Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [patch] add LIST_MODULES_* values in psapi.h
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: > Hey > > here is a patch that adds LIST_MODULES_* values in psapi.h. See > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms682633%28v=VS.85%29.aspx > > Vincent Torri Why are you using ifdefs ?? As for LIST_MODULES_ALL, defining as (LIST_MODULES_32BIT|LIST_MODULES_64BIT) would be more eye friendly as opposed to 0x3, IMO. -- O.S. -- BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA Learn about the latest advances in developing for the BlackBerry® mobile platform with sessions, labs & more. See new tools and technologies. Register for BlackBerry® DevCon today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy1 ___ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [patch] add LIST_MODULES_* values in psapi.h
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Vincent Torri > wrote: > > Hey > > > > here is a patch that adds LIST_MODULES_* values in psapi.h. See > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms682633%28v=VS.85%29.aspx > > > > Vincent Torri > > Why are you using ifdefs ?? > Kai told me to use them > > As for LIST_MODULES_ALL, defining as > (LIST_MODULES_32BIT|LIST_MODULES_64BIT) would be > more eye friendly as opposed to 0x3, IMO. > why not. Feel free to modify the patch Vincent Torri > > -- > O.S. > > > -- > BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA > Learn about the latest advances in developing for the > BlackBerry® mobile platform with sessions, labs & more. > See new tools and technologies. Register for BlackBerry® DevCon today! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy1 > ___ > Mingw-w64-public mailing list > Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public > -- BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA Learn about the latest advances in developing for the BlackBerry® mobile platform with sessions, labs & more. See new tools and technologies. Register for BlackBerry® DevCon today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy1 ___ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [patch] add LIST_MODULES_* values in psapi.h
2011/9/14 Vincent Torri : > > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote: >> >> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Vincent Torri >> wrote: >> > Hey >> > >> > here is a patch that adds LIST_MODULES_* values in psapi.h. See >> > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms682633%28v=VS.85%29.aspx >> > >> > Vincent Torri >> >> Why are you using ifdefs ?? > > Kai told me to use them > >> >> As for LIST_MODULES_ALL, defining as >> (LIST_MODULES_32BIT|LIST_MODULES_64BIT) would be >> more eye friendly as opposed to 0x3, IMO. > > why not. Feel free to modify the patch > > Vincent Torri > >> >> -- >> O.S. The cause for this ifdef's might be that user might have defined those values h(im/er)self. To use here an unnamed enumerator looks to me wrong here, so I prefer defines for those constants Nevertheless patch looks ok, but Ozkan, if you want to alter it, feel free to do so. Regards, Kai -- BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA Learn about the latest advances in developing for the BlackBerry® mobile platform with sessions, labs & more. See new tools and technologies. Register for BlackBerry® DevCon today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy1 ___ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [patch] add LIST_MODULES_* values in psapi.h
