Mobile: +213660347746 __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7324 (20120724) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __**_ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotikhttp://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20120724/eafa9415/attachment.html ___ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7324 (20120724) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com ___ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
Re: [Mikrotik] Route marking problem
show traceroute from one subnet to another one -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2012/7/24 Meftah Tayeb tayeb.mef...@gmail.com done it but still no effect :( thank you - Original Message - From: Chupaka chup...@gmail.com To: Mikrotik discussions mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 3:02 PM Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] Route marking problem /ip fi man add chain=prerouting dst-address=172.16.0.0/12 action=accept place-before=0 -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2012/7/24 Meftah Tayeb tayeb.mef...@gmail.com Hello, i have 2 Links in my MT one DSL and one fiber i use DSL for our lan and fiber for my server. i want the lan subnet's (172.16.100.0/24) for now to go out through DSL and servers (172.16.101.0/24 through Fiber so i did in firewall mangle mark the traffic comming from 172.16.100.0/24as a lan and added a default route (0.0.0.0) with routing mark of lan to the DSL router while the server subnet (172.16.101.0/24 remind unmarked all is working werll so far nat also same using address list but for now my server's can't ping my lan and my lan can't ping my servers any idea ? thank you all Meftah Tayeb IT Consulting http://www.tmvoip.com/ phone: +21321656139 Mobile: +213660347746 __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7324 (20120724) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com ___ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotikhttp://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotik http**://www.butchevans.com/mailman/**listinfo/mikrotikhttp://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.butchevans.com/**pipermail/mikrotik/** attachments/20120724/eafa9415/**attachment.htmlhttp://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20120724/eafa9415/attachment.html __**_ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotikhttp://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7324 (20120724) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __**_ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotikhttp://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20120724/46f2f482/attachment.html ___ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
Re: [Mikrotik] Route marking problem
traceroute from 172.16.101.254 to 172.16.100.2 show only 172.16.100.1 and then only * - Original Message - From: Chupaka chup...@gmail.com To: Mikrotik discussions mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 4:02 PM Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] Route marking problem show traceroute from one subnet to another one -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2012/7/24 Meftah Tayeb tayeb.mef...@gmail.com done it but still no effect :( thank you - Original Message - From: Chupaka chup...@gmail.com To: Mikrotik discussions mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 3:02 PM Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] Route marking problem /ip fi man add chain=prerouting dst-address=172.16.0.0/12 action=accept place-before=0 -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2012/7/24 Meftah Tayeb tayeb.mef...@gmail.com Hello, i have 2 Links in my MT one DSL and one fiber i use DSL for our lan and fiber for my server. i want the lan subnet's (172.16.100.0/24) for now to go out through DSL and servers (172.16.101.0/24 through Fiber so i did in firewall mangle mark the traffic comming from 172.16.100.0/24as a lan and added a default route (0.0.0.0) with routing mark of lan to the DSL router while the server subnet (172.16.101.0/24 remind unmarked all is working werll so far nat also same using address list but for now my server's can't ping my lan and my lan can't ping my servers any idea ? thank you all Meftah Tayeb IT Consulting http://www.tmvoip.com/ phone: +21321656139 Mobile: +213660347746 __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7324 (20120724) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com ___ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotikhttp://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotik http**://www.butchevans.com/mailman/**listinfo/mikrotikhttp://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.butchevans.com/**pipermail/mikrotik/** attachments/20120724/eafa9415/**attachment.htmlhttp://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20120724/eafa9415/attachment.html __**_ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotikhttp://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7324 (20120724) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __**_ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotikhttp://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20120724/46f2f482/attachment.html ___ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7325 (20120724) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com ___ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
Re: [Mikrotik] Route marking problem
what addresses are on router's interfaces? because gateway of 172.16.101.254/24 subnet cannot be outside that subnet (172.16.100.1) or you may have more complicated setup - anyway we need moar info :) -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2012/7/24 Meftah Tayeb tayeb.mef...@gmail.com traceroute from 172.16.101.254 to 172.16.100.2 show only 172.16.100.1 and then only * - Original Message - From: Chupaka chup...@gmail.com To: Mikrotik discussions mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 4:02 PM Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] Route marking problem show traceroute from one subnet to another one -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2012/7/24 Meftah Tayeb tayeb.mef...@gmail.com done it but still no effect :( thank you - Original Message - From: Chupaka chup...@gmail.com To: Mikrotik discussions mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 3:02 PM Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] Route marking problem /ip fi man add chain=prerouting dst-address=172.16.0.0/12 action=accept place-before=0 -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2012/7/24 Meftah Tayeb tayeb.mef...