Re: [Mimedefang] A rose by any other name... Renaming MIMEDefang. What's your idea for a name?

2020-01-17 Thread David Both
I do like "oyster" but I think MIMEDefang mostly performs classification 
and modification and any filtering seems to be secondary. I do filtering 
with procmail. I also think the current name is less than clear about 
what it does unless one is a real geek -- and even then...


So here are some names I have been thinking about.

SpamCat

SpamID

SpamKiller

Spam Defender

Spamalot -- sorry, I couldn't help myself.

Spam Chaser

SafeMail

Mail Defender

CleanMail


I could go on, but I will refrain.

Thanks!



On 11/12/19 12:55 AM, Bill Maidment wrote:

On 12/11/2019 3:45 pm, Kenneth Porter wrote:

--On Monday, November 11, 2019 9:55 PM -0500 "Kevin A. McGrail"
 wrote:


MIMEDefang needs a new name.  Got ideas?  Shout em out!


It's a filter that works with Perl. What filter-feeder makes pearls?
How about Oyster?



That would go well with ClamAV :-)


--


*
David P. Both, RHCE
Millennium Technology Consulting LLC
Raleigh, NC, USA
919-389-8678

db...@millennium-technology.com

www.millennium-technology.com
www.Linux-Databook.info - Home of the DataBook for Linux
DataBook is a Registered Trademark of David Both
*

___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID.  You may ignore it.

Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang


Re: [Mimedefang] Add header to be auto moved into outlook junk folder

2011-05-16 Thread David Both


Here is the modified code I use in mimedefang-filter. I add a different message 
("Probably Spam" and "Possibly Spam") in the Subject line depending upon the 
score. I also add "Probably" "Possibly" and "No" to the X-Spam-Status header. 
Now any email client with filters can act upon it in various ways. You may want 
to change the values being tested against the variable $hits for your 
environment.

I hope this helps.



#
# Determine how to handle the email based on its spam score  and
#
# add an appropriate X-Spam-Status header and alter the subject.
#

#
if ($hits >= 6.7) {
# The following header is used by some email clients to display 
a SpamAssassin score
# in the fancy message headers. This is the minimum required 
format for this to work.
action_change_header("X-Spam-Status", "Yes, score=$hits 
required=$req tests=$names");
# If over a score as set above we delete the message
action_discard();
} elsif ($hits >= $req) {
# The following header is used by some email clients to display 
a SpamAssassin score
# in the fancy message headers. This is the minimum required 
format for this to work.
action_change_header("X-Spam-Status", "Probably, score=$hits 
required=$req tests=$names");
# Add a message to the subject
action_change_header("Subject", "Probably SPAM ($hits) 
$Subject");
md_graphdefang_log('spam', $hits, $RelayAddr);

# If you find the SA report useful, add it, I guess...
action_add_part($entity, "text/plain", "-suggest",
"$report\n",
"SpamAssassinReport.txt", "inline");
} elsif ($hits >= 3) {
# The following header is used by some email clients to display 
a SpamAssassin score
# in the fancy message headers. This is the minimum required 
format for this to work.
action_change_header("X-Spam-Status", "Possibly, score=$hits 
required=$req tests=$names");
# Add a message to the subject
action_change_header("Subject", "Possibly SPAM ($hits) 
$Subject");
md_graphdefang_log('spam', $hits, $RelayAddr);

# If you find the SA report useful, add it, I guess...
action_add_part($entity, "text/plain", "-suggest",
"$report\n",
"SpamAssassinReport.txt", "inline");

} else {
# If score (hits) is less than 3
# The following header is used by some email clients to display 
a SpamAssassin score
# in the fancy message headers. This is the minimum required 
format for this to work.
action_change_header("X-Spam-Status", "No, score=$hits 
required=$req tests=$names");
        }


-- 


*
David P. Both, RHCE
Millennium Technology Consulting LLC
919-389-8678

db...@millennium-technology.com

www.millennium-technology.com 
www.databook.bz - Home of the DataBook for Linux
DataBook is a Registered Trademark of David Both


On Monday, May 16, 2011 17:13:53 Scott Ostrander wrote:
> 
> We are using MimeDefang and SpamAssassin.
> This setup is doing a great job.
> 
> Google is coming up short in finding info about Outlook Junk filter workings.
> For various internal reasons we have a range of emails that are not clearly 
> defined as Spam. (the users want these emails, just not in their inbox)
> Does anyone know of a header I can add with MimeDefang that the Outlook 2010 
> Junk filter will react to and move the email into the Junk folder?
> I know how to add rules in Outlook to move emails tagged as Spam into the 
> Junk folder by looking at the X-Spam-Score header.  I was hoping to avoid 
> adding rules for each end user.
> 
> Regards,
> Scott
> ___
> NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
> message, it is NULL AND VOID.  You may ignore it.
> 
> Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
> MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
> http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
> 
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID.  You may ignore it.

Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.roaringpenguin.com
MIMEDefang mailing list MIMEDefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang