Re: [Mikrotik Users] Small setup...

[T tech via Mikrotik-users]

You can tunnel port 2s and tunnel port 3s and run two eoip tunnels.

On May 3, 2017 12:18 AM, "Dan Harling via Mikrotik-users" <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 9:06 PM, Blair Davis via Mikrotik-users
>  wrote:
> > I have a small network I need to modify
> >
> > There are three locations, each with a RB433GL on site.
> >
> > Port one of each RB433GL is linked to port one of the other two
> > RB433GL's via a wireless bridge.
> >
> > Port two and three each go off to a separate local LAN at each location,
> > giving me six little LAN's that can route traffic among themselves.
> >
> > My client now wants to convert from six little LAN's to two bigger LAN's.
> >
> > He wants port two of each RB433GL to be part of one flat LAN and port
> > three of each RB433GL to be part of a different flat LAN.
>
> On each board: two VLANs on the ether1 interface, bridged to ether2 &
> ether3 respectively.
>
> Be sure that your client understands that this new topology will 1)
> cause the wireless bridge to start carrying broadcast packets for both
> LANs between all three RB433GLs, and 2) count on the bridge devices'
> STP algorithm to prevent packet storms.  Both are reasons that routed
> networks are usually preferable, unless a single broadcast domain is
> absolutely necessary for a particular application.
>
> Daniel Harling  <><
> Engineering, Cape Ann Communications
> 183 Main Street, Gloucester, MA  01930
> harl...@capeanncomm.com
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] ubiquiti to mikrotik

[T tech via Mikrotik-users]

Definition of low cost 128 foot guy no concrete engineered for 100mph ice
and snow 7 sqr feet wind load.  $3,850 include the 12 hours 2 person crew
to install.

Electric and permits extra.

Our trees average 80 feet.  Leaving 40 feet of antenna.

No crane, no bucket, no road way.  Tower weighs 450 - 500 pounds.  Carry
into the setting or site.

Did I misunderstand your question.

We made a custom driver for anchors.
Shovel. G-pole, rope, tools, harness, garden cabinet.

Can share off list parts an engineering.  Cost to get engineering stamp
$1,500.

On Feb 24, 2017 4:38 PM, "Jan-OOLLC via Mikrotik-users" <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

am interested in how you build low-cost towers with 128ft los

Jan V

On 02/24/2017 12:11 PM, Don Spaulding via Mikrotik-users wrote:

Would you mind sharing details on how you build your towers?

I'm a flatlander, but we still have trees!

On Feb 24, 2017 1:34 PM, "T tech via Mikrotik-users" <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> Tik metal 9.
>
> All we do is rural/remote.  Hills and trees.  Los requires 128 feet of
> height so we also build light weight, low cost towers.
>
>
>
>
> On Feb 24, 2017 8:37 AM, "Hexis via Mikrotik-users" <
> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>
> Out of curiosity, how did the MikroTik perform in comparison to the ubnt
> gear? I agree that Cambium gear in general is more well designed and GPS
> sync is a must for urban areas, but some rural areas with limited LOS
> require a cheap solution. In this case, do you pick ubnt or tik?
>
> On 2/24/2017 7:31 AM, T tech via Mikrotik-users wrote:
>
> At 200 devices we moved from ubnt to mikrotik at 1,600 we are evaluating
> cambium
>
> Mikrotik positioned us for cambium
>
> In 3-4 years mikrotik will be routing and inside wifi only
>
>
> On Feb 23, 2017 9:38 PM, "David Milholen via Mikrotik-users" <
> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>
>> +1000 on ePMP
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2/6/2017 8:55 PM, Jason Wilson via Mikrotik-users wrote:
>>
>> Look past mikrotik and towards cambium ePMP.
>>
>> On Feb 6, 2017 6:43 PM, "Jan-OOLLC via Mikrotik-users" <
>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Thinking of moving from ubiquiti to mikrotik.  Has anyone else done
>>> this?  I need sector antenna's is there a comparable Mikrotik product to
>>> a Rocket for an AP?
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Jan V
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Mikrotik-users mailing 
>> listMikrotik-users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>
>> --
>> ___ Mikrotik-users mailing
>> list Mikrotik-users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman
>> /listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing 
> listMikrotik-users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
> ___ Mikrotik-users mailing
> list Mikrotik-users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman
> /listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
> ___ Mikrotik-users mailing
> list Mikrotik-users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman
> /listinfo/mikrotik-users