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Kai Tietz wrote: > 2011/9/14 Vincent Torri : >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Vincent Torri >>> wrote: >>> > Hey >>> > >>> > here is a patch that adds LIST_MODULES_* values in psapi.h. See >>> > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms682633%28v=VS.85%29.aspx >>> > >>> > Vincent Torri >>> >>> Why are you using ifdefs ?? >> >> Kai told me to use them >> >>> >>> As for LIST_MODULES_ALL, defining as >>> (LIST_MODULES_32BIT|LIST_MODULES_64BIT) would be >>> more eye friendly as opposed to 0x3, IMO. >> >> why not. Feel free to modify the patch >> >> Vincent Torri >> >>> >>> -- >>> O.S. > > The cause for this ifdef's might be that user might have defined those > values h(im/er)self. To use here an unnamed enumerator looks to me > wrong here, so I prefer defines for those constants > > Nevertheless patch looks ok, but Ozkan, if you want to alter it, feel > free to do so. > > Regards, > Kai Hand-edited patch inlined below: Fixed the 64 bit definition, changed the _ALL definition to OR'ed _32 and _64 defs. --- psapi.h 2011-09-14 06:20:12 + +++ psapi_new.h 2011-09-14 06:48:47 + @@ -21,6 +21,19 @@ #define EnumPageFiles __MINGW_NAME_AW(EnumPageFiles) #define GetProcessImageFileName __MINGW_NAME_AW(GetProcessImageFileName) +#ifndef LIST_MODULES_DEFAULT +#define LIST_MODULES_DEFAULT 0x0 +#endif +#ifndef LIST_MODULES_32BIT +#define LIST_MODULES_32BIT 0x01 +#endif +#ifndef LIST_MODULES_64BIT +#define LIST_MODULES_64BIT 0x02 +#endif +#ifndef LIST_MODULES_ALL +#define LIST_MODULES_ALL (LIST_MODULES_32BIT|LIST_MODULES_64BIT) +#endif + WINBOOL WINAPI EnumProcesses(DWORD *lpidProcess,DWORD cb,DWORD *cbNeeded); WINBOOL WINAPI EnumProcessModules(HANDLE hProcess,HMODULE *lphModule,DWORD cb,LPDWORD lpcbNeeded); DWORD WINAPI GetModuleBaseNameA(HANDLE hProcess,HMODULE hModule,LPSTR lpBaseName,DWORD nSize); -- O.S. -- BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA Learn about the latest advances in developing for the BlackBerry® mobile platform with sessions, labs & more. See new tools and technologies. Register for BlackBerry® DevCon today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy1 ___ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [patch] add LIST_MODULES_* values in psapi.h
2011/9/14 Ozkan Sezer : > On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Kai Tietz wrote: >> 2011/9/14 Vincent Torri : >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote: On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Vincent Torri wrote: > Hey > > here is a patch that adds LIST_MODULES_* values in psapi.h. See > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms682633%28v=VS.85%29.aspx > > Vincent Torri Why are you using ifdefs ?? >>> >>> Kai told me to use them >>> As for LIST_MODULES_ALL, defining as (LIST_MODULES_32BIT|LIST_MODULES_64BIT) would be more eye friendly as opposed to 0x3, IMO. >>> >>> why not. Feel free to modify the patch >>> >>> Vincent Torri >>> -- O.S. >> >> The cause for this ifdef's might be that user might have defined those >> values h(im/er)self. To use here an unnamed enumerator looks to me >> wrong here, so I prefer defines for those constants >> >> Nevertheless patch looks ok, but Ozkan, if you want to alter it, feel >> free to do so. >> >> Regards, >> Kai > > Hand-edited patch inlined below: Fixed the 64 bit definition, > changed the _ALL definition to OR'ed _32 and _64 defs. > > --- psapi.h 2011-09-14 06:20:12 + > +++ psapi_new.h 2011-09-14 06:48:47 + > @@ -21,6 +21,19 @@ > #define EnumPageFiles __MINGW_NAME_AW(EnumPageFiles) > #define GetProcessImageFileName __MINGW_NAME_AW(GetProcessImageFileName) > > +#ifndef LIST_MODULES_DEFAULT > +#define LIST_MODULES_DEFAULT 0x0 > +#endif > +#ifndef LIST_MODULES_32BIT > +#define LIST_MODULES_32BIT 0x01 > +#endif > +#ifndef LIST_MODULES_64BIT > +#define LIST_MODULES_64BIT 0x02 > +#endif > +#ifndef LIST_MODULES_ALL > +#define LIST_MODULES_ALL (LIST_MODULES_32BIT|LIST_MODULES_64BIT) > +#endif > + > WINBOOL WINAPI EnumProcesses(DWORD *lpidProcess,DWORD cb,DWORD *cbNeeded); > WINBOOL WINAPI EnumProcessModules(HANDLE hProcess,HMODULE > *lphModule,DWORD cb,LPDWORD lpcbNeeded); > DWORD WINAPI GetModuleBaseNameA(HANDLE hProcess,HMODULE > hModule,LPSTR lpBaseName,DWORD nSize); > > -- > O.S. Ok, thanks. Patch is ok for trunk and IMHO for v2.x. About 1.x I am not sure if this is worth. Kai -- BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA Learn about the latest advances in developing for the BlackBerry® mobile platform with sessions, labs & more. See new tools and technologies. Register for BlackBerry® DevCon today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy1 ___ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [patch] add LIST_MODULES_* values in psapi.h
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Kai Tietz wrote: > 2011/9/14 Ozkan Sezer : >> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Kai Tietz wrote: >>> 2011/9/14 Vincent Torri : On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Vincent Torri > wrote: > > Hey > > > > here is a patch that adds LIST_MODULES_* values in psapi.h. See > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms682633%28v=VS.85%29.aspx > > > > Vincent Torri > > Why are you using ifdefs ?? Kai told me to use them > > As for LIST_MODULES_ALL, defining as > (LIST_MODULES_32BIT|LIST_MODULES_64BIT) would be > more eye friendly as opposed to 0x3, IMO. why not. Feel free to modify the patch Vincent Torri > > -- > O.S. >>> >>> The cause for this ifdef's might be that user might have defined those >>> values h(im/er)self. To use here an unnamed enumerator looks to me >>> wrong here, so I prefer defines for those constants >>> >>> Nevertheless patch looks ok, but Ozkan, if you want to alter it, feel >>> free to do so. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Kai >> >> Hand-edited patch inlined below: Fixed the 64 bit definition, >> changed the _ALL definition to OR'ed _32 and _64 defs. >> >> --- psapi.h 2011-09-14 06:20:12 + >> +++ psapi_new.h 2011-09-14 06:48:47 + >> @@ -21,6 +21,19 @@ >> #define EnumPageFiles __MINGW_NAME_AW(EnumPageFiles) >> #define GetProcessImageFileName __MINGW_NAME_AW(GetProcessImageFileName) >> >> +#ifndef LIST_MODULES_DEFAULT >> +#define LIST_MODULES_DEFAULT 0x0 >> +#endif >> +#ifndef LIST_MODULES_32BIT >> +#define LIST_MODULES_32BIT 0x01 >> +#endif >> +#ifndef LIST_MODULES_64BIT >> +#define LIST_MODULES_64BIT 0x02 >> +#endif >> +#ifndef LIST_MODULES_ALL >> +#define LIST_MODULES_ALL (LIST_MODULES_32BIT|LIST_MODULES_64BIT) >> +#endif >> + >> WINBOOL WINAPI EnumProcesses(DWORD *lpidProcess,DWORD cb,DWORD *cbNeeded); >> WINBOOL WINAPI EnumProcessModules(HANDLE hProcess,HMODULE >> *lphModule,DWORD cb,LPDWORD lpcbNeeded); >> DWORD WINAPI GetModuleBaseNameA(HANDLE hProcess,HMODULE >> hModule,LPSTR lpBaseName,DWORD nSize); >> >> -- >> O.S. > > Ok, thanks. Patch is ok for trunk and IMHO for v2.x. OK. Can Vincent apply or should I do it? > About 1.x I am > not sure if this is worth. No, not for 1.x. > > Kai -- O.S. -- BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA Learn about the latest advances in developing for the BlackBerry® mobile platform with sessions, labs & more. See new tools and technologies. Register for BlackBerry® DevCon today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy1 ___ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [patch] add LIST_MODULES_* values in psapi.h
2011/9/14 Ozkan Sezer : > On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Kai Tietz wrote: >> 2011/9/14 Ozkan Sezer : >>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Kai Tietz wrote: 2011/9/14 Vincent Torri : > > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote: >> >> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Vincent Torri >> wrote: >> > Hey >> > >> > here is a patch that adds LIST_MODULES_* values in psapi.h. See >> > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms682633%28v=VS.85%29.aspx >> > >> > Vincent Torri >> >> Why are you using ifdefs ?? > > Kai told me to use them > >> >> As for LIST_MODULES_ALL, defining as >> (LIST_MODULES_32BIT|LIST_MODULES_64BIT) would be >> more eye friendly as opposed to 