@gmail.com Hello, i have 2 Links in my MT one DSL and one fiber i use DSL for our lan and fiber for my server. i want the lan subnet's (172.16.100.0/24) for now to go out through DSL and servers (172.16.101.0/24 through Fiber so i did in firewall mangle mark the traffic comming from 172.16.100.0/24as a lan and added a default route (0.0.0.0) with routing mark of lan to the DSL router while the server subnet (172.16.101.0/24 remind unmarked all is working werll so far nat also same using address list but for now my server's can't ping my lan and my lan can't ping my servers any idea ? thank you all Meftah Tayeb IT Consulting http://www.tmvoip.com/ phone: +21321656139 Mobile: +213660347746 __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7324 (20120724) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __**_ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotikhttp://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik http**://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotikhttp://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotik http**://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/**listinfo/mikrotikhttp://www.butchevans.com/mailman/**listinfo/mikrotik ht**tp://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotikhttp://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/**http://www.butchevans.com/**pipermail/mikrotik/** attachments/20120724/eafa9415/attachment.htmlhttp://www.** butchevans.com/pipermail/**mikrotik/attachments/20120724/** eafa9415/attachment.htmlhttp://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20120724/eafa9415/attachment.html ___ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotikhttp://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotik http**://www.butchevans.com/mailman/**listinfo/mikrotikhttp://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7324 (20120724) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com ___ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotikhttp://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotik http**://www.butchevans.com/mailman/**listinfo/mikrotikhttp://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.butchevans.com/**pipermail/mikrotik/** attachments/20120724/46f2f482/**attachment.htmlhttp://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20120724/46f2f482/attachment.html __**_ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotikhttp://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7325 (20120724) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com
Re: [Mikrotik] Route marking problem
both gateway is 172.16.100.1 and 172.16.101.1 - Original Message - From: Chupaka chup...@gmail.com To: Mikrotik discussions mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 4:12 PM Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] Route marking problem what addresses are on router's interfaces? because gateway of 172.16.101.254/24 subnet cannot be outside that subnet (172.16.100.1) or you may have more complicated setup - anyway we need moar info :) -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2012/7/24 Meftah Tayeb tayeb.mef...@gmail.com traceroute from 172.16.101.254 to 172.16.100.2 show only 172.16.100.1 and then only * - Original Message - From: Chupaka chup...@gmail.com To: Mikrotik discussions mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 4:02 PM Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] Route marking problem show traceroute from one subnet to another one -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2012/7/24 Meftah Tayeb tayeb.mef...@gmail.com done it but still no effect :( thank you - Original Message - From: Chupaka chup...@gmail.com To: Mikrotik discussions mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 3:02 PM Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] Route marking problem /ip fi man add chain=prerouting dst-address=172.16.0.0/12 action=accept place-before=0 -- Подпись: (добавляется в конце всех исходящих писем) 2012/7/24 Meftah Tayeb tayeb.mef...@gmail.com Hello, i have 2 Links in my MT one DSL and one fiber i use DSL for our lan and fiber for my server. i want the lan subnet's (172.16.100.0/24) for now to go out through DSL and servers (172.16.101.0/24 through Fiber so i did in firewall mangle mark the traffic comming from 172.16.100.0/24as a lan and added a default route (0.0.0.0) with routing mark of lan to the DSL router while the server subnet (172.16.101.0/24 remind unmarked all is working werll so far nat also same using address list but for now my server's can't ping my lan and my lan can't ping my servers any idea ? thank you all Meftah Tayeb IT Consulting http://www.tmvoip.com/ phone: +21321656139 Mobile: +213660347746 __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7324 (20120724) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __**_ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotikhttp://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik http**://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotikhttp://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotik http**://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/**listinfo/mikrotikhttp://www.butchevans.com/mailman/**listinfo/mikrotik ht**tp://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotikhttp://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/**http://www.butchevans.com/**pipermail/mikrotik/** attachments/20120724/eafa9415/attachment.htmlhttp://www.** butchevans.com/pipermail/**mikrotik/attachments/20120724/** eafa9415/attachment.htmlhttp://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20120724/eafa9415/attachment.html ___ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotikhttp://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotik http**://www.butchevans.com/mailman/**listinfo/mikrotikhttp://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7324 (20120724) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com ___ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotikhttp://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotik http**://www.butchevans.com/mailman/**listinfo/mikrotikhttp://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.butchevans.com/**pipermail/mikrotik/** attachments/20120724/46f2f482/**attachment.htmlhttp://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20120724/46f2f482/attachment.html __**_ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/**mailman/listinfo/mikrotikhttp://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version
Re: [Mikrotik] Need OSPF help !
