RE: [Mimedefang] Re: URIDNSBL not running
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:34:25 +1000, Matt Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Nathan Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
would give URIDNSBL a try, but I can't seem to get its rules to run.
I have $SALocalTestsOnly = 0 in my mimedefang-filter.
make sure that your
$SALocalTestsOnly variable is set before the SpamAssassin init routine
(as
below) in your mimedefang-filter.
$SALocalTestsOnly = 0;
if ($Features{SpamAssassin}) {
spam_assassin_init()-compile_now(1) if
defined(spam_assassin_init());
Also, make sure that in your sa-mimedefang.cf file, you don't have the
line skip_rbl_checks 0 as that will undo the above.
I'll also add my recent experience. Test it, using a piece of email
you _think_ should be blocked:
su -c spamassassin --test -D defang email.test
I actually ended up running 'spamassassin -D --lint' and found that
Net::DNS was not new enough. Once I upgraded this package, everything
worked fine. Thanks for your tips.
Nathan
___
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
MIMEDefang mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
[Mimedefang] URIDNSBL not running
Hello All, I have just upgraded to mimedefang 2.45 and SA 3.0. I thought that I would give URIDNSBL a try, but I can't seem to get its rules to run. I have $SALocalTestsOnly = 0 in my mimedefang-filter. I also have 'loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL' in my init.pre file. Is there something else that I am missing? Your help is appreciated. Nathan ___ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
RE: [Mimedefang] Multiplexor Consuming Processor
or 6 slaves that are busy. I guess my question is why is my load so high if I am only processing 5 or 6 mails at a time? Impossible to tell. Is /var/spool/MIMEDefang on a RAM Disk? Are you using the embedded Perl interpreter? What's the maximum size of message that you're passing to SpamAssassin? If you pass a huge message to SpamAssassin (more than around 100 kB), it can chew up CPU like you wouldn't believe. 1. /var/spool/MIMEDefang is on a RAM Disk 2. I am using the Perl interpreter 3. Only messages smaller than 100KB are being passed to SA Any more ideas? Thank you, Nathan ___ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
[Mimedefang] Multiplexor Consuming Processor
Hello, I have mimedefang 2.45-Beta-1, SA 2.63, clamd 0.75 running on a RedHat 9 machine with dual PIII-500 and 1GB memory. I have been noticing that the multiplexor process is consuming 99.9% of its processor (using 'top'). This machine's load often jumps to 25 or 30. When I run 'md-mx-ctrl status', I can see that there are rarely more than 5 or 6 slaves that are busy. I guess my question is why is my load so high if I am only processing 5 or 6 mails at a time? Thank you, Nathan ___ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
[Mimedefang] Skip MD for some users
Hello everyone, I have MD 2.39 setup with Sendmail 8.12.8 on a RedHat 9 machine. Everything works fine for me, but now a few users want to be excluded from the Spam scanning that I am doing. I have tried the solution described at: http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/pipermail/mimedefang/2002-August/010883. html, but the mail for the user that I listed is still being scanned by MD. I don't know if this matters or not, but my MD machine is not the actual delivery machine. It is forwarding mail onto our internal Exchange server. Has anyone had a similar problem? Is there something that I can do to offer more info to the list? TIA, Nathan Martinez ___ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