0x3, IMO. > > why not. Feel free to modify the patch > > Vincent Torri > >> >> -- >> O.S. The cause for this ifdef's might be that user might have defined those values h(im/er)self. To use here an unnamed enumerator looks to me wrong here, so I prefer defines for those constants Nevertheless patch looks ok, but Ozkan, if you want to alter it, feel free to do so. Regards, Kai >>> >>> Hand-edited patch inlined below: Fixed the 64 bit definition, >>> changed the _ALL definition to OR'ed _32 and _64 defs. >>> >>> --- psapi.h 2011-09-14 06:20:12 + >>> +++ psapi_new.h 2011-09-14 06:48:47 + >>> @@ -21,6 +21,19 @@ >>> #define EnumPageFiles __MINGW_NAME_AW(EnumPageFiles) >>> #define GetProcessImageFileName __MINGW_NAME_AW(GetProcessImageFileName) >>> >>> +#ifndef LIST_MODULES_DEFAULT >>> +#define LIST_MODULES_DEFAULT 0x0 >>> +#endif >>> +#ifndef LIST_MODULES_32BIT >>> +#define LIST_MODULES_32BIT 0x01 >>> +#endif >>> +#ifndef LIST_MODULES_64BIT >>> +#define LIST_MODULES_64BIT 0x02 >>> +#endif >>> +#ifndef LIST_MODULES_ALL >>> +#define LIST_MODULES_ALL (LIST_MODULES_32BIT|LIST_MODULES_64BIT) >>> +#endif >>> + >>> WINBOOL WINAPI EnumProcesses(DWORD *lpidProcess,DWORD cb,DWORD *cbNeeded); >>> WINBOOL WINAPI EnumProcessModules(HANDLE hProcess,HMODULE >>> *lphModule,DWORD cb,LPDWORD lpcbNeeded); >>> DWORD WINAPI GetModuleBaseNameA(HANDLE hProcess,HMODULE >>> hModule,LPSTR lpBaseName,DWORD nSize); >>> >>> -- >>> O.S. >> >> Ok, thanks. Patch is ok for trunk and IMHO for v2.x. > > OK. Can Vincent apply or should I do it? Well, Vincent might be able to, not absolutely sure about it. So if you don't mind, please apply it. >> About 1.x I am >> not sure if this is worth. > > No, not for 1.x. > >> >> Kai > > -- > O.S. Thanks, Kai -- BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA Learn about the latest advances in developing for the BlackBerry® mobile platform with sessions, labs & more. See new tools and technologies. Register for BlackBerry® DevCon today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy1 ___ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [patch] add LIST_MODULES_* values in psapi.h
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Kai Tietz wrote: > 2011/9/14 Ozkan Sezer : >> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Kai Tietz wrote: >>> 2011/9/14 Ozkan Sezer : On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Kai Tietz wrote: > 2011/9/14 Vincent Torri : >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Vincent Torri >>> wrote: >>> > Hey >>> > >>> > here is a patch that adds LIST_MODULES_* values in psapi.h. See >>> > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms682633%28v=VS.85%29.aspx >>> > >>> > Vincent Torri >>> >>> Why are you using ifdefs ?? >> >> Kai told me to use them >> >>> >>> As for LIST_MODULES_ALL, defining as >>> (LIST_MODULES_32BIT|LIST_MODULES_64BIT) would be >>> more eye friendly as opposed to 0x3, IMO. >> >> why not. Feel free to modify the patch >> >> Vincent Torri >> >>> >>> -- >>> O.S. > > The cause for this ifdef's might be that user might have defined those > values h(im/er)self. To use here an unnamed enumerator looks to me > wrong here, so I prefer defines for those constants > > Nevertheless patch looks ok, but Ozkan, if you want to alter it, feel > free to do so. > > Regards, > Kai Hand-edited patch inlined below: Fixed the 64 bit definition, changed the _ALL definition to OR'ed _32 and _64 defs. --- psapi.h 2011-09-14 06:20:12 + +++ psapi_new.h 2011-09-14 06:48:47 + @@ -21,6 +21,19 @@ #define EnumPageFiles __MINGW_NAME_AW(EnumPageFiles) #define GetProcessImageFileName __MINGW_NAME_AW(GetProcessImageFileName) +#ifndef LIST_MODULES_DEFAULT +#define LIST_MODULES_DEFAULT 0x0 +#endif +#ifndef LIST_MODULES_32BIT +#define LIST_MODULES_32BIT 0x01 +#endif +#ifndef LIST_MODULES_64BIT +#define LIST_MODULES_64BIT 0x02 +#endif +#ifndef LIST_MODULES_ALL +#define LIST_MODULES_ALL (LIST_MODULES_32BIT|LIST_MODULES_64BIT) +#endif + WINBOOL WINAPI EnumProcesses(DWORD *lpidProcess,DWORD cb,DWORD *cbNeeded); WINBOOL WINAPI EnumProcessModules(HANDLE hProcess,HMODULE *lphModule,DWORD cb,LPDWORD lpcbNeeded); DWORD WINAPI GetModuleBaseNameA(HANDLE hProcess,HMODULE hModule,LPSTR lpBaseName,DWORD nSize); -- O.S. >>> >>> Ok, thanks. Patch is ok for trunk and IMHO for v2.x. >> >> OK. Can Vincent apply or should I do it? > > Well, Vincent might be able to, not absolutely sure about it. So if > you don't mind, please apply it. Done, r4470 & 4471. -- O.S. -- BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA Learn about the latest advances in developing for the BlackBerry® mobile platform with sessions, labs & more. See new tools and technologies. Register for BlackBerry® DevCon today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy1 ___ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [patch] add LIST_MODULES_* values in psapi.h
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Ozkan Sezer wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Kai Tietz > wrote: > > 2011/9/14 Ozkan Sezer : > >> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Kai Tietz > wrote: > >>> 2011/9/14 Vincent Torri : > > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Ozkan Sezer > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Vincent Torri < > vincent.to...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > Hey > > > > > > here is a patch that adds LIST_MODULES_* values in psapi.h. See > > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms682633%28v=VS.85%29.aspx > > > > > > Vincent Torri > > > > Why are you using ifdefs ?? > > Kai told me to use them > > > > > As for LIST_MODULES_ALL, defining as > > (LIST_MODULES_32BIT|LIST_MODULES_64BIT) would be > > more eye friendly as opposed to 0x3, IMO. > > why not. Feel free to modify the patch > > Vincent Torri > > > > > -- > > O.S. > >>> > >>> The cause for this ifdef's might be that user might have defined those > >>> values h(im/er)self. To use here an unnamed enumerator looks to me > >>> wrong here, so I prefer defines for those constants > >>> > >>> Nevertheless patch looks ok, but Ozkan, if you want to alter it, feel > >>> free to do so. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Kai > >> > >> Hand-edited patch inlined below: Fixed the 64 bit definition, > >> changed the _ALL definition to OR'ed _32 and _64 defs. > >> > >> --- psapi.h 2011-09-14 06:20:12 + > >> +++ psapi_new.h 2011-09-14 06:48:47 + > >> @@ -21,6 +21,19 @@ > >> #define EnumPageFiles __MINGW_NAME_AW(EnumPageFiles) > >> #define GetProcessImageFileName > __MINGW_NAME_AW(GetProcessImageFileName) > >> > >> +#ifndef LIST_MODULES_DEFAULT > >> +#define LIST_MODULES_DEFAULT 0x0 > >> +#endif > >> +#ifndef LIST_MODULES_32BIT > >> +#define LIST_MODULES_32BIT 0x01 > >> +#endif > >> +#ifndef LIST_MODULES_64BIT > >> +#define LIST_MODULES_64BIT 0x02 > >> +#endif > >> +#ifndef LIST_MODULES_ALL > >> +#define LIST_MODULES_ALL (LIST_MODULES_32BIT|LIST_MODULES_64BIT) > >> +#endif > >> + > >> WINBOOL WINAPI EnumProcesses(DWORD *lpidProcess,DWORD cb,DWORD > *cbNeeded); > >> WINBOOL WINAPI EnumProcessModules(HANDLE hProcess,HMODULE > >> *lphModule,DWORD cb,LPDWORD lpcbNeeded); > >> DWORD WINAPI GetModuleBaseNameA(HANDLE hProcess,HMODULE > >> hModule,LPSTR lpBaseName,DWORD nSize); > >> > >> -- > >> O.S. > > > > Ok, thanks. Patch is ok for trunk and IMHO for v2.x. > > OK. Can Vincent apply or should I do it? > I don't think that i have commit access (at least, i never asked such privilege). Vincent Torri -- BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA Learn about the latest advances in developing for the BlackBerry® mobile platform with sessions, labs & more. See new tools and technologies. Register for BlackBerry® DevCon today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy1 ___ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
