Re: [Mimedefang] SpamCopURI w/SA2.64 w/Chris' umask Patch
Ahh, sorry, I did perform the diff before I "installed" as a test to check the offset difference and I think you are totally correct that this steps was what "made it work". KAM > It looks like the solution is to apply diff-2.63 from the SpamCopURI source to > SpamAssassin and reinstall SA. ___ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
Re: [Mimedefang] SpamCopURI w/SA2.64 w/Chris' umask Patch
On Thursday 05 August 2004 11:34 am, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > Just an FYI that I edited the Makefile.PL for SpamCopURI to change 2.63 to > 2.64 (3 instances) for the new SA 2.64 w/Chris' umask patch and all seems > to be working fine. SpamCopURI overwrites two SpamAssassin files (Conf.pm and PerMsgStatus.pm) with pre-patched files. Unfortunately at least one of these has changed between SA 2.63 and SA 2.64, so you end up losing some of those fixes -- and the changes from Chris' patch -- if you install SA first and SpamCopURI second. It looks like the solution is to apply diff-2.63 from the SpamCopURI source to SpamAssassin and reinstall SA. -- Kelson Vibber SpeedGate Communications, ___ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
[Mimedefang] SpamCopURI w/SA2.64 w/Chris' umask Patch
Just an FYI that I edited the Makefile.PL for SpamCopURI to change 2.63 to 2.64 (3 instances) for the new SA 2.64 w/Chris' umask patch and all seems to be working fine. Regards, KAM ___ Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
