[tdf-mirrors] rsync-stage doesn't update...
What's the matter with rsync-stage.documentfoundation.org? The only change in the repository is TIMESTAMP, for many days already. Is this correct? -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: mirrors+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/mirrors/ Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
Re: [tdf-mirrors] TDF mirror rsync connection limit
Elton Chung (el...@elton.tk) wrote on 5 August 2011 22:37: HI Carlos, LKD FTP, *, Maybe both of you can consider rsync from mirrors in the same continent? WE are the primary/main continental mirror. And as such I don't mirror from another one, only from the master. That's why I'm complaining. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to mirrors+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/mirrors/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-mirrors] TDF mirror rsync connection limit
Florian Effenberger (flo...@documentfoundation.org) wrote on 31 July 2011 10:38: Hi Carlos, Carlos Carvalho wrote on 2011-07-29 17:38: Here it happens occasionally, not only in the last days. I don't like it at all; we're one of the main mirrors and should not have such restrictions. I haven't complained before because it's (still) uncommon, so it hasn't compromised our quality of service. The best way to avoid this is to define a tiering scheme, and limit access to the master to the tier-1 mirrors. If you choose to not do it you should match the connection limit to the number of mirrors. This will however degrade the performance of the master. are you syncing from the staging tree, or from the regular tree? From rsync-stage::tdf-stage. Just got a refusal: @ERROR: max connections (7) reached -- try again later -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to mirrors+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/mirrors/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-mirrors] TDF mirror rsync connection limit
Florian Effenberger (flo...@documentfoundation.org) wrote on 29 July 2011 13:47: Hi, LKD FTP wrote on 2011-07-29 10:49: I got the error 2 or 3 times. Maybe others encountered the error but did nor report it because the error does not persist. did it only occur in the last days, or also before? Here it happens occasionally, not only in the last days. I don't like it at all; we're one of the main mirrors and should not have such restrictions. I haven't complained before because it's (still) uncommon, so it hasn't compromised our quality of service. The best way to avoid this is to define a tiering scheme, and limit access to the master to the tier-1 mirrors. If you choose to not do it you should match the connection limit to the number of mirrors. This will however degrade the performance of the master. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to mirrors+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/mirrors/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-mirrors] IP change for tdf.c3sl.ufpr.br
Florian Effenberger (flo...@documentfoundation.org) wrote on 28 March 2011 11:06: Carlos Carvalho wrote on 2011-03-26 14.37: In fact there's one change we request: to use tdf.c3sl instead of sagres.c3sl. Currently tdf is a cname to sagres but this will change soon. If the cname is a problem I can register the IP directly. I've changed it. Now it reads tdf.c3sl.ufpr.br Well... I'm very sorry to have to ask you to change it back... :-( :-( Unfortunately it's not possible to make changes compatible to all master mirrors, and we'll have to use a single IP for outbound connections. Therefore, our mirror IP will change soon but not the IP used to connect to the master. Which means we'll have to use the name sagres for the updates. So, please revert your access list to allow sagres.c3sl.ufpr.br, which is what was configured in the beginning... Sorry again for all the trouble. And now that we've partially done the IP change here we can no longer update until you change it in rsync-stage :-( -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to mirrors+h...@documentfoundation.org List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/mirrors/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-mirrors] IP change for tdf.c3sl.ufpr.br
Florian Effenberger (flo...@documentfoundation.org) wrote on 25 March 2011 10:53: Carlos Carvalho wrote on 2011-03-25 03.38: We're changing our IP from 200.17.202.1 to 200.236.36.1. Please give access to both of them to rsync-stage. We'll stop using the first when it's ttl expires but for now we must keep it configured in the machine. the only record I have is a PTR record named sagres.c3sl.ufpr.br. Is that still correct? Yes, tdf.c3sl is a cname for sagres.c3sl. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to mirrors+h...@documentfoundation.org List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/mirrors/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-mirrors] IP change for tdf.c3sl.ufpr.br
Florian Effenberger (flo...@documentfoundation.org) wrote on 25 March 2011 16:16: Carlos Carvalho wrote on 2011-03-25 14.20: Yes, tdf.c3sl is a cname for sagres.c3sl. then it should work once the DNS is changed on your side. :-) So mirrorbrain uses only the dns. Excellent, kudos to Peter :-) -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to mirrors+h...@documentfoundation.org List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/mirrors/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
[tdf-mirrors] IP change for tdf.c3sl.ufpr.br
We're changing our IP from 200.17.202.1 to 200.236.36.1. Please give access to both of them to rsync-stage. We'll stop using the first when it's ttl expires but for now we must keep it configured in the machine. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to mirrors+h...@documentfoundation.org List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/mirrors/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Re: [tdf-mirrors] md5sums?
NoOp (gl...@sbcglobal.net) wrote on 13 October 2010 09:09: Downloaded the beta2 for linux (LibO_3.3.0_beta2_Linux_x86_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz) and get this when attempting to extract: $ tar xvzf LibO_3.3.0_beta2_Linux_x86_install-deb_en-US.tar.gztar: This does not look like a tar archive tar: Skipping to next header tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors File size is correct: $ ls -hs LibO_3.3.0_beta2_Linux_x86_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz 164M LibO_3.3.0_beta2_Linux_x86_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz Unfortunately, there are no md5sums to check on the mirror: http://mirrors.supportex.net/tdf/libreoffice/testing/3.3.0-beta2/deb/x86/ Here is my md5sum: $ md5sum LibO_3.3.0_beta2_Linux_x86_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz 77f5d740ad5a7ee6165e5913256219fd LibO_3.3.0_beta2_Linux_x86_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz Yes, it's not the good one. Would it be possible to put up an md5sum file similar to: http://download.openoffice.org/md5sums/3.2.1_md5sums.txt so that downloads can be checked? Attached. Should be enough until Peter publishes the official one. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail to mirrors+h...@documentfoundation.org All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted. List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/mirrors/
