Divine call reply for more information.

2011-03-06 Thread Mrs Ukadi
新しいメ.襯ドレスをお知らせします新しいメ.襯ドレス: 
toyoreply2...@yahoo.co.jp

Greetings in name of our Lord.I am Mrs Ukadi,69years old widow  a Christian, 
suffering from long time cancer of the blood.I have the sum($5.1m)USD in COTE 
D'IVOIRE i want to donate it for you to use it to help the poor.Contact me for 
more information on how you will get my charity donation. 

- Mrs Ukadi



Re: How to partition magneto-optical disks with sectors of 2048 bytes?

2011-03-06 Thread Jens A. Griepentrog

 On 03/06/11 02:25, Matthew Dempsky wrote:

On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 7:20 AM, Jens A. Griepentrog
griep...@wias-berlin.de wrote:

What went wrong? The procedure works for usual hard disks and memory
sticks with sectors of 512 bytes. I would be grateful for any hint.
(As a final aim I would like to have some bootable magneto-optical
disk with root partition a: and two more partitions d: and e: ...)


When you say The procedure works for usual hard disks and memory
sticks [...], do you mean it works on this same system when attached
to the same ahc(4) controller? E.g., if you replace this sd0 with a
standard SCSI disk, will the same set of fdisk/disklabel/newfs
commands work correctly?


Thanks, Matthew, I just checked this again with some 16-year old SCSI
disk to give a rigorous proof of my above statement:

...
ahc0 at pci6 dev 2 function 0 vendor Adaptec,
unknown product 0x0082 rev 0x02: apic 7 int 21 (irq 3)
scsibus0 at ahc0: 8 targets, initiator 7
sd0 at scsibus0 targ 4 lun 0: QUANTUM, FIREBALL1080S, 1Q09
SCSI2 0/direct fixed
sd0: 1042MB, 512 bytes/sec, 2134305 sec total
...

Here, the same set of commands works successfully:

# fdisk sd0
Disk: sd0   geometry: 132/255/63 [2134305 Sectors]
Offset: 0   Signature: 0xAA55
Starting Ending LBA Info:
 #: id  C   H   S -  C   H   S [   start:size ]
---
 0: 00  0   0   0 -  0   0   0 [   0:   0 ] unused
 1: 00  0   0   0 -  0   0   0 [   0:   0 ] unused
 2: 00  0   0   0 -  0   0   0 [   0:   0 ] unused
 3: 00  0   0   0 -  0   0   0 [   0:   0 ] unused
# fdisk -i sd0
Do you wish to write new MBR and partition table? [n] y
Writing MBR at offset 0.
# fdisk sd0
Disk: sd0   geometry: 132/255/63 [2134305 Sectors]
Offset: 0   Signature: 0xAA55
Starting Ending LBA Info:
 #: id  C   H   S -  C   H   S [   start:size ]
---
 0: 00  0   0   0 -  0   0   0 [   0:   0 ] unused
 1: 00  0   0   0 -  0   0   0 [   0:   0 ] unused
 2: 00  0   0   0 -  0   0   0 [   0:   0 ] unused
*3: A6  0   1   2 -131 254  63 [  64: 2120516 ] OpenBSD
# disklabel -E sd0
Label editor (enter '?' for help at any prompt)
 p
OpenBSD area: 64-2120580; size: 2120516; free: 2120516
#size   offset  fstype [fsize bsize  cpg]
  c:  21343050  unused
 a e
offset: [64]
size: [2120516]
FS type: [4.2BSD]
 w
 q
No label changes.
# disklabel sd0
# /dev/rsd0c:
type: SCSI
disk: SCSI disk
label: FIREBALL1080S
uid: 6e33f59301aa59ca
flags:
bytes/sector: 512
sectors/track: 63
tracks/cylinder: 255
sectors/cylinder: 16065
cylinders: 132
total sectors: 2134305
boundstart: 64
boundend: 2120580
drivedata: 0

16 partitions:
#size   offset  fstype [fsize bsize  cpg]
  c:  21343050  unused
  e:  2120512   64  4.2BSD   2048 163841
# newfs /dev/rsd0e
/dev/rsd0e: 1035.4MB in 2120512 sectors of 512 bytes
6 cylinder groups of 202.47MB, 12958 blocks, 25984 inodes each
super-block backups (for fsck -b #) at:
 32, 414688, 829344, 1244000, 1658656, 2073312,
# mount /dev/sd0e /mnt
# mount
/dev/sd1a on / type ffs (local)
/dev/sd1d on /home type ffs (local, nodev, nosuid, softdep)
mfs:12008 on /tmp type mfs (asynchronous, local, nodev, nosuid, 
size=2097152 512-blocks)

/dev/sd2d on /usr type ffs (local, nodev, softdep)
/dev/sd2e on /var type ffs (local, nodev, nosuid, softdep)
/dev/sd0e on /mnt type ffs (local)
# umount /mnt

By the way, I also tried to add the sector-size option -S 2048
to the newfs command on the MO disk but without any success.