Butch, you are the man. I kept this all for my notes. -Ty On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 2:29 AM, Butch Evans but...@butchevans.com wrote: On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 02:17 -0500, Butch Evans wrote: For what it's worth, this is part of the topic that will be discussed in GREAT DETAIL at my class before the MUM this year (assuming I stick with the MTCTCE course). I guess I may as well give you the troubleshooting tips for this type of issue as well. When you are first turning OSPF up on an interface (adding the network setting), you should first ensure that the interface was added (dynamic) to Routing-OSPF-Interfaces tab. You will see a neighbor count - this would have been your first indication that there was a communication problem between this router and the others on the network. You SHOULD have exactly the same number of neighbors on every router on the segment. In your case, you probably did NOT. The problem router was not seeing all the other routers on the segment. Looking on the Routing-OSPF-Neighbors tab would have shown you which router(s) it WAS seeing, along with the state. You should always see state full with the DR and BDR, and 2-way with all other routers (grouped per interface), UNLESS you ARE either the DR or BDR, in which case you will see ALL other routers with state full. I will not bore you all with any other scenarios, but by looking at these things on all routers on the segment would allow you to determine where the problem was located in this instance. -- * Butch Evans* Professional Network Consultation * * http://www.butchevans.com/ * Network Engineering * * http://store.wispgear.net/ * Wired or Wireless Networks * * http://blog.butchevans.com/ * ImageStream, Mikrotik and MORE!* * NOTE THE NEW PHONE NUMBER: 702-537-0979 * ___ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20120724/2dc87a3a/attachment.html ___ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
Re: [Mikrotik] Route marking problem
Add a route for 172.16.201.0/24 with gateway = 172.21.201.1 and routing table = lan The only routes 172.16.100.0/24 knows are the ones in the lan routing table. You have to tell that one everything it needs to be able to get to. On 7/24/2012 3:38 AM, Meftah Tayeb wrote: Hello, i have 2 Links in my MT one DSL and one fiber i use DSL for our lan and fiber for my server. i want the lan subnet's (172.16.100.0/24) for now to go out through DSL and servers (172.16.101.0/24 through Fiber so i did in firewall mangle mark the traffic comming from 172.16.100.0/24 as a lan and added a default route (0.0.0.0) with routing mark of lan to the DSL router while the server subnet (172.16.101.0/24 remind unmarked all is working werll so far nat also same using address list but for now my server's can't ping my lan and my lan can't ping my servers any idea ? thank you all Meftah Tayeb IT Consulting http://www.tmvoip.com/ phone: +21321656139 Mobile: +213660347746 __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7324 (20120724) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com ___ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2012.0.2197 / Virus Database: 2437/5150 - Release Date: 07/23/12 -- Scott Reed Owner NewWays Networking, LLC Wireless Networking Network Design, Installation and Administration Mikrotik Advanced Certified www.nwwnet.net (765) 855-1060 (765) 439-4253 (855) 231-6239 ___ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
Re: [Mikrotik] Route marking problem
ok, while try that thank you ! - Original Message - From: Scott Reed sr...@nwwnet.net To: Mikrotik discussions mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 11:56 PM Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] Route marking problem Add a route for 172.16.201.0/24 with gateway = 172.21.201.1 and routing table = lan The only routes 172.16.100.0/24 knows are the ones in the lan routing table. You have to tell that one everything it needs to be able to get to. On 7/24/2012 3:38 AM, Meftah Tayeb wrote: Hello, i have 2 Links in my MT one DSL and one fiber i use DSL for our lan and fiber for my server. i want the lan subnet's (172.16.100.0/24) for now to go out through DSL and servers (172.16.101.0/24 through Fiber so i did in firewall mangle mark the traffic comming from 172.16.100.0/24 as a lan and added a default route (0.0.0.0) with routing mark of lan to the DSL router while the server subnet (172.16.101.0/24 remind unmarked all is working werll so far nat also same using address list but for now my server's can't ping my lan and my lan can't ping my servers any idea ? thank you all Meftah Tayeb IT Consulting http://www.tmvoip.com/ phone: +21321656139 Mobile: +213660347746 __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7324 (20120724) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com ___ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2012.0.2197 / Virus Database: 2437/5150 - Release Date: 07/23/12 -- Scott Reed Owner NewWays Networking, LLC Wireless Networking Network Design, Installation and Administration Mikrotik Advanced Certified www.nwwnet.net (765) 855-1060 (765) 439-4253 (855) 231-6239 ___ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7325 (20120724) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7325 (20120724) __ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com ___ Mikrotik mailing list Mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com http://www.butchevans.com/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik RouterOS