___
Mikrotik-users mailing
listMikrotik-users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users


___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] ubiquiti to mikrotik

[T tech via Mikrotik-users]

Tik metal 9.

All we do is rural/remote.  Hills and trees.  Los requires 128 feet of
height so we also build light weight, low cost towers.




On Feb 24, 2017 8:37 AM, "Hexis via Mikrotik-users" <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

Out of curiosity, how did the MikroTik perform in comparison to the ubnt
gear? I agree that Cambium gear in general is more well designed and GPS
sync is a must for urban areas, but some rural areas with limited LOS
require a cheap solution. In this case, do you pick ubnt or tik?

On 2/24/2017 7:31 AM, T tech via Mikrotik-users wrote:

At 200 devices we moved from ubnt to mikrotik at 1,600 we are evaluating
cambium

Mikrotik positioned us for cambium

In 3-4 years mikrotik will be routing and inside wifi only


On Feb 23, 2017 9:38 PM, "David Milholen via Mikrotik-users" <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> +1000 on ePMP
>
>
>
>
> On 2/6/2017 8:55 PM, Jason Wilson via Mikrotik-users wrote:
>
> Look past mikrotik and towards cambium ePMP.
>
> On Feb 6, 2017 6:43 PM, "Jan-OOLLC via Mikrotik-users" <
> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>
>> Thinking of moving from ubiquiti to mikrotik.  Has anyone else done
>> this?  I need sector antenna's is there a comparable Mikrotik product to
>> a Rocket for an AP?
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Jan V
>>
>> ___
>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>
>
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing 
> listMikrotik-users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
> --
> ___ Mikrotik-users mailing
> list Mikrotik-users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman
> /listinfo/mikrotik-users

___
Mikrotik-users mailing
listMikrotik-users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users


___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] ubiquiti to mikrotik

[T tech via Mikrotik-users]

At 200 devices we moved from ubnt to mikrotik at 1,600 we are evaluating
cambium

Mikrotik positioned us for cambium

In 3-4 years mikrotik will be routing and inside wifi only


On Feb 23, 2017 9:38 PM, "David Milholen via Mikrotik-users" <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> +1000 on ePMP
>
>
>
>
> On 2/6/2017 8:55 PM, Jason Wilson via Mikrotik-users wrote:
>
> Look past mikrotik and towards cambium ePMP.
>
> On Feb 6, 2017 6:43 PM, "Jan-OOLLC via Mikrotik-users" <
> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>
>> Thinking of moving from ubiquiti to mikrotik.  Has anyone else done
>> this?  I need sector antenna's is there a comparable Mikrotik product to
>> a Rocket for an AP?
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Jan V
>>
>> ___
>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>
>
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing 
> listMikrotik-users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
>
> --
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Equipment for sale cheap!

[T tech via Mikrotik-users]

We trash this amount weekly.  The 400 series can not meet the current
broadband levels and will negatively effect an entire network.  CPU time is
the root issue.  Today's need dictate 600mhz minimum and pushing the need
for 800-1100mhz.