Jens



Re: MacBook pro compatibility

2011-03-06 Thread Aaron
Hey Luis,

I just booted 4.8 up on my MBP ( first release of the unibody ).  The
broadcom interface is not recognized.  Ethernet works tho.

Cheers,
Aaron

On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Luis Useche use...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Guys,

 I was wondering if anybody is using the last macbook pro with OpenBSD. They
 come with an intel or ati video device now which I guess make it more
 compatible. My main concern was about the wireless net device. I think it
 comes with a broadcom by default that, as far as I know, is not supported
 in
 OBSD.

 Is anybody using this laptop with OBSD?

 Luis.



Re: How to partition magneto-optical disks with sectors of 2048 bytes?

2011-03-06 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 04:14:33PM +0100, Jens A. Griepentrog wrote:
  On 03/06/11 02:25, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
  [...] Jens A. Griepentrog griep...@wias-berlin.de wrote:
 What went wrong? The procedure works for usual hard disks and memory
 sticks with sectors of 512 bytes. I would be grateful for any hint.
 (As a final aim I would like to have some bootable magneto-optical
 disk with root partition a: and two more partitions d: and e: ...)
 
 When you say The procedure works for usual hard disks and memory
 sticks [...], do you mean it works on this same system when attached
 to the same ahc(4) controller? E.g., if you replace this sd0 with a
 standard SCSI disk, will the same set of fdisk/disklabel/newfs
 commands work correctly?
 
 Thanks, Matthew, I just checked this again with some 16-year old SCSI
 disk to give a rigorous proof of my above statement:
 
 ...
 ahc0 at pci6 dev 2 function 0 vendor Adaptec,
 unknown product 0x0082 rev 0x02: apic 7 int 21 (irq 3)
 scsibus0 at ahc0: 8 targets, initiator 7
 sd0 at scsibus0 targ 4 lun 0: QUANTUM, FIREBALL1080S, 1Q09
 SCSI2 0/direct fixed
 sd0: 1042MB, 512 bytes/sec, 2134305 sec total
 ...

  a e
 offset: [64]
   ^^

That was 32 in your earlier example. Did you try some
appropriately-large offsets? (AFAIK, that shouldn't help, but maybe the
first sectors are magical or maybe the disk barfs on unaligned
access?)

Joachim



BSDCan 2011 - schedule released

2011-03-06 Thread Dan Langille
The list of talks and speakers for BSDcan 2011 has been released. For 
2011, we once again have a strong collection of talks that will appeal 
to a wide range of attendees. Registration will open later this week. Be 
sure to start making your travel plans.


  http://www.bsdcan.org/2011/schedule/

We also have a Facebook and Twitter pages. Please help us to spread the 
word.


  http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=272755641371
  http://www.twitter.com/bsdcan

--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/



Mounting NTFS, Invalid argument

2011-03-06 Thread Anthony J. Bentley
Hi,

When I attempt to mount a NTFS-formatted external drive, it fails:
# mount -t ntfs /dev/sd2i /media/usb/
mount_ntfs: /dev/sd2i on /media/usb: Invalid argument

There is a note about this under BUGS in mount_ntfs(8):

  If the attempt to mount NTFS gives you an error like this:
  
# mount -t ntfs /dev/wd0k /mnt
mount_ntfs: /dev/wd0k on /mnt: Invalid argument
  
  make sure that the appropriate partition has the correct entry in the
  disk label, particularly that the partition offset is correct.  If the
  NTFS partition is the first partition on the disk, the offset should be
  '63' (see disklabel(8)).

However, disklabel already says 63 for the argument, so this seems
not to apply. Also, the size entry matches fdisk output and the type
is (obviously) NTFS.

Any ideas of what to debug? Is this a PEBKAC?

fdisk:
Disk: sd2   geometry: 14593/255/63 [234441648 Sectors]
Offset: 0   Signature: 0xAA55
Starting Ending LBA Info:
 #: id  C   H   S -  C   H   S [   start:size ]
---
 0: 07  0   1   1 -  14592 254  63 [  63:   234436482 ] NTFS
 1: 00  0   0   0 -  0   0   0 [   0:   0 ] unused  
 2: 00  0   0   0 -  0   0   0 [   0:   0 ] unused  
 3: 00  0   0   0 -  0   0   0 [   0:   0 ] unused  

disklabel:
# /dev/rsd2c:
type: SCSI
disk: SCSI disk
label: HM121HC 
duid: 
flags:
bytes/sector: 512
sectors/track: 63
tracks/cylinder: 255
sectors/cylinder: 16065
cylinders: 14593
total sectors: 234441648
boundstart: 0
boundend: 234441648
drivedata: 0 

16 partitions:
#size   offset  fstype [fsize bsize  cpg]
  c:2344416480  unused   
  i:234436482   63NTFS   



Re: Mounting NTFS, Invalid argument

2011-03-06 Thread Otto Moerbeek
NTFS support is not enabled in the GENERIC kernel.

-Otto

On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 10:18:45PM -0700, Anthony J. Bentley wrote:

 Hi,
 
 When I attempt to mount a NTFS-formatted external drive, it fails:
 # mount -t ntfs /dev/sd2i /media/usb/
 mount_ntfs: /dev/sd2i on /media/usb: Invalid argument
 
 There is a note about this under BUGS in mount_ntfs(8):
 
   If the attempt to mount NTFS gives you an error like this:
   
 # mount -t ntfs /dev/wd0k /mnt
 mount_ntfs: /dev/wd0k on /mnt: Invalid argument
   
   make sure that the appropriate partition has the correct entry in the
   disk label, particularly that the partition offset is correct.  If the
   NTFS partition is the first partition on the disk, the offset should be
   '63' (see disklabel(8)).
 
 However, disklabel already says 63 for the argument, so this seems
 not to apply. Also, the size entry matches fdisk output and the type
 is (obviously) NTFS.
 
 Any ideas of what to debug? Is this a PEBKAC?
 
 fdisk:
 Disk: sd2 geometry: 14593/255/63 [234441648 Sectors]
 Offset: 0 Signature: 0xAA55
 Starting Ending LBA Info:
  #: id  C   H   S -  C   H   S [   start:size ]
 ---
  0: 07  0   1   1 -  14592 254  63 [  63:   234436482 ] NTFS  
   
  1: 00  0   0   0 -  0   0   0 [   0:   0 ] unused
   
  2: 00  0   0   0 -  0   0   0 [   0:   0 ] unused
   
  3: 00  0   0   0 -  0   0   0 [   0:   0 ] unused
   
 
 disklabel:
 # /dev/rsd2c:
 type: SCSI
 disk: SCSI disk
 label: HM121HC 
 duid: 
 flags:
 bytes/sector: 512
 sectors/track: 63
 tracks/cylinder: 255
 sectors/cylinder: 16065
 cylinders: 14593
 total sectors: 234441648
 boundstart: 0
 boundend: 234441648
 drivedata: 0 
 
 16 partitions:
 #size   offset  fstype [fsize bsize  cpg]
   c:2344416480  unused   
   i:234436482   63NTFS   



Re: Mounting NTFS, Invalid argument

2011-03-06 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 07:57:56AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:

 NTFS support is not enabled in the GENERIC kernel.

Oops, I may be wrong. It is enabled on recent i386 and amd64 kernels.
But since you neglect to give us a dmesg, we cannot tell if it is
actually enable on your machine.

-Otto

 
 On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 10:18:45PM -0700, Anthony J. Bentley wrote:
 
  Hi,
  
  When I attempt to mount a NTFS-formatted external drive, it fails:
  # mount -t ntfs /dev/sd2i /media/usb/
  mount_ntfs: /dev/sd2i on /media/usb: Invalid argument
  
  There is a note about this under BUGS in mount_ntfs(8):
  
If the attempt to mount NTFS gives you an error like this:

  # mount -t ntfs /dev/wd0k /mnt
  mount_ntfs: /dev/wd0k on /mnt: Invalid argument

make sure that the appropriate partition has the correct entry in the
disk label, particularly that the partition offset is correct.  If the
NTFS partition is the first partition on the disk, the offset should be
'63' (see disklabel(8)).
  
  However, disklabel already says 63 for the argument, so this seems
  not to apply. Also, the size entry matches fdisk output and the type
  is (obviously) NTFS.
  
  Any ideas of what to debug? Is this a PEBKAC?
  
  fdisk:
  Disk: sd2   geometry: 14593/255/63 [234441648 Sectors]
  Offset: 0   Signature: 0xAA55
  Starting Ending LBA Info:
   #: id  C   H   S -  C   H   S [   start:size ]
  ---
   0: 07  0   1   1 -  14592 254  63 [  63:   234436482 ] NTFS
  
   1: 00  0   0   0 -  0   0   0 [   0:   0 ] unused  
  
   2: 00  0   0   0 -  0   0   0 [   0:   0 ] unused  
  
   3: 00  0   0   0 -  0   0   0 [   0:   0 ] unused  
  
  
  disklabel:
  # /dev/rsd2c:
  type: SCSI
  disk: SCSI disk
  label: HM121HC 
  duid: 
  flags:
  bytes/sector: 512
  sectors/track: 63
  tracks/cylinder: 255
  sectors/cylinder: 16065
  cylinders: 14593
  total sectors: 234441648
  boundstart: 0
  boundend: 234441648
  drivedata: 0 
  
  16 partitions:
  #size   offset  fstype [fsize bsize  cpg]
c:2344416480  unused   
i:234436482   63NTFS   



Re: Mounting NTFS, Invalid argument

2011-03-06 Thread Markus Hennecke

Am 07.03.2011 07:57, schrieb Otto Moerbeek:

NTFS support is not enabled in the GENERIC kernel.


CVS says that it is enabled.

Kind regards,
  Markus