On Sep 23, 2016 2:15 PM, "Shawn C. Peppers via Mikrotik-users" <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> Make me an offer.  Who ever takes them gets them all.  They are going in
> the trash otherwise.
>
> 2 - Mikrotik Routerboard 411
> 3 - Mikrotik Routerboard 411AH
> 4 - Ubnt XR9
> 3 - Mikrotik 493AH
> 2 - XR2
> 1 - XR5
> 1 - R52-350
> 1 - R5H
>
>
> Shawn C. Peppers
> Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment
> 866-680-8433 Toll Free
> 480-287-9960 Fax
> http://www.video-direct.tv
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Share single public ip to multiple private IP address

[T tech via Mikrotik-users]

Assigning a public IP should be done with routing not nating public on
customer router.  Nating a private IP /24 to a public is a masquerade.
Multiple /24 private to different public IP multiple routers is best.

On Sep 21, 2016 12:32 PM, "Ken Patrick via Mikrotik-users" <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> Sort of this is what i have now with src-nat
>
> /ip firewall nat add chain=srcnat action=src-nat src-address=
> 192.168.0.64/27 to-address=8.8.8.1;
> /ip firewall nat add chain=srcnat action=src-nat src-address=
> 192.168.0.96/27 to-address=8.8.8.2;
> /ip firewall nat add chain=srcnat action=src-nat src-address=
> 192.168.0.128/27 to-address=8.8.8.3;
> /ip firewall nat add chain=srcnat action=src-nat src-address=
> 192.168.0.160/27 to-address=8.8.8.4;
> /ip firewall nat add chain=srcnat action=src-nat src-address=
> 192.168.0.192/27 to-address=8.8.8.5;
> /ip firewall nat add chain=srcnat action=src-nat src-address=
> 192.168.0.224/27 to-address=8.8.8.6;
>
> Do i need to change it to masquerade and then add out interface ether1
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Shawn C. Peppers <
> videodirectwispal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Your confusing me a bit.  Are you thinking you can src nat a bunch of
>> private ips out one public ip and expect to dst nat from one outside public
>> ip to a bunch of private ips?
>>
>> You need to research carrier grade natting long term if you plan to keep
>> natting you customers.
>>
>> Shawn C. Peppers
>> Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment
>> 866-680-8433 Toll Free
>> 480-287-9960 Fax
>> http://www.video-direct.tv
>>
>> On Sep 21, 2016, at 10:18 AM, Ken Patrick  wrote:
>>
>> Socket I also need dst nat rules as currently with Src nat rules the
>> users complain they can't access Playststion network and streaming video on
>> some sites is slow whereas if I assign a static public ip the issues go
>> away but can't continue since I am running out
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 4:10 PM Shawn C. Peppers <
>> videodirectwispal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I don't understand your dst nat question.
>>>
>>> You can src nat the the /24 by breaking up the /24 subnet into smaller
>>> subnets in the firewall/nat rules.
>>>
>>> Shawn C. Peppers
>>> Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment
>>> 866-680-8433 Toll Free
>>> 480-287-9960 Fax
>>> http://www.video-direct.tv
>>>
>>> On Sep 21, 2016, at 10:03 AM, Ken Patrick via Mikrotik-users <
>>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi list,
>>> I have run out of public IPV4 address and not ready to go to IPv6 yet.
>>>
>>> I am trying to share 6 public IP address /27 to my /24 private IP
>>> address using a mikrotik router and want the Same public IP address to be
>>> used by the Src Nat and dst-Nat
>>>
>>> I.e. 24 private hosts will always be assigned a particular IP address
>>> and next batch of 24 will shared the next IP address
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>>
>>>
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Share single public ip to multiple private IP address

[T tech via Mikrotik-users]

Gateway is your main router .1 of private.

Private on own bridge

SRC nat 0/24 action masquerade

On Sep 21, 2016 11:04 AM, "Ken Patrick via Mikrotik-users" <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> Hi list,
> I have run out of public IPV4 address and not ready to go to IPv6 yet.
>
> I am trying to share 6 public IP address /27 to my /24 private IP address
> using a mikrotik router and want the Same public IP address to be used by
> the Src Nat and dst-Nat
>
> I.e. 24 private hosts will always be assigned a particular IP address and
> next batch of 24 will shared the next IP address
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> ___
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
>
